Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Microstructural differences between Viscose and Lyocell revealed by in-situ studies of wet and dry fibers

  • Aakash Sharma
  • Shirish Thakre
  • Guruswamy KumaraswamyEmail author
Original Research
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Regenerated cellulose fibers manufactured using Lyocell and Viscose processes exhibit differences in their structural response to mechanical deformation. Here, we study the effect of stretching and stress relaxation on the orientation of crystal and amorphous phases. Our results show that on stretching, orientation in both crystal and amorphous phases increases linearly with strain, correlating with the increase in stress and with the stretching of the crystalline unit cell along the c-axis. On holding after stretching to a particular strain, the stress relaxes logarithmically in time, correlating with a decrease in the strain along the c-axis of the crystal unit cell. The stress relaxation is also correlated with a logarithmic increase in amorphous orientation, while crystalline orientation stays constant. We attribute the stress development during stretching to deformation of the crystal unit cell, while crystal reorientation in the fiber direction results in increase in the crystalline orientation parameter. On holding the fiber at a fixed total strain, the stress relaxes as strain is transferred from crystal to amorphous regions. Thus, the strain on the unit cell c-axis decreases and amorphous orientation increases. There are quantitative differences between the rate of increase in amorphous phase orientation during stress relaxation for Lyocell and Viscose fibers. For dry fibers, Lyocell shows a slower increase in orientation during stress relaxation. On wetting the fibers, their structural response changes qualitatively. We combine wide angle x ray diffraction and birefringence experiments with our model to infer that that on stretching the wet fiber, the crystalline phase is neither strained nor oriented. However, orientation develops in the amorphous phase. During stress relaxation in wet condition, Lyocell fibers shows a faster increase in amorphous orientation than Viscose fibers, in line with the comparison of relaxation time spectra for wet Viscose and Lyocell fibers.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Regenerated cellulose Crystal-amorphous orientation In-situ WAXD Birefringence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

A.S. acknowledges Aditya Birla Science and Technology Company for funding.

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2863_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (328 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 328 kb)

References

  1. Abu-Rous M, Ingolic E, Schuster KC (2006a) Visualisation of the nano-structure of tencel®(Lyocell) and other cellulosics as an approach to explaining functional and wellness properties in textiles. Lenzinger Berichte 85:31–37Google Scholar
  2. Abu-Rous M, Ingolic E, Schuster KC (2006b) Visualisation of the fibrillar and pore morphology of cellulosic fibres applying transmission electron microscopy. Cellulose 13:411–419.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9052-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adusumalli R-B, Muller U, Weber H, Roeder T, Sixta H, Gindl W (2006) Tensile testing of single regenerated cellulose fibres. Macromol Symp 244:83–88.  https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.200651207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akim EL, Naimark NI, Vasilyev BV, Fomenko BA, Ignateva EV, Zhegalova NN (1971) Effect of plasticizing liquid media on the glass transition temperatures of cellulosic materials. Polym Sci USSR 13:2522–2529.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3950(71)90062-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexander LE (1969) X-ray diffraction methods in polymer science. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryant GM, Walter AT (1959) Stiffness and resiliency of wet and dry fibers as a function of temperature. Text Res J 29:211–219.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902900303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cai J, Zhang L, Zhou J, Qi H, Chen H, Kondo T, Chen X, Chu B (2007) Multifilament fibers based on dissolution of cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution: structure and properties. Adv Mater 47:8676–8683.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie800833w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen X, Burger C, Fang D, Ruan D, Zhang L, Hsiao BS, Chu B (2006) X-ray studies of regenerated cellulose fibers wet spun from cotton linter pulp in NaOH/thiourea aqueous solutions. Polymer 47:2839–2848.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.02.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen JH, Guan Y, Wang K, Xu F, Sun RC (2015) Regenerated cellulose fibers prepared from wheat straw with different solvents. Macromol Mater Eng 300:793–801.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201500066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Driemeier C, Calligaris GA (2011) Theoretical and experimental developments for accurate determination of crystallinity of cellulose I materials. J Appl Crystallogr 44:184–192.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889810043955 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Einfeldt J, Meißner D, Kwasniewski A (2003) Contributions to the molecular origin of the dielectric relaxation processes in polysaccharides—the high temperature range. J Non Cryst Solids 320:40–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3093(03)00086-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fink HP, Weigel P, Purz HJ, Ganster J (2001) Structure formation of regenerated cellulose materials from NMMO-solutions. Prog Polym Sci 26:1473–1524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00025-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ganser C, Kreiml P, Morak R, Weber F, Paris O, Schennach R, Teichert C (2015) The effects of water uptake on mechanical properties of viscose fibers. Cellulose 22:2777–2786.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0666-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gindl W, Keckes J (2006) Strain hardening in regenerated cellulose fibres. Compos Sci Technol 66:2049–2053.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gindl W, Martinschitz KJ, Boesecke P, Keckes J (2006) Orientation of cellulose crystallites in regenerated cellulose fibres under tensile and bending loads. Cellulose 13:621–627.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-006-9074-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hermans JJ, Hermans PH, Vermaas D, Weidinger A (1946) Quantitative evaluation of orientation in cellulose fibres from the X-Ray fibre diagram. Recl des Trav Chim des Pays-Bas 65:427–447.  https://doi.org/10.1002/recl.19460650605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiang G, Huang W, Li L, Wang X, Pang F, Zhang Y, Wang H (2012a) Structure and properties of regenerated cellulose fibers from different technology processes. Carbohydr Polym 87:2012–2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jiang G, Yuan Y, Wang B, Yin X, Mukuze KS, Huang W, Zhang Y, Wang H (2012b) Analysis of regenerated cellulose fibers with ionic liquids as a solvent as spinning speed is increased. Cellulose 19:1075–1083.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9716-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim DB (2005) Dry jet-wet spinning of cellulose/N-methylmorpholine N-oxide hydrate solutions and physical properties of lyocell fibers. Text Res J 75:331–341.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517505054852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klemm D, Philipp B, Heinze T, Heinze U, Wagenknecht W (1998) Comprehensive cellulose chemistry volume fundamentals and analytical methods. Wiley, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kong K, Eichhorn SJ (2005) The influence of hydrogen bonding on the deformation micromechanics of cellulose fibers the influence of hydrogen bonding on the deformation micromechanics of cellulose fibers. J Macromol Sci Part B Phys 44:1123–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222340500324597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kong K, Davies RJ, McDonald MA, Young RJ, Wilding MA, Ibbett RN, Eichhorn SJ (2007) Influence of domain orientation on the mechanical properties of regenerated cellulose fibers. Biomacromol 8:624–630.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060877b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kreze T, Stana-Kleinschek K, Ribitsch V (2001a) The sorption behaviour of cellulose fibres. Lenzinger Berichte 80:28–33Google Scholar
  24. Kreze T, Strnad S, Stana-Kleinschek K, Ribitsch V (2001b) Influence of aqueous medium on mechanical properties of conventional and new environmentally friendly regenerated cellulose fibers. Mater Res Innov 4:107–114.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s100190000089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kreze T, Jeler S, Strnad S (2003) Correlation between structure characteristics and adsorption properties of regenerated cellulose fibers. Mater Res Innov 5:277–283.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10019-002-0162-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumaraswamy G, Verma RK, Kornfield JA, Yeh F, Hsiao BS (2004) Shear-enhanced crystallization in isotactic polypropylene. In-situ synchrotron SAXS and WAXD. Macromolecules 37:9005–9017.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma035840n CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lavanya DKPK, Dixit M, Raavi PK, Krishna LNV (2011) Sources of cellulose and their applications—a review. Int J DRUG Formul Res 2:19–38Google Scholar
  28. Lenz J, Schurz J, Wrentschur E (1993) Properties and structure of solvent-spun and viscose-type fibres in the swollen state. Colloid Polym Sci 271:460–468.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00657390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lenz J, Schurz J, Wrentschur E (1994) On the elongation mechanism of regenerated cellulose fibres. Holzforschung 48:72–76.  https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1994.48.s1.72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morehead FF, Sisson WA (1945) Skin effect in viscose rayon. Text Res J 15:443–450.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051754501501201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Müller M, Riekel C, Vuong R, Chanzy H (2000) Skin/core micro-structure in viscose rayon fibres analysed by X-ray microbeam and electron diffraction mapping. Polymer 41:2627–2632.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-3861(99)00433-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peng S, Shao H, Hu X (2003) Lyocell fibers as the precursor of carbon fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 90:1941–1947.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.12879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Röder T, Moosbauer J, Wöss K, Schlader S, Kraft G (2013) Man-made cellulose fibres—a comparison based on morphology and mechanical properties. Lenzinger Berichte 91:7–12Google Scholar
  34. Sharma A, Kumaraswamy G, Thakre S (2018) Modeling the universal viscoelastic response of polymer fibers. Phys Rev Mater 2:062601.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.062601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharma A, Nagarkar S, Thakre S, Kumaraswamy G (2019a) Structure—property relations in regenerated cellulose fibers: comparison of fibers manufactured using viscose and lyocell processes. Cellulose 26:3655–3669.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02352-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharma A, Sen D, Thakre S, Kumaraswamy G (2019b) Characterizing microvoids in regenerated cellulose fibers obtained from viscose and lyocell processes. Macromolecules 52:3987–3994.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.9b00487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stana-Kleinschek K, Ribitsch V, Kreže T, Sfiligoj-Smole M, Peršin Z (2003) Correlation of regenerated cellulose fibres morphology and surface free energy components. Lenzinger Berichte 82:83–95Google Scholar
  38. Stein RS (1958) The X-ray diffraction, birefringence, and infrared dichroism of stretched polyethylene. III. Biaxial orientation. J Polym Sci 31:335–343.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1958.1203112310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Szcześniak L, Rachocki A, Tritt-Goc J (2008) Glass transition temperature and thermal decomposition of cellulose powder. Cellulose 15:445–451.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9192-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor GR, Darin SR (1955) Birefringence and crystallization in elastomers. J Appl Phys 26:1075–1079.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1722153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Woodings C (2001) Regenerated cellulose fibres. Woodhead Publishing Limited, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang L, Ruan D, Zhou J (2001) Structure and properties of regenerated cellulose films prepared from cotton linters in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:5923–5928.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0010417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang S, Chen C, Duan C, Hu H, Li H (2018) Regenerated cellulose by the Lyocell process, a brief review of the process and properties. BioResources 13(2):4577–4592Google Scholar
  44. Zhou S, Tashiro K, Hongo T, Shirataki H, Yamane C, Ii T (2001) Influence of water on structure and mechanical properties of regenerated cellulose studied by an organized combination of infrared spectra, X-ray diffraction, and dynamic viscoelastic data measured as functions of temperature and humidity. Macromolecules 34:1274–1280.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma001507x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIR-National Chemical LaboratoryPuneIndia
  2. 2.Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR)GhaziabadIndia
  3. 3.Fiber and Textiles, Aditya Birla Science and Technology Company Pvt. LtdNavi MumbaiIndia
  4. 4.Chemical Engineering DepartmentIndian Institute of Technology BombayPowai, MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations