Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 3069–3082 | Cite as

Choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvent systems as a pretreatment for nanofibrillation of ramie fibers

  • Wang Yu
  • Chaoyun WangEmail author
  • Yongjian Yi
  • Wanlai Zhou
  • Hongying Wang
  • Yuanru Yang
  • Zhijian TanEmail author
Original Research
  • 173 Downloads

Abstract

As a new type of green solvents, deep eutectic solvents (DESs) were used as pretreatment media for the nanofibrillation of ramie fibers (RFs). Two DESs, choline chloride-oxalic acid dihydrate (CO) and choline chloride-urea (CU), were formed at 100 °C and then applied to decompose RFs. The DES-pretreated fibers were nanofibrillated using a planetary ball mill, and their properties were analyzed. During the DES pretreatment, CU DES could only dissolve some of hemicelluloses in raw RFs, while CO DES could degrade some oligosaccharides and a part of amorphous cellulose to loosen the fiber structure. Therefore, only the CO DES pretreatment could significantly enhance nanofibrillation of the RFs with a low hemicellulose content in this study, as indicated by the decrease of milling time (from 11 to 5 h) to obtain desirable cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs). After 7 h CO DES pretreatment at room temperature and a subsequent ball milling process, a turbid and gel-like CNF suspension with a mean equivalent spherical diameter of 262 nm was obtained from RFs, and the mass yield of CNFs reached 94.06%. The CNFs also showed a crystallinity index of 66.51% and a thermal stability with Tmax = 322.6 °C, and the produced CNF film had a tensile strength of 52 MPa. Overall, the CO DES pretreatment has great potential for use in the production of CNFs from RFs.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Cellulose nanofibrils Deep eutectic solvent Ramie fibers Pretreatment Ball milling 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21878326), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (No. CARS-19-08B) and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (No. ASTIP-IBFC07). Alfred D. French (Agricultural Research Service) and Zhe Ling (Beijing Forestry University) were thanked for the using of Mercury software.

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2290_MOESM1_ESM.docx (6.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 6496 kb)

References

  1. Abdul Khalil HPS, Davoudpour Y, Islam MN, Mustapha A, Sudesh K, Dungani R, Jawaid M (2014) Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 99:649–665Google Scholar
  2. Abdul Khalil HPS, Davoudpour Y, Saurabh CK, Hossain MS, Adnan AS, Dungani R, Paridah MT, Sarker MZI, Fazita MRN, Syakir MI, Haafiz MKM (2016) A review on nanocellulosic fibres as new material for sustainable packaging: process and applications. Renew Sust Energy Rev 64:823–836Google Scholar
  3. Abo-Hamad A, Hayyan M, Alssaadi MA, Hashim MA (2015) Potential applications of deep eutectic solvents in nanotechnology. Chem Eng J 273:551–567Google Scholar
  4. Agarwal UP, Reiner RS, Ralph SA (2010) Cellulose I crystallinity determination using FT–Raman spectroscopy: univariate and multivariate methods. Cellulose 17(4):721–733Google Scholar
  5. Azrina ZAZ, Beg MDH, Rosli MY, Ramli R, Junadi N, Alam AKMA (2017) Spherical nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) from oil palm empty fruit bunch pulp via ultrasound assisted hydrolysis. Carbohydr Polym 162:115–120Google Scholar
  6. Baheti V, Militky J (2013) Reinforcement of wet milled jute nano/micro particles in polyvinyl alcohol films. Fiber Polym 14(1):133–137Google Scholar
  7. Baheti V, Militky J, Marsalkova M (2013) Mechanical properties of poly lactic acid composite films reinforced with wet milled jute nanofibers. Polym Compos 34(12):2133–2141Google Scholar
  8. Beltramino F, Roncero MB, Torres AL, Vidal T, Valls C (2016) Optimization of sulfuric acid hydrolysis conditions for preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose from enzymatically pretreated fibers. Cellulose 23(3):1777–1789Google Scholar
  9. Cai YJ, Su SW, Navik R, Wen S, Peng XY, Pervez MN, Lin LN (2018) Cationic modification of ramie fibers in liquid ammonia. Cellulose 25(8):4463–4475Google Scholar
  10. Dai Y, van Spronsen J, Witkamp GJ, Verpoorte R, Choi YH (2013) Ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents in natural products research: mixtures of solids as extraction solvents. J Nat Prod 76(11):2162–2173Google Scholar
  11. De Menezes AJ, Longo E, Leite FL, Dufresne A (2014) Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals grafted with organic acid chloride of different sizes. J Renew Mater 2(4):306–313Google Scholar
  12. Diop CIK, Lavoie JM (2017) Isolation of nanocrystalline cellulose: a technological route for valorizing recycled Tetra Pak aseptic multilayered food packaging wastes. Waste Biomass Valoriz 8(1):41–56Google Scholar
  13. Ditzel FI, Prestes E, Carvalho BM, Demiate IM, Pinheiro LA (2017) Nanocrystalline cellulose extracted from pine wood and corncob. Carbohydr Polym 157:1577–1585Google Scholar
  14. Du CL, Zhao BY, Chen XB, Birbilis N, Yang HY (2016) Effect of water presence on choline chloride-2urea ionic liquid and coating platings from the hydrated ionic liquid. Sci Rep 6:29225Google Scholar
  15. French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20(1):583–588Google Scholar
  16. Hiasa S, Kumagai A, Endo T, Edashige Y (2016) Prevention of aggregation of pectin-containing cellulose nanofibers prepared from mandarin peel. J Fiber Sci Technol 72(1):17–26Google Scholar
  17. Hietala M, Sain S, Oksman K (2017) Highly redispersible sugar beet nanofibers as reinforcement in bionanocomposites. Cellulose 24(5):2177–2189Google Scholar
  18. Ho TTT, Abe K, Zimmermann T, Yano H (2015) Nanofibrillation of pulp fibers by twin-screw extrusion. Cellulose 22(1):421–433Google Scholar
  19. Huang P, Zhao Y, Kuga S, Wu M, Huang Y (2016) A versatile method for producing functionalized cellulose nanofibers and their application. Nanoscale 8(6):3753–3759Google Scholar
  20. Jiang W, Song Y, Liu SY, Ben HX, Zhang YM, Zhou CF, Han GT, Ragauskas AJ (2018) A green degumming process of ramie. Ind Crops Prod 120:131–134Google Scholar
  21. Jonoobi M, Oladi R, Davoudpour Y, Oksman K, Dufresne A, Hamzeh Y, Davoodi R (2015) Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review. Cellulose 22(2):935–969Google Scholar
  22. Karimi S, Tahir PM, Karimi A, Dufresne A, Abdulkhani A (2014) Kenaf bast cellulosic fibers hierarchy: a comprehensive approach from micro to nano. Carbohydr Polym 101:878–885Google Scholar
  23. Laitinen O, Ojala J, Sirviö JA, Liimatainen H (2017a) Sustainable stabilization of oil in water emulsions by cellulose nanocrystals synthesized from deep eutectic solvents. Cellulose 24(4):1679–1689Google Scholar
  24. Laitinen O, Suopajärvi T, Österberg M, Liimatainen H (2017b) Hydrophobic, superabsorbing aerogels from choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvent pretreated and silylated cellulose nanofibrils for selective oil removal. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(29):25029–25037Google Scholar
  25. Lee BM, Jeun JP, Kang PH, Choi JH, Hong SK (2017) Isolation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from different precursor materials. Fiber Polym 18(2):272–277Google Scholar
  26. Li ZL, Yu CW (2014) Effect of peroxide and softness modification on properties of ramie fiber. Fiber Polym 15(10):2105–2111Google Scholar
  27. Li WY, Jin AX, Liu CF, Sun RC, Zhang AP, Kennedy JF (2009) Homogeneous modification of cellulose with succinic anhydride in ionic liquid using 4-dimethylaminopyridine as a catalyst. Carbohydr Polym 78(3):389–395Google Scholar
  28. Li ZF, Li ZL, Ding RY, Yu CW (2016a) Composition of ramie hemicelluloses and effect of polysaccharides on fiber properties. Text Res J 86(5):451–460Google Scholar
  29. Li ZL, Chen J, Zhou JJ, Zheng L, Pradel KC, Fan X, Guo HY, Wen Z, Yeh MH, Yu CW, Wang ZL (2016b) High-efficiency ramie fiber degumming and self-powered degumming wastewater treatment using triboelectric nanogenerator. Nano Energy 22:548–557Google Scholar
  30. Li PP, Sirviö JA, Haapala A, Liimatainen H (2017) Cellulose nanofibrils from nonderivatizing urea-based deep eutectic solvent pretreatments. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(3):2846–2855Google Scholar
  31. Liimatainen H, Sirviö J, Haapala A, Hormi O, Niinimäki J (2011) Characterization of highly accessible cellulose microfibers generated by wet stirred media milling. Carbohydr Polym 83(4):2005–2010Google Scholar
  32. Liu YZ, Guo BT, Xia QQ, Meng J, Chen WS, Liu SX, Wang QW, Liu YX, Li J, Yu HP (2017) Efficient cleavage of strong hydrogen bonds in cotton by deep eutectic solvents and facile fabrication of cellulose nanocrystals in high yields. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(9):7623–7631Google Scholar
  33. Macrae CF, Bruno IJ, Chisholm JA, Edgington PR, McCabe P, Pidcock E, Rodriguez-Monge L, Taylor R, van de Streek J, Wood PA (2008) Mercury CSD 2.0 - new features for the visualization and investigation of crystal structures. J Appl Crystallogr 41:466–470Google Scholar
  34. Mazumder BB, Ohtani Y, Cheng Z, Sameshima K (2000) Combination treatment of kenaf bast fiber for high viscosity pulp. J Wood Sci 46(5):364–370Google Scholar
  35. Mohd Amin KN, Annamalai PK, Morrow IC, Martin D (2015) Production of cellulose nanocrystals via a scalable mechanical method. RSC Adv 5(70):57133–57140Google Scholar
  36. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crops Prod 93:2–25Google Scholar
  37. Pacaphol K, Aht-Ong D (2017) Preparation of hemp nanofibers from agricultural waste by mechanical defibrillation in water. J Clean Prod 142:1283–1295Google Scholar
  38. Ray D, Sarkar BK (2001) Characterization of alkali-treated jute fibers for physical and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 80(7):1013–1020Google Scholar
  39. Roman M, Winter WT (2004) Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5(5):1671–1677Google Scholar
  40. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad JR, Conard CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794Google Scholar
  41. Siró I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17(3):459–494Google Scholar
  42. Sirviö JA, Visanko M (2017) Anionic wood nanofibers produced from unbleached mechanical pulp by highly efficient chemical modification. J Mater Chem A 5(41):21828–21835Google Scholar
  43. Sirviö JA, Visanko M, Liimatainen H (2015) Deep eutectic solvent system based on choline chloride-urea as a pre-treatment for nanofibrillation of wood cellulose. Green Chem 17(6):3401–3406Google Scholar
  44. Sirviö JA, Visanko M, Liimatainen H (2016) Acidic deep eutectic solvents as hydrolytic media for cellulose nanocrystal production. Biomacromolecules 17(9):3025–3032Google Scholar
  45. Smith EL, Abbott AP, Ryder KS (2014) Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and their applications. Chem Rev 114(21):11060–11082Google Scholar
  46. Suopajärvi T, Sirviö JA, Liimatainen H (2017) Nanofibrillation of deep eutectic solvent-treated paper and board cellulose pulps. Carbohydr Polym 169:167–175Google Scholar
  47. Tan ZJ, Wang CY, Yi YJ, Wang HY, Li M, Zhou WL, Tan SY, Li FF (2014) Extraction and purification of chlorogenic acid from ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud) leaf using an ethanol/salt aqueous two-phase system. Sep Purif Technol 132:396–400Google Scholar
  48. TAPPI Standard test method (1999) T230 om-99, Viscosity of pulp (capillary viscometer method)Google Scholar
  49. Tian XZ, Yan DD, Lu QX, Jiang X (2017) Cationic surface modification of nanocrystalline cellulose as reinforcements for preparation of the chitosan-based nanocomposite films. Cellulose 24(1):163–174Google Scholar
  50. Visanko M, Sirviö JA, Piltonen P, Sliz R, Liimatainen H, Illikainen M (2017) Mechanical fabrication of high-strength and redispersible wood nanofibers from unbleached groundwood pulp. Cellulose 24(10):4173–4187Google Scholar
  51. Wagle DV, Zhao H, Baker GA (2014) Deep eutectic solvents: sustainable media for nanoscale and functional materials. Acc Chem Res 47(8):2299–2308Google Scholar
  52. Xie HX, Du HS, Yang XH, Si CL (2018) Recent strategies in preparation of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils derived from raw cellulose materials. Int J Polym Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7923068 Google Scholar
  53. Yang ZZ, Tan ZJ, Li FF, Li XD (2016) An effective method for the extraction and purification of chlorogenic acid from ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.) leaves using acidic ionic liquids. Ind Crops Prod 89:78–86Google Scholar
  54. Yokoyama T, Kadla JF, Chang HM (2002) Microanalytical method for the characterization of fiber components and morphology of woody plants. J Agric Food Chem 50(5):1040–1044Google Scholar
  55. Zhang QH, Vigier KDO, Royer S, Jérôme F (2012) Deep eutectic solvents: syntheses, properties and applications. Chem Soc Rev 41(21):7108–7146Google Scholar
  56. Zhang LY, Tsuzuki T, Wang XG (2015) Preparation of cellulose nanofiber from softwood pulp by ball milling. Cellulose 22(3):1729–1741Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Bast Fiber CropsChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations