Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–15 | Cite as

A facile approach for coating Ti3C2Tx on cotton fabric for electromagnetic wave shielding

  • Liang Geng
  • Puxin Zhu
  • Yujun Wei
  • Ronghui GuoEmail author
  • Cheng Xiang
  • Ce Cui
  • Ying Li
Original Research
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding fabric is widely used to deal with radiation pollution. However, the traditional EMI shielding fabrics are limited by their reflection-dominated shielding mechanism, large loading and poor shielding performance. Herein, Ti3C2Tx coated cotton fabrics with low Ti3C2Tx loading (1.5–2.6 mg/cm2) were prepared through a facile vacuum filtration process. Ti3C2Tx coated cotton fabric exhibits excellent electrical conductivity (up to 1570 S/cm), EMI SE (up to 48.9 dB) and superior shielding efficiency (up to 2969 dB cm2/g) with a low Ti3C2Tx loading (2.6 mg/cm2) in the frequency of 2–18 GHz. Especially, Ti3C2Tx coated cotton fabric shows high ratio of absorption shielding efficiency (SEA)/reflection shielding efficiency (SER) (> 9) in the frequency of 2–13.5 GHz, indicating that the dominant shielding mechanism of Ti3C2Tx coated cotton fabrics is microwave absorption of EM radiation. Additionally, the Ti3C2Tx coated cotton fabric exhibits a high tensile strength (up to 70 N) and fracture elongation (up to 18.3%). The result suggests that the Ti3C2Tx coated cotton fabric is a superior absorption-dominated EMI shielding material. The Ti3C2Tx coated cotton fabric with low loading, robust, and highly conductive properties can be regarded as an alternative electromagnetic wave absorbing material.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Ti3C2Tx Cotton fabric Electromagnetic interference shielding Absorption dominated 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by The National Natural Science Foundation of China and The Civil Aviation Administration of China (No. U1833118).

Supplementary material

10570_2019_2284_MOESM1_ESM.doc (4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 4072 kb)

References

  1. Ameli A, Nofar M, Wang S, Park CB (2014) Lightweight polypropylene/stainless-steel fiber composite foams with low percolation for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:11091–11100.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am500445g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aravinda CL, Mayanna SM, Bera P, Jayaram V, Sharma AK (2002) XPS and XAES investigations of electrochemically deposited Cu–Ni solar selected black coatings on molybdenum substrate. J Mater Sci Lett 21:205–208.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014704607322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazant P, Kuritka I, Munster L, Kalina L (2015) Microwave solvothermal decoration of the cellulose surface by nanostructured hybrid Ag/ZnO particles: a joint XPS, XRD and SEM study. Cellulose 22:1275–1293.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0561-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bi S, Zhao H, Hou L, Lu Y (2017) Comparative study of electroless Co–Ni–P plating on tencel fabric by Co0-based and Ni0-based activation for electromagnetic interference shielding. Appl Surf Sci 419:465–475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bin S, Wentao Z, Wenge Z (2014) Ultrathin flexible graphene film: an excellent thermal conducting material with efficient EMI shielding. Adv Funct Mater 24:4542–4548.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201400079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao M-S, Wang X-X, Cao W-Q, Yuan J (2015) Ultrathin graphene: electrical properties and highly efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. J Mater Chem C 3:6589–6599.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TC01354B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao W-T, Chen F-F, Zhu Y-J, Zhang Y-G, Jiang Y-Y, Ma M-G, Chen F (2018) Binary strengthening and toughening of MXene/cellulose nanofiber composite paper with nacre-inspired structure and superior electromagnetic interference shielding properties. ACS Nano 12:4583–4593.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b00997 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng S, Berry V (2016) Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: an overview of formation mechanism, electronic properties, and applications. Mater Today 19:197–212.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhawan SK, Singh N, Venkatachalam S (2002) Shielding behaviour of conducting polymer-coated fabrics in X-band, W-band and radio frequency range. Synth Met 129:261–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Du Z, Guo R, Lan J, Jiang S, Lin S, Cheng C, Zhao L (2017) Bismuth tungstate coating on polyester fabric modified with dopamine for photocatalytic property under visible light irradiation. Surf Coat Technol 319:219–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.04.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fan Z et al (2018) Modified MXene/holey graphene films for advanced supercapacitor electrodes with superior energy storage. Adv Sci 5:1800750.  https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201800750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghidiu M, Lukatskaya MR, Zhao M-Q, Gogotsi Y, Barsoum MW (2014) Conductive two-dimensional titanium carbide ‘clay’ with high volumetric capacitance. Nature 516:78.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13970 Google Scholar
  14. Ghosh S, Mondal S, Ganguly S, Remanan S, Singha N, Das NC (2018) Carbon nanostructures based mechanically robust conducting cotton fabric for improved electromagnetic interference shielding. Fibers Polym 19:1064–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-7995-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guo RH, Jiang SX, Zheng YD, Lan JW (2013) Electroless nickel deposition of a palladium-activated self-assembled monolayer on polyester fabric. J Appl Polym Sci 127:4186–4193.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.36799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guo R, Jing X, Peng L, Lan J, Jiang S, Yan W (2017) Nickel-catalyzed deposition of Cu film on PET fabric with supercritical fluid. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:16618–16626.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-7572-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halim J et al (2014) Transparent conductive two-dimensional titanium carbide epitaxial thin films. Chem Mater 26:2374–2381.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cm500641a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Han JC, Wang XN, Qiu YF, Zhu JQ, Hu PA (2015) Infrared-transparent films based on conductive graphene network fabrics for electromagnetic shielding. Carbon 87:206–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.01.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Han M et al (2016) Ti3C2 MXenes with modified surface for high-performance electromagnetic absorption and shielding in the X-band. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:21011–21019.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b06455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hong X, Chung DDL (2017) Carbon nanofiber mats for electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 111:529–537.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang SX, Guo RH (2011) Electromagnetic shielding and corrosion resistance of electroless Ni–P/Cu–Ni multilayer plated polyester fabric. Surf Coat Technol 205:4274–4279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim Y-S et al (2006) Surface characterization of copper electroless deposition on atomic layer deposited palladium on iridium and tungsten. Surf Coat Technol 200:5760–5766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.08.142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li X, Li Y, Guan T, Xu F, Sun J (2018) Durable, highly electrically conductive cotton fabrics with healable superamphiphobicity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:12042–12050.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b01279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu J, Zhang H-B, Sun R, Liu Y, Liu Z, Zhou A, Yu Z-Z (2017) Hydrophobic, flexible, and lightweight MXene foams for high-performance electromagnetic-interference shielding. Adv Mater (Deerfield Beach, Fla).  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201702367 Google Scholar
  25. Lu Y, Liang Q, Li W (2013) Fabrication of copper/modal fabric composites through electroless plating process for electromagnetic interference shielding. Mater Chem Phys 140:553–558.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.03.068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mashtalir O, Naguib M, Dyatkin B, Gogotsi Y, Barsoum MW (2013) Kinetics of aluminum extraction from Ti3AlC2 in hydrofluoric acid. Mater Chem Phys 139:147–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2013.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mondal S et al (2017) High-performance carbon nanofiber coated cellulose filter paper for electromagnetic interference shielding. Cellulose 24:5117–5131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1441-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Naguib M et al (2011) Two-dimensional nanocrystals produced by exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Adv Mater 23:4248–4253.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201102306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Naguib M, Mochalin VN, Barsoum MW, Gogotsi Y (2014) 25th anniversary article: MXenes: a new family of two-dimensional materials. Adv Mater 26:992–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201304138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Onar N, Akşit AC, Ebeoglugil MF, Birlik I, Celik E, Ozdemir I (2009) Structural, electrical, and electromagnetic properties of cotton fabrics coated with polyaniline and polypyrrole. J Appl Polym Sci 114:2003–2010.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.30652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Saini P, Choudhary V, Vijayan N, Kotnala RK (2012) Improved electromagnetic interference shielding response of poly(aniline)-coated fabrics containing dielectric and magnetic nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 116:13403–13412.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp302131w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shah SA, Habib T, Gao H, Gao P, Sun W, Green MJ, Radovic M (2017) Template-free 3D titanium carbide (Ti3C2Tx) MXene particles crumpled by capillary forces. Chem Commun 53:400–403.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cc07733a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shahzad F, Alhabeb M, Hatter CB, Anasori B, Man Hong S, Koo CM, Gogotsi Y (2016) Electromagnetic interference shielding with 2D transition metal carbides (MXenes). Science 353:1137–1140.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomassin JM, Jerome C, Pardoen T, Bailly C, Huynen I, Detrembleur C (2013) Polymer/carbon based composites as electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding materials. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 74:211–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2013.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tian M, Du M, Qu L, Chen S, Zhu S, Han G (2017) Electromagnetic interference shielding cotton fabrics with high electrical conductivity and electrical heating behavior via layer-by-layer self-assembly route. RSC Adv 7:42641–42652.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra08224j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vaisakh SS, Mahesh KV, Balanand S, Metz R, Hassanzadeh M, Ananthakumar S (2015) MAX phase ternary carbide derived 2-D ceramic nanostructures [CDCN] as chemically interactive functional fillers for damage tolerant epoxy polymer nanocomposites. RSC Adv 5:16521–16531.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra16518g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Lam D, Shim HC, Kim J-H, Lee H-J, Lee S-M (2017) Carbon textile decorated with pseudocapacitive VC/VxOy for high-performance flexible supercapacitors. Small 13:1702702.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201702702 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang LL, Tay BK, See KY, Sun Z, Tan LK, Lua D (2009) Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness of carbon-based materials prepared by screen printing. Carbon 47:1905–1910.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.03.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang C, Guo R, Lan J, Jiang S, Zhang Z (2017) Microwave-assisted synthesis of silver/reduced graphene oxide on cotton fabric. Cellulose 24:4045–4055.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1392-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yingchao S, Baiyu Z, Lifeng L, Jianshe L, Guangyu L (2015) Electromagnetic shielding and corrosion resistance of electroless Ni–P and Ni–P–Cu coatings on polymer/carbon fiber composites. Polym Compos 36:923–930.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.23012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yousefi N et al (2014) Highly aligned graphene/polymer nanocomposites with excellent dielectric properties for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Adv Mater 26:5480–5487.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yuan Y et al (2018) Lightweight, flexible and strong core-shell non-woven fabrics covered by reduced graphene oxide for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbon 130:59–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang CJ et al (2017) Oxidation stability of colloidal two-dimensional titanium carbides (MXenes). Chem Mater 29:4848–4856.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00745 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhao H, Hou L, Lu Y (2016) Electromagnetic shielding effectiveness and serviceability of the multilayer structured cuprammonium fabric/polypyrrole/copper (CF/PPy/Cu) composite. Chem Eng J 297:170–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liang Geng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Puxin Zhu
    • 1
  • Yujun Wei
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ronghui Guo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cheng Xiang
    • 1
  • Ce Cui
    • 1
  • Ying Li
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Light Industry, Textile and Food EngineeringSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.School of Textile EngineeringChengdu Textile CollegeChengduChina

Personalised recommendations