Chromosome Research

, 16:413 | Cite as

Changes in chromosome organization during PHA-activation of resting human lymphocytes measured by cryo-FISH

  • Miguel R. Branco
  • Tiago Branco
  • Francisco Ramirez
  • Ana PomboEmail author


During interphase, chromosomes are arranged into territories within a highly organized nuclear space containing several compartments. It is becoming clear that this complex nuclear arrangement is important for gene regulation and therefore expression. The study of chromosome organization in interphase requires high-resolution imaging methods that at the same time allow for flexible labelling strategies and preserve nuclear structure. Tokuyasu cryosections of cells or tissues provide a simple, high-resolution platform for performing immunolabelling and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on well-preserved samples. Here we show how FISH performed on thin cryosections (cryo-FISH) can be used for the study of chromosome organization at high resolution and in a quantitative manner. We have measured chromosome intermingling, volume and radial position, in resting and activated human lymphocytes, and observed chromosome-specific differences between the two cellular states. These differences are in part related to the nuclear expansion that occurs during activation, but are also likely to be tied to their different transcriptional profiles. Extrapolation of our dataset to the whole genome suggests that activated cells contain a lower amount of chromatin involved in intermingling than resting cells.

Key words

chromosome territory cryosections lymphocyte activation radial position stereology 

Supplementary material

10577_2008_1230_MOESM1_ESM.doc (26 kb)
Supplementary Table S1 Relative and absolute intermingling volumes in resting and PHA-activated human lymphocytes obtained after cryo-FISH (DOC 26 kb).
10577_2008_1230_MOESM2_ESM.doc (26 kb)
Supplementary Table 2 Relative and absolute chromosome volumes in resting and PHA-activated human lymphocytes obtained after cryo-FISH (DOC 27 kb).
10577_2008_1230_MOESM3_ESM.doc (26 kb)
Supplementary Table 3 CT radial positions in resting and PHA-activated human lymphocytes obtained after cryo-FISH (DOC 27 kb).
10577_2008_1230_MOESM4_ESM.tif (1.8 mb)
Supplementary Figure 1 Example of the empirical thresholding criteria. A cryo-FISH of chromosome 5 (A) was segmented using different threshold levels of empirically find a mask that best fits the fluorescent signal from the chromosome paint (B). The mask of the ynder-thresholded image includes patches away from the main body of the CT that are likely to be background (arrowhead), whilst the mask of the over-thresholded image excludes areas of fluorescence that are clearly above the background level (arrowhead). Bar, 0.5 μm. (TIFF 1.81 mb)
10577_2008_1230_MOESM5_ESM.tif (888 kb)
Supplementary Figure 2 Frequency of section radii upon random sectioning. A, Schematic representation of how to obtain the frequency (f) of a class of section sizes from their radii (ri) and the 3D nuclear radius (R), using the formula shown on the right (zi is the axial position of the section of radius ri). B, Relative frequency of the different section sizes obtained from the sectioning of a nucleus of radius 1. (TIFF 887 kb)


  1. Branco MR, Pombo A (2006) Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol 4: e138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Branco MR, Pombo A (2007) Chromosome organization: new facts new models. Trends Cell Biol 17: 127–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Branco MR, Xie SQ, Martin S, Pombo A (2005) Correlative microscopy using Tokuyasu cryosections: applications for immunolabeling and in situ hybridization. In: D. Stephens, ed. Cell Imaging. Bristol UK, Scion.Google Scholar
  4. Bridger JM, Boyle S, Kill IR, Bickmore WA (2000) Re-modelling of nuclear architecture in quiescent and senescent human fibroblasts. Curr Biol 10: 149–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cremer M, von Hase J, Volm T et al. (2001) Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells. Chromosome Res 9: 541–567.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cremer M, Kupper K, Wagler B et al. (2003) Inheritance of gene density-related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei. J Cell Biol 162: 809–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cremer T, Cremer M, Dietzel S, Muller S, Solovei I, Fakan S (2006) Chromosome territories—a functional nuclear landscape. Curr Opin Cell Biol 18: 307–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Croft JA, Bridger JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore WA (1999) Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 145: 1119–1131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dardick I, Setterfield G, Hall R, Bladon T, Little J, Kaplan G (1981) Nuclear alterations during lymphocyte transformation: relationship to the heterogeneous morphologic presentations of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Am J Pathol 103: 10–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dehghani H, Dellaire G, Bazett-Jones DP (2005) Organization of chromatin in the interphase mammalian cell. Micron 36: 95–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dellaire G, Bazett-Jones DP (2004) PML nuclear bodies: dynamic sensors of DNA damage and cellular stress. Bioessays 26: 963–977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Faro-Trindade I, Cook PR (2006) A conserved organization of transcription during embryonic stem cell differentiation and in cells with high C value. Mol Biol Cell 17: 2910–2920.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabdoulkhakova A, Henriksson G, Avkhacheva N, Sofin A, Bredberg A (2007) High rate of mutation reporter gene inactivation during human T cell proliferation. Immunogenetics 59: 135–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grabenbauer M, Geerts WJ, Fernadez-Rodriguez J, Hoenger A, Koster AJ, Nilsson T (2005) Correlative microscopy and electron tomography of GFP through photooxidation. Nat Methods 2: 857–862.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guillot PV, Xie SQ, Hollinshead M, Pombo A (2004) Fixation-induced redistribution of hyperphosphorylated RNA polymerase II in the nucleus of human cells. Exp Cell Res 295: 460–468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Handwerger KE, Gall JG (2006) Subnuclear organelles: new insights into form and function. Trends Cell Biol 16: 19–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hell SW (2007) Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science 316: 1153–1158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hepperger C, Otten S, von Hase J, Dietzel S (2007) Preservation of large-scale chromatin structure in FISH experiments. Chromosoma 116: 117–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kreth G, Finsterle J, von Hase J, Cremer M, Cremer C (2004) Radial arrangement of chromosome territories in human cell nuclei: a computer model approach based on gene density indicates a probabilistic global positioning code. Biophys J 86: 2803–2812.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kysela K, Philimonenko AA, Philimonenko VV, Janacek J, Kahle M, Hozak P (2005) Nuclear distribution of actin and myosin I depends on transcriptional activity of the cell. Histochem Cell Biol 124: 347–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lamond AI, Spector DL (2003) Nuclear speckles: a model for nuclear organelles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 605–612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lomvardas S, Barnea G, Pisapia DJ, Mendelsohn M, Kirkland J, Axel R (2006) Interchromosomal interactions and olfactory receptor choice. Cell 126: 403–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin S, Pombo A (2003) Transcription factories: quantitative studies of nanostructures in the mammalian nucleus. Chromosome Res 11: 461–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nisman R, Dellaire G, Ren Y, Li R, Bazett-Jones DP (2004) Application of quantum dots as probes for correlative fluorescence conventional and energy-filtered transmission electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 52: 13–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Noordermer D, Branco MR, Splinter E et al. (2008) Transcription and chromatin organization of a housekeeping gene cluster containing an integrated β-globin locus control region. PLoS Genetics 4(3): e1000016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Osborne CS, Chakalova L, Brown KE et al. (2004) Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat Genet 36: 1065–1071.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Parada LA, McQueen PG, Misteli T (2004) Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes. Genome Biol 5: R44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pombo A (2007) Advances in imaging the interphase nucleus using thin cryosections. Histochem Cell Biol 128: 97–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pombo A, Branco MR (2007) Functional organisation of the genome during interphase. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17: 451–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pombo A, Hollinshead M, Cook PR (1999a) Bridging the resolution gap: Imaging the same transcription factories in cryosections by light and electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem 47: 471–480.Google Scholar
  31. Pombo A, Jackson DA, Hollinshead M, Wang Z, Roeder RG, Cook PR (1999b) Regional specialization in human nuclei: visualization of discrete sites of transcription by RNA polymerase III. EMBO J 18: 2241–2253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robinson JM, Takizawa T, Pombo A, Cook PR (2001) Correlative fluorescence and electron microscopy on ultrathin cryosections: bridging the resolution gap. J Histochem Cytochem 49: 803–808.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Simonis M, Klous P, Splinter E et al. (2006) Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet 38: 1348–1354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Solovei I, Cavallo A, Schermelleh L et al. (2002) Spatial preservation of nuclear chromatin architecture during three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization (3D-FISH). Exp Cell Res 276: 10–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Soutoglou E, Dorn JF, Sengupta K et al. (2007) Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat Cell Biol 9: 675–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spector DL (2003) The dynamics of chromosome organization and gene regulation. Annu Rev Biochem 72: 573–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tanabe H, Habermann FA, Solovei I, Cremer M, Cremer T (2002) Non-random radial arrangements of interphase chromosome territories: evolutionary considerations and functional implications. Mutat Res 504: 37–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Tokuyasu KT (1973) A technique for ultracryotomy of cell suspensions and tissues. J Cell Biol 57: 551–565.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tolhuis B, Palstra RJ, Splinter E, Grosveld F, de Laat W (2002) Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. Mol Cell 10: 1453–1465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Torelli G, Ferrari S, Donelli A et al. (1981) Sequence complexity and diversity of polyadenylated RNA molecules of human normal resting PHA-stimulated and leukemic lymphocytes. Nucleic Acids Res 9: 7013–7032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weibel ER (1979) Stereological Methods: Practical Methods for Biological Morphometry. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wurtele H, Chartrand P (2006) Genome-wide scanning of HoxB1-associated loci in mouse ES cells using an open-ended chromosome conformation capture methodology. Chromosome Res 14: 477–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao Z, Tavoosidana G, Sjolinder M et al. (2006) Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat Genet 38: 1341–1347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel R. Branco
    • 1
  • Tiago Branco
    • 2
  • Francisco Ramirez
    • 3
  • Ana Pombo
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.MRC Clinical Sciences Centre, Faculty of MedicineImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Wolfson Institute for Biomedical ResearchUCLLondonUK
  3. 3.South RuislipMiddlesexUK

Personalised recommendations