Chromosome Research

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 549–557 | Cite as

Use of meiotic pachytene stage of spermatocytes for karyotypic studies in insects

Article

Abstract

Coleopterans represent by far the largest animal group, with more than 300,000 identified species. Only little progress in their chromosome analysis has been accomplished during recent decades, compared with that made in vertebrate cytogenetics. Both the small size of their genome and the difficulty of obtaining mitotic cells with nice chromosomes have limited the application of conventional techniques, such as chromosome banding. A method for obtaining chromosome banding on well-spread bivalents from the pachytene stage of the meiotic prophase, the most frequent stage in young imagines, is described. It makes possible the identification of all bivalents and the establishment of the karyotype with greater ease and accuracy than with mitotic cells. In addition, it gives some insight into chromosome organization at a stage when autosomes are assumed to undergo an intense transcriptional activity. The results of the technique, which was successfully applied to many species, are described here in two of them, Cetonia aurata and Adesmia montana as examples.

Key words

chromosome bivalents Coleoptera insect karyotype pachynema 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angus RB (1982) Separation of two species standing as Helophorus aquaticus (L.) (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae) by banded chromosome analysis. Syst Entomol 7: 265–281.Google Scholar
  2. Cassagnau P (1971) Les chromosomes salivaire polytènes chez Bilobella grassei (Denis) (Collembole : Neanuridae). Chromosoma 35: 57–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Coffigny H, Bourgeois C, Ricoul M et al. (1999) Alterations of DNA methylation patterns in germ cells and Sertoli cells from developing mouse testis. Cytogenet Cell Genet 87: 175–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Counce SJ, Meyer GF (1973) Differentiation of the synaptonemal complex of the kinetochore in Locusta spermatocytes studied by whole mount electron microscopy. Chromosoma 44: 231–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dutrillaux B, Couturier J (1981) La pratique de l’analyse chromosomique. Paris: Masson, pp. 1–96.Google Scholar
  6. Fox DP, Hewitt GM, Hall DJ (1974) DNA replication and RNA transcription of euchromatic and heterochromatic regions during grasshopper meiosis. Chromosoma 45: 43–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henderson SA (1964) RNA synthesis during male meiosis and spermiogenesis. Chromosoma 15: 345–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jaafar H, Gabriel-Robez O, Rumpler Y (1993) Chromosomal anomalies and disturbance of transcriptional activity at the pachytene stage of meiosis: relationship to male sterility. Cytogenet Cell Genet 64: 273–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Juan C, Petitpierre E (1991) Evolution of genome size in darkling beetles (Tenebrionidae, Coleoptera). Genome 34: 169–173.Google Scholar
  10. Kudoh K, Abe A, Saitoh K (1973) Chromosomes studies of beetles. VI: A chromosome survey of eleven species of the family Scarabaeidae. Sci Report Hirosaki Univ 20: 88–95.Google Scholar
  11. Luciani JM, Morazzani MR, Stahl A (1975) Identification of pachytene bivalents in human male meiosis using G-banding technique. Chromosoma 52: 275–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luciani JM, Guichaoua MR, Morazzani MR (1984) Complete pachytene chromomere karyotypes of human spermatocyte bivalents. Hum Genet 66: 267–271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Luciani JM, Guichaoua MR, Cau P, Devictor B, Salagon N (1988) Differential elongation of autosomal pachytene bivalents related to their DNA content in human spermatocytes. Chromosoma 97: 19–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Macgregor HC, Varley JM (1988) Working with Animal Chromosomes, 2nd edn. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Marec F, Traut W (1993) Synaptonemal complexes in female and male meiotic prophase of Ephestia kuehniella (Lepidoptera). Heredity 71: 394–404.Google Scholar
  16. Peters AHFM, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P (1997) A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res 5: 66–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Petitpierre E, Segarra C, Juan C (1993) Genome size and chromosomal evolution in leaf beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Hereditas 119: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Popescu P, Hayes H, Dutrillaux B (1998) Techniques de cytogénétique animale. Paris: INRA.Google Scholar
  19. Shaarawi FA, Angus RB (1991) A chromosomal investigation of five European species of Anacaena Thomson (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Entomol Scand 21(4): 415–426.Google Scholar
  20. Smith SG, Virkki N (1978) Animal Cytogenetics, Vol. 3: Insecta 5. Coleoptera. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger.Google Scholar
  21. Speed RM (1982) Meiosis in the foetal mouse ovary. Chromosoma 85: 427–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75: 304–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Virkki N (1951) Zur Zytologie einiger Scarabaeiden (Coleoptera). Ann Zool Soc “Vanamo” 14: 1–105.Google Scholar
  24. Virkki N (1954) Weitere spermatogenesestudien an Skarabäiden (Coleoptera). Ann Acad Sci Fenn A IV 25: 1–58.Google Scholar
  25. Vitkova M, Kral J, Traut W, Zrzavy J, Marec F (2005) The evolutionary origin of insect telomeric repeats, (TTAGG)n. Chromosome Res 13: 145–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yoshido A, Bando H, Yasukochi Y, Sahara K (2005) The Bombyx mori karyotype and the assignment of linkage groups. Genetics 170: 675–685.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UMR 5202, OSEBParisFrance

Personalised recommendations