Child Psychiatry and Human Development

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 167–176 | Cite as

Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Experience Questionnaire in Adolescents: Descriptive Data, Reliability, and Factorial Validity

  • Eric A. Storch
  • Heather Crisp
  • Jonathan W. Roberti
  • Daniel M. Bagner
  • Carrie Masia-Warner


This study evaluated the psychometric properties of the Social Experience Questionnaire (SEQ) in a sample of 1158 adolescents aged 13–17 years. Confirmatory factor analysis fit indices supported the hypothesized three-factor model of the SEQ that assesses overt and relational victimization, and prosocial behaviors from peers. Analyses of gender differences revealed that boys reported being overtly victimized more than girls, and girls reported greater receipt of prosocial behaviors from peers than boys. No gender differences in relational victimization were found. The internal consistency was adequate across gender, and test–retest stability over 12 months was modest. Intercorrelations among overt and relational victimization subscales suggest that these subscales assess related, but relatively independent constructs of peer victimization. These findings support the use of the SEQ with adolescents.

Key words

peer victimization social experience questionnaire validity reliability Adolescents 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hawker, DS, Boulton, MJ 2000Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial adjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studiesJ Child Psychol Psychiatry41441455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Storch, EA, Masia-Warner, C, Brassard, MR 2003The relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescenceChild Stud J33118Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crick, NR, Grotpeter, JK 1996Children’s treatment by peers: victims of relational and overt aggressionDevelop Psychopath8367380Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Storch, EA, Nock, MK, Masia-Warner, C, Barlas, ME 2003Peer victimization and social-psychological adjustment in Hispanic-American and African-American childrenJ Child Fam Stud12439452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Storch, EA, Masia-Warner, CL 2004The relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescent femalesJ Adolesc27351362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crick, NR, Bigbee, MA 1998Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: a multi-informant approachJ Consult Clin Psychol66337347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Prinstein, MJ, Boergers, J, Vernberg, EM 2001Overt and relational aggression in adolescents: Social-psychological adjustment of aggressors and victimsJ Clin Child Psychol30479491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bond, L, Carlin, JB, Thomas, L, Rubin, K, Patton, G 2001Does bullying cause emotional problems? A prospective study of young teenagersBMJ323480484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Storch EA, Masia-Warner C, Dent HC, Klein RG : Peer victimization and social anxiety in adolescence: A prospective study. Agg Beh, in press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Storch, EA, Zelman, E, Sweeney, M, Danner, G, Dove, S 2002Overt and relational victimization, and psychosocial adjustment in minority preadolescentsChild Stud J327380Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Storch, EA, Esposito, L 2003Peer victimization and posttraumatic stress in childrenChild Study J339198Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cronbach, L 1951Coefficient alpha and the internal consistency of testsPsychometrika16297334Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shrout, PE, Fleiss, JL 1979Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliabilityPsychol Bull86420428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arbuckle, JL 1996AMOS user’s guide, Version 3.6SmallwatersChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hair, JF, Anderson, RE, TathamRL Black, WC 1992Multivariate data analysis with readingsMacMillanNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thompson, B 2004Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applicationsAmerican Psychological AssociationWashington DCGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bryne, BM 2001Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programmingL Erlbaum AssociatesMahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Streiner, DL 2003Being inconsistent about consistency: When coefficient alpha does and doesn’t matterJ Per Assess80217222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Strauss, CC, Frame, CL, Forehand, R 1987Psychosocial impairment associated with anxiety in childrenJ Clin Child Psychol16235240Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric A. Storch
    • 1
  • Heather Crisp
    • 2
  • Jonathan W. Roberti
    • 3
  • Daniel M. Bagner
    • 4
  • Carrie Masia-Warner
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.University of DenverUSA
  3. 3.New College of FloridaUSA
  4. 4.University of FloridaUSA
  5. 5.New York University School of MedicineUSA

Personalised recommendations