Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 3955–3972 | Cite as

The self-assembly and formation mechanism of regenerated cellulose films for photocatalytic degradation of C.I. Reactive Blue 19

  • Ji Fan
  • Dan Yu
  • Wei Wang
  • Baojiang LiuEmail author
Original Research
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, a simple method has been developed to fabricate flexible fiber materials with excellent visible light response. Firstly, polydopamine (PDA) layer was deposited on the cotton fibers to functionize cotton fibers. Then, a uniformly dense layer of silver and tungsten trioxide nanoparticles was obtained on cotton fabric by reduction of PDA. The deposition of PDA provided a media for the Ag–WO3 photocatalyst to be loaded with good adhension. The results showed that the prepared cotton (C)-PDA–Ag–WO3(c) composite photocatalytic material exhibited excellent photocatalytic performance with 98% degradation efficiency of RB-19 dye solution within 180 min under visible light irradiation. Moreover, the degradation rate constants were 52.43 ×, 35.73 ×, 12.01 × and 3.77 × higher than those of raw cotton, C-PDA, C-PDA-Ag and C-PDA-Ag–WO3(a), respectively. The free radical trapping experiments showed that h+, ·OH and ·O2 were important active species in the photocatalytic process. Based on the characterizations of the system, the possible photocatalytic reaction mechanism of the C-PDA-Ag–WO3(c) composite photocatalytic material was proposed. This paper provided a new perspective for the preparation of high catalytic performance visible light responsive flexible fiber materials applied in the degradation of dye wastewater.

Keywords

C-PDA-Ag–WO3(c) Photocatalytic fabric Photodegradation Visible light Recycle and reuse 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project of Zhejiang Province China (LGG18E030002), the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (17ZR1400400) and Guangxi Innovation Drive Development Fund (AA17204076).

References

  1. Adhikari R, Gyawali G, Sekino T, Lee SW (2013) Microwave assisted hydrothermal synthesis of Ag/AgCl/WO3 photocatalyst and its photocatalytic activity under simulated solar light. J Solid State Chem 197:560–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ghafri B, Bora T, Sathe P, Dobrestov S, Al-Abri M (2018) Photocatalytic microbial removal and degradation of organic contaminants of water using PES fibers. Appl Catal B 233:136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antoniadou M, Daskalaki VM, Balis N, Kondarides DI, Kordulis C, Lianos P (2011) Photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis using (CdS-ZnS)/TiO2 combined photocatalysts. Appl Catal B 107:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyadjiev SI et al (2017) TiO2/ZnO and ZnO/TiO(2) core/shell nanofibers prepared by electrospinning and atomic layer deposition for photocatalysis and gas sensing. Appl Surf Sci 424:190–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bu Y, Chen Z, Sun C (2015) Highly efficient Z-scheme Ag3PO4/Ag/WO3-x photocatalyst for its enhanced photocatalytic performance. Appl Catal B 179:363–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao X et al (2018) A photochromic composite with enhanced carrier separation for the photocatalytic activation of benzylic C–H bonds in toluene. Nat Catal 1:704–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen J, Xio X, Wang Y, Ye Z (2019) Ag nanoparticles decorated WO3/g-C3N4 2D/2D heterostructure with enhanced photocatalytic activity for organic pollutants degradation. Appl Surf Sci 467:1000–1010Google Scholar
  8. Cheng W, He J, Dettelbach KE, Johnson NJJ, Sherbo RS, Berlinguette CP (2018) Photodeposited amorphous oxide films for electrochromic windows. Chem 4:821–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ding J, Chai Y, Liu Q, Liu X, Ren J, Dai W-L (2016) Selective deposition of silver nanoparticles onto WO3 nanorods with different facets: the correlation of facet-induced electron transport preference and photocatalytic activity. J Phys Chem C 120:4345–4353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ding J, Zhang L, Liu Q, Dai W-L, Guan G (2017) Synergistic effects of electronic structure of WO3 nanorods with the dominant 001 exposed facets combined with silver size-dependent on the visible-light photocatalytic activity. Appl Catal B 203:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding K, Wang W, Yu D, Gao P, Liu B (2018) Facile formation of flexible Ag/AgCl/polydopamine/cotton fabric composite photocatalysts as an efficient visible-light photocatalysts. Appl Surf Sci 454:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dong R, Tian B, Zeng C, Li T, Wang T, Zhang J (2013) Ecofriendly synthesis and photocatalytic activity of uniform cubic Ag@AgCl plasmonic photocatalyst. J Phys Chem C 117:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong Y-z, Xue Y-s, ang W-wY, SuY You H-m (2019) Visible light driven CdS/WO3 inverse opals with enhanced RhB degradation activity. Colloids Surf A 561:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duan Y, Zhang M, Wang L, Wang F, Yang L, Li X, Wang C (2017) Plasmonic Ag–TiO2−x nanocomposites for the photocatalytic removal of NO under visible light with high selectivity: the role of oxygen vacancies. Appl Catal B 204:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elmalem E, Saunders AE, Costi R, Salant A, Banin U (2008) Growth of photocatalytic CdSe-Pt nanorods and nanonets. Adv Mater 20:4312–4317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao H, Sun Y, Zhou J, Xu R, Duan H (2013) Mussel-inspired synthesis of polydopamine-functionalized graphene hydrogel as reusable adsorbents for water purification. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:425–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gondal MA, Suliman MA, Dastageer MA, Chuah G-K, Basheer C, Yang D, Suwaiyan A (2016) Visible light photocatalytic degradation of herbicide (Atrazine) using surface plasmon resonance induced in mesoporous Ag–WO3/SBA-15 composite. J Mol Catal A Chem 425:208–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Han S, Zhang X, Yu Q, Lei L (2012) Preparation of TiO2/ITO film electrode by AP-MOCVD for photoelectrocatalytic application. Sci China Chem 55:2462–2470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. He C, Li X, Li Y, Li J, Xi G (2017) Large-scale synthesis of Au–WO3 porous hollow spheres and their photocatalytic properties. Catal Sci Technol 7:3702–3706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Higashi M, Domen K, Abe R (2011) Fabrication of efficient TaON and Ta3N5 photoanodes for water splitting under visible light irradiation. Energy Environ Sci 4:4138–4147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu C, Peng T, Hu X, Nie Y, Zhou X, Qu J, He H (2010a) Plasmon-induced photodegradation of toxic pollutants with Ag–Agl/Al2O3 under visible-light irradiation. J Am Chem Soc 132:857–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu L et al (2010b) Stretchable, porous, and conductive energy textiles. Nano Lett 10:708–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu X, Mu L, Wen J, Zhou Q (2012) Covalently synthesized graphene oxide-aptamer nanosheets for efficient visible-light photocatalysis of nucleic acids and proteins of viruses. Carbon 50:2772–2781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hu H, Chang M, Wang X, Chen D (2017) Cotton fabric-based facile solar photocatalytic purification of simulated real dye wastes. J Mater Sci 52:9922–9930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hu T, Li P, Zhang J, Liang C, Dai K (2018) Highly efficient direct Z-scheme WO3/CdS-diethylenetriamine photocatalyst and its enhanced photocatalytic H2 evolution under visible light irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 442:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ji L W, Lin L, Yu D, Gao P, Wang W, Liu B J (2018) Solvent-free in situ synthesis of flexible BiVO4/Bi2WO6: MWCNT, PET composites with superior mineralization potential for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Mater Lett 220:94–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kim JH, Lee M, Park CB (2014) Polydopamine as a biomimetic electron gate for artificial photosynthesis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53:6364–6368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li S, Zhang L, Wang H, Chen Z, Hu J, Xu K, Liu J (2014) Ta3N5-Pt nonwoven cloth with hierarchical nanopores as efficient and easily recyclable macroscale photocatalysts. Sci Rep 4:3978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Q, Duan G, Luo J, Liu X (2018) Ultrasonic-assisted synthesis of plasmonic Z-scheme Ag/AgCl/WO3-nanoflakes photocatalyst in geothermal water with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performance. J Energy Chem 27:826–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Z et al (2019) Facile synthesis of WO3 nanocuboids from tungsten trioxide powder and hydrogen peroxide. Mater Lett 236:197–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang Y, Lin S, Liu L, Hu J, Cui W (2015) Oil-in-water self-assembled Ag@AgCl QDs sensitized Bi2WO6: enhanced photocatalytic degradation under visible light irradiation. Appl Catal B 164:192–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Limmer SJ, Chou TP, Cao GZ (2004) A study on the growth of TiO2 nanorods using sol electrophoresis. J Mater Sci 39:895–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu Y, Ai K, Lu L (2014) Polydopamine and its derivative materials: synthesis and promising applications in energy, environmental, and biomedical fields. Chem Rev 114:5057–5115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu BJ, Lin L, Yu D, Sun J, Zhu ZJ, Gao P, Wang W (2018) Construction of fiber-based BiVO4/SiO2/reduced graphene oxide (RGO) with efficient visible light photocatalytic activity. Cellulose 25:1089–1101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Long Y, Wu J, Wang H, Zhang X, Zhao N, Xu J (2011) Rapid sintering of silver nanoparticles in an electrolyte solution at room temperature and its application to fabricate conductive silver films using polydopamine as adhesive layers. J Mater Chem 21:4875–4881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lv H, Liu Y, Tang H, Zhang P, Wang J (2017) Synergetic effect of MoS2 and graphene as cocatalysts for enhanced photocatalytic activity of BiPO4 nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 425:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ma X, Jiang D, Xiao P, Jin Y, Meng S, Chen M (2017) 2D/2D heterojunctions of WO3 nanosheet/K+Ca2Nb3O10 ultrathin nanosheet with improved charge separation efficiency for significantly boosting photocatalysis. Catal Sci Technol 7:3481–3491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maeda K (2011) Photocatalytic water splitting using semiconductor particles: history and recent developments. J Photochem Photobiol C 12:237–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meng Z et al (2015) Morphological and crystal structural control of tungsten trioxide for highly sensitive NO2 gas sensors. J Mater Chem C 3:1134–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Momeni MM, Ghayeb Y (2015) Visible light-driven photoelectrochemical water splitting on ZnO–TiO2 heterogeneous nanotube photoanodes. J Appl Electrochem 45:557–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Momeni MM, Ghayeb Y, Davarzadeh M (2015) Single-step electrochemical anodization for synthesis of hierarchical WO3–TiO2 nanotube arrays on titanium foil as a good photoanode for water splitting with visible light. J Electroanal Chem 739:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Naik AJT, Warwick MEA, Moniz SJA, Blackman CS, Parkin IP, Binions R (2013) Nanostructured tungsten oxide gas sensors prepared by electric field assisted aerosol assisted chemical vapour deposition. J Mater Chem A 1:1827–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pan C, Liu X, Gong K, Mumtaz F, Wang Y (2018) Dopamine assisted PMOXA/PAA brushes for their switchable protein adsorption/desorption. J Mater Chem B 6:556–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Panayotov DA, Frenkel AI, Morris JR (2017) Catalysis and photocatalysis by nanoscale Au/TiO2: perspectives for renewable energy. ACS Energy Lett 2:1223–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paz EC et al (2018) Evaluation of H2O2 electrogeneration and decolorization of Orange II azo dye using tungsten oxide nanoparticle-modified carbon. Appl Catal B 232:436–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ramstedt M, Franklyn P (2010) Difficulties in determining valence for Ag0 nanoparticles using XPS-characterization of nanoparticles inside poly (3-sulphopropyl methacrylate) brushes. Surf Interface Anal 42:855–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schlaich C et al (2018) Mussel-inspired polymer-based universal spray coating for surface modification: fast fabrication of antibacterial and superhydrophobic surface coatings. Adv Mater Interfaces 5:1701254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shi W, Zhang X, Brillet J, Huang D, Li M, Wang M, Shen Y (2016) Significant enhancement of the photoelectrochemical activity of WO3 nanoflakes by carbon quantum dots decoration. Carbon 105:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shirke YM, Mukherjee SP (2017) Selective synthesis of WO3 and W18O49 nanostructures: ligand-free pH-dependent morphology-controlled self-assembly of hierarchical architectures from 1D nanostructure and sunlight-driven photocatalytic degradation. CrystEngComm 19:2096–2105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shuang S, Lv R, Cui X, Xie Z, Zheng J, Zhang Z (2018) Efficient photocatalysis with graphene oxide/Ag/Ag2S–TiO2 nanocomposites under visible light irradiation. RSC Adv 8:5784–5791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sun S, Wang W, Zeng S, Shang M, Zhang L (2010) Preparation of ordered mesoporous Ag/WO3 and its highly efficient degradation of acetaldehyde under visible-light irradiation. J Hazard Mater 178:427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sun J et al (2017) Synthesis of Sb doping hierarchical WO3 microspheres and mechanism of enhancing sensing properties to NO2. J Alloys Compd 692:876–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tauc J (1966) Optical properties and electronic structure of amorphous Ge and Si. Phys Status Solidi 3:37–46Google Scholar
  54. Tian Y, Zhao Y, Gong C, Chai Y (2012) Effect of doping transition metal ions on photocatalysis of TiO2 nanowires. Appl Mech Mater 217–219:203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vallejos S et al (2011) Au nanoparticle-functionalised WO3 nanoneedles and their application in high sensitivity gas sensor devices. Chem Commun 47:565–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Varma RS, Thorat N, Fernandes R, Kothari DC, Patel N, Miotello A (2016) Dependence of photocatalysis on charge carrier separation in Ag-doped and decorated TiO2 nanocomposites. Catal Sci Technol 6:8428–8440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang C, Shao C, Wang L, Zhang L, Li X, Liu Y (2009) Electrospinning preparation, characterization and photocatalytic properties of Bi2O3 nanofibers. J Colloid Interface Sci 333:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang W, Li R, Tian M, Liu L, Zou H, Zhao X, Zhang L (2013) Surface silverized meta-aramid fibers prepared by bio-inspired poly(dopamine) functionalization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:2062–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang Z, Hu M, Wei Y, Liu J, Qin Y (2016) Low-temperature NO2-sensing properties and morphology-controllable solvothermal synthesis of tungsten oxide nanosheets/nanorods. Appl Surf Sci 362:525–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang P, Lu N, Su Y, Liu N, Yu H, Li J, Wu Y (2017a) Fabrication of WO3@g-C3N4 with core@shell nanostructure for enhanced photocatalytic degradation activity under visible light. Appl Surf Sci 423:197–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang Y et al (2017b) Simultaneous synthesis of WO3−x quantum dots and bundle-like nanowires using a one-pot template-free solvothermal strategy and their versatile applications. Small 13:1603689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang X, Lu W, Chen Y, Li N, Zhu Z, Wang G, Chen W (2018a) Effective elimination of antibiotics over hot-melt adhesive sheath-core polyester fiber supported graphitic carbon nitride under solar irradiation. Chem Eng J 335:82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang W, Lin L, Yu D, Baojiang Liu (2018b) Study on the photocatalytic performance of BiVO4/Bi2WO6/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites in one-pot hydrothermal process. J nanosci Nanotechnol 11:7691–7702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wenderich K, Mul G (2016) Methods, mechanism, and applications of photodeposition in photocatalysis: a review. Chem Rev 116:14587–14619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Xie R, Zhang L, Xu H, Zhong Y, Sui X, Mao Z (2015) Fabrication of Z-scheme photocatalyst Ag–AgBr@Bi20TiO32 and its visible-light photocatalytic activity for the degradation of isoproturon herbicide. J Mol Catal A Chem 406:194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Xu H, Shi X, Ma H, Lv Y, Zhang L, Mao Z (2011) The preparation and antibacterial effects of dopa-cotton/AgNPs. Appl Surf Sci 257:6799–6803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yang S-F, Niu C-G, Huang D-W, Zhang H, Lianga C, Zeng G-M (2017) SrTiO3 nanocubes decorated with Ag/AgCl nanoparticles as photocatalysts with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity towards the degradation of dyes, phenol and bisphenol A. Environ Sci Nano 4:585–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yin X-B, Liu D-Y (2008) Polydopamine-based permanent coating capillary electrochromatography for auxin determination. J Chromatogr A 1212:130–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yu J, Xiang Q, Zhou M (2009) Preparation, characterization and visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity of Fe-doped titania nanorods and first-principles study for electronic structures. Appl Catal B 90:595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yu W, Chen J, Shang T, Chen L, Gu L, Peng T (2017) Direct Z-scheme g-C3N4/WO3 photocatalyst with atomically defined junction for H2 production. Appl Catal B 219:693–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang Z, Zhang J, Zhang B, Tang J (2013) Mussel-inspired functionalization of graphene for synthesizing Ag-polydopamine-graphene nanosheets as antibacterial materials. Nanoscale 5:118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang J, Liu Z, Liu Z (2016a) Novel WO3/Sb2S3 heterojunction photocatalyst based on WO3 of different morphologies for enhanced efficiency in photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:9684–9691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang J, Zhang L, Shen X, Xu P, Liu J (2016b) Synthesis of BiOBr/WO3 p–n heterojunctions with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. CrystEngComm 18:3856–3865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang M et al (2017a) In situ reduction of silver nanoparticles on hybrid polydopamine-copper phosphate nanoflowers with enhanced antimicrobial activity. J Mater Chem B 5:5311–5317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhang Q, Dong R, Wu Y, Gao W, He Z, Ren B (2017b) Light-driven Au-WO3@C janus micromotors for rapid photodegradation of dye pollutants. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:4674–4683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang S et al (2017c) Unexpected ultrafast and high adsorption capacity of oxygen vacancy-rich WOx/C nanowire networks for aqueous Pb2+ and methylene blue removal. J Mater Chem A 5:15913–15922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhang J, Fu X, Hao H, Gan W (2018) Facile synthesis 3D flower-like Ag@WO3 nanostructures and applications in solar-light photocatalysis. J Alloys Compd 757:134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhao Y, Eley C, Hu J, Foord JS, Ye L, He H, Tsang SCE (2012) Shape-dependent acidity and photocatalytic activity of Nb2O5 nanocrystals with an active TT (001) surface. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:3846–3849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhao H et al (2015) Fe2O3-AgBr nonwoven cloth with hierarchical nanostructures as efficient and easily recyclable macroscale photocatalysts. RSC Adv 5:10951–10959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhou H, Wen Z, Liu J, Ke J, Duan X, Wang S (2019) Z-scheme plasmonic Ag decorated WO3/Bi2WO6 hybrids for enhanced photocatalytic abatement of chlorinated-VOCs under solar light irradiation. Appl Catal B 242:76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhu Z J, Han Q, Yu D, Sun J, Liu BJ (2017) A novel p-n heterojunction of BiVO4/TiO2/GO composite for enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. Mater Lett 209:379–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhu Z J, Li Y, Wang C M, Liang L J, Yu D, Sun J, Gao P, Liu B J (2018) Facile synthesis and characterization of Bi2MoO6/Ag3PO4/RGO composites with enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity. Mater Lett 227:296–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and BiotechnologyDonghua UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Zhejiang Province New Textile Research and Development Emphasised LaboratoryHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations