Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Experience Questionnaire in Adolescents: Descriptive Data, Reliability, and Factorial Validity
- 580 Downloads
This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Social Experience Questionnaire (SEQ) in a sample of 1158 adolescents aged 13–17 years. Confirmatory factor analysis fit indices supported the hypothesized three-factor model of the SEQ that assesses overt and relational victimization, and prosocial behaviors from peers. Analyses of gender differences revealed that boys reported being overtly victimized more than girls, and girls reported greater receipt of prosocial behaviors from peers than boys. No gender differences in relational victimization were found. The internal consistency was adequate across gender, and test–retest stability over 12 months was modest. Intercorrelations among overt and relational victimization subscales suggest that these subscales assess related, but relatively independent constructs of peer victimization. These findings support the use of the SEQ with adolescents.
Key wordspeer victimization social experience questionnaire validity reliability Adolescents
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Storch, EA, Masia-Warner, C, Brassard, MR 2003The relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescenceChild Stud J33118Google Scholar
- 3.Crick, NR, Grotpeter, JK 1996Children’s treatment by peers: victims of relational and overt aggressionDevelop Psychopath8367380Google Scholar
- 9.Storch EA, Masia-Warner C, Dent HC, Klein RG : Peer victimization and social anxiety in adolescence: A prospective study. Agg Beh, in press.Google Scholar
- 10.Storch, EA, Zelman, E, Sweeney, M, Danner, G, Dove, S 2002Overt and relational victimization, and psychosocial adjustment in minority preadolescentsChild Stud J327380Google Scholar
- 11.Storch, EA, Esposito, L 2003Peer victimization and posttraumatic stress in childrenChild Study J339198Google Scholar
- 12.Cronbach, L 1951Coefficient alpha and the internal consistency of testsPsychometrika16297334Google Scholar
- 14.Arbuckle, JL 1996AMOS user’s guide, Version 3.6SmallwatersChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hair, JF, Anderson, RE, TathamRL Black, WC 1992Multivariate data analysis with readingsMacMillanNew YorkGoogle Scholar
- 16.Thompson, B 2004Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applicationsAmerican Psychological AssociationWashington DCGoogle Scholar
- 17.Bryne, BM 2001Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programmingL Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
- 19.Strauss, CC, Frame, CL, Forehand, R 1987Psychosocial impairment associated with anxiety in childrenJ Clin Child Psychol16235240Google Scholar