Advertisement

Children's Literature in Education

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 295–310 | Cite as

How Nonfiction Reveals the Nature of Science

  • Myra Zarnowski
  • Susan Turkel
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

In this article, the authors consider whether children’s trade books promote an authentic understanding of the nature of science. They begin by discussing the characteristics of the nature of science and then examine existing research in children’s science books for evidence of the visibility of these features. They describe the problems science educators have with literature that constructs what has been called an “architecture of scientific myths.” Instead, the authors suggest using the literature of inquiry, books that promote scientific understanding by developing an authentic context for science. The authors provide an indepth discussion of three exemplary books, each an example of the literature of inquiry. They end with suggestions for explicitly discussing the nature of science in children’s nonfiction.

Keywords

Nonfiction Nature of Science Literature of Inquiry 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad. (2002). Images of Nature of Science in Middle Grade Science Trade Books. The New Advocate, 15(2), 121–126.Google Scholar
  2. Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad. (2012). Examining Sources for Our Understandings about Science: Enduring Conflations and Critical Issues in Research on Nature of Science in Science Education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akerson, Valarie L., and Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad S. (2005). “How Should I Know What Scientists Do?—I Am Just a Kid”: Fourth-Grade Students’ Conceptions of Nature of Science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akerson, Valarie, and Donnelly, Lisa A. (2010). Teaching Nature of Science to K-2 Students: What Understandings Can They Attain? International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allchin, Douglas. (2003). Scientific Myth-Conceptions. Science Education, 87(3), 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allchin, Douglas. (2011). Evaluating Knowledge of the Nature of (Whole) Science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993/2009). Benchmarks for Science Literacy: A project 2061 Report. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/index.
  8. Aronson, Marc. (2010). If Stones Could Speak: Unlocking the Secrets of Stonehenge. Washington, DC: National Geographic.Google Scholar
  9. Berger, Lee R., and Aronson, Marc. (2012). The Skull in the Rock: How a Scientist, a Boy, and Google Earth Opened a New Window on Human Origins. Washington, DC: National Geographic.Google Scholar
  10. Burns, Loree G. (2010). The Hive Detectives: Chronicle of a Honey Bee Catastrophe (Ellen Harasimowicz, Illust.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  11. Buxton, Cory A., and Austin, Patricia. (2003). Better Books, Better Teaching. Science and Children, 41(2), 28–32.Google Scholar
  12. Cervetti, Gina, and Barber, Jacqueline. (2009). Bringing Back Books. Science and Children, 47(3), 36–39.Google Scholar
  13. Crowther, David T., Lederman, Norman G., and Lederman, Judith S. (2005). Understanding the True Meaning of Nature of Science. Science and Children, 43(2), 50–52.Google Scholar
  14. Dagher, Zoubeida R., and Ford, Danielle J. (2005). How Are Scientists Portrayed in Children’s Science Biographies? Science and Education, 14, 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farland, Donna. (2006). The Effect of Historical Nonfiction Trade Books on Students’ Perceptions of Scientists. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18(2), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ford, Danielle J. (2006). Representations of Science within Children’s Trade Books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 214–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanuscin, Deborah L., and Lee, Eun J. (2009). Helping Students Understand the Nature of Science. Science and Children, 46(7), 64–65.Google Scholar
  18. Kirchhoff, Allison. (2008). Weaving in the Story of Science. Science Teacher, 75(3), 33–37.Google Scholar
  19. Kirkpatrick, Katherine. (2011). Mysterious Bones: The Story of Kennewick Man (Emma Stevenson, Illust.). New York, NY: Holiday House.Google Scholar
  20. Kishfe, Rola, and Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad. (2002). Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views of Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kruse, Jerrid, and Borzo, Sarah. (2010). People Behind the Science. Science and Children, 48(4), 51–55.Google Scholar
  22. Lourie, Peter. (2009). Whaling Season: A Year in the Life of an Arctic Whale Scientist. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  23. Markle, Sandra. (2012). The Case of the Vanishing Golden Frogs: A Scientific Mystery. Minneapolis, MN: Millbrook.Google Scholar
  24. McComas, William F. (1996). Ten Myths of Science: Reexamining What We Think We Know About the Nature of Science. School Science and Mathematics, 96, 10–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McComas, William F. (2012). Darwin’s Error: Using the Story of Pangenesis to Illustrate Aspects of Nature of Science in the Classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 74(3), 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Metz, Don, Klassen, Stephen, McMillan, Barbara, Clough, Michael, and Olson, Joanne. (2007). Building a Foundation for the Use of Historical Narratives. Science and Education, 16, 313–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Milne, Catherine. (1998). Philosophically Correct Science Stories? Examining the Implications of Heroic Science Stories for School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Montgomery, Sy. (2010). Kakapo Rescue: Saving the World’s Strangest Parrot (Nic Bishop, Illust.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  29. National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  30. National Science Teachers Association. (2012). Outstanding Science Trade Books: 2012. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/publications/ostb/ostb2012.aspx.
  31. O’Connell, Caitlin, and Jackson, Donna M. (2011). The Elephant Scientist (Caitlin O’Connell and Timothy Rodwell, Illust.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  32. Osborne, Jonathan J., Collins, Sue, Ratcliffe, Mary, Millar, Robin, and Duschl, Rick. (2003). What “Ideas-About Science” Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quigley, Cassie, Pongsanon, Khemmawadee, and Akerson, Valarie L. (2011). If We Teach Them, They Can Learn: Young Students Views of Nature of Science During an Informal Science Education Program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rudolph, John L. (2000). Reconsidering the “Nature of Science” as a Curriculum Component. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(3), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rusch, Elizabeth. (2012). The Might Mars Rovers: The Incredible Adventures of Spirit and Opportunity. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  36. Schwartz, Renee, and Lederman, Norman. (2008). What Scientists Say: Scientists’ Views of Nature of Science and Relation to Science Context. International Journal of Science Education, 30(6), 727–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharkawy, Azza. (2009). Moving Beyond the Lone Scientist: Helping 1st Grade Students Appreciate the Social Context of Scientific Work Using Stories About Scientists. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(1), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shibley, Ivan A. (2003). Using Newspapers to Examine the Nature of Science. Science and Education, 12, 691–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thimmesh, Catherine. (2006). Team Moon: How 400, 000 People Landed Apollo 11 on the Moon. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  40. Turner, Pamela S. (2005). Gorilla Doctors: Saving Endangered Great Apes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  41. van Dijk, Esther M. (2011). Portraying Real Science in Science Communication. Science Education, 95(6), 1086–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Virginia Mathematics and Science Coalition, and Task Force on Scientific Inquiry and the Nature of Science. (2010). Report of the VMSC Task Force on Scientific Inquiry and the Nature of Science. Retrieved from http://www.vamsc.org/projects/VMSC_Inquiry_and_NOS_White_Paper_5_11_10.doc.
  43. Walker, Sally M. (2005). Secrets of a Civil War Submarine: Solving the Mysteries of the H. L. Hunley. Minneapolis, MN: Carolrhoda.Google Scholar
  44. Zarnowski, Myra, and Turkel, Susan. (2011). Nonfiction Literature that Highlights Inquiry: Real People Solving Real Problems. Journal of Children’s Literature, 37(1), 30–37.Google Scholar
  45. Zarnowski, Myra, and Turkel, Susan. (2012). Creating New Knowledge: Books that Demystify the Process. Journal of Children’s Literature, 38(2), 28–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Elementary and Early Childhood EducationQueens CollegeFlushingUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options