Chromosome Research

, Volume 13, Issue 7, pp 675–685 | Cite as

Cohesion proteins are present in centromere protein bodies associated with avian lampbrush chromosomes

  • Alla Krasikova
  • Jose Luis Barbero
  • Elena Gaginskaya
Article

Abstract

Proteins of sister chromatid cohesion are important for maintenance of meiotic chromosome structure and retention of homologous chromosomes in bivalents during diplotene. Localization of the cohesion proteins within nuclei of growing oocytes merits special attention, particularly in avian oocytes, in which diplotene chromosomes assume the form of lampbrush chromosomes (LBCs). We performed indirect immunostaining using antibodies against cohesins SMC1α, SMC1β, SMC3, Rad21, and the SA/STAG family on chaffinch, pigeon and duck LBCs spreads, and frozen ovary sections. On LBCs spreads, antibodies to the majority of cohesins showed punctate staining on chromosome axes. LBC lateral loops, where sister chromatids are separated, did not show cohesin components. The spherical entities attached to the LBCs centromeres in avian germinal vesicles, the so-called protein bodies (PBs), were enriched in SMC1α, SMC3, Rad21, STAG1 and STAG2. The synaptonemal complex component SYCP3, which also participates in cohesion, was detected in the axes of avian lampbrush bivalents and, to a greater degree, in the PBs. In vitellogenic oocytes, cohesion proteins persist in the PBs associated with condensing bivalents when they concentrate into the karyosphere. These results indicate that cohesion proteins accumulate in centromere PBs in avian oocytes and are involved into structural maintenance of lampbrush chromosome axes.

Key words

avian oocyte centromere cohesin lampbrush chromosome protein bodies 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beenders B, Watrin E, Legagneux V, Kireev I, Bellini M (2003) Distribution of XCAP-E and XCAP-D2 in the Xenopus oocyte nucleus. Chromosome Res 11: 549–564.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berezney R, Coffey DS (1974) Identification of nuclear protein matrix. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 60: 1410–1417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Callan HG (1986) Lampbrush Chromosomes. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen-Fix O (2000) Sister chromatid separation: falling apart at the seams. Curr Biol 10: R816–R819.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobson MJ, Pearlman RE, Karaiskakis A, Spyropoulos B, Moens PB (1994) Synaptonemal complex proteins: occurrence, epitope mapping and chromosome disjunction. J Cell Sci 107: 2749–2760.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Doyle O, Corden JL, Murphy C, Gall JG (2002) The distribution of RNA polymerase II largest subunit (RPB1) in the Xenopus germinal vesicle. J Struct Biol 140: 154–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunn, MJ (1993) Gel Electrophoresis: Proteins. Oxford UK: BIOS Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Earnshaw WC, Halligan B, Cooke CA, Heck MMS, Liu LF (1985) Topoisomerase II is a structural component of mitotic chromosome scaffolds. J Cell Biol 100: 1706–1715.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Eijpe M, Heyting C, Gross B, Jessberger R (2000) Association of mammalian SMC1 and SMC3 proteins with meiotic chromosomes and synaptonemal complexes. J Cell Sci 113: 673–682.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Firooznia A, Revenkova E, Jessberger R (2005) XXVII North American Testis Workshop: the function of SMC and other cohesin proteins in meiosis. J Androl 26: 1–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisher D, Hock R, Sheer U (1993) DNA topoisomerase II is not detectable on lampbrush chromosomes but enriched in the amplified nucleoli of Xenopus oocytes. Exp Cell Res 209: 255–260.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaginskaya ER (1972) Nuclear structures in oocytes of adult birds. II. Protein bodies and the karyosphere. Tsitologiia 14: 568–578.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaginskaya ER, Gruzova MN (1969) Characteristics of oogenesis in the finch. Tsitologiia 11: 1241–1251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gall JG (1992) Organelle assembly and function in the amphibian germinal vesicle. Adv Dev Biol 1: 1–29.Google Scholar
  15. Gall JG, Murphy C (1998) Assembly of lampbrush chromosomes from sperm chromatin. Mol Biol Cell 9: 733–747.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gall JG, Wu Z, Murphy C, Gao H (2004) Structure in the amphibian germinal vesicle. Exp Cell Res 296: 28–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gruber S, Haering CH, Nasmyth K (2003) Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell 112: 765–777.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Haering CH, Nasmyth K (2003) Building and breaking bridges between sister chromatids. Bioessays 25: 1178–1191.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hagstrom KA, Meyer BJ (2003) Condensin and cohesin: more than chromosome compactor and glue. Natl Rev Genet 4: 520–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hauf S, Roitinger E, Koch B, Dittrich CM, Mechtler K, Peters JM (2005) Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol 3: e69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hock R, Carl M, Lieb B, Gebauer D, Scheer U (1996) A monoclonal antibody against DNA topoisomerase II labels the axial granules of Pleurodeles lampbrush chromosomes. Chromosoma 104: 358–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jessberger R (2002) The many functions of SMC proteins in chromosome dynamics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3: 767–778.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kouznetsova A, Novak I, Jessberger R, Hoog C (2005) SYCP2 and SYCP3 are required for cohesin core integrity at diplotene but not for centromere cohesion at the first meiotic division. J Cell Sci 118: 2271–2278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Krasikova A, Kulikova T, Saifitdinova A, Derjusheva S, Gaginskaya E (2004) Centromeric protein bodies on avian lampbrush chromosomes contain a protein detectable with an antibody against DNA topoisomerase II. Chromosoma 113: 316–323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kropotova EV, Gaginskaya ER (1984) Lampbrush chromosomes from Japanese quail oocytes. Tsitologiia 26: 1008–1014.Google Scholar
  26. Lengronne A, Katou Y, Mori S et al.. (2004) Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature 430: 573–578.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Losada A, Yokochi T, Kobayashi R, Hirano T (2000) Identification and characterization of SA/Scc3p subunits in the Xenopus and human cohesion complexes. J Cell Biol 150: 405–416.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Macgregor, HC, Solovei, I, Mizuno, S, 1997. Lampbrush chromosomes as system for high resolution studies of meiotic chromosome structure. In: Abbondandolo A, Vig BK, Roi R (eds.) Chromosome Segregation and Aneuploidy, pp 172–183. European Commission Joint Research Centre Publication, pp 172–183.Google Scholar
  29. Meluh PB, Strunnikov AV (2002) Beyond the ABCs of CKC and SCC. Do centromeres orchestrate sister chromatid cohesion or vice versa? Eur J Biochem 269: 2300–2314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Morgan GT (2002) Lampbrush chromosomes and associated bodies: new insights into principles of nuclear structure and function. Chromosome Res 10: 177–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Morrison C, Vagnarelli P, Sonoda E, Takeda S, Earnshaw WC (2003) Sister chromatid cohesion and genome stability in vertebrate cells. Biochem Soc Trans 31: 263–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Parra MT, Viera A, Gomez R et al.. (2004) Involvement of the cohesin Rad21 and SCP3 in monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores during mouse meiosis I. J Cell Sci 117: 1221–1234.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pezzi N, Prieto I, Kremer L et al.. (2000) STAG3, a novel gene encoding a protein involved in meiotic chromosome pairing and location of STAG3-related genes flanking Williams–Beuren syndrome deletion. FASEB J 14: 581–592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Prieto I, Suja JA, Pezzi N, et al.. (2001) Mammalian STAG3 is a cohesin specific to sister chromatid arms in meiosis I. Nat Cell Biol 3: 761–766.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Prieto I, Pezzi N, Buesa JM et al.. (2002) STAG2 and Rad21 mammalian mitotic cohesins are implicated in meiosis. EMBO Rep 3: 543–550.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Prieto I, Tease C, Pezzi N et al.. (2004) Cohesin component dynamics during meiotic prophase I in mammalian oocytes. Chromosome Res 12: 197–213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pyne CK, Loones M-T, Simon F, Zhou ZJ (1995) Immunocytochemical study of lampbrush chromosomes of the urodele Pleurodeles waltl: axial granules are recognized by the mitosis-specific monoclonal antibody MPM-2. Biol Cell 83: 191–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Revenkova E, Eijpe M, Heyting C, Gross B, Jessberger R (2001) Novel meiosis-specific isoform of mammalian SMC1. Mol Cell Biol 21: 6984–6998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Ross KE, Cohen-Fix, O (2004) Cohesins slip sliding away. Nature 430: 520–521.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Saifitdinova A, Derjusheva S, Krasikova A, Gaginskaya E (2003) Lampbrush chromosomes of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs L.). Chromosome Res 11: 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schleiffer A, Kaitna S, Maurer-Stroh S, Glotzer M, Nasmyth K, Eisenhaber F (2003) Kleisins: a superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC protein partners. Mol Cell 11: 571–575.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Solari AJ (1981) Chromosomal axes during and after diplotene. Internatl Cell Biol 80–81: 178–186.Google Scholar
  43. Solovei I, Gaginskaya E, Hutchison N, Macgregor H (1993) Avian sex chromosomes in the lampbrush form: the ZW lampbrush bivalent from six species of bird. Chromosome Res 1: 153–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Solovei IV, Gaginskaya ER, Macgregor HC (1994) The arrangement and transcription of telomere DNA sequences at the ends of lampbrush chromosomes of birds. Chromosome Res 2: 460–470.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Solovei IV, Joffe BI, Gaginskaya ER, Macgregor HC (1996) Transcription on lampbrush chromosomes of a centromerically localized highly repeated DNA in pigeon (Columba) relates to sequence arrangement. Chromosome Res 4: 588–603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsvetkov AG, Gaginskaya ER (1983) The nuclear matrix of oocytes of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs L.) Tsitologiia 25: 649–654.Google Scholar
  47. Watanabe Y, Nurse P (1999) Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis. Nature 400: 461–464.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Xu H, Beasley M, Verschoor S, Inselman A, Handel MA, McKay MJ (2004) A new role for the mitotic RAD21/SCC1 cohesin in meiotic chromosome cohesion and segregation in the mouse. EMBO Rep 5: 378–384.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alla Krasikova
    • 1
  • Jose Luis Barbero
    • 2
  • Elena Gaginskaya
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Research InstituteSaint-Petersburg State UniversitySaint-PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Department of Immunology and Oncology, Centro Nacional de BiotecnologiaUAM Campus de CantoblancoMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations