Advertisement

The Overcontrol in Youth Checklist (OCYC): Behavioral and Neural Validation of a Parent-Report of Child Overcontrol in Early Childhood

  • Kirsten GilbertEmail author
  • Deanna M. Barch
  • Joan L. Luby
Original Article
  • 73 Downloads

Abstract

Self-control is protective against psychopathology in childhood. However, too much self-control, namely overcontrol, potentiates risk. Overcontrol is a constellation of child characteristics related to high need for control, perfectionism, inflexibility, social comparison, and performance monitoring and is a transdiagnostic risk factor associated with psychiatric disorders across the lifespan. However, there are no quick and developmentally appropriate screeners to identify overcontrol in early childhood, when overcontrol purportedly becomes stable. The current study validated the Overcontrol in Youth Checklist (OCYC) in 4–7 year old children and examined relationships with cognitive, social, and psychiatric, neural and behavioral indicators. The OCYC demonstrated good psychometrics and was associated with deficits in cognitive shifting, social functioning, and preschool psychopathology. Higher OCYC scores were associated with a blunted ΔERN, an indicator of performance monitoring in preschoolers. Findings demonstrate the OCYC to be a developmentally valid measure of overcontrol that identifies this transdiagnostic risk factor early in development.

Keywords

Overcontrol Early childhood Transdiagnostic Behavioral inhibition Error-related negativity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the many parents and children who participated in the Parent–Child Interaction Treatment Emotion Development (PCIT-ED) study.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01MH098454-04; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02076425; K23 MH115074-01).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

KG, DB and JL have received research grants from National Institute of Health.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

10578_2019_907_MOESM1_ESM.docx (24 kb)
Supplementary file1 (DOCX 25 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Moffitt TE et al (2011) A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth and public safety. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:2693–2698Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eisenberg N et al (2001) The relations of regulation and emotionality to childrens externalizing and internalizing problem behavior. Child Dev 72(4):1112–1134Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL, Eggum ND (2010) Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children’s maladjustment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 6:495–525Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Donnellan BM, Robins RW (2010) Resilient, overcontrolled and undercontrolled personality types: issues and controversies. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 3:1–14Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zucker NL et al (2007) Anorexia nervosa and autism spectrum disorders: guided investigation of social cognitive endophenotypes. Psychol Bull 133(6):976–1006Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Altman SE, Shankman SA (2009) What is the association between obsessive-compulsive disorder and eating disorders? Clin Psychol Rev 29(7):638–646Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lynch TR (2018) Radically open dialectical behavior therapy: theory and practice for treating disorders of overcontrol. Context Press, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kagan J et al (1984) Behavioral inhibition to the unfamiliar. Child Dev 55:2212–2225Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Derryberry D, Rothbart MK (1997) Reactive and effortful processes in the organization of temperament. Dev Psychopathol 9(4):633–652Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fox NA et al (2005) Behavioral inhibition: linking biology and behavior within a developmental framework. Annu Rev Psychol 56:235–262Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henderson HA, Pine DS, Fox NA (2015) Behavioral inhibition and developmental risk: a dual-processing perspective. Neuropsychopharmacology 40(1):207–224Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fox NA et al (2013) Commentary: to intervene or not? Appreciating or treating individual differences in childhood temperament—remarks on Rapee (2013). J Child Psychol Psychiatry 54(7):789–790Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Block JH, Block J (1980) The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. Dev Cogn Affect Soc Relat 13:39–101Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Asendorpf JB, van Aken MA (1999) Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality prototypes in childhood: replicability, predictive power, and the trait-type issue. J Pers Soc Psychol 77:815–832Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robins RW, John OP, Caspi A (1998) The typological approach to studying personality. In: Cairns RB, Bergman LR, Kagan J (eds) Methods and models for studying the individual. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp 135–160Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hart D et al (2003) Personality and development in childhood: a person-centered approach. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 68: i122Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Asendorpf JB et al (2001) Carving personality description at its joints: confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. Eur J Pers 15(3):169–198Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Professional manaul: revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources, OdessaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gilbert KE, Whalen D, Jackson JJ, Tillman R, Barch DM, Luby J (under review) Identifying observed preschool personality types and their associations with longitudinal symptom trajectoriesGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eisenberg N et al (2000) Dispositional emotionality and regulation: their role in predicting quality of social functioning. J Pers Soc Psychol 78:136–157Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    White LK et al (2011) Behavioral inhibition and anxiety: the moderating roles of inhibitory control and attention shifting. J Abnorm Child Psychol 39(5):735–747Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moser JS et al (2013) On the relationship between anxiety and error monitoring: a meta-analysis and conceptual framework. Front Hum Neurosci 7:466Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meyer A et al (2018) Early temperamental fearfulness and the developmental trajectory of error-related brain activity. Dev Psychobiol 60(2):224–231Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gehring WJ et al (2012) The error-related negativity (ERN/Ne). In: Luck SJ, Kappenman ES (eds) The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 231–291Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eisenberg N, Fabes RA (1992) Emotion, regulation, and the development of social competence. In: Clark MS (ed) Review of personality and social psychology. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 119–150Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Newman DL et al (1997) Antecedents of adult interpersonal functioning: effects of individual differences in age 3 temperament. Dev Psychol 33:206–217Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robins RW et al (1996) Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled boys: three replicable personality types. J Pers Soc Psychol 70(1):157–171Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thorell L, Bohlin G, Rydell A-M (2004) Two types of inhibitory control: predictive relations to social functioning. Int J Behav Dev 28:193–203Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brooker RJ, Kiel EJ, Buss KA (2016) Early social fear predicts kindergarteners’ socially anxious behaviors: direct associations, moderation by inhibitory control, and differences from nonsocial fear. Emotion 16(7):997–1010Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Riesel A et al (2015) Overactive performance monitoring as an endophenotype for obsessive-compulsive disorder: evidence from a treatment study. Am J Psychiatry 172(7):665–673Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gehring WJ, Himle J, Nisenson LG (2000) Action-monitoring dysfunction in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychol Sci 11:1–6Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Meyer A et al (2015) Enhanced error-related brain activity in children predicts the onset of anxiety disorders between the ages of 6 and 9. J Abnorm Psychol 124(2):266–274Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weinberg A et al (2016) Error-related negativity (ERN) and sustained threat: conceptual framework and empirical evaluation in an adolescent sample. Psychophysiology 53(3):372–385Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meyer A et al (2012) The development of the error-related negativity (ERN) and its relationship with anxiety: evidence from 8 to 13 year-olds. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2(1):152–161Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Torpey DC et al (2013) Error-related brain activity in young children: associations with parental anxiety and child temperamental negative emotionality. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 54(8):854–862Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Botvinick M et al (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108(3):624–652Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Buzzell GA et al (2017) Error-induced blindness: error detection leads to impaired sensory processing and lower accuracy at short response-stimulus intervals. J Neurosci 37(11):2895–2903Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jentzsch I, Dudschig C (2009) Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of posterror slowing. Q J Exp Psychol 62(2):209–218Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Egger HL, Angold A (2006) Common emotional and behavioral disorders in preschool children: presentation, nosology, and epidemiology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47(3–4):313–337Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Luby JL et al (2018) A randomized control trial of parent-child psychotherapy targeting emotion development for early childhood depression. Am J Psychiatry 175:1102–1110Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2000) Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms and profiles: an integrated system of multi-informant assessment; Child Behavior Checklist for ages 1 1/2–5; Language Development Survey; Caregiver-Teacher Report Form. University of Vermont, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Achenbach TM (2001) Manual for ABESA school-age forms & profiles. Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, University of Vermont, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kim J et al (2011) Psychometric properties of the behavioral inhibition questionnaire in preschool children. J Pers Assess 93(6):545–555Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Scahill L et al (1997) Children’s Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale: reliability and validity. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36(6):844–852Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Southgate L et al (2008) The development of the childhood retrospective perfectionism questionnaire (CHIRP) in an eating disorder sample. Eur Eat Disord Rev 16(6):451–462Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gibbons FX, Buunk BP (1999) Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(1):129–142Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gioia GA, Espy KA, Isquith PK (2003) Behavior rating inventory of executive function-preschool version. Psychological Assessment Resources, LutzGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, & Kenworthy L (2000) Behavior rating inventory of executive function (BRIEF): a professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pagliaccio D et al (2015) Revising the BIS/BAS scale to study development: measurement invariance and normative effects of age and sex from childhood through adulthood. Psychol Assess 28(4):429–442Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gaffrey MS, Luby, JL (2012) Kiddie-Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia - early childhood version (K-SADS-EC). Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MOGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Armstrong JM, Goldstein LH, T.M.W.g.o.O. Assessment (2003) Manual for the MacArthur Health and Behavior Questionnaire (HBQ 10). In: Kupfer DJ (ed) MacArthur Foundation Research Network on psychopathology and development. University of Pittsburgh, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Grammer JK et al (2014) Age-related changes in error processing in young children: a school-based investigation. Dev Cogn Neurosci 9:93–105Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-Prime (version 2.0) [Computer software and manual]. Psychology Software Tools Inc, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E (1983) A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 55(4):468–484Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Bishop G, Spence SH, Mcdonald C (2003) Can parents and teachers provide a reliable and valid report of behavioral inhibition. Child Dev 74(6):1899–1917Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cornaccchio D et al (2016) Irritability and anxiety severity among youth with anxiety. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 55(1):54–61Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Stoddard J et al (2014) Irritability in child and adolescent anxiety disorders. Depression Anxiety 31(7):566–573Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rouquette A et al (2018) Emotional and behavioral symptom network structure in elementary school girls and association with anxiety disorders and depression in adolescence and early adulthood: a network analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 75:1173–1181Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Stahl J et al (2015) Perfect error processing: perfectionism-related variations in action monitoring and error processing mechanisms. Int J Psychophysiol 97(2):153–162Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Buzzell GA et al (2017) A neurobehavioral mechanism linking behaviorally inhibited temperament and later adolescent social anxiety. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 56(12):1097–1105Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Park JM et al (2016) Obsessive-compulsive personality traits in youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 47:281–290Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Pinto A, Ansell EB, Wright AGC (2011) A new approach to the assessment of obsessive compulsive personality. In: Integrated paper session conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality Assessment, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychological & Brain SciencesWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations