A region of euchromatin coincides with an extensive tandem repeat on the mouse (Mus musculus) inactive X chromosome
- 430 Downloads
Euchromatic features are largely absent from the human inactive X chromosome (Xi), with the exception of several large tandem repeats that can be detected as euchromatin bands at metaphase. Despite residing megabases apart, these tandem repeats make frequent inactive X-specific interactions. The mouse homologue has been reported for at least one of the tandem repeats, but whether the mouse Xi is also characterized by distinct bands of euchromatin remains unknown. We examined the mouse Xi for the presence of euchromatin bands by examining the pattern of histone H3 dimethylated at lysine 4 and detected two major signals. The first band resides in the subtelomeric region of band XF5 and may correspond to the pseudoautosomal region. The second band localizes to XE3 and coincides with an extensive complex repeat composed of a large tandem and inverted repeat segment as well as several large short interspersed nuclear element (SINE)-rich tandem repeats. Fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals that sequences with homology to the repeat region are scattered along the length of the Y chromosome. Immunofluorescence analysis of histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 9 on metaphase chromosomes indicates that the repeat region corresponds to a band of constitutive heterochromatin on the male X and female active X chromosomes, whereas the euchromatin signal appears to be female specific. These data suggest that the band of euchromatin observed at XE3 is unique to the mouse Xi, comparable to the chromatin arrangement of several large tandem repeats located on the human X chromosome.
KeywordsInactive X chromosome H3K4me2 Tandem repeat Mouse X chromosome Euchromatin and heterochromatin
Amplified spermatogenic transcripts X encoded
Bacterial artificial chromosome
Bovine serum albumin
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
Histone H3 dimethylated at lysine 4
Histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 9
Histone H3 trimethylated at lysine 27
Long noncoding RNA
Long interspersed nuclear element
Long terminal repeat
Ribosomal protein S12
Short interspersed nuclear element
Serine-rich secreted X-linked
Vomeronasal 2 receptor 121
Active X chromosome
X chromosome inactivation
Inactive X chromosome
X inactivation center
X inactive-specific transcript
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [GM073120 to B.P.C.].
Experiments performed in this manuscript comply with the current laws of the USA.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
- Balog J, Miller D, Sanchez-Curtailles E, Carbo-Marques J, Block G, Potman M, de Knijff P, Lemmers RJ, Tapscott SJ, van der Maarel SM (2012) Epigenetic regulation of the X-chromosomal macrosatellite repeat encoding for the cancer/testis gene CT47. Eur J Hum Genet 20(2):185–191. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.150 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horakova AH, Calabrese JM, McLaughlin CR, Tremblay DC, Magnuson T, Chadwick BP (2012a) The mouse DXZ4 homolog retains Ctcf binding and proximity to Pls3 despite substantial organizational differences compared to the primate macrosatellite. Genome Biol 13(8):R70. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-8-r70 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ohno S (1967) Sex chromosomes and sex-linked genes. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Roman AC, Gonzalez-Rio FJ, Molto E, Hernando H, Neto A, Vicente-Garcia C, Ballestar E, Gomez-Skarmeta JL, Vavrova-Anderson J, White RJ, Montoliu L, Fernandez-Salguero PM (2011) Dioxin receptor and SLUG transcription factors regulate the insulator activity of B1 SINE retrotransposons via and RNA polymerase switch. Genome Res 21:422–432PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schaap M, Lemmers RJ, Maassen R, van der Vliet PJ, Hoogerheide LF, van Dijk HK, Basturk N, de Knijff P, van der Maarel SM (2013) Genome-wide analysis of macrosatellite repeat copy number variation in worldwide populations: evidence for differences and commonalities in size distributions and size restrictions. BMC Genomics 14:143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-143 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril JF, Agarwal P, Agarwala R, Ainscough R, Alexandersson M, An P, Antonarakis SE, Attwood J, Baertsch R, Bailey J, Barlow K, Beck S, Berry E, Birren B, Bloom T, Bork P, Botcherby M, Bray N, Brent MR, Brown DG, Brown SD, Bult C, Burton J, Butler J, Campbell RD, Carninci P, Cawley S, Chiaromonte F, Chinwalla AT, Church DM, Clamp M, Clee C, Collins FS, Cook LL, Copley RR, Coulson A, Couronne O, Cuff J, Curwen V, Cutts T, Daly M, David R, Davies J, Delehaunty KD, Deri J, Dermitzakis ET, Dewey C, Dickens NJ, Diekhans M, Dodge S, Dubchak I, Dunn DM, Eddy SR, Elnitski L, Emes RD, Eswara P, Eyras E, Felsenfeld A, Fewell GA, Flicek P, Foley K, Frankel WN, Fulton LA, Fulton RS, Furey TS, Gage D, Gibbs RA, Glusman G, Gnerre S, Goldman N, Goodstadt L, Grafham D, Graves TA, Green ED, Gregory S, Guigo R, Guyer M, Hardison RC, Haussler D, Hayashizaki Y, Hillier LW, Hinrichs A, Hlavina W, Holzer T, Hsu F, Hua A, Hubbard T, Hunt A, Jackson I, Jaffe DB, Johnson LS, Jones M, Jones TA, Joy A, Kamal M, Karlsson EK, Karolchik D, Kasprzyk A, Kawai J, Keibler E, Kells C, Kent WJ, Kirby A, Kolbe DL, Korf I, Kucherlapati RS, Kulbokas EJ, Kulp D, Landers T, Leger JP, Leonard S, Letunic I, Levine R, Li J, Li M, Lloyd C, Lucas S, Ma B, Maglott DR, Mardis ER, Matthews L, Mauceli E, Mayer JH, McCarthy M, McCombie WR, McLaren S, McLay K, McPherson JD, Meldrim J, Meredith B, Mesirov JP, Miller W, Miner TL, Mongin E, Montgomery KT, Morgan M, Mott R, Mullikin JC, Muzny DM, Nash WE, Nelson JO, Nhan MN, Nicol R, Ning Z, Nusbaum C, O’Connor MJ, Okazaki Y, Oliver K, Overton-Larty E, Pachter L, Parra G, Pepin KH, Peterson J, Pevzner P, Plumb R, Pohl CS, Poliakov A, Ponce TC, Ponting CP, Potter S, Quail M, Reymond A, Roe BA, Roskin KM, Rubin EM, Rust AG, Santos R, Sapojnikov V, Schultz B, Schultz J, Schwartz MS, Schwartz S, Scott C, Seaman S, Searle S, Sharpe T, Sheridan A, Shownkeen R, Sims S, Singer JB, Slater G, Smit A, Smith DR, Spencer B, Stabenau A, Stange-Thomann N, Sugnet C, Suyama M, Tesler G, Thompson J, Torrents D, Trevaskis E, Tromp J, Ucla C, Ureta-Vidal A, Vinson JP, Von Niederhausern AC, Wade CM, Wall M, Weber RJ, Weiss RB, Wendl MC, West AP, Wetterstrand K, Wheeler R, Whelan S, Wierzbowski J, Willey D, Williams S, Wilson RK, Winter E, Worley KC, Wyman D, Yang S, Yang SP, Zdobnov EM, Zody MC, Lander ES (2002) Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420(6915):520–562. doi: 10.1038/nature01262 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zeng W, de Greef JC, Chen YY, Chien R, Kong X, Gregson HC, Winokur ST, Pyle A, Robertson KD, Schmiesing JA, Kimonis VE, Balog J, Frants RR, Ball AR Jr, Lock LF, Donovan PJ, van der Maarel SM, Yokomori K (2009) Specific loss of histone H3 lysine 9 trimethylation and HP1gamma/cohesin binding at D4Z4 repeats is associated with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD). PLoS Genet 5(7):e1000559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000559 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar