Child Psychiatry & Human Development

, Volume 49, Issue 2, pp 290–297 | Cite as

Perceived Police Injustice, Moral Disengagement, and Aggression Among Juvenile Offenders: Utilizing the General Strain Theory Model

  • Tamika C. B. ZapolskiEmail author
  • Devin E. Banks
  • Katherine S. L. Lau
  • Matthew C. Aalsma
Original Article


Although many juvenile offenders report experiencing police injustice, few studies have examined how this source of strain may impact youths’ behavioral outcomes, including risk for future recidivism. This study begins to address that gap in the literature. We applied the general strain theory as our theoretical framework to examine the interactive effect of perceived police injustice and moral disengagement on juvenile aggressive behavior. Our sample included 95 juvenile offenders who completed questionnaires on measures of perceived police injustice and moral disengagement. Results supported our hypothesis, such that moral disengagement predicted past month aggression among juvenile offenders, but only by youth who reported mean and high levels of perceived police injustice. While more research is needed in this area, this study’s findings underscore the need to address both perceived police engagement and moral disengagement among youth at-risk of engaging in delinquent behaviors. Implications for intervention programs are also presented.


Policing Aggression Moral disengagement Juvenile offenders 


  1. 1.
    Agnew R (1992) Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology 30:47–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agnew R (2001) Building on the foundation of general strain theory: specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. J Res Crime Delinq 38(4):319–361. doi: 10.1177/0022427801038004001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agnew R (2013) When criminal coping is likely: an extension of general strain theory. Deviant Behav 34(8):653–670. doi: 10.1080/01639625.2013.766529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bandura A (1999) Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 3(3):193–209. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara GV, Pastorelli C (1996) Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. J Pers Soc Psychol 71(2):364–374. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barkworth JM, Murphy K (2015) Procedural justice policing and citizen compliance behaviour: the importance of emotion. Psychol Crime Law 21(3):254–273. doi: 10.1080/1068316X.2014.951649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borrero M (2001) The widening mistrust between youth and police. Fam Soc 82(4):399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bustamante A, Chaux E (2014) Reducing moral disengagement mechanisms: a comparison of two interventions. J Lat/Lat Am Stud 6(1):52–54. doi: 10.18085/llas.6.1.123583644qq115t3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cardwell SM, Piquero AR, Jennings WG, Copes H, Schubert CA, Mulvey EP (2015) Variability in moral disengagement and its relation to offending in a sample of serious youthful offenders. Crim Justice Behav 42(8):819–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dowler K, Zawilski V (2007) Public perceptions of police misconduct and discrimination: examining the impact of media consumption. J Crim Justice 35(2):193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farrell AD, Kung EM, White KS, Valois R (2000) The structure of self-reported aggression, drug use, and delinquent behaviors during early adolescence. J Clin Child Psychol 29(2):282–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Froggio G (2007) Strain and juvenile delinquency: a critical review of Agnew’s General Strain Theory. J Loss Trauma 12(4):383–418. doi: 10.1080/15325020701249363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gini G, Pozzoli T, Hymel S (2014) Moral disengagement among children and youth: a meta-analytic review of links to aggressive behavior. Aggress Behav 40(1):56–68. doi: 10.1002/ab.21502 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goodrich SA, Anderson SA, LaMotte V (2014) Evaluation of a program designed to promote positive police and youth interactions. J Juv Justice 3(2):55–71Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hayes AF (2012) PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from
  16. 16.
    Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Henry DB, Farrell AD, Project TMVP (2004) The study designed by a committee: design of the Multisite Violence Prevention Project. Am J Prev Med 26(1):12–19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hymel S, Bonanno RA (2014) Moral disengagement processes in bullying. Theory Into Pract 53(4):278–285. doi: 10.1080/00405841.2014.947219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hymel S, Perren S (2015) Introduction to the special issue: moral disengagement and aggression in children and youth. Merrill-Palmer Q 61(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaufman JM, Rebellon CJ, Thaxton S, Agnew R (2008) A general strain theory of racial differences in criminal offending. Aust N Z J Criminol 41(3):421–437. doi: 10.1375/acri.41.3.421 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kane RJ (2005) Compromised police legitimacy as a predictor of violent crime in structurally disadvantaged communities. Criminology 43(2):469–498. doi: 10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00014.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kiriakidis SP (2008) Moral disengagement: relation to delinquency and independence from indices of social dysfunction. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 52:571–583. doi: 10.1177/0306624X07309063 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Listwan SJ, Sullivan CJ, Agnew R, Cullen FT, Colvin M (2011) The pains of imprisonment revisited: the impact of strain on inmate recidivism. Justice Q 30(1):144–168. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2011.597772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lersch KM, Mieczkowski T (2005) Violent police behavior: past, present, and future research directions. Aggress Violent Behav 10(5):552–568. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2004.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McAlister AL (2001) Moral disengagement: measurement and modification. J Peace Res 38(1):87–99. doi: 10.1177/0022343301038001005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McGrath SA, Marcum CD, Copes H (2012) The effects of experienced, vicarious, and anticipated strain on violence and drug use among inmates. Am J Crim Justice 37(1):60–75. doi: 10.1007/s12103-011-9127-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Morris RG, Carriaga ML, Diamond B, Piquero NL, Piquero AR (2012) Does prison strain lead to prison misbehavior? An application of general strain theory to inmate misconduct. J Crim Justice 40(3):194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mulford CF (2004) Restorative justice and the development of empathy, remorse and moral disengagement in adolescent offenders. Diss Abstr Int 64:5256Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Neff JL, Waite DE (2007) Male versus female substance abuse patterns among incarcerated juvenile offenders: comparing strain and social learning variables. Justice Q 24(1):106–132. doi: 10.1080/07418820701201024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ngo FT, Paternoster R, Cullen FT, Mackenzie DL (2011) Life domains and crime: a test of Agnew’s general theory of crime and delinquency. J Crim Justice 39(4):302–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pelton J, Gound M, Forehand R, Brody G (2004) The moral disengagement scale: extension with an American minority sample. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 26(1):31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Piquero NL, Sealock MD (2000) Generalizing general strain theory: an examination of an offending population. Justice Q 17(3):449–484. doi: 10.1080/07418820000094631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Piquero NL, Sealock MD (2004) Gender and general strain theory: a preliminary test of Broidy and Agnew’s gender/GST hypotheses. Justice Q 21(1):125–158. doi: 10.1080/07418820400095761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 42:185–227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Robertson AR, Stein JA, Schaefer-Rohleder L (2010) Effects of hurricane Katrina and other adverse life events on adolescent female offenders: a test of general strain theory. J Res Crime Delinq 47:469–495. doi: 10.1177/0022427810375577 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shulman EP, Cauffman E, Piquero AR, Fagan J (2011) Moral disengagement among serious juvenile offenders: a longitudinal study of the relations between morally disengaged attitudes and offending. Dev Psychol 47(6):1619–1632. doi: 10.1037/a0025404 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Slocum LA, Wiley SA, Esbensen FA (2016) The importance of being satisfied: a longitudinal exploration of police contact, procedural injustice, and subsequent delinquency. Crim Justice Behav 43(1):7–26. doi: 10.1177/0093854815609069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sullivan TN, Farrell AD, Kliewer W (2006) Peer victimization in early adolescence: association between physical and relational victimization and drug use, aggression, and delinquent behaviors among urban middle school students. Dev Psychopathol 18(1):119–137. doi: 10.1017/S095457940606007X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tyler TR, Fagan J, Geller A (2014) Street stops and police legitimacy: teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. J Empir Leg Stud 11(4):751–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Walters GD (2016) Friends, cognition, and delinquency: proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents. Justice Q 33(6):1055–1079. doi: 10.1080/07418825.2015.1039048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zweig JM, Yahner J, Visher CA, Lattimore PK (2015) Using general strain theory to explore the effects of prison victimization experiences on later offending and substance use. Prison J 95(1):84–113. doi: 10.1177/0032885514563283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indiana University-Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.State University of New York at OneontaOneontaUSA
  3. 3.Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyIndiana University Purdue University-IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations