In vivo decomposition of 13C-labeled cellulose in the mouse

  • 9 Accesses


The in vivo decomposition of regenerated cellulose in the digestive organs of a mouse was investigated for the first time, in anticipation of food products of regenerated cellulose becoming commercially available. In past studies, plants were grown from their seeds in a labeled CO2 environment and labeled cellulose was then extracted from these plants. The small amounts of the obtained labeled cellulose made the study of in vivo decomposition of cellulose in a digestive tract difficult. In the present study, a new method was developed to overcome this. 13C-labeled natural cellulose (13C-NC) was produced from cultures of Gluconacetobacter xylinus supplemented with 13C-labeled glucose. 13C-labeled regenerated cellulose was then prepared from a hydrolyzed 13C-NC/aqueous cuprammonium solution. 13C NMR revealed that the labeling ratio of 13C to 12C in 13C-labeled cellulose was 48.3% (mol/mol). The degree of in vivo decomposition is defined as the ratio of 13C in 13CO2 in the expired gas from mice to 13C in 13C-labeled cellulose fed to the mice. Although the decomposition rate for regenerated cellulose by enzymatic saccharification was markedly higher than that for natural cellulose under in vitro conditions, the decomposition of regenerated cellulose by mice was similar to that for natural cellulose under in vivo conditions, with decomposition rates of 18.1% (w/w) for regenerated cellulose and 15.4% (w/w) for natural cellulose. These results suggest the potential of regenerated cellulose as a low-calorie food material similar to natural cellulose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3


  1. Brown W, Wikström R (1965) A viscosity-molecular weight relationship for cellulose in cadoxen and a hydrodynamic interpretation. Eur Polym J 1(1):1–10

  2. Budtova T, Navard P (2016) Cellulose in NaOH–water based solvents. Cellulose 23(1):5–55

  3. Cai J, Zhang L, Zhou J, Qi H, Chen H, Kondo T, Chen X, Chu B (2007) Multifilament fibers based on dissolution of cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution: structure and properties. Adv Mater 19:821–825

  4. Dimitrijevich SD, Tatarko M, Gracy RW, Wise GE, Oakford LX (1990) In vivo degradation of oxidized, regenerated cellulose. Carbohydr Res 198:331–341

  5. Elcin AE (2006) In vivo degradation of oxidized acetyl- and ethyl-cellulose sponges. Artif Cells Blood Substit Biotechnol 34:407–418

  6. Hisano J, Goto A, Okajima K (1991) Edible body and process for preparation there of. United States Patents 4994285

  7. Ishihara K, Oyaizu S, Mizunoya W, Fukuchi Y, Yasumoto K, Fushiki T (2002) Use of 13C-labeled glucose for measuring exogenous glucose oxidation in mice. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 66:426–429

  8. Ishihara K, Fukuchi Y, Mizunoya W, Mita Y, Fukuya Y, Fushiki T, Yasumoto K (2003a) Amino acid composition of soybean protein increased postprandial carbohydrate oxidation in diabetic mice. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 67:2505–2511

  9. Ishihara K, Oyaizu S, Fukuchi Y, Mizunoya W, Segawa K, Takahashi M, Mita Y, Fukuya Y, Fushiki T, Yasumoto K (2003b) A soybean peptide isolate diet promotes postprandial carbohydrate oxidation and energy expenditure in type II diabetic mice. J Nutr 133:752–757

  10. Johnson RB, Peterson DA, Tolbert BM (1960) Cellulose metabolism in the rat. J Nutr 72:353–356

  11. Kamide K, Okajima K (1984) Study on the solubility of cellulose in aqueous alkali solution by deuteration IR and 13C NMR. Polym J 16:857–866

  12. Kamide K, Okajima K (1987) Cellulose dope, process for preparation and method for application thereof. United States Patent 4634470

  13. Kamide K, Okajima K (1992) Dissolution of natural cellulose into aqueous alkali solution: role of super-molecular structure of cellulose. Polym J 24:71–86

  14. Kono H, Anai H, Hashimoto H, Shimizu Y (2015) 13C-detection two-dimensional NMR approaches for cellulose derivatives. Cellulose 22:2927–2942

  15. Kono H, Oka C, Kishimoto R, Fujita S (2017) NMR characterization of cellulose acetate: mole fraction of monomers in cellulose acetate determined from carbonyl carbon resonances. Carbohydr Polym 170:23–32

  16. Lai C, Zhang SJ, Wang LQ, Sheng LY, Zhou QZ, Xi TF (2015) The relationship between microstructure and in vivo degradation of modified bacterial cellulose sponges. J Mater Chem B 3:9001–9010

  17. Miyamoto H, Yamane C, Seguchi M, Okajima K (2009) Structure and properties of cellulose starch blend films regenerated from aqueous sodium hydroxide solution. Food Sci Technol Res 15:403–412

  18. Miyamoto H, Yamane C, Seguchi M, Okajima K (2011) Comparison between cellulose blend films prepared from aqueous sodium hydroxide solution and edible films of biopolymers with possible application for new food materials. Food Sci Technol Res 17:21–30

  19. Qi H, Cai J, Zhang L, Nishiyama Y, Rattaz A (2008) Influence of finishing oil on structure and properties of multifilament fibers from cellulose dope in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Cellulose 15:81–89

  20. Sasaki T, Tanaka T, Noriko N, Sato Y, Kainuma K (1979) Correlation between X-ray diffraction measurements of cellulose crystalline structure and the susceptibility to microbial cellulase. Biotechnol Bioeng 21:1031–1042

  21. Schlufter K, Schmauder H-P, Dorn S, Heinze T (2006) Efficient homogeneous chemical modification of bacterial cellulose in the ionic liquid 1-N-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride. Macromol Rapid Commun 27:1670–1676

  22. Schramm M, Gromet Z, Hestrin S (1957) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. 3. Substrates and inhibitors. Biochem J 67:669–679

  23. Southgate DAT, Durnin JVGA (1970) Calorie conversion factors. An experimental reassessment of the factors used in the calculation of the energy value on human diets. Br J Nutr 24:517–535

  24. Struszczyk H, Wawro D, Urbanovski A, Mikolajczyk, Starostka P (2002) Process for producing fibres, films, casings and other products from modified soluble cellulose. European patent EP 1317573 B1

  25. Vehviläinen M, Kamppuri T, Rom M, Janicki J, Ciechanska D, Grönqvist S, Sioika-Aho M, Christoffersson K, Nousiainen P (2008) Effect of wet spinning parameters on the properties of novel cellulosic fibres. Cellulose 15:671–680

  26. Yadav V, Paniliatis BJ, Shi H, Lee K, Cebe P, Kaplan DL (2010) Novel in vivo-degradable cellulose-chitin copolymer from metabolically engineered Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6257–6265

  27. Yamane C, Mori M, Saito M, Okajima K (1996) Structure and mechanical properties of cellulose filament spun from cellulose/aqueous NaOH solution system. Polym J 12:1039–1047

  28. Yamane C, Abe K, Sato M, Miyamoto H (2015) Dissolution of cellulose nanofibers in aqueous sodium hydroxide solution. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 30:92–98

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Chihiro Yamane.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okugawa, A., Ishihara, K., Taniguchi, H. et al. In vivo decomposition of 13C-labeled cellulose in the mouse. Cellulose (2020) doi:10.1007/s10570-020-02968-3

Download citation


  • Regenerated cellulose
  • Bacterial cellulose
  • In vivo decomposition
  • 13C NMR
  • Mouse
  • Detection of 13CO2