Child Psychiatry & Human Development

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 200–213 | Cite as

Reliability and Validity of the Child and Adolescent Behavior Assessment (CABA): A Brief Structured Scale

  • Amanda Leigh MorinEmail author
  • Stacy Jo Miller
  • Johan R. Smith
  • Karen E. Johnson
Original Article


Use of valid, affordable, accessible, and brief measures facilitates the assessment of mental health outcomes. The Child and Adolescent Behavior Assessment Scale, a brief, structured scale, assesses problem behavior through patient and/or informant report. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the scale’s psychometric properties. In the cross-sectional study presented, a large national sample of youth (aged 5–18) admitted for psychiatric treatment (N = 32,689) was examined. The two major domains of problem behavior assessed were Internalizing and Externalizing. Reliability was good to excellent with alpha levels ranging from 0.874 to 0.917. Additional items measured Risk Behavior (α = 0.648). Subscale total scores correlated well with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children, 9-item version (BPRS-C-9). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported the three-factor, multidimensional model of problem behavior as satisfactory for child and adolescent use, although further research is required to refine some items for clarity and improved model fit.


Child and Adolescent Behavior Assessment CABA Outcomes assessment Psychometrics Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children 



The authors acknowledge the valuable comments and suggestions of Dominique Simons, MS and Elizabeth Vera-Bolanos, MS who are employed by a subsidiary of Universal Health Services, Inc., and Sara E. Brady, PhD of Elite Research, LLC. These individuals contributed through uncompensated manuscript review. Dr. Amanda Morin had full access to all data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Dr. Morin has served as consultant to a subsidiary of Universal Health Services, Inc. and Stacy Miller (, Johan Smith (, and Karen Johnson ( are employees of a subsidiary of Universal Health Services, Inc. The authors report no other potential conflicts of interest. No part of this manuscript nor the data represented have been published previously and are not under consideration elsewhere. The views expressed in this publication are the authors’ and do not represent the official position of Universal Health Services, Inc. or any of its subsidiaries, whose funding facilitated the collection of these data and preparation of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10578_2016_632_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)
10578_2016_632_MOESM2_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 19 kb)


  1. 1.
    Ries Merikangas K, Jian-ping H, Burstein M et al (2010) Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in US adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication-Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Psychiatry 49:980–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griffith A (2010) Committee on the prevention of mental disorders and substance abuse among children, youth, and young adults, National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine: preventing mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders among young people: progress and possibilities. J Child Fam Stud 19(5):675–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2013) Mental health surveillance among children—United States, 2005–2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62(02):1–35Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1999) Mental health: a report of the surgeon general. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, RockvilleGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    IsHak W, Burt T, Sederer L (2002) Outcome measurement in psychiatry: a critical review, xvii. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baer L, Blais M (2010) Handbook of Clinical Rating Scales and assessment in psychiatry and mental health. Humana Press, TotowaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lambert M, Schmitt N, Samms-Vaughan M, An J, Fairclough M, Nutter C (2003) Is it prudent to administer all items for each child behavior checklist cross-informant syndrome? Evaluating the psychometric properties of the youth self-report dimensions with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Psychol Assess 15(4):550–568CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gale J, Pfefferbaum B, Suhr M, Overall J (1986) The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale for Children: a reliability study. J Clin Child Psychol 15(4):341–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hughes C, Rintelmann J, Emslie G, Lopez M, MacCabe N (2001) A revised anchored version of the BPRS-C for childhood psychiatric disorders. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 11(1):77–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hughes C, Melson A (2008) Child and adolescent measures of diagnosis and screening. In: Rush AJ Jr, First MB, Blacker D (eds) Deborah Blacker Handbook of psychiatric measures (2nd ed). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    White G, Jellinek M, Murphy J (2010) The use of rating scales to measure outcomes in child psychiatry and mental health. In: Baer L, Blais MA (eds) Handbook of clinical rating scales and assessment in psychiatry and mental health. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 175–194Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deighton J, Tymms P, Wolpert M et al (2013) The development of a school-based measure of child mental health. J Psychoeduc Assess 31(3):247–257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Urben S, Gloor A, Baier V et al (2015) Patients’ satisfaction with community treatment: a pilot cross-sectional survey adopting multiple perspectives. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 22(9):680–687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu L, Bentler P (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6(1):1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Akaike H (1987) Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52(3):317–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bentler P (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107(2):238–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jöreskog K, Sörbom D (1993) LISREL 8: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Steiger J (1990) Structural model evaluation and modification. Multivariate Behav Res 25:214Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    George D, Mallory M (2010) SPSS for windows step by step: a simple guide and reference, 17.0, 10th edn. Pearson, BostonGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nunnally J, Bernstein I (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Olsson U (1979) Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika 44(4):443–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando P (2013) FACTOR 9.2: a comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Appl Psychol Meas 37:497–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Horn J (1965) A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 30:179–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Connor B (2000) SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 32:396–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Velicer W, Eaton C, Fava J (2000) Construct explication through factor or component analysis: a review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In: Goffin RD, Helmes E (eds) Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 41–71Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nunnally J (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cronbach L (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Briggs S, Cheek J (1986) The role of factor analysis in the evaluation of personality scales. J Pers 54:106–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Benefit Policy Manual 2(20). Published June 27, 2014. Accessed 6 Oct 2014
  31. 31.
    Dickey B (2002) Outcome measurement from research to clinical practice. In: IsHak WW, Burt T, Sederer L (eds) Outcome measurement in psychiatry: a critical review. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc, Arlington, pp 15–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Texas Christian UniversityFort WorthUSA
  2. 2.Universal Health Services, Inc.LewisvilleUSA
  3. 3.Mental Health OutcomesLewisvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations