The Problem of ‘Power’: Metacritical Implications of Aetonormativity for Children’s Literature Research
- 1.3k Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
This article takes as its starting point the concept of aetonormativity (the adult normativity germane to the discourse of children’s literature), coined by Maria Nikolajeva (2010) in an attempt to unify the increasingly power-oriented theories of children’s literature criticism within the past few decades. Acknowledging the usefulness of this concept, but wary of the fact that it could imply an easy transference of “adult” power theory to the study of children’s literature, I argue that an aetonormativity-centred system of children’s literature criticism crucially needs to reconceptualise the notion of “power” which lies at its heart. Any automatic connection between adult normativity and adult “power” would thus be questioned and critiqued. I propose a first conceptual split of “power” into “authority” and “might”, and a consequent redistribution of these two concepts to the adult and child parties in the children’s book. I then investigate the critical and metacritical implications, within the framework of an aetonormativity-centred criticism of children’s literature, of an increased subtlety in the use and handling of the concept of power when referring to the complex medium of the children’s text.
Keywords
Aetonormativity Metacriticism Power Authority Children’s literatureReferences
- Arendt, Hannah. (1960). Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
- Booth, Wayne C. (2001). Why Ethical Criticism Can Never Be Simple. In T.F. Davis and K. Womack (Eds.), Mapping the Ethical Turn: A Reader in Ethics, Culture, and Literary Theory (pp. 16–29). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
- Hollindale, Peter. (1988). Ideology and the Children’s Book. Stroud: Thimble Press.Google Scholar
- Hunt, Peter. (1991). Criticism, Theory, & Children’s Literature. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Hunt, Peter. (1992). Introduction. In P. Hunt (Ed.), Literature for Children: Contemporary Criticism (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hunt, Peter. (2005). Introduction: The Expanding World of Children’s Literature Studies. In P. Hunt (Ed.), Understanding Children’s Literature (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Knowles, Murray, and Malmkjær, Kirsten. (1996). Language and Control in Children’s Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lesnik-Oberstein, Karín. (1994). Children’s Literature: Criticism and the Fictional Child. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- McGillis, Roderick. (1996). The Nimble Reader: Literary Theory and Children’s Literature. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
- Mickenberg, Julia L., and Nel, Philip (Eds.) (2008). Tales for Little Rebels: A Collection of Radical Children’s Literature. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Nikolajeva, Maria. (2010). Power, Voice and Subjectivity in Literature for Young Readers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Nodelman, Perry. (1992). The Other: Orientalism, Colonialism, and Children’s Literature. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 17(1), 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nodelman, Perry. (1994). Humane Ideology. Children’s Literature, 22, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nodelman, Perry. (2008). The Hidden Adult: Defining Children’s Literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Pinsent, Pat. (1993). The Power of the Page. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
- Reynolds, Kimberley. (2007). Radical Children’s Literature: Future Visions and Aesthetic Transformations in Juvenile Fiction. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Rose, Jacqueline. (1984). The Case of Peter Pan, or The Impossibility of Children’s Fiction. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Rudd, David. (2005). Theorising and Theories: How Does Children’s Literature Exist? In P. Hunt (Ed.), Understanding Children’s Literature (pp. 15–29). Basingstoke: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rudrum, David. (2006). Introduction—Literature and Philosophy: The Contemporary Interface. In D. Rudrum (Ed.), Literature and Philosophy: A Guide to Contemporary Debates (pp. 1–8). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Sarland, Charles. (2005). Critical Tradition and Ideological Positioning. In P. Hunt (Ed.), Understanding Children’s Literature (pp. 30–49). Basingstoke: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Shavit, Zohar. (1986). Poetics of Children’s Literature. Athens and London: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
- Stephens, John. (1992). Language and Ideology in Children’s Fiction. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Sutherland, Robert D. (1985). Hidden Persuaders: Political Ideologies in Literature for Children. Children’s Literature in Education, 16(3), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tatar, Maria. (2009). Enchanted Hunters: The Power of Stories in Childhood. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
- Trites, Roberta Seelinger. (2000). Disturbing the Universe: Power and Repression in Adolescent Literature. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
- Vallone, Lynne. (2009). Ideas of Difference in Children’s Literature. In M.O. Grenby and A. Immel (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Children’s Literature (pp. 174–189). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weber, Max. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1) (Eds. G. Roth and C. Wittich; trans. E. Fischoff et al.). New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
- Zipes, Jack. (2001). Sticks and Stones: The Troublesome Success of Children’s Literature from Slovenly Peter to Harry Potter. Basingstoke: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Zornado, Joseph. (2001). Inventing the Child. Culture, Ideology, and the Story of Childhood. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar