Advertisement

Children's Literature in Education

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 190–205 | Cite as

Understanding Motherhood as Maturation: Maternity Scripts in Lois Lowry’s Son

  • Justyna Deszcz-Tryhubczak
  • Mateusz Marecki
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

When put together with the other parts of The Giver Quartet, Son (2012), Lowry’s recently published concluding book, emerges as an odd exception to the focus on young adult protagonists since it foregrounds the mother’s perspective and addresses the issue of motherhood. It presents the reader with at least three conceptual models of motherhood: mothers (1) as human egg incubators in the community; (2) as caring and nurturing; and (3) as abusive and neglectful. Unlike the latter familiar models, the first is intended to evoke in young readers the effect called cognitive dissonance (Festinger, A Theory of Dissonance, 1957). Employing a combination of approaches within a cognitive paradigm (Lakoff and Johnson, Metaphors we live by, 1980; Schank, Explanation patterns: understanding mechanically and creatively, 1986; Zunshine, Why we read fiction: theory of mind and the novel, 2006; Gavins, Text world theory: an introduction, 2007), this essay in the first place seeks to demonstrate how Lowry creates her vision of maternity through cognitive scripting and how her young audience understands and makes sense of motherhood by resorting to the underlying conceptual metaphor motherhood is maturation. Simultaneously, in line with the contention that people’s interpretations of phenomena are largely dependent on societal frames, we intend to confront Lowry’s models with some of the cultural scripts of motherhood that prevail in Western Europe. Finally, this essay aims at explaining how young readers potentially recuperate the final meaning of Son by tracking Claire’s and Gabe’s mental constructions and compressing them into a joint wish text-world.

Keywords

Motherhood Scripts Conceptual metaphor Theory of mind Lois Lowry Son 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Basu, Balaka, Broad, Katherine R. and Hintz, Carrie. (2014). Introduction. In Balaka Basu, Katherine R. Broad and Carrie Hintz (Eds.), Contemporary Dystopian Fiction for Young Readers: Brave New Teenagers (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bradford, Clare, Mallan, Kerry, Stephens, John and McCallum, Robyn. (2008). New World Orders in Contemporary Children’s Literature: Utopian Transformations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caracciolo, Marco. (2013). Patterns of Cognitive Dissonance in Readers’ Engagement with Characters. Enthymema, 8, 21–37.Google Scholar
  4. Chang, Jade. (2012). Interview with Lois Lowry. GoodReads. Accessed February 10, 2014, from http://www.goodreads.com/interviews/show/813.Lois_Lowry.
  5. Collins, Suzanne. (2010). Mockingjay. New York: Scholastic.Google Scholar
  6. Cosslett, Tess. (1994). Women Writing Childbirth: Modern Discourses of Motherhood. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Croft, William. (2009). Toward a Social Cognitive Linguistics. In Vyvyan Evans and Stéphanie Pourcel (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 395–420). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emmott, Catherine and Alexander, Marc. (2014, April 22). Schemata. In Peter Hühn, John Pier, Wolf Schmid and Jarg Schanert (Eds.), The Living Book of Narratology. Accessed May 3, 2014, from http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de.
  9. Festinger, Leon. (1957). A Theory of Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, May. (2013). Mommyblogs and the Changing Face of Motherhood. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gavins, Joanna. (2007). Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herman, David. (22 Sept. 2013). Cognitive Narratology. In Peter Hühn, John Pier, Wolf Schmid and Jarg Schanert (Eds.), The Living Book of Narratology. Accessed November 3, 2013, from http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de.
  13. Keen, Suzanne. (2007). Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kokkola, Lydia. (2013). Fictions of Adolescent Carnality: Sexy Sinners and Delinquent Deviants. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  15. Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lowry, Lois. (1993). The Giver. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  17. Lowry, Lois. (2000). Gathering Blue. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  18. Lowry, Lois. (2004). Messenger. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  19. Lowry, Lois. (2012). Son. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  20. Marotta, Marsha. (2002). Time, Space, and Motherhoods. In Constance L. Mui and Julien S. Murphy (Eds.), Gender Struggles: Practical Approaches to Contemporary Feminism (pp. 276–294). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Mazzoni, Cristina. (2002). Maternal Impressions: Pregnancy and Childbirth in Literature and Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Miller, Tina. (2005). Making Sense of Motherhood: A Narrative Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murkoff, Heidi and Mazel, Sharon. (2008). What to Expect When You’re Expecting (4th ed.). New York: Workman.Google Scholar
  24. Nikolajeva, Maria. (2012). Guilt, Empathy and the Ethical Potential of Children’s Literature. Barnboken - Journal for Children’s Literature Research, 35, 1–13. Accessed January 17, 2015, from http://www.barnboken.net/index.php/clr/article/view/139.
  25. Nikolajeva, Maria. (2014). Reading for Learning: Cognitive Approaches to Children’s Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  26. O’Reilly, Andrea and Caporale Bizzini, Sylvia. (2009). Introduction. In Andrea O’Reilly and Silvia Caporale Bizzini (Eds.), From the Personal to the Political: Toward a New Theory of Maternal Narrative (pp. 9–31). Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Perez, Danica. (2001). The Glow: The Journey to Motherhood. New York: IBooks.Google Scholar
  28. Rich, Adrienne. (1976). Of Woman Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Rigdon, Mary. (2003). Theory-of-Mind in Two-Person Experiments. In Lynn Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (pp. 379–382). London: Nature.Google Scholar
  30. Schank, Roger C. (1986). Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively. New Jersey: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  31. Schank, Roger C. and Abelson, Robert. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. Stephens, John. (2011). Schemas and Scripts: Cognitive Instruments and the Representation of Cultural Diversity in Children’s Literature. In Kerry Mallan and Clare Bradford (Eds.), Contemporary Children’s Literature and Film (pp. 12–35). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  33. Stockwell, Peter. (2002). Cognitive Poetics. An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Stockwell, Peter. (2013). The Positioned Reader. Language and Literature, 22(3), 263–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trites, Roberta Seelinger. (2012). Growth in Adolescent Literature: Metaphors, Scripts, and Cognitive Narratology. International Research in Children’s Literature, 5(1), 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trites, Roberta Seelinger. (2014). Literary Conceptualizations of Growth: Metaphors and Cognition in Adolescent Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vermeule, Blakey. (2010). Why Do We Care about Literary Characters? Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Zunshine, Lisa. (2006). Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of English StudiesUniversity of WrocławWrocławPoland
  2. 2.OławaPoland

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options