Child Psychiatry & Human Development

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 556–560

Anxious and Non-Anxious Adolescents’ Experiences of Non-Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research

  • Anneke D. M. Haddad
  • Belinda Platt
  • Anthony C. James
  • Jennifer Y. F. Lau
Original Article

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a ubiquitous research tool for developmental neuroscientists interested in brain structure and function in children and adolescents. However, ethical concerns are sometimes raised about using MRI with children and adolescents, especially when participants have anxiety. We asked 17 clinically/sub-clinically anxious and 19 non-anxious adolescents about their experiences of taking part in MRI for research purposes. Although the anxious group reported experiencing more anxiety during the scan, these differences had attenuated by the time participants got home. We found no evidence that anxious adolescents would be less likely to choose to have another scan or would feel more nervous during another scan. There was some evidence that more trait anxious adolescents found the MRI study enjoyable. These findings should give ethics committees, clinicians, and parents confidence that so long as researchers exercise appropriate care, MRI research is acceptable to adolescents, including those with clinical anxiety.

Keywords

Anxiety Anxiety disorders Magnetic resonance imaging Adolescent psychopathology Ethics 

References

  1. 1.
    Poldrack RA, Paré-Blagoev EJ, Grant PE (2002) Pediatric functional magnetic resonance imaging: progress and challenges. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13:61–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kotsoni E, Byrd D, Casey BJ (2006) Special considerations for functional magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric populations. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:877–886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schiloff JD, Magwood B, Malisza KL (2011) MRI research proposals involving child subjects: concerns hindering research ethics boards from approving them and a checklist to help evaluate them. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 20:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hinton VJ (2002) Ethics of neuroimaging in pediatric development. Brain Cogn 50:455–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Melendez JC, McCrank E (1993) Anxiety-related reactions associated with magnetic resonance imaging examinations. JAMA 270:745–747PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muehlhan M et al (2011) The scanner as a stressor: evidence from subjective and neuroendocrine stress parameters in the time course of a functional magnetic resonance imaging session. Int J Psychophysiol 79:118–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fenton A, Meynell L, Baylis F (2009) Ethical challenges and interpretive difficulties with non-clinical applications of pediatric fMRI. Am J Bioethics 9:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marshall SP, Smith MS, Weinberger E (1995) Perceived anxiety of pediatric patients to magnetic resonance. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 34:59–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomason ME (2009) Children in non-clinical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies give the scan experience a “thumbs up”. Am J Bioeth 9:25–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galván A, Van Leijenhorst L, McGlennen KM (2012) Considerations for imaging the adolescent brain. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2:293–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jorm AF, Kelly CM, Morgan AJ (2007) Participant distress in psychiatric research: a systematic review. Psychol Med 37:917–926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rivlin A et al (2012) Impact on prisoners of participating in research interviews related to near-lethal suicide attempts. J Affect Disord 136:54–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ceci SJ, Peters D, Plotkin J (1985) Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. Am Psychol 40:994–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaufman J et al (1997) Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:980–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spielberger CD et al (1973) The state–trait anxiety inventory for children. Mind Garden, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Downie J et al (2007) Paediatric MRI research ethics: the priority issues. J Bioethic Inq 4:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anneke D. M. Haddad
    • 1
  • Belinda Platt
    • 1
  • Anthony C. James
    • 2
  • Jennifer Y. F. Lau
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Experimental PsychologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations