Chromosome Research

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 319–332 | Cite as

Histone deacetylase activity is necessary for chromosome condensation during meiotic maturation in Xenopus laevis



Chromosome condensation is thought to be an essential step for the faithful transmission of genetic information during cellular division or gamete formation. The folding of DNA into metaphase chromosomes and its partition during the cell cycle remains a fundamental cellular process that, at the molecular level, is poorly understood. Particularly, the role of histone deacetylase (HDAC) activities in establishing and maintaining meiotic metaphase chromosome condensation has been little documented. In order to better understand how metaphase chromosome condensation is achieved during meiosis, we explored, in vivo, the consequences of HDAC activities inhibition in a Xenopus oocyte model. Our results show that deacetylase activity plays a crucial role in chromosome condensation. This activity is necessary for correct chromosome condensation since the earlier stages of meiosis, but dispensable for meiosis progression, meiosis exit and mitosis entry. We show that HDAC activity correlates with chromosome condensation, being higher when chromosomes are fully condensed and lower during interphase, when chromosomes are decondensed. In addition, we show that, unlike histone H4, Xenopus maternal histone H3 is stored in the oocyte as a hypoacetylated form and is rapidly acetylated when the oocyte exits meiosis.

Key words

chromosome condensation histone deacetylase meiosis mitosis trichostatin A Xenopus 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrieu A, Magnaghi-Jaulin L, Kahana JA et al. (2001) Mps1 is a kinetochore-associated kinase essential for the vertebrate mitotic checkpoint. Cell 106: 83–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Almouzni G, Khochbin S, Dimitrov S, Wolffe AP (1994) Histone acetylation influences both gene expression and development of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 165: 654–669.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Astrand C, Klenka T, Wrange O, Belikov S (2004) Trichostatin A reduces hormone-induced transcription of the MMTV promoter and has pleiotropic effects on its chromatin structure. Eur J Biochem 271: 1153–1162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bannister AJ, Miska EA (2000) Regulation of gene expression by transcription factor acetylation. Cell Mol Life Sci 57: 1184–1192.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird AW, Yu DY, Pray-Grant MG et al. (2002) Acetylation of histone H4 by Esa1 is required for DNA double-strand break repair. Nature 419: 411–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brehm A, Miska EA, McCance DJ, Reid JL, Bannister AJ, Kouzarides T (1998) Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nature 391: 597–601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen RH, Murray A (1997) Characterization of spindle assembly checkpoint in Xenopus egg extracts. Methods Enzymol 283: 572–584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Choy JS, Kron SJ (2002) NuA4 subunit Yng2 function in intra-S-phase DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 22: 8215–8225.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cimini D, Mattiuzzo M, Torosantucci L, Degrassi F (2003) Histone hyperacetylation in mitosis prevents sister chromatid separation and produces chromosome segregation defects. Mol Biol Cell 14: 3821–3833.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimitrov S, Almouzni G, Dasso M, Wolffe AP (1993) Chromatin transitions during early Xenopus embryogenesis: changes in histone H4 acetylation and in linker histone type. Dev Biol 160: 214–227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Earnshaw WC, Halligan B, Cooke CA, Heck MM, Liu LF (1985) Topoisomerase II is a structural component of mitotic chromosome scaffolds. J Cell Biol 100: 1706–1715.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekwall K, Olsson T, Turner BM, Cranston G, Allshire RC (1997) Transient inhibition of histone deacetylation alters the structural and functional imprint at fission yeast centromeres. Cell 91: 1021–1032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fissore RA, Robl JM (1992) Intracellular Ca2+ response of rabbit oocytes to electrical stimulation. Mol Reprod Dev 32: 9–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Formosa T (2003) Changing the DNA landscape: putting a SPN on chromatin. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 274: 171–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gall JG, Wu Z, Murphy C, Gao H (2004) Structure in the amphibian germinal vesicle. Exp Cell Res 296: 28–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gard DL (1992) Microtubule organization during maturation of Xenopus oocytes: assembly and rotation of the meiotic spindles. Dev Biol 151: 516–530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gasser SM, Laroche T, Falquet J, Boy de la Tour E, Laemmli UK (1986) Metaphase chromosome structure. Involvement of topoisomerase II. J Mol Biol 188: 613–629.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerhart J, Wu M, Kirschner M (1984) Cell cycle dynamics of an M-phase-specific cytoplasmic factor in Xenopus laevis oocytes and eggs. J Cell Biol 98: 1247–1255.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kusch T, Florens L, Macdonald WH et al. (2004) Acetylation by Tip60 is required for selective histone variant exchange at DNA lesions. Science 306: 2084–2087.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Losada A, Hirano T (2005) Dynamic molecular linkers of the genome: the first decade of SMC proteins. Genes Dev 19: 1269–1287.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Magnaghi-Jaulin L, Groisman R, Naguibneva I et al. (1998) Retinoblastoma protein represses transcription by recruiting a histone deacetylase. Nature 391: 601–605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan GT (2002) Lampbrush chromosomes and associated bodies: new insights into principles of nuclear structure and function. Chromosome Res 10: 177–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray AW (1991) Cell cycle extracts. Methods Cell Biol 36: 581–605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nebreda AR, Ferby I (2000) Regulation of the meiotic cell cycle in oocytes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12: 666–675.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nicolas E, Morales V, Magnaghi-Jaulin L, Harel-Bellan A, Richard-Foy H, Trouche D (2000) RbAp48 belongs to the histone deacetylase complex that associates with the retinoblastoma protein. J Biol Chem 275: 9797–9804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nowak SJ, Corces VG (2004) Phosphorylation of histone H3: a balancing act between chromosome condensation and transcriptional activation. Trends Genet 20: 214–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nurse P (1990) Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature 344: 503–508.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohsumi K, Sawada W, Kishimoto T (1994) Meiosis-specific cell cycle regulation in maturing Xenopus oocytes. J Cell Sci 107: 3005–3013.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Peter M, Castro A, Lorca T et al. (2001) The APC is dispensable for first meiotic anaphase in Xenopus oocytes. Nat Cell Biol 3: 83–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Qiu L, Burgess A, Fairlie DP, Leonard H, Parsons PG, Gabrielli BG (2000) Histone deacetylase inhibitors trigger a G2 checkpoint in normal cells that is defective in tumor cells. Mol Biol Cell 11: 2069–2083.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ryan J, Llinas AJ, White DA, Turner BM, Sommerville J (1999) Maternal histone deacetylase is accumulated in the nuclei of Xenopus oocytes as protein complexes with potential enzyme activity. J Cell Sci 112: 2441–2452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Smillie DA, Llinas AJ, Ryan JT, Kemp GD, Sommerville J (2004) Nuclear import and activity of histone deacetylase in Xenopus oocytes is regulated by phosphorylation. J Cell Sci 117: 1857–1866.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Swedlow JR, Hirano T (2003) The making of the mitotic chromosome: modern insights into classical questions. Mol Cell 11: 557–569.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Taddei A, Maison C, Roche D, Almouzni G (2001) Reversible disruption of pericentric heterochromatin and centromere function by inhibiting deacetylases. Nat Cell Biol 3: 114–120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomson S, Clayton AL, Hazzalin CA, Rose S, Barratt MJ, Mahadevan LC (1999) The nucleosomal response associated with immediate-early gene induction is mediated via alternative MAP kinase cascades: MSK1 as a potential histone H3/HMG-14 kinase. EMBO J 18: 4779–4793.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Verdone L, Caserta M, Di Mauro E (2005) Role of histone acetylation in the control of gene expression. Biochem Cell Biol 83: 344–353.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Xie AY, Folk WR (2002) Inhibition of polyomavirus ori-dependent DNA replication by mSin3B. J Virol 76: 11809–11818.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CRBM, UPR 1086 CNRSMontpellier cedex 5France
  2. 2.Institut de Génétique Humaine, UPR 1142 CNRSMontpellier cedex 5France
  3. 3.INSERM EMI 229 CRLC Val d'Aurelle-Paul LamarqueParc EuromédecineMontpellier cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations