Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–14 | Cite as

Green approach for the activation and functionalization of jute fibers through ball milling

  • Rocio GallegoEmail author
  • Carmen C. Piras
  • Laurens A. J. Rutgeerts
  • Susana Fernandez-Prieto
  • Wim M. De Borggraeve
  • Jose M. Franco
  • Johan Smets
Original Research
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

As well known, cellulose fibers, defibrillated/activated in different degrees or even chemically modified, can be employed as additives in matrixes of different nature with the aim of modulating some properties such as the mechanical resistance, rheological behavior or hydrophobicity of the product. Consequently, there is an increasing interest in the incorporation of these materials in a wide variety of products, being necessary the development of green methodologies for their chemical modification. The objective of this work is the use of the ball milling technology as tool for the activation and chemical modification of cellulose fibers, specifically of cellulosic material from jute. The traditional method used to date for the NCO-functionalization of cellulose fibers requires a solvent as reaction medium, the action of a catalyst and a previous stage of mercerization to boost the reactivity of the fibers. Accordingly to the former, jute fibers were NCO-functionalized, on one side, evading previous mercerization and, on other side, applying two different alkali-based activation pre-treatments that lead to materials with different crystallinity index. In addition to this, and after having optimized milling conditions, both activation and NCO-functionalization were successfully carried out in a planetary ball mill avoiding solvent, catalyst and previous alkalization. Cellulose fibers esterification was successfully implemented over already ball milled cellulosic material, showing that activation and chemical modification do not need to be performed at the same time. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy provided the follow-up of each reaction and the impact of ball milling on the fibers was analyzed by hydrodynamic diameter measurements. Thus, it is demonstrated that ball milling can be proposed as an efficient and environmentally friendly methodology for the activation and/or functionalization of cellulose fibers.

Graphic abstract

Keywords

Cellulose Jute fibers Ball milling Isocyanate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is part of the research project Intelligent Structuring Systems for Complex Flowing Products sponsored by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program for research, technological development and demonstration under Grant Agreement no. 612330. The authors gratefully acknowledge its financial support. The authors also acknowledge the support of Celesa for jute fibers samples supply, and Steff Van Loy and the department of Chemical Engineering of KU Leuven for the use of the ball mill.

References

  1. Ago M, Endo T, Hirotsu T (2004) Crystalline transformation of native cellulose from cellulose I to cellulose ID polymorph by a ball-milling method with a specific amount of water. Cellulose 11(2):163–167.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CELL.0000025423.32330.fa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ago M, Endo T, Okajima K (2007) Effect of solvent on morphological and structural change of cellulose under ball-milling. Polym J 39:435.  https://doi.org/10.1295/polymj.PJ2006096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves Fidelis ME, Castro Pereira TV, Martins Gomes OdF, de Andrade Silva F, Toledo Filho RD (2013) The effect of fiber morphology on the tensile strength of natural fibers. J Mater Res Technol 2(2):149–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2013.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrakhiz FZ, Elachaby M, Bouhfid R, Vaudreuil S, Essassi M, Qaiss A (2012) Mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene reinforced with alfa fiber under different chemical treatment. Mater Des 35:318–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avolio R, Bonadies I, Capitani D, Errico ME, Gentile G, Avella M (2012) A multitechnique approach to assess the effect of ball milling on cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 87(1):265–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baheti V, Abbasi R, Militky J (2012a) Ball milling of jute fibre wastes to prepare nanocellulose. World J Eng 9(1):45–50.  https://doi.org/10.1260/1708-5284.9.1.45 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baheti V, Marsalkova M, Rehan A, Militký J (2012b) Comparison of wet milling action for fibrous and solid materials. Fibres Text 19:3–7Google Scholar
  8. Beyene D, Chae M, Dai J, Danumah C, Tosto F, Demesa AG, Bressler DC (2018) Characterization of cellulase-treated fibers and resulting cellulose nanocrystals generated through acid hydrolysis. Materials 11(8):1272.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081272 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M (2003) Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:519–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borysiak S, Doczekalska B (2005) X-ray diffraction study of pine wood treated with NaOH. Fibers Text East Eur 13(5):87–89Google Scholar
  11. Božič M, Elschner T, Tkaučič D, Bračič M, Hribernik S, Kleinschek KS, Kargl R (2018) Effect of different surface active polysaccharide derivatives on the formation of ethyl cellulose particles by the emulsion-solvent evaporation method. Cellulose 25(12):6901–6922.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2062-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brito BSL, Pereira FV, Putaux JL, Jean B (2012) Preparation, morphology and structure of cellulose nanocrystals from bamboo fibers. Cellulose 19(5):1527–1536.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9738-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cao X, Ding B, Yu J, Al-Deyab SS (2012) Cellulose nanowhiskers extracted from TEMPO-oxidized jute fibers. Carbohydr Polym 90(2):1075–1080.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.06.046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrillo F, Colom X, Suñol JJ, Saurina J (2004) Structural FTIR analysis and thermal characterisation of lyocell and viscose-type fibres. Eur Polym J 40(9):2229–2234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diop CIK, Tajvidi M, Bilodeau MA, Bousfield DW, Hunt JF (2017) Evaluation of the incorporation of lignocellulose nanofibrils as sustainable adhesive replacement in medium density fiberboards. Ind Crop Prod 109:27–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dutta S, Kim J, Ide Y, Kim JH, Hossain MSA, Bando Y, Yamauchi Y, Wu KCW (2017) 3D network of cellulose-based energy storage devices and related emerging applications. Mater Horiz 4:522–545.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6mh00500d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallego R, Arteaga JF, Valencia C, Franco JM (2013a) Chemical modification of methyl cellulose with HMDI to modulate the thickening properties in castor oil. Cellulose 20(1):495–507.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9803-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallego R, Arteaga JF, Valencia C, Franco JM (2013b) Rheology and thermal degradation of isocyanate-functionalized methyl cellulose-based oleogels. Carbohydr Polym 98(1):152–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallego R, Arteaga JF, Valencia C, Díaz MJ, Franco JM (2015) Gel-like dispersions of hmdi-cross-linked lignocellulosic materials in castor oil: toward completely renewable lubricating grease formulations. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3(9):2130–2141.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00389 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaudreault R, Van de Ven TGM, Whitehead MA (2005) Mechanisms of flocculation with poly(ethylene oxide) and novel cofactors. Colloid Surf A 268(1):131–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.04.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghali L, Aloui M, Zidi M, Bendaly H, M’Sahli S, Sakli F (2011) Effect of chemical modification of luffa cylindrica fibers on the mechanical and hygrothermal behaviours of polyester/luffa composites. BioResources 6(4):3836–3849Google Scholar
  22. Gong J, Li J, Xu J, Xiang Z, Mo L (2017) Research on cellulose nanocrystals produced from cellulose sources with various polymorphs. RSC Adv 7(53):33486–33493.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA06222B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gorrasi G, Sorrentino A (2015) Mechanical milling as a technology to produce structural and functional bio-nanocomposites. Green Chem 17(5):2610–2625.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5GC00029G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hansen CM, Björkman A (1998) The ultrastructure of wood from a solubility parameter point of view. Holzforschung 52(4):335–344.  https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1998.52.4.335 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hideno A (2016) Comparison of the thermal degradation properties of crystalline and amorphous cellulose, as well as treated lignocellulosic biomass. BioResources 11(3):6309–6319.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.11.3.6309-6319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu H, Li H, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Huang Z, Huang A, Zhu Y, Qin X, Lin B (2015) Green mechanical activation-assisted solid phase synthesis of cellulose esters using a co-reactant: effect of chain length of fatty acids on reaction efficiency and structure properties of products. RSC Adv 5(27):20656–20662.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA02393A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang G, Wang P (2017) Effects of preparation conditions on properties of rigid polyurethane foam composites based on liquefied bagasse and jute fibre. Polym Test 60:266–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.04.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jähn A, Schröder MW, Füting M, Schenzel K, Diepenbrock W (2002) Characterization of alkali treated flax fibres by means of FT Raman spectroscopy and environmental scanning electron microscopy. Spectrochim Acta A 58(10):2271–2279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-1425(01)00697-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khan AS, Man Z, Bustam MA, Kait CF, Khan MI, Muhammad N, Nasrullah A, Ullah Z, Ahmad P (2016) Impact of ball-milling pretreatment on pyrolysis behavior and kinetics of crystalline cellulose. Waste Biomass Valoris 7(3):571–581.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-015-9460-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim JT, Netravali AN (2010) Mercerization of sisal fibers: effect of tension on mechanical properties of sisal fiber and fiber-reinforced composites. Compos Part A Appl S 41(9):1245–1252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ling Z, Wang T, Makarem M, Santiago Cintrón M, Cheng HN, Kang X, Bacher M, Potthast A, Rosenau T, King H, Delhom CD, Nam S, Edwards JV, Kim SH, Xu F, French AD (2019) Effects of ball milling on the structure of cotton cellulose. Cellulose 26(1):305–328.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-02230-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu XY, Dai GC (2007) Surface modification and micromechanical properties of jute fiber mat reinforced polypropylene composites. Express Polym Lett 1(5):299–307.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.43 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu Y, Hu H (2008) X-ray diffraction study of bamboo fibers treated with NaOH. Fiber Polym 9(6):735–739.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-008-0115-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. López Durán V, Larsson PA, Wågberg L (2018) Chemical modification of cellulose-rich fibres to clarify the influence of the chemical structure on the physical and mechanical properties of cellulose fibres and thereof made sheets. Carbohydr Polym 182:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. M’Hamed MO (2015) Ball milling for heterocyclic compounds synthesis in green chemistry: a review. Synth Commun 45(22):2511–2528.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2015.1058396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moosakazemi F, Tavakoli Mohammadi MR, Mohseni M, Karamoozian M, Zakeri M (2017) Effect of design and operational parameters on particle morphology in ball mills. Int J Miner Process 165:41–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2017.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moriana R, Vilaplana F, Karlsson S, Ribes A (2014) Correlation of chemical, structural and thermal properties of natural fibres for their sustainable exploitation. Carbohydr Polym 112:422–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.06.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Nemoto S, Ueno T, Watthanaphanit A, Hieda J, Saito N (2017) Crystallinity and surface state of cellulose in wet ball-milling process. J Appl Polym Sci 134(22):44903.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. O’Sullivan AC (1997) Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose 4(3):173–207.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018431705579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Panshin AJ, De Zeeuw C (1980) Textbook of wood technology: structure, identification, properties, and uses of the commercial woods of the United States and Canada. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Paquet O, Krouit M, Bras J, Thielemans W, Belgacem MN (2010) Surface modification of cellulose by PCL grafts. Acta Mater 58(3):792–801.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peponi L, Biagiotti J, Torre L, Kenny JM, Mondragòn I (2008) Statistical analysis of the mechanical properties of natural fibers and their composite materials I. Natural fibers. Polym Compos 29(3):313–320.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Piras CC, Fernández-Prieto S, De Borggraeve WM (2019) Ball milling: a green technology for the preparation and functionalisation of nanocellulose derivatives. Nanoscale Adv.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NA00238J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Qin X, Zhou J, Huang A, Guan J, Zhang Q, Huang Z, Hu H, Zhang Y, Yang M, Wu J, Qina Y, Feng Z (2016) A green technology for the synthesis of cellulose succinate for efficient adsorption of Cd(ii) and Pb(ii) ions. RSC Adv 6(32):26817–26825.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA27280G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rao X, Kuga S, Wu M, Huang Y (2015) Influence of solvent polarity on surface-fluorination of cellulose nanofiber by ball milling. Cellulose 22(4):2341–2348.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0659-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rathore A, Pradhan MK (2017) hybrid cellulose bionanocomposites from banana and jute fibre: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Mater Today Proc 4(2):3942–3951.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ray D, Sarkar BK, Rana AK, Bose NR (2001) Effect of alkali treated jute fibres on composite properties. B Mater Sci 24(2):129–135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02710089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sonia A, Dasan KP (2013) Chemical, morphology and thermal evaluation of cellulose microfibers obtained from Hibiscus sabdariffa. Carbohydr Polym 92(1):668–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Stolle A (2015) Technical implications of organic syntheses in ball mills. In: Stolle A, Ranu B (eds) Ball milling towards green synthesis: applications, projects, challenges. The Royal Society of Chemistry, London, pp 241–276.  https://doi.org/10.1039/9781782621980-00241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stolle A, Szuppa T, Leonhardt SES, Ondruschka B (2011) Ball milling in organic synthesis: solutions and challenges. Chem Soc Rev 40(5):2317–2329.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00195C CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stolle A, Hopfe W, Simon W (2013) Planetary ball mills as innovative reactors in organic synthesis laboratory. Chem Ing Tech 85(6):914–918.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201200087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suwanruji P, Tuechart T, Smitthipong W, Chollakup R (2017) Modification of pineapple leaf fiber surfaces with silane and isocyanate for reinforcing thermoplastic. J Thermoplast Compos 30(10):1344–1360.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705716632860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Takacs L (2002) Self-sustaining reactions induced by ball milling. Prog Mater Sci 47(4):355–414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(01)00002-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tenorio-Alfonso A, Sánchez MC, Franco JM (2017) Preparation, characterization and mechanical properties of bio-based polyurethane adhesives from isocyanate-functionalized cellulose acetate and castor oil for bonding wood. Polym Basel 9(4):132.  https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9040132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tonoli GHD, Mendes RF, Siqueira G, Bras J, Belgacem MN, Savastano H Jr (2013) Isocyanate-treated cellulose pulp and its effect on the alkali resistance and performance of fiber cement composites. Holzforschung 67(8):853–861.  https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2012-0195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Torres FG, Cubillas ML (2005) Study of the interfacial properties of natural fibre reinforced polyethylene. Polym Test 24(6):694–698.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Voisin H, Bergström L, Liu P, Mathew AP (2017) Nanocellulose-based materials for water purification. Nanomater Basel 7(3):57.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nano7030057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yu L, Lin J, Tian F, Li X, Bian F, Wang J (2014) Cellulose nanofibrils generated from jute fibers with tunable polymorphs and crystallinity. J Mater Chem A 2(18):6402–6411.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta00004h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang X, Do MD, Kurniawan L, Qiao GG (2010) Wheat gluten-based renewable and biodegradable polymer materials with enhanced hydrophobicity by using epoxidized soybean oil as a modifier. Carbohydr Res 345(15):2174–2182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2010.07.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of HuelvaHuelvaSpain
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.Brussels Innovation CenterProcter and Gamble Services Company NVStrombeek BeverBelgium
  4. 4.Pro2TecS—Chemical Process and Product Technology Research CenterUniversity of HuelvaHuelvaSpain

Personalised recommendations