Advertisement

Child Psychiatry and Human Development

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 107–119 | Cite as

Relationship between Defenses, Personality, and Affect During a Stress Task in Normal Adolescents

  • Hans SteinerEmail author
  • Sarah J. Erickson
  • Peggy MacLean
  • Sanja Medic
  • Belinda Plattner
  • Cheryl Koopman
Original Paper

Abstract

Objective

Although there are extensive data on the relationship between personality and stress reactivity in adults, there is little comparable empirical research with adolescents. This study examines the simultaneous relationships between long term functioning (personality, defenses) and observed stress reactivity (affect) in adolescents.

Methods

High school students (N = 169; mean age 16; 73 girls) were asked to participate in two conditions of the Stress Induced Speech Task (SIST): Free Association and Stressful Situation. Immature and mature defenses, distress and restraint personality dimensions, and negative and positive affect were examined.

Results

Greater reported use of immature defenses was significantly associated with negative affect, whereas greater reported use of mature defenses was significantly associated with greater positive affect. Although personality style was also a significant predictor of negative affect across two out of three conditions, defenses were better overall predictors of affect than were personality dimensions. Gender was also a significant predictor of negative affect, wherein girls reported more negative affect than boys.

Discussion

Defenses and personality style predict affective response during a moderately stressful task. Immature defenses and, to a lesser extent, the distress personality dimension predict mobilization of negative affect, whereas mature defenses predict the reporting of positive affect. These results relate to processes central to psychotherapy: defensive responding, personality style, and affective reactivity during the recounting of stressful events.

Keywords

Defenses Arousal Affect Personality Adolescents 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rutledge T, Linden W (2000) Defensiveness status predicts 3-year incidence of hypertension. J␣Hypertens 18:153–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keltikangas-Jaervinen L, Kettunen J, Ravaja N, Naetaenen P (1999) Inhibited and disinhibited temperament and autonomic stress reactivity. Int J Psychophysiol 33:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bongard S, Al’Absi M, Lovallo WR (1998) Interactive effects of trait hostility and anger expression on cardiovascular reactivity in young men. Int J Psychophysiol 28:181–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cramer P (2003) Defense mechanisms and physiological reactivity to stress. J Pers 71:221–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Araujo KB, Medic S, Yasnovsky J, Steiner H (2006) Assessing defense structure in school-age children using the Response Evaluation Measure-71-Youth version (REM-Y-71). Child Psychiat Hum D 36:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cramer P (2000) Defense mechanisms in psychology today: Further processes for adaptation. Am Psychol 55:637–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freud A (1936) The mechanisms of defense. IUP Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paulhaus DL, Fridhandler B, Hayes S (1997) Psychological defense: Contemporary theory and research. In: Hogan R, Johnson J, Briggs S (Eds) Handbook of personality psychology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steiner H, Araujo KB, Koopman C (2001) The Response Evaluation Measure (REM-71): A new instrument for the measurement of defenses in adults and adolescents. Am J Psychiatry 158:455–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vaillant GE (1992) Ego mechanisms of defense. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vaillant GE (1971) Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechanisms. Arch Gen Psychiatry 24:107–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vaillant GE (1994) Ego mechanisms of defense and personality psychopathology. J Abnorm Psychol 103:44–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cohen S, Manuck S (1995) Stress, reactivity, and disease. Psychosom Med 57:423–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lovallo WR, Gerin W (2003) Psychophysiological reactivity: Mechanisms and pathways to cardiovascular disease. Psychosom Med 65:36–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cramer P, Block J (1998) Preschool antecedents of defense mechanism use in young adults: A longitudinal study. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:159–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erickson SJ, Feldman SS, Hans S (1996) Defense mechanisms and adjustment in normal adolescents. Am J Psychiatry 153:826–828PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Erickosn S, Feldman SS, Steiner H (1997) Defense reactions and coping strategies in normal adolescents. Child Psychiat Hum D 28:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sandstrom MJ, Cramer P (2003) Defense mechanism and psychological adjustment in childhood. J Nerv Ment Dis 191:487–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Erikson SJ, Feldman SS, Steiner H (1997) Defense reactions and coping strategies in normal adolescents. Child Psychiatry Hum D 28:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noam GG, Recklitis CJ (1990) The relationship between defenses and symptoms in adolescent psychopathology. J Pers Assess 54:311–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feldman SS, Araujo KB, Steiner H (1996) Defense mechanisms in adolescents as a function of age, sex and mental health status. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35:1344–1354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steiner H, Feldman SS (1995) Two approaches to the measurement of adaptive style: comparison of normal, psychosomatically ill, and delinquent adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 34:180–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cramer P, Kelly FD (2004) Defense mechanism in adolescent conduct disorder and adjustment reaction. J Nerv Ment Dis 192:139–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weinberger DA (1997) Distress and self-restraint as measures of adjustment across the life span: Confirmatory factor analyses in clinical and non-clinical samples. Psychol Assess 9:132–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weinberger DA, Schwartz GE, Gary G (1990) Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: A typological perspective. J Pers 58:381–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weinberger DA (1990) The construct validity of the repressive coping style. In: Singer JL (ed) Repression and dissociation: implications for personality theory, psychopathology, and health. University of Chicago, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weinberger DA, Davidson MN (1994) Styles of inhibiting emotional expression: Distinguishing repressive coping from impression management. J Pers 62:587–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Asendorpf JB, Scherer KR (1983) The discrepant repressor: Differentiation between low anxiety, high anxiety, and repression of anxiety by autonomic-facial-verbal patterns of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 45:1334–1346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    King AC, Taylor CB, Albright CA, Haskell W (1990) The relationship between repressive and defensive coping styles and blood pressure responses in healthy, middle-aged men and women. J Psychosom Res 34:461–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Davis PJ (1987) Repression and the inaccessibility of affective memories. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:585–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Newton TL, Contrada RJ (1992) Repressive coping and verbal-autonomic response dissociation: The influence of social context. J Pers Soc Psychol 62:159–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wundt W(1911) Grundzuege der physiologichen Psychologie. Leipzig, EngelmannGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pennebaker JW (1999) The effects of traumatic disclosure on physical and mental health: The values of writing and talking about upsetting events. Int J Emerg Ment Health 1:9–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Muris P, Winands D, Horselenberg R (2003) Defense styles, personality traits, and psychopathological symptoms in nonclinical adolescents. J Nerv Ment Dis 191:771–780PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Steiner H, Ryst E, Berkowitz J, Gschwendt M, Carrion V, Koopman C (2002) Boys’ and girls’ responses to stress: Affect and heart rate during a speech task. J Adol Health 30:14–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bond M, Gardner ST, Christian J, Sigal JJ (1983) Empirical study of self-rated defense styles. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:333–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Steiner H, Feldman SS (1995) Two approaches to the measurement of adaptive style: A comparison of normal, psychosomatically ill, and delinquent adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 34:180–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weinberger DA (1998) Defenses, personality structure, and development: Integrating psychodynamic theory into a typological approach to personality. J Pers 66:1061–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Feldman SS, Wentzel KR (1990) Relations among family interaction patterns, classroom, self-restraint, and academic achievement in preadolescent boys. J Educ Psych 82:813–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Folkman S, Lazarus RS (1985) If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping. J Pers Soc Psychol 48:150–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Joiner TE, Blalock JA, Wagner KD (1999) Preliminary examination of sex differences in depressive symptoms among adolescent psychiatric inpatients: The role of anxious symptoms and generalized negative affect. J Clin Child Psych 28:211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rutter M, Izard CE, Read PB (1986) Depression in young people: Developmental and clinical perspective. Cuilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bauer AM, Quas JA, Boyce WT (2002) Associations between physiological reactivity and children’s behavior Advantages of a multisystem approach. J Dev Beh Peds 23:102–113Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jemerin JM, Boyce WT (1990) Physiobiological differences in childhood stress response: Cardiovascular markers of vulnerability. J Dev Peds 11:140–150Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zeig JK, Munion WM (1990) What is psychotherapy? Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Delizonna L, Haapanen R, Silvermann M, Redlich A, Steiner H (2003) Defensiveness and structured interview detection of DSM-IV diagnoses in incarcerated youth. Poster presentation at annual convention of Association for the Advancement of Behavior TherapyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Steiner
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sarah J. Erickson
    • 2
  • Peggy MacLean
    • 2
  • Sanja Medic
    • 1
  • Belinda Plattner
    • 1
  • Cheryl Koopman
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Psychiatry and The Law, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations