Relationship between Defenses, Personality, and Affect During a Stress Task in Normal Adolescents
- 120 Downloads
Although there are extensive data on the relationship between personality and stress reactivity in adults, there is little comparable empirical research with adolescents. This study examines the simultaneous relationships between long term functioning (personality, defenses) and observed stress reactivity (affect) in adolescents.
High school students (N = 169; mean age 16; 73 girls) were asked to participate in two conditions of the Stress Induced Speech Task (SIST): Free Association and Stressful Situation. Immature and mature defenses, distress and restraint personality dimensions, and negative and positive affect were examined.
Greater reported use of immature defenses was significantly associated with negative affect, whereas greater reported use of mature defenses was significantly associated with greater positive affect. Although personality style was also a significant predictor of negative affect across two out of three conditions, defenses were better overall predictors of affect than were personality dimensions. Gender was also a significant predictor of negative affect, wherein girls reported more negative affect than boys.
Defenses and personality style predict affective response during a moderately stressful task. Immature defenses and, to a lesser extent, the distress personality dimension predict mobilization of negative affect, whereas mature defenses predict the reporting of positive affect. These results relate to processes central to psychotherapy: defensive responding, personality style, and affective reactivity during the recounting of stressful events.
KeywordsDefenses Arousal Affect Personality Adolescents
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.Freud A (1936) The mechanisms of defense. IUP Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Paulhaus DL, Fridhandler B, Hayes S (1997) Psychological defense: Contemporary theory and research. In: Hogan R, Johnson J, Briggs S (Eds) Handbook of personality psychology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- 10.Vaillant GE (1992) Ego mechanisms of defense. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 26.Weinberger DA (1990) The construct validity of the repressive coping style. In: Singer JL (ed) Repression and dissociation: implications for personality theory, psychopathology, and health. University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
- 32.Wundt W(1911) Grundzuege der physiologichen Psychologie. Leipzig, EngelmannGoogle Scholar
- 42.Rutter M, Izard CE, Read PB (1986) Depression in young people: Developmental and clinical perspective. Cuilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 43.Bauer AM, Quas JA, Boyce WT (2002) Associations between physiological reactivity and children’s behavior Advantages of a multisystem approach. J Dev Beh Peds 23:102–113Google Scholar
- 44.Jemerin JM, Boyce WT (1990) Physiobiological differences in childhood stress response: Cardiovascular markers of vulnerability. J Dev Peds 11:140–150Google Scholar
- 45.Zeig JK, Munion WM (1990) What is psychotherapy? Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 46.Delizonna L, Haapanen R, Silvermann M, Redlich A, Steiner H (2003) Defensiveness and structured interview detection of DSM-IV diagnoses in incarcerated youth. Poster presentation at annual convention of Association for the Advancement of Behavior TherapyGoogle Scholar