Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 285–300 | Cite as

Study on the hydrolysis of cellulose with the regenerable and recyclable multifunctional solid acid as a catalyst and its catalytic hydrolytic kinetics

  • Heng-Xiang Li
  • Xiaohua Zhang
  • Qun Wang
  • Donghua Yang
  • Qing CaoEmail author
  • Li’e Jin
Original Research
  • 152 Downloads

Abstract

The regenerated solid acid (Cl-MCMB-SO3H) catalyst containing bifunctional groups, namely, –SO3H and –Cl, was prepared using mesocarbon microbeads (MCMB) with numerous aromatic constituents. The acidic densities of –SO3H and –Cl in the as-prepared Cl-MCMB-SO3H reached 1.98 and 1.72 mmol/g, respectively. The total reducing sugar (TRS) yield of 70.3% was achieved at 130 °C for 3 h in distilled water with Cl-MCMB-SO3H solid acid as a catalyst. The analysis of hydrolytic kinetic model showed that the activation energy (Ea) of cellulose hydrolysis by using Cl-MCMB-SO3H was 89.4 kJ/mol, which was considerably lower than that of MCMB-SO3H (109.2 kJ/mol). Thus, the existence of –Cl group was not only beneficial in forming hydrogen bonds with cellulose but also aided in reducing the Ea value of cellulose hydrolysis. The TRS yield only decreased by 9.6% with Cl-MCMB-SO3H solid acid after it was recycled five times. More importantly, the TRS yield still reached 70.1% and 69.7% through the first and second Cl-MCMB-SO3H regeneration, respectively, demonstrating the excellent regenerability of the solid acid catalyst.

Graphic abstract

The multifunctional MCMB-solid acid was prepared and used for the catalytic hydrolysis of cellulose, which exhibited excellent catalysis, regenerability, and recyclability performances, and the introduction of –Cl group not only facilitated the formation of hydrogen bonds with cellulose but also dramatically decreased the activation energy.

Keywords

Cellulose hydrolysis Catalysis Multifunctional solid acid Mesocarbon microbeads Hydrolytic kinetic 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful for the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC (No. 51174144), the Key Research and Development Program of Shanxi Province (No. 201703D12111437) and the Graduate Science and Technology Innovation Fund Project of Shanxi. (No. 2019BY059).

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2777_MOESM1_ESM.doc (566 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 565 kb)

References

  1. Akin O, Yuksel A (2016) Novel hybrid process for the conversion of microcrystalline cellulose to value-added chemicals: part 1: process optimization. Cellulose 23:3475–3493Google Scholar
  2. Akin O, Yuksel A (2017) Novel hybrid process for the conversion of microcrystalline cellulose to value-added chemicals: part 2: effect of constant voltage on product selectivity. Cellulose 24:4729–4741Google Scholar
  3. Alonso DM, Bond JQ, Dumesic JA (2010) Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels. Green Chem 12:1493–1513Google Scholar
  4. Bai C, Zhu L, Shen F, Qi X (2016) Black liquor-derived carbonaceous solid acid catalyst for the hydrolysis of pretreated rice straw in ionic liquid. Bioresour Technol 220:656–660PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cantero DA, Bermejo MD, Cocero MJ (2015) Governing chemistry of cellulose hydrolysis in supercritical water. Chemsuschem 8:1026–1033PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Ai X, Huang B, Huang M, Huang Y, Lu Y (2017) Consecutive preparation of hydrochar catalyst functionalized in situ with sulfonic groups for efficient cellulose hydrolysis. Cellulose 24:2743–2752Google Scholar
  7. Cheng J, Qiu Y, Zhang J, Huang R, Yang W, Fan Z (2017) Conversion of lipids from wet microalgae into biodiesel using sulfonated graphene oxide catalysts. Bioresour Technol 244:569–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. de Oliveira Ribeiro WC, da Silva Lima AC, de Araújo Morandim-Giannetti A (2018) Optimizing treatment condition of coir fiber with ionic liquid and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis for future bioethanol production. Cellulose 25:527–536Google Scholar
  9. Dong K, Zhang J, Luo W, Su L, Huang Z (2018) Catalytic conversion of carbohydrates into 5-hydroxymethyl furfural over sulfonated hyper-cross-linked polymer in DMSO. Chem Eng J 334:1055–1064Google Scholar
  10. Fontanals N, Marcé RM, Borrull F, Cormack PAG (2015) Hypercrosslinked materials: preparation, characterisation and applications. Polym Chem 6:7231–7244Google Scholar
  11. Gan L, Zhu J, Lv L (2017) Cellulose hydrolysis catalyzed by highly acidic lignin-derived carbonaceous catalyst synthesized via hydrothermal carbonization. Cellulose 24:5327–5339Google Scholar
  12. Gao Y, Song H, Chen X (2003) Self-sinterability of mesocarbon microbeads (MCMB) for preparation of high-density isotropic carbon. J Mater Sci 38:2209–2213Google Scholar
  13. Goswami M, Meena S, Navatha S, Prasanna Rani KN, Pandey A, Sukumaran RK, Prasad RB, Prabhavathi Devi BL (2015) Hydrolysis of biomass using a reusable solid carbon acid catalyst and fermentation of the catalytic hydrolysate to ethanol. Bioresour Technol 188:99–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu S, Smith TJ, Lou W, Zong M (2014) Efficient hydrolysis of cellulose over a novel sucralose-derived solid acid with cellulose-binding and catalytic sites. J Agric Food Chem 62:1905–1911PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu L, Li Z, Wu Z, Lin L, Zhou S (2016) Catalytic hydrolysis of microcrystalline and rice straw-derived cellulose over a chlorine-doped magnetic carbonaceous solid acid. Ind Crop Prod 84:408–417Google Scholar
  16. Huang Y, Fu Y (2013) Hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose by solid acid catalysts. Green Chem 15:1095–1111Google Scholar
  17. Jiang L, Wu N, Zheng A, Liu A, Zhao Z, Zhang F, He F, Li H (2017) Comprehensive utilization of hemicellulose and cellulose to release fermentable sugars from corncobs via acid hydrolysis and fast pyrolysis. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:5208–5213Google Scholar
  18. Konwar LJ, Mäki-Arvela P, Salminen E, Kumar N, Thakur AJ, Mikkola J-P, Deka D (2015) Towards carbon efficient biorefining: Multifunctional mesoporous solid acids obtained from biodiesel production wastes for biomass conversion. Appl Catal B Environ 176:20–35Google Scholar
  19. Konwar LJ, Samikannu A, Mäki-Arvela P, Boström D, Mikkola J-P (2018) Lignosulfonate-based macro/mesoporous solid protonic acids for acetalization of glycerol to bio-additives. Appl Catal B Environ 220:314–323Google Scholar
  20. Li C, Wang Q, Zhao ZK (2008) Acid in ionic liquid: an efficient system for hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Green Chem 10:177–182Google Scholar
  21. Li T, Shen S, Cai B, Wang Y, Peng X, Li Y (2016) High-performance carbon-based solid acid prepared by environmental and efficient recycling of PVC waste for cellulose hydrolysis. RSC Adv 6:91921–91929Google Scholar
  22. Li H, Xu Z, Yan P, Zhang ZC (2017) A catalytic aldol condensation system enables one pot conversion of biomass saccharides to biofuel intermediates. Green Chem 19:1751–1756Google Scholar
  23. Li HX, Zhang K, Zhang X, Cao Q, Le Jin (2018a) Contributions of ultrasonic wave, metal ions, and oxidation on the depolymerization of cellulose and its kinetics. Renew Energy 126:699–707Google Scholar
  24. Li HX, Zhang X, Wang Q, Zhang K, Cao Q, Le Jin (2018b) Preparation of the recycled and regenerated mesocarbon microbeads-based solid acid and its catalytic behaviors for hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 270:166–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Li Y, Shen S, Wang C, Peng X, Yuan S (2018c) The effect of difference in chemical composition between cellulose and lignin on carbon based solid acids applied for cellulose hydrolysis. Cellulose 25:1851–1863Google Scholar
  26. Lin X, Wu L, Huang S, Qin Y, Qiu X, Lou H (2019) Effect of lignin-based amphiphilic polymers on the cellulase adsorption and enzymatic hydrolysis kinetics of cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 207:52–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu T, Li Z, Li W, Shi C, Wang Y (2013) Preparation and characterization of biomass carbon-based solid acid catalyst for the esterification of oleic acid with methanol. Bioresour Technol 133:618–621PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mika LT, Csefalvay E, Nemeth A (2017) Catalytic conversion of carbohydrates to initial platform chemicals: chemistry and sustainability. Chem Rev 118:505–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mission EG, Quitain AT, Sasaki M, Kida T (2017) Synergizing graphene oxide with microwave irradiation for efficient cellulose depolymerization into glucose. Green Chem 19:3831–3843Google Scholar
  30. Nagalakshmi M, Karthikeyan C, Anusuya N, Brundha C, Basu MJ, Karuppuchamy S (2017) Synthesis of TiO2 nanofiber for photocatalytic and antibacterial applications. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:15915–15920Google Scholar
  31. Ngaosuwan K, Goodwin JG, Prasertdham P (2016) A green sulfonated carbon-based catalyst derived from coffee residue for esterification. Renew Energy 86:262–269Google Scholar
  32. Onda A, Ochi T, Yanagisawa K (2008) Selective hydrolysis of cellulose into glucose over solid acid catalysts. Green Chem 10:1033–1037Google Scholar
  33. Ordomsky VV, Schouten JC, van der Schaaf J, Nijhuis TA (2012) Foam supported sulfonated polystyrene as a new acidic material for catalytic reactions. Chem Eng J 207:218–225Google Scholar
  34. Pan H, Liu X, Zhang H, Yang K, Huang S, Yang S (2017) Multi-SO3H functionalized mesoporous polymeric acid catalyst for biodiesel production and fructose-to-biodiesel additive conversion. Renew Energy 107:245–252Google Scholar
  35. Pang Q, Wang L, Yang H, Jia L, Pan X, Qiu C (2014) Cellulose-derived carbon bearing –Cl and –SO3H groups as a highly selective catalyst for the hydrolysis of cellulose to glucose. RSC Adv 4:41212–41218Google Scholar
  36. Piqueras CM, Cabeza Á, Gallina G, Cantero DA, García-Serna J, Cocero MJ (2017) Online integrated fractionation-hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass using sub- and supercritical water. Chem Eng J 308:110–125Google Scholar
  37. Promdej C, Matsumura Y (2011) Temperature effect on hydrothermal decomposition of glucose in sub- and supercritical water. Ind Eng Chem Res 50:8492–8497Google Scholar
  38. Qi X, Watanabe M, Aida TM, Smith RL (2011) Catalytic conversion of cellulose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in high yields via a two-step process. Cellulose 18:1327–1333Google Scholar
  39. Qin L, Liu L, Li WC, Zhu JQ, Li BZ, Yuan YJ (2016) Evaluation of soluble fraction and enzymatic residual fraction of dilute dry acid, ethylenediamine, and steam explosion pretreated corn stover on the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 209:172–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Saeman JF (1945) Kinetics of wood saccharification-hydrolysis of cellulose and decomposition of sugars in dilute acid at high temperature. Ind Eng Chem 37:43–52Google Scholar
  41. Sasaki M, Fang Z, Fukushima Y, Adschiri T, Arai K (2000) Dissolution and hydrolysis of cellulose in subcritical and supercritical water. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:2883–2890Google Scholar
  42. Sasaki M, Adschiri T, Arai K (2004) Kinetics of cellulose conversion at 25 MPa in sub- and supercritical water. AIChE J 50:192–202Google Scholar
  43. Shen J, Wyman CE (2012) Hydrochloric acid-catalyzed levulinic acid formation from cellulose: data and kinetic model to maximize yields. AIChE J 58:236–246Google Scholar
  44. Shen F, Smith RL, Li L, Yan L, Qi X (2017) Eco-friendly method for efficient conversion of cellulose into levulinic acid in pure water with cellulase-mimetic solid acid catalyst. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:2421–2427Google Scholar
  45. Shen F, Guo T, Bai C, Qiu M, Qi X (2018) Hydrolysis of cellulose with one-pot synthesized sulfonated carbonaceous solid acid. Fuel Process Technol 169:244–247Google Scholar
  46. Shuai L, Pan X (2012) Hydrolysis of cellulose by cellulase-mimetic solid catalyst. Energy Environ Sci 5:6889–6894Google Scholar
  47. Su TC, Fang Z, Zhang F, Luo J, Li XK (2015) Hydrolysis of selected tropical plant wastes catalyzed by a magnetic carbonaceous acid with microwave. Sci Rep 5:17538PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Suganuma S, Nakajima K, Kitano M, Yamaguchi D, Kato H, Hayashi S, Hara M (2008) Hydrolysis of cellulose by amorphous carbon bearing SO3H, COOH, and OH groups. J Am Chem Soc 130:12787–12793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sutarlie L, Yang KL (2013) Hybrid cellulase aggregate with a silica core for hydrolysis of cellulose and biomass. J Colloid Interface Sci 411:76–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tyufekchiev M, Duan P, Schmidt-Rohr K, Granados-Focil S, Timko T, Emmert MH (2018) Cellulase-inspired solid acids for cellulose hydrolysis structural explanations for high catalytic activity. ACS Catal 8:1464–1468Google Scholar
  51. Wu B, Wang Z, Gong QM, Song HH, Liang J (2008) Fabrication and mechanical properties of in situ prepared mesocarbon microbead/carbon nanotube composites. Mater Sci Eng A 487:271–277Google Scholar
  52. Wu M, Wang Y, Wang D, Tan M, Li P, Wu W, Tsubaki N (2016) SO3H-modified petroleum coke derived porous carbon as an efficient solid acid catalyst for esterification of oleic acid. J Porous Mater 23:263–271Google Scholar
  53. Yang Q, Pan X (2016) Synthesis and application of bifunctional porous polymers bearing chloride and sulfonic acid as cellulase-mimetic solid acids for cellulose hydrolysis. BioEnergy Res 9:578–586Google Scholar
  54. Yuan S, Li T, Wang Y, Cai B, Wen X, Shen S, Peng X, Li Y (2019) Double-adsorption functional carbon based solid acids derived from copyrolysis of PVC and PE for cellulose hydrolysis. Fuel 237:895–902Google Scholar
  55. Zhang M, Zhou Q, Li A, Shuang C, Wang W, Wang M (2013) A magnetic sorbent for the efficient and rapid extraction of organic micropollutants from large-volume environmental water samples. J Chromatogr A 1316:44–52PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringTaiyuan University of TechnologyTaiyuanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations