Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 4021–4037 | Cite as

Fabrication of hydrophobic cellulosic materials via gas–solid silylation reaction for oil/water separation

  • Lisha Yu
  • Zeming Zhang
  • Hongding Tang
  • Jinping ZhouEmail author
Original Research
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

Development of a simple, green, and universal method for the fabrication of hydrophobic cellulosic materials is of significance for enlarging their applications. Herein, one-step gas–solid reaction for the preparation of hydrophobic cellulosic materials having any shape and size is proposed. The substance can be made hydrophobic, as it is fully exposed to the reactive organosilane vapor. Filter paper (FP), a typical cellulosic material, was selected to study the hydrophobic modification with perfluorooctyltriethoxysilane (PFTS). The results indicated that PFTS was successfully introduced onto the surface of the cellulose fiber. Compared with the pristine FP, the physicochemical properties of the PFTS-modified FP (SFP) were significantly improved. The silane content of SFP was approximately 45–55 mg g−1, and the water contact angle was as large as 146° ± 3° under the proper conditions. SFP retained good chemical stability in harsh conditions of acidic, alkaline and saline solutions that is appropriate in practical environment. It was successfully applied in separating a series of oil/water mixtures with a separation efficiency of over 99%. The flux and separation efficiency remained high even after 30 reuse cycles (99% for chloroform/water mixtures). Moreover, the proposed vapor-based technique has the potential to allow continuous preparation of hydrophobic cellulosic materials with industrial applications.

Graphical abstract

Organosilane vapor-based surface modification is provided to fabricate the hydrophobic cellulosic materials with any shape and size, which has promise in industrial applications.

Keywords

Hydrophobicity Cellulosic materials Gas–solid reaction Organosilane Oil/water separation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51473128 and 51273151).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2355_MOESM1_ESM.docx (4.1 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 4232 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MP4 9683 kb)

References

  1. Baidya A, Ganayee MA, Ravindran SJ, Tam KC, Das SK, Ras RHA, Pradeep T (2017) Organic solvent-free fabrication of durable and multifunctional superhydrophobic paper from waterborne fluorinated cellulose nanofiber building blocks. ACS Nano 11:11091–11099.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b05170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chinga-Carrasco G, Kuznetsova N, Garaeva M, Leirset I, Galiullina G, Kostochko A, Syverud K (2012) Bleached and unbleached MFC nanobarriers: properties and hydrophobisation with hexamethyldisilazane. J Nanopart Res 14:1280.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1280-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cunha AG, Gandini A (2010) Turning polysaccharides into hydrophobic materials: a critical review. Part 1. Cellulose. Cellulose 17:875–889.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-010-9434-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cunha AG, Freire C, Silvestre A, Neto CP, Gandini A, Belgacem MN, Chaussy D, Beneventi D (2010) Preparation of highly hydrophobic and lipophobic cellulose fibers by a straightforward gas–solid reaction. J Colloid Interface Sci 344:588–595.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2009.12.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dong ZQ, Wang BJ, Ma X, Wei YM, Xu ZL (2015) Fas grafted electrospun poly(vinyl alcohol) nanofiber membranes with robust superhydrophobicity for membrane distillation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:22652–22659.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b07454 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duan B, Gao H, He M, Zhang L (2014) Hydrophobic modification on surface of chitin sponges for highly effective separation of oil. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:19933–19942.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am505414y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fadeev AY, McCarthy TJ (2000) Self-assembly is not the only reaction possible between alkyltrichlorosilanes and surfaces: monomolecular and oligomeric covalently attached layers of dichloro- and trichloroalkylsilanes on silicon. Langmuir 16:7268–7274.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la00471z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng J, Nguyen ST, Fan Z, Duong HM (2015) Advanced fabrication and oil absorption properties of super-hydrophobic recycled cellulose aerogels. Chem Eng J 270:168–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huang X, Wang A, Xu X, Liu H, Shang S (2017) Enhancement of hydrophobic properties of cellulose fibers via grafting with polymeric epoxidized soybean oil. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:1619–1627.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarrah K, Hisaindee S, Al-Sayah MH (2018) Preparation of oil sorbents by solvent-free grafting of cellulose cotton fibers. Cellulose 25:4093–4106.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1846-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang F, Hsieh YL (2014) Amphiphilic superabsorbent cellulose nanofibril aerogels. J Mater Chem A 2:6337–6342.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta00743c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiao Y, Wan C, Qiang T, Li J (2016) Synthesis of superhydrophobic ultralight aerogels from nanofibrillated cellulose isolated from natural reed for high-performance adsorbents. Appl Phys A 122:686.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-0194-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jin M, Wang J, Yao X, Liao M, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Jiang L (2011) Underwater oil capture by a three-dimensional network architectured organosilane surface. Adv Mater 23:2861–2864.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201101048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kabusaki D, Okumura H, Nakatani T, Nakatsubo F, Yano H (2016) Surface modification of cellulose nanofibers with alkenyl succinic anhydride for high-density polyethylene reinforcement. Compos A 83:72–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kettunen M, Silvennoinen RJ, Houbenov N, Nykänen A, Ruokolainen J, Sainio J, Pore V, Kemell M, Ankerfors M, Lindström T, Ritala M, Ras RHA, Ikkala O (2011) Photoswitchable superabsorbency based on nanocellulose aerogels. Adv Funct Mater 21:510–517.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201001431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim DY, Nishiyama Y, Kuga S (2002) Surface acetylation of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 9:361–367.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021140726936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim TW, Lee SY, Chun SJ, Doh GH, Paik KH (2010) Effect of silane coupling on the fundamental properties of wood flour reinforced polypropylene composites. J Compos Mater 45:1595–1605.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998310385589 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:3358–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kong L, Wang Q, Xiong S, Wang Y (2014) Turning low-cost filter papers to highly efficient membranes for oil/water separation by atomic-layer-deposition-enabled hydrophobization. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:16516–26522.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie502864u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li X, Wang M, Wang C, Cheng C, Wang X (2014) Facile immobilization of Ag nanocluster on nanofibrous membrane for oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:15272–15282.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am503721k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li S, Huang J, Chen Z, Chen G, Lai Y (2017) A review on special wettability textiles: theoretical models, fabrication technologies and multifunctional applications. J Mater Chem A 5:31–55.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TA07984A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li N, Chen W, Chen G, Wan X, Tian J (2018a) Low-cost, sustainable, and environmentally sound cellulose absorbent with high efficiency for collecting methane bubbles from seawater. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 12:10365–10373.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ascsuschemeng.8b00146 Google Scholar
  23. Li F, Wang Z, Huang S, Pan Y, Zhao X (2018b) Flexible, durable, unconditioned superoleophobic/superhydrophilic surface for controllable transport and oil–water separation. Adv Funct Mater 28:1706867.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201706867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu K, Yao X, Jiang L (2010) ChemInform abstract: recent developments in bioinspired special wettability. Chem Soc Rev 39:3240–3255.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b917112f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu N, Cao Y, Lin X, Chen Y, Feng L, Wei Y (2014) A facile solvent-manipulated mesh for reversible oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interface 6:12821–12826.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am502809h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nguyen ST, Feng J, Le NT, Le ATT, Hoang N, Tan VBC, Duong HM (2013) Cellulose aerogel from paper waste for crude oil spill cleaning. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:18386–18391.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie4032567 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Obaid M, Barakat Nasser AM, Fadali OA, Motlak M, Almajid AA, Khalil KA (2015) Effective and reusable oil/water separation membranes based on modified polysulfone electrospun nanofiber mats. Chem Eng J 259:449–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.07.095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rafieian F, Hosseini M, Jonoobi M, Yu Q (2018) Development of hydrophobic nanocellulose-based aerogel via chemical vapor deposition for oil separation for water treatment. Cellulose 25:4695–4710.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1867-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rao X, Kuga S, Wu M, Huang Y (2015) Influence of solvent polarity on surface-fluorination of cellulose nanofiber by ball milling. Cellulose 22:2341–2348.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0659-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rather AM, Jana N, Hazarika P, Manna U (2017) Sustainable polymeric material for the facile and repetitive removal of oil-spills through the complementary use of both selective-absorption and active-filtration processes. J Mater Chem A 5:2339–23348.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta07982f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Revol JF, Bradford H, Giasson J, Marchessault RH, Gray DG (1992) Helicoidal self-ordering of cellulose microfibrils in aqueous suspension. Int J Biol Macromol 14:170–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-8130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sai H, Fu R, Li X, Xiang J, Li Z, Li F, Zhang T (2015) Surface modification of bacterial cellulose aerogels’ web-like skeleton for oil/water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:7373–7381.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b00846 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Santucci V, Maury F, Senocq F (2010) Vapor phase surface functionalization under ultra violet activation of parylene thin films grown by chemical vapor deposition. Thin Solid Films 518:1675–1681.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2009.11.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shang Y, Si Y, Raza A, Yang L, Mao X, Ding B, Yu J (2012) An in situ polymerization approach for the synthesis of superhydrophobic and superoleophilic nanofibrous membranes for oil–water separation. Nanoscale 4:7847–7854.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2nr33063f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shang W, Huang J, Luo H, Chang PR, Feng J, Xie G (2013) Hydrophobic modification of cellulose nanocrystal via covalently grafting of castor oil. Cellulose 20:179–190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9795-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shi H, He Y, Pan Y, Di H, Zeng G, Zhang L, Zhang C (2016) A modified mussel-inspired method to fabricate TiO2 decorated superhydrophilic PVDF membrane for oil/water separation. J Membr Sci 506:60–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.01.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sun T, Qing G, Su B, Jiang L (2011) Functional biointerface materials inspired from nature. Chem Soc Rev 40:2909–2921.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cs00124d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tai MH, Gao P, Tan BYL, Sun DD, Leckie O (2014) Highly efficient and flexible electrospun carbon–silica nanofibrous membrane for ultrafast gravity-driven oil–water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:9393–9401.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am501758c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tao S, Wang Y, An Y (2011) Superwetting monolithic SiO2 with hierarchical structure for oil removal. J Mater Chem 21:11901–11907.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm12141c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taokaew S, Phisalaphong M, Newby BMZ (2015) Modification of bacterial cellulose with organosilanes to improve attachment and spreading of human fibroblasts. Cellulose 22:2311–2324.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0651-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang SH, Li M, Lu QH (2010) Filter paper with selective absorption and separation of liquids that differ in surface tension. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:677–683.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am900704u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang Y, Wang X, Heim LO, Breitzke H, Buntkowsky G, Zhang K (2015a) Superhydrophobic surfaces from surface-hydrophobized cellulose fibers with stearoyl groups. Cellulose 22:289–299.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0505-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang S, Peng X, Zhong L, Tan J, Jing S, Cao X, Chen W, Liu C, Sun R (2015b) An ultralight, elastic, cost-effective, and highly recyclable superabsorbent from microfibrillated cellulose fibers for oil spillage cleanup. J Mater Chem A 3:8772–8781.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta07057g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang S, Lu A, Zhang L (2016) Recent advances in regenerated cellulose materials. Prog Polym Sci 53:169–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wu Z, Li C, Liang H, Chen J, Yu S (2013) Ultralight, flexible, and fire-resistant carbon nanofiber aerogels from bacterial cellulose. Angew Chem Int Ed 125:2997–3001.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201209676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Xiong S, Kong L, Huang J, Chen X, Wang Y (2015) Atomic-layer-deposition-enabled nonwoven membranes with hierarchical ZnO nanostructures for switchable water/oil separations. J Membr Sci 493:478–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu Z, Zhao Y, Wang H, Zhou H, Qin C, Wang X, Lin T (2016) Fluorine-free superhydrophobic coatings with pH-induced wettability transition for controllable oil–water separation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:5661–5667.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b11720 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yang CY, Chuang SI, Lo YH, Cheng HM, Duh JG, Chen PY (2016) Stalagmite-like self-cleaning surfaces prepared by-silanization of plasma-assisted metal-oxide nanostructures. J Mater Chem A 4:3406–3414.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta10469f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yuan S, Strobbe D, Kruth JP, Puyvelde PV, Bruggen BVD (2017) Super-hydrophobic 3D printed polysulfone membranes with a switchable wettability by self-assembled candle soot for efficient gravity-driven oil/water separation. J Mater Chem A 5:24401–25409.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta08836a Google Scholar
  50. Zhang F, Sautter K, Larsen AM, Findley DA, Davis RC, Samha H, Linford MR (2010) Chemical vapor deposition of three aminosilanes on silicon dioxide: surface characterization, stability, effects of silane concentration, and cyanine dye adsorption. Langmuir 26:14648–14654.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la102447y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang M, Wang CY, Wang SL, Shi YL, Li J (2012) Fabrication of coral-like superhydrophobic coating on filter paper for water–oil separation. Appl Surf Sci 261:764–769.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.08.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang Z, Sèbe G, Rentsch D, Zimmermann T, Tingaut P (2014) Ultralightweight and flexible silylated nanocellulose sponges for the selective removal of oil from water. Chem Mater 26:2659–2668.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm5004164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zheng Q, Cai Z, Gong S (2014) Green synthesis of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-cellulose nanofibril (CNF) hybrid aerogels and their use as superabsorbents. J Mater Chem A 2:3110–3118.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta14642a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zheng T, Li A, Li Z, Hu W, Shao L, Lu L, Cao Y, Chen Y (2017) Mechanical reinforcement of a cellulose aerogel with nanocrystalline cellulose as reinforcer. RSC Adv 7:34461–34465.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra04904h CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Biomedical Polymers, Ministry of EducationWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry and Engineering Research Center of Organosilicon Compounds & Materials, Ministry of EducationWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations