Advertisement

Children's Literature in Education

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 51–71 | Cite as

Exploring Grade 7 Students’ Responses to Shaun Tan’s The Red Tree

  • Sylvia Pantaleo
Commemorative issue for Dr. Lawrence Sipe
First Online:

Abstract

As art objects, picturebooks have the potential to contribute to readers’ aesthetic development. Many scholars and practitioners have recognized how using picturebooks with older students can augment their reading motivation and extend their understanding of visual elements of art and design, as well as develop their literacy, language, and thinking skills. The Red Tree (Tan, 2001) was one of the picturebooks used during two multifaceted, classroom-based research projects with Grade 7 students. The studies explored how the students responded to and interpreted picturebooks and graphic novels with metafictive devices, and examined how the students transferred their knowledge and understanding of various literary and art elements when creating their own multimodal print texts. Overall, the content analysis of the students’ written responses to The Red Tree revealed an adoption of an “aesthetic attitude” (Doonan, Looking at Pictures in Picture Books, 1993, p. 11) towards the picturebook. The students’ responses reflected how they positioned themselves as active readers who looked closely at Tan’s sophisticated and metaphorical paintings, and who embraced a co-authoring role as they interpreted the emotional landscapes and textual fragments in the picturebook. The article concludes with a discussion of several pedagogical issues associated with using picturebooks in middle years’ classrooms.

Keywords

Picturebooks Students’ responses Middle years 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agosto, Denise. (1999). One and Inseparable: Interdependent Storytelling in Picture Storybooks. Children’s Literature in Education, 30(4), 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allington, Richard. (2006). What Really Matters for Struggling Readers: Designing Research-Based Programs (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Ammon, Bette, & Sherman, Gale. (1996). Worth a Thousand words: An Annotated Guide to Picture Books for Older Readers. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  4. Arizpe, Evelyn, & Styles, Morag. (2003). Children Reading Pictures: Interpreting Visual Texts. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  5. Arizpe, Evelyn, & Styles, Morag. (2008). A Critical Review of Research into Children’s Responses to Multimodal Texts. In James Flood, Shirley Brice Heath, & Diane Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of Teaching Literacy Through the Communicative and Visual Arts (Vol. II, pp. 363–373). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Bader, Barbara. (1976). American Picturebooks from Noah’s Ark to The Beast Within. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Benedict, Susan, & Carlisle, Lenore. (1992). Beyond Words: Picture Books for Older Readers and Writers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Biancarosa, Gina, & Snow, Catherine. (2006). Reading Next—A Vision for Action and Research in Middle and High School Literacy: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.Google Scholar
  9. Billman, Linda. (2002). Aren’t These Books for Little Kids? Educational Leadership, 60(3), 48–51.Google Scholar
  10. Browne, Anthony. (1997). Willy the Dreamer. Cambridge, MA: Candlewick Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, Bronwyn, & Harré, Rom. (1999). Positioning and Personhood. In Rom Harré & Luk van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action (pp. 32–52). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Day, Karen. (1996). The Challenge of Style in Reading Picturebooks. Children’s Literature in Education, 27(3), 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Doonan, Jane. (1993). Looking at Pictures in Picture Books. Stroud: The Thimble Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dresang, Eliza. (1999). Radical Change: Books for Youth in a Digital Age. New York: The H. W. Wilson Company.Google Scholar
  15. Dyson, Anne Haas. (2001). Introduction … and a Warning. The Elementary School Journal, 101(4), 379–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eisner, Elliot. (2004). What can Education Learn from the Arts About the Practice of Education? International Journal of Education & the Arts, 5(4), 1–12.Google Scholar
  17. Eisner, Elliot. (2009). What Education can Learn from the Arts. Art Education, 62(2), 6–9.Google Scholar
  18. Galda, Lee, & Beach, Richard. (2001). Response to Literature as a Cultural Activity. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(1), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Golden, Joanne. (1990). The Narrative Symbol in Childhood Literature: Explorations in the Construction of Text. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
  20. Guthrie, John, & Davis, Marcia. (2003). Motivating Struggling Readers in Middle School Through an Engagement Model of Classroom Practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoffman, James, Wilson, Melissa, Martinez, Ramon, & Sailors, Misty. (2011). Content Analysis: The Past, Present, and Future. In Nell Duke & Marla Mallette (Eds.), Literacy Research Methodologies (2nd ed., pp. 28–49). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kiefer, Barbara. (1995). The Potential of Picturebooks: From Visual Literacy to Aesthetic Understanding Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Lave, Jean. (1996). Teaching, as Learning, in Practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(3), 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis, David. (2001). Reading Contemporary Picturebooks: Picturing Text New York:RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  25. Linehan, Carol, & McCarthy, J. (2000). Positioning in Practice: Understanding Participation in the Social World. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(4), 435–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyle, Susan. (2008). Learners’ Collaborative Talk. In Nancy Hornberger, Marilyn Martin-Jones, & Anne-Marie de Mejia (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Education: Volume 3: Discourse and Education (2nd ed., pp. 279–290). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Macaulay, David. (1991). Caldecott Acceptance Speech. Horn Book Magazine, 67(4), 410–421.Google Scholar
  28. Marantz, Kenneth. (1977). The Picture Book as Art Object: A Call for Balanced Reviewing. Wilson Library Bulletin, 52(2), 148–151.Google Scholar
  29. Martinez, Miriam, Roser, Nancy, & Harmon, Janis. (2009). Using Picture Books with Older Learners. In Karen Wood & William Blanton (Eds.), Literacy Instruction for Adolescents: Research-based Practices (pp. 287–306). New York:The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  30. Metros, Susan. (2008). The Educator’s Role in Preparing Visually Literate Learners. Theory into Practice, 47(2), 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitchell, William J.T. (1994). Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Moebius, William. (1986). Introduction to Picturebook Codes. Word and Image, 2(2), 141–158.Google Scholar
  33. Murphy, Patricia. (2009). Using Picture Books to Engage Middle School Students. Middle School Journal, 40(4), 20–24.Google Scholar
  34. Nikolajeva, Maria, & Scott, Carole. (2001). How Picturebooks Work. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Pantaleo, Sylvia. (2008). Exploring Student Response to Contemporary Picturebooks. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pantaleo, Sylvia. (2010). Contemporary Picturebooks with Radical Change Characteristics. In M.C. Courtland & T. Gambell (Eds.), Literature, Media, and Multiliteracies in Adolescent Language Arts Classrooms (pp. 103–125). Vancouver, BC: Pacific Educational Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pantaleo, Sylvia. (2011a). Grade 7 Students Reading Graphic Novels: “You Need to do a lot of Thinking”. English in Education, 45(2), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pantaleo, Sylvia. (2011b). Middle Years Students’ Collaborative Talk About The Red Tree: “A Book That Works Your Mind”. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(3), 260–278.Google Scholar
  39. Pantaleo, Sylvia. (2011c). WARNING: A Grade 7 Student Disrupts Narrative Boundaries. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(1), 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pantaleo, Sylvia, & Bomphray, Alexandra. (2011). Exploring Grade 7 Students’ Written Responses to Shaun Tan’s The Arrival. Changing English: Studies in Culture and Education, 18(2), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Purves, Alan, & Rippere, Victoria. (1968). Elements of Writing About a Literary Work: A Study of Response to Literature. Research Report No. 9. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  42. Rosenblatt, Louise. (1978). The Reader, the Text, the Poem: The Transactional Theory of the Literary Work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Roser, Nancy, Martinez, Miriam, & Fowler-Amato, Michelle. (2011). The Power of Picturebooks: Resources That Support Language and Learning in Middle Grade Classes. Voices from the Middle, 19(1), 24–31.Google Scholar
  44. Rowe, Deborah. (2008). Social Contracts for Writing: Negotiating Shared Understandings About Text in the Preschool Years. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(1), 66–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwarcz, Joseph. (1982). Ways of the Illustrator: Visual Communication in Children’s Literature. Chicago: American Library Association.Google Scholar
  46. Siegel, Marjorie. (1995). More Than Words: The Generative Power of Transmediation for Learning. Canadian Journal of Education, 20(4), 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Siegesmund, Richard. (2005). Teaching Qualitative Reasoning: Portraits of Practice. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(1), 18–23.Google Scholar
  48. Sipe, Lawrence R. (2008a). Storytime: Young Children’s Literary Understanding in the Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sipe, Lawrence R. (2008b). Young Children’s Visual Meaning Making in Response to Picturebooks. In James Flood, Shirley Brice Heath, & Diane Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of Teaching Literacy Through the Communicative and Visual Arts (Vol. II, pp. 381–391). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  50. Sipe, Lawrence R., & Pantaleo, Sylvia (Eds.). (2008). Postmodern Picturebooks: Play, Parody, and Self-Referentiality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Tan, Shaun. (2001). The Red Tree. Melbourne:Lothian.Google Scholar
  52. Tan, Shaun. (2011). Lost & Found. Melbourne: Arthur A. Levine Books.Google Scholar
  53. Tan, Shaun. (n.d.). Picture Books: Who are They for? Accessed February 1, 2009, from http://www.shauntan.net/comments1.html
  54. Taylor, Barbara, Raphael, Taffy, & Au, Kathryn. (2011). Reading and School Reform. In Michael Kamil, P. David Pearson, Elizabeth Moje and Peter Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. IV, pp. 594–628). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Unsworth, Len, Thomas, Angela, Simpson, Alyson, & Asha, Jennifer. (2005). Children’s Literature and Computer Based Teaching. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Walsh, Maureen. (2003). ‘Reading’ Pictures: What do they Reveal? Young Children’s Reading of Visual Texts. Reading: Literacy and Language, 37(3), 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waugh, Patricia. (1984). Metafiction: The Theory and Practice of Self-Conscious Fiction. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
  58. Wolfenbarger, Carol, & Sipe, Lawrence R. (2007). A Unique Visual and Literary Art Form: Recent Research on Picturebooks. Language Arts, 84(3), 273–280.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of EducationUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options