The Basic Empathy Scale: A Chinese Validation of a Measure of Empathy in Adolescents
- 1.4k Downloads
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Basic Empathy Scale (BES). The Chinese version of BES was administered to a sample (n = 1,524) aged 9–18 and 65 males with conduct disorder aged 13–18. The result of confirmatory factor analysis showed a two-factor structure with four items deleted to be the most adequate model (cognitive empathy, affective empathy). Empathy was positively correlated with a measure of prosocial behaviour and a measure of emotional problems. Boys with conduct disorder scored significantly lower than matched participants on cognitive empathy. Moreover, in line with previous researches, girls were found to score significantly higher on empathy than boys and the scores on both cognitive and affective empathy increased with age. The Chinese revision exhibited satisfactory internal consistency and moderate test–retest reliability.
KeywordsEmpathy Validation Chinese adolescents
We would like to thank all the participants for their support, especially thank Darrick Jolliffe, who gave permission to revise his scale and offered assistance in modifying article. This work was supported by a grant from Humanities and Social Sciences Project of Ministry of Education of China (Project No: 11YJA190005).
- 3.Davis MH (1980) A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Select Documents in psychology 10:85Google Scholar
- 8.Eisenberg N, Strayer J (eds) (1987) Empathy and its development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 20.Kleinman A (1980) Patients and healers in the context of culture. University of California press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- 21.Yang DS (2000) Foundation of psychiatry, 3rd edn. Hunan science & technology press, ChangshaGoogle Scholar
- 22.Zhang FF, Dong Y, Wang K, Zhan ZY, Xie LF (2010) Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the interpersonal reactivity index-C. Chin J Clin Psychol 18(2):155–157Google Scholar
- 27.Ding F, Guo Y (2010) The relationship of theory og mind and empathy with prosocial behaviour. Psychol Sci 33:660–662Google Scholar
- 29.Li L (1990) The relationship between empathy and prosocial behavior in adolescents. Acta Psychologica Sinica 1:72–79Google Scholar
- 30.Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ (2002) The Jefferson scale of physician empathy: further psychometric data and differences by gender and specialty at item level. Acad Med (supplement) 77:560–572Google Scholar
- 31.An XQ, Yang H, Xu JP, Song LP, Qiu YF (2008) Compilation and evaluation of Jefferson empathy scale. Chin Nurs Res 22(8):2063–2066Google Scholar
- 33.Kou JH, Du YS, Xia LM (2007) Formulation of children strengths and difficulties questionnaire (the edition for students) for Shanghai Norm. China J Health Psychol 15(1):3–5Google Scholar
- 34.Hau KT, Wen Z, Cheng Z (2004) Structural equation model and its applications. Educational Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar