Children's Literature in Education

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 234–250

The BFG and the Spaghetti Book Club: A Case Study of Children as Critics

Original Paper


Situated at the intersections of ethnography, childhood studies, literary studies, and education research, this reception study seeks to access real children’s responses to a particular text, and to offer empirical description of actual reading experiences. Survey data is generated by taking advantage of an online resource: an archive of children’s book reviews of Roald Dahl’s The BFG posted on the website of the Spaghetti Book Club, a for-profit educational organization that provides web hosting services for school classes and their students’ book reviews. Thirty different reviews and their accompanying illustrations are analyzed; all were produced by fourth-grade students ranging in age from 8 years old to 11, and representing a broad diversity of American demographic groups and geographic areas. Far from revealing an “essential” or passive child reader, this sample set bears witness to children’s capacity to derive highly personal meaning from the text while simultaneously manifesting self-awareness about their status as children in a larger reading community. More importantly, these child-reviewers represent themselves as capable of sophisticated negotiations between self and story. A significant number of individuals demonstrate a capacity or propensity to approach the text as an aesthetic—rather than a bibliotherapeutic—experience. This study prompts us to re-evaluate the primary significance of categorical distinctions between fantasy and reality when analyzing reader response.


Reader response Roald Dahl Reception Fantasy New media 


  1. Alasuutari, Pertti. (1999). Introduction: Three Phrases of Reception Studies. In Pertti Alasuutari (Ed.), Rethinking the Media Audience (pp. 1–21). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Appleyard, J. A. (1990). Becoming a Reader: The Experience of Fiction from Childhood to Adulthood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, Martin. (2006). I have Seen the Future and it is Not Here Yet…; or, On Being Ambitious for Audience Research. The Communication Review, 9, 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benton, Michael. (1999). Readers, Texts, Contexts: Reader-Response Criticism. In Peter Hunt (Ed.), Understanding Children’s Literature (pp. 81–99). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Blackford, Holly Virginia. (2004). Out of this World: Why Literature Matters to Girls. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bosmajian, Hamida. (1985). Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and Other Excremental Visions. Lion and the Unicorn, 9, 36–49.Google Scholar
  7. Bouchard, Lois Kalb. (1972). A New Look at Old Favorites: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. In Donnarae MacCann & Gloria Woodard (Eds.), The Black American in Books for Children: Readings in Racism. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, Alasdair. (1981). Children’s Writers: 6 Roald Dahl. The School Librarian, 29(2), 108–114.Google Scholar
  9. Culley, Jonathon. (1991). Roald Dahl—It’s about Children and It’s for Children—But Is It Suitable? Children’s Literature in Education, 22(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahl, Roald. (1982). The BFG Quentin Blake, Illus. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
  11. Ennis, Harriett.H. (1986). Learning to Respond to Literature (Part I): A Theoretical Framework for Investigation. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 11(2), 100–102.Google Scholar
  12. Fish, Stanley. (1980). Is there a Text in this Class: The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Flood, James. (2003). Current Understandings from Research on Children’s Literary Meaning-Making. In James Flood (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts (pp. 801–804). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Fox, Geoff. (1979). Dark Watchers: Young Readers and Their Fiction. English in Education, 13(1), 32–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Genette, Gerard. (1997). Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation (Jane E. Lewin, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grenby, Matthew O. (2008). General Introduction. In Julia Briggs, Dennis Butts & M. O. Grenby (Eds.), Popular Children’s Literature in Britain (pp. 1–22). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, Christine and Coles, Martin. (1999). Children’s Reading Choices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Harkin, Patricia. (2005). The Reception of Reader-Response Theory. College Composition and Communication, 56(3), 410–425.Google Scholar
  19. Hollindale, Peter. (2008). And Children Swarmed to Him Like Settlers. He Became a Land. The Outrageous Success of Roald Dahl. In Julia Briggs, Dennis Butts, & M .O. Grenby (Eds.), Popular Children’s Literature in Britain (pp. 271–286). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Horn Book Virtual History Exhibit. (2010). Eleanor Cameron vs. Roald Dahl. Boston: The Horn Book Inc. Accessed January 18, 2010, from
  21. Hunt, Peter. (1984a). Childist Criticism: The Subculture of the Child, the Book and the Critic. Signal, 43, 42–59.Google Scholar
  22. Hunt, Peter. (1984b). Questions of Method and Methods of Questioning: Childist Criticism in Action. Signal, 45, 180–200.Google Scholar
  23. Hunt, Peter. (1988). What Do We Lose When We Lose Allusion? Experience and Understanding Stories. Signal, 57, 212–222.Google Scholar
  24. Lowe, Virginia. (1991). Stop! You Didn’t Read Who Wrote It! The Concept of the Author. Children’s Literature in Education, 22(2), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nell, Victor. (1988). Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Nodelman, Perry. (2000). Pleasure and Genre: Speculations on the Characteristics of Children’s Fiction. Children’s Literature, 28, 1–15.Google Scholar
  27. Rose, Jacqueline. (1984). The Case of Peter Pan, or, The Impossibility of Children’s Fiction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rosenblatt, Louise. (1993). The Literary Transaction: Evocation and Response. In Kathleen E. Holland, Rachel A. Hungerford & Shirley B. Ernst (Eds.), Journeying: Children Responding to Literature (pp. 6–23). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  29. Rosmarin, Julie, Director. (1999–2010). The Spaghetti Book Club: Reviews by Kids, for Kids. Happy Medium Productions, Inc. Accessed December 18, 2009, from
  30. Sarland, Charles. (1983). The Secret Seven vs. The Twits: Cultural Clash or Cosy Combination? Signal, 42, 155–171.Google Scholar
  31. Sarland, Charles. (1991). Young People Reading: Culture and Response. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Simpson, A. (1996). Fictions and Facts: An Investigation of the Readings Practices of Girls and Boys. English Education, 28, 268–279.Google Scholar
  33. Travisano, Thomas. (2000). Of Dialectic and Divided Consciousness: Intersections Between Children’s Literature and Childhood Studies. Children’s Literature, 28, 22–29.Google Scholar
  34. Tucker, Nicholas. (1980). Can We Ever Know the Reader’s Response? In Michael Benton (Ed.), Approaches to Research in Children’s Literature. Southampton: Department of Education, Southampton University.Google Scholar
  35. Warren, Alan. (1985). Roald Dahl: Nasty, Nasty. In Darrell Schweitzer (Ed.), Discovering Modern Horror Fiction (vol. I, pp. 120–128). San Bernardino, CA: The Borgo Press.Google Scholar
  36. West, Mark. (1988). Roald Dahl. In Mark West (Ed.), Trust your Children: Voices Against Censorship in Children’s Literature. New York, London: Neal-Schuman Publishers.Google Scholar
  37. West, Mark. (1990). The Grotesque and the Taboo in Roald Dahl’s Humorous Writings for Children. Children’s Literature Association Quarterly, 15(3), 115–116.Google Scholar
  38. West, Mark. (1992). Roald Dahl. New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Wolf, Shelby Anne, & Heath, Shirley Brice. (1982). The Braid of Literature: Children’s Worlds of Reading. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Zipes, Jack. (1981). Second Thoughts on Socialization through Literature for Children. Lion and the Unicorn, 5, 19–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations