Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 531–543 | Cite as

Effect of dopant on the conductivity and stability of three different cotton fabrics impregnated with PEDOT:PSS

  • Fahad Alhashmi AlamerEmail author
  • Nujud M. Badawi
  • Abdullah Alodhayb
  • Rawda M. Okasha
  • Nessrin A. Kattan
Original Research
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

This study has investigated the electrical conductivity (sheet resistance) and morphological properties of dental cotton, textile cotton and gauze cotton after drop casting each type with mixtures of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) as primary dopant and dimethylsulfoxide as secondary dopant to further enhance conductivity. These cottons were chosen because they are representative of the wide range of cottons available in the marketplace. Results show that the dental cotton with 96.82 wt% PEDOT:PSS had a minimum sheet resistance of 0.0615 Ω/□ by comparison with the gauze and textile cottons which showed sheet resistances of 0.5061 Ω/□ (64.79 wt% PEDOT:PSS) and 1.2159 Ω/□ (37.20 wt% PEDOT:PSS) respectively. Further, all sheet resistances were found to be stable over a period of approximately 1 month. The sheet resistances of the conductive cottons were also investigated as a function of temperature in the range from 30 to 100 °C.

Keywords

Cotton Conductive polymer PEDOT:PSS Sheet resistance Metallic behavior 

Notes

References

  1. Alamer FA (2017) A simple method for fabricating highly electrically conductive cotton fabric without metals or nanoparticles, using PEDOT:PSS. J Alloys Compd 702:266–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alamer FA (2018a) Structural and electrical properties of conductive cotton fabrics coated with the composite polyaniline/carbon black. Cellulose 25:2075–2082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alamer FA (2018b) The effects of temperature and frequency on the conductivity and dielectric properties of cotton fabric impregnated with doped PEDOT:PSS. Cellulose 25(10):6221–6230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alamer FA (2019) Capacitance-resistive PEDOT:PSS cotton fabric satisfied Jonscher’s law with index exceeding one. J Electron Mater 48:261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Altinok AS, Üçgül I, Öksüz AU (2014) Production of polyester/polyaniline, cotton/polyaniline composite fabrics an examing electrical characteristic. Tekst Konfeksiyon 24(1):21–25Google Scholar
  6. Anand A, Rani N, Saxena P, Bhandari H, Dhawan SK (2015) Development of polyaniline/zinc oxide nanocomposite impregnated fabric as an electrostatic charge dissipative material. Polym Int 64:1096–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atalay O, Atalay A, Gafford J, Walsh C (2017) A highly sensitive capacitive-based soft pressure sensor based on a conductive fabric and a microporous dielectric layer. Adv Mater Technol 3(1):1700237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bajgar V, Penhaker M, Martinková L, Pavlovic A, Bober P, Trchová M (2016) Cotton fabric coated with conducting polymers and its application in monitoring of carnivorous plant response. Sensors 16:498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bashir T, Fast L, Skrifvars M, Persson NK (2012) Electrical resistance measurement methods and electrical characterization of poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-coated conductive fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 124:2954–2961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cao Y, Kovalev AE, Xiao R, Kim J, Mayer TS, Mallouk T (2008) Electrical transport and chemical sensing properties of individual conducting polymer nanowires. Nano Lett 8(12):4653–4658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen HC, Lee KC, Lin JH, Koch M (2007) Fabrication of conductive woven fabric and analysis of electromagnetic shielding via measurement and empirical equation. Adv Mater Res Switz 184:124–130Google Scholar
  12. Choi CM, Kwon SN, Na SI (2017) Conductive PEDOT:PSS-coated poly-araphenylene terephthalamide thread for highly durable electronic textiles. J Ind Eng Chem 50:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. El-Naggar M, Shaarawy S, Hebeish AA (2018) Multifunctional properties of cotton fabrics coated with in situ synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles capped with date seed extract. Carbohyd Polym 181:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eom J, Jaisutti R, Lee H, Lee W, Heo J, Lee J, Park SK, Kim Y (2017) Highly sensitive textile strain sensors and wireless user-interface devices using all-polymeric conducting fibers. ACS Appl Mater Inter 9(11):10190–10197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gong F, Meng C, He J, Don X (2018) Fabrication of highly conductive and multifunctional polyester fabrics by spray-coating with PEDOT:PSS solutions. Prog Org Coat 121:89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hidenori O, Masayoshi I (2003) Spinning and characterization of conducting microfibers. Macromol Rapid Commun 24:261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hiremath RK, Rabinal MK, Mulimani BG (2006) Simple setup to measure electrical properties of polymeric films. Rev Sci Instrum 77:126106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim JY, Jung JH, Lee DE, Joo J (2002) Enhancement of electrical conductivity of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/poly(4-styrenesulfonate) by a change of solvents. Synth Met 126(2):311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirchmeyer S, Reuter K, Simpson J (2007) Poly(3,4-ethylene-dioxythiophene) scientific importance, remarkable properties, and applications. In: Skotheim T, Reynolds J (eds) Handbook of Conducting Polymers, 3rd edn, vol 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 79–100Google Scholar
  20. Meoli D, Plumlee TM (2002) Interactive electronic textile. Text Appar 2:2Google Scholar
  21. Nindiyasari F, Griesshaber E, Zimmermann T, Manian AP, Randow C, Zehbe R, Fernandez-Diaz L, Ziegler A, Fleck C, Schmahl WW (2015) Characterization and mechanical properties investigation of the cellulose/gypsum composite. J Compos Mater 50(5):657–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Okuzaki H, Harashina Y, Yan H (2009) Highly conductive PEDOT/PSS microfibers fabricated by wet-spinning and dip-treatment in ethylene glycol. Eur Polym J 45:256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Otley M, Alamer FA, Guo Y, Santana J, Eren E, Li M, Lombardi J, Sotzing G (2017) Phase segregation of PEDOT:PSS on textile to produce materials of > 10 A mm−2 current carrying capacity. Macromol Mater Eng 302:1600348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pomfret SJ, Adams PN, Comfort NP, Monkman AP (2000) Electrical and mechanical properties of polyaniline fibres produced by a one-step wet spinning process. Polymer 41:2265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ramesh G, Palaniappan S, Basavaiah K (2018) One-step synthesis of PEDOT-PSS-TiO2 by peroxotitanium acid: a highly stable electrode for a supercapacitor. Ionics 24:1475–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roh JS, Chi YS, Nam SW, Kang TJ (2008) Electromagnetic shielding effectiveness of multifunctional metal composite fabrics. Text Res J 78:825–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roh JS, Chi YS, Kang TJ (2009) Thermal insulation properties of multifunctional metal composite fabrics. Smart Mater Struct 18:025018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shi H, Liu C, Jiang Q, Xu J (2015) Effective approaches to improve the electrical conductivity of PEDOT:PSS: a review. Adv Electron Mater 1:1500017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skrifvars M, Soroudi A (2008) Melt spinning of carbon nanotube modified polypropylene for electrically conducting nanocomposite fibres. Solid State Phenom 151:43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wen Y, Xu J (2017) Scientific importance of water-processable PEDOT–PSS and preparation, challenge and new application in sensors of its film electrode: a review. Polym Chem 55(7):1121–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Woltornist SJ, Alamer FA, McDannald A, Jain M, Sotzing GA, Adamson DH (2015) Preparation of conductive graphene/graphite infused fabrics using an interface trapping method. Carbon 18:38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xia Y, Ouyang J (2011) PEDOT:PSS films with significantly enhanced conductivities induced by preferential solvation with cosolvents and their application in polymer photovoltaic cells. J Mater Chem 21:4927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yadav A, Prasad V, Kathe A (2006) Functional finishing in cotton fabrics using zinc oxide nanoparticles. Bull Mater Sci 29:641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yetisen A, Qu H, Manbachi A, Butt H, Dokmeci M, Hinestroza J, Skorobogatiy M, Khademhosseini A, Yu S (2016) Nanotechnology in textiles. ACS Nano 10:3042–3068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zandieh M, Montazer M (2019) Novel conductive polyester using PEDOT:PSS, carbon black nanoparticles stabilized with vinyl acrylate copolymer. Synth Met 247:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zeronian S (2015) Contributions to the chemistry and physics of cotton fibers. AATCC Rev 15(3):36–41Google Scholar
  37. Zhou J, Mulle M, Zhang Y, Xu X, Li E, Han F, Thoroddsen ST, Lubineau G, Mater J (2016) High-ampacity conductive polymer microfibers as fast response wearable heaters and electromechanical actuators. Chem C 4:1238–1249Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fahad Alhashmi Alamer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nujud M. Badawi
    • 1
  • Abdullah Alodhayb
    • 2
  • Rawda M. Okasha
    • 3
  • Nessrin A. Kattan
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Physics, Faculty of Applied ScienceUmm AL-Qura UniversityMakkahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Research Chair for Tribology, Surface, and Interface Sciences, Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Chemistry Department, Faculty of ScienceTaibah UniversityAl-Madinah Al-MunawarahSaudi Arabia
  4. 4.Physics Department, Faculty of ScienceTaibah UniversityAl-Madinah Al-MunawarahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations