Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–22 | Cite as

A comparative analysis of source based distinctly functionalized nanostructured cellulose for the adsorptive removal of toxic colorants

  • Komal
  • Kanu Gupta
  • Simranjeet Kaur
  • Jasleen Kaur
  • Anupama Kaushik
  • Sonal SinghalEmail author
Original Research
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

In order to annul the toxic dye contaminants which are being heavily discharged into the water bodies, the present study emphasizes on the fabrication of pristine and functionalized cellulose nanofibres derived from two distinct lignocellulosic biomass sources i.e. sugarcane bagasse and pine needles. Pine needles proved to be a better source than sugarcane bagasse in terms of high adsorption capacity of the adsorbents which may be due to the difference in the nanofibrillar arrangement based on source. The developed adsorbents were characterized for their structural, morphological and other physico-chemical properties with the help of FT-IR, Powder XRD, FE-SEM and EDX spectroscopic techniques. Outstanding adsorption properties of modified cellulose nanofibres were explored for the eradication of Safranin O and Methylene blue from the polluted wastewater. Structural differences based on origin resulted in the variable adsorption characteristics over functionalized adsorbents. Among all, esterified cellulose nanofibres presented best adsorption capacity for the removal of toxic colorants. Incorporation of different isotherms and kinetic models provided the deep insights of the adsorption mechanism.

Graphical abstract

Functionalized cellulose nanofibres derived from two distinct lignocellulosic biomass sources for the eradication of toxic colorants from wastewater.

Keywords

Lignocellulosic biomass Nanocellulose Functionalized cellulose Adsorption 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to acknowledge Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) (Grant no. 01(02833)/15/EMR-II). The authors are grateful for providing the instrumentation facility for the required characterizations to Sophisticated Analytical Instrumentation Facility (SAIF), Panjab University (PU), Chandigarh.

Supplementary material

10570_2018_2191_MOESM1_ESM.docx (3.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3498 kb)

References

  1. Banerjee S, Chattopadhyaya MC (2017) Adsorption characteristics for the removal of a toxic dye, tartrazine from aqueous solutions by a low cost agricultural by-product. Arab J Chem 10(S1629):S1638.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bansal M, Chauhan GS, Kaushik A, Sharma A (2016) Extraction and functionalization of bagasse cellulose nanofibres to Schiff-base based antimicrobial membranes. Int J Biol Macromol 91:887–894.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.06.045 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhullar N, Kumari K, Sud D (2018) A biopolymer-based composite hydrogel for rhodamine 6G dye removal: its synthesis, adsorption isotherms and kinetics. Iran Polym J 27:527–535.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-018-0630-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ching TW, Haritos V, Tanksale A (2018) Ultrasound-assisted conversion of cellulose into hydrogel and functional carbon material. Cellulose 25:2629–2645.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1746-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daneshvar E, Vazirzadeh A, Niazi A, Kousha M, Naushad M, Bhatnagar A (2017) Desorption of Methylene blue dye from brown macroalga: effects of operating parameters, isotherm study and kinetic modeling. J Clean Prod 152:443–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. French AD, Santiago Cintrón M (2013) Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal Crystallinity Index. Cellulose 20:583–588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freundlich HMF (1906) Over the adsorption in solution. J Phys Chem 57:1100–1107Google Scholar
  9. Ghaedi M, Hajjati S, Mahmudi Z, Tyagi I, Agarwal S, Maity A, Gupta VK (2015) Modeling of competitive ultrasonic assisted removal of the dyes—Methylene blue and Safranin-O using Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 268:28–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ho YS, McKay G (1999) The sorption of lead(II) ions on peat. Water Res 33:578–584.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00207-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang F, Dinh DM, Hsieh YL (2017) Adsorption and desorption of cationic malachite green dye on cellulose nanofibril aerogels. Carbohydr Polym 173:286–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.05.097 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaushik A, Singh M (2011) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from wheat straw using steam explosion coupled with high shear homogenization. Carbohydr Res 346:76–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2010.10.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Langmuir I (1916) The constitution and fundamental properties of solids and liquids. Part I. Solids. J Am Chem Soc 38:2221–2295.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja02268a002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lazzari LK, Zampieri VB, Zanini M, Zattera AJ, Baldasso C (2017) Sorption capacity of hydrophobic cellulose cryogels silanized by two different methods. Cellulose 24:3421–3431.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1349-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li D, Li Q, Bai N, Dong H, Mao D (2017) One-step synthesis of cationic hydrogel for efficient dye adsorption and its second use for emulsified oil separation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:5598–5607.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lima EC (2018) Removal of emerging contaminants from the environment by adsorption. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 150:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.12.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lobmann K, Svagan AJ (2017) Cellulose nanofibers as excipient for the delivery of poorly soluble drugs. Int J Pharm 533:285–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.09.064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. McManus JB, Yang H, Wilson L, Kubicki JD, Tien M (2018) Initiation, elongation, and termination of bacterial cellulose synthesis. ACS Omega 3:2690–2698.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01808 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Meng F, Yang B, Wang B, Duan S, Chen Z, Ma W (2017) Novel dendrimer like magnetic biosorbent based on modified orange peel waste: adsorption–reduction behavior of arsenic. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:9692–9700.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nagarajan S, Skillen NC, Irvine JT, Lawton LA, Robertson PK (2017) Cellulose II as bioethanol feedstock and its advantages over native cellulose. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 77:182–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson ML, O’Connor RT (1964) Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal lattice type. Part II. A new infrared ratio for estimation of crystallinity in celluloses I and II. J Appl Polym Sci 8:1325–1341.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1964.070080323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nishino, T (2017) Cellulose fiber/nanofiber from natural sources including waste-based sources, 2nd edn. Green composites, pp 19–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100783-9.00010-1
  23. Orlandi G, Cavasotto J, Machado FR Jr, Colpani GL, Dal Magro J, Dalcanton F, Mello JM, Fiori MA (2017) An adsorbent with a high adsorption capacity obtained from the cellulose sludge of industrial residues. Chemosphere 169:171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.071 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Petroudy SRD, Garmaroody ER, Rudi H (2017) Oriented cellulose nanopaper (OCNP) based on bagasse cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr Polym 157:1883–1891.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.11.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Phinichka N, Kaenthong S (2018) Regenerated cellulose from high alpha cellulose pulp of steam-exploded sugarcane bagasse. J Mater Res Technol 7:55–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Polak J, Jarosz-Wilkolazka A, Szuster-Ciesielska A, Wlizlo K, Kopycinska M, Sojka-Ledakowicz J, Lichawska-Olczyk J (2016) Toxicity and dyeing properties of dyes obtained through laccase-mediated synthesis. J Clean Prod 112:4265–4272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Preethi S, Sivasamy A, Sivanesan S, Ramamurthi V, Swaminathan G (2006) Removal of safranin basic dye from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto corncob activated carbon. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:7627–7632.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0604122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ruan CQ, Stromme M, Lindh J (2017) Preparation of porous 2, 3-dialdehyde cellulose beads crosslinked with chitosan and their application in adsorption of Congo red dye. Carbohydr Polym 181:200–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.072 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Safari M, Khataee A, Soltani RDC, Rezaee R (2018) Ultrasonically facilitated adsorption of an azo dye onto nanostructures obtained from cellulosic wastes of broom and cooler straw. J Colloid Interface Sci 522:228–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2018.03.076 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Safarik I, Baldikova E, Prochazkova J, Safarikova M, Pospiskova K (2018) Magnetically modified agricultural and food waste: preparation and application. J Agric Food Chem 66:2538–2552.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b06105 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Saleh TA, Tuzen M, Sari A (2017) Polyethylenimine modified activated carbon as novel magnetic adsorbent for the removal of uranium from aqueous solution. Chem Eng Res Des 117:218–227.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.10.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salleh MAM, Mahmoud DK, Karim WAWA, Idris A (2011) Cationic and anionic dye adsorption by agricultural solid wastes: a comprehensive review. Desalination 280:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saygili GA, Guzel F (2017) Chemical modification of a cellulose-based material to improve its adsorption capacity for anionic dyes. J Disper Sci Technol 38:381–392.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2016.1170608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh M, Kaushik A, Ahuja D (2016) Surface functionalization of nanofibrillated cellulose extracted from wheat straw: effect of process parameters. Carbohydr Polym 150:48–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.109 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Singla P, Goel N, Kumar V, Singhal S (2015) Boron nitride nanomaterials with different morphologies: synthesis, characterization and efficient application in dye adsorption. Ceram Int 41:10565–10577.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.04.151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Spaic M, Small DP, Cook JR, Wan W (2014) Characterization of anionic and cationic functionalized bacterial cellulose nanofibres for controlled release applications. Cellulose 21:1529–1540.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0174-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sun JX, Sun XF, Sun RC, Su YQ (2004) Fractional extraction and structural characterization of sugarcane bagasse hemicelluloses. Carbohydr Polym 56:195–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tian X, Hua F, Lou C, Jiang X (2018) Cationic cellulose nanocrystals (CCNCs) and chitosan nanocomposite films filled with CCNCs for removal of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions. Cellulose 25:3927–3939.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1842-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tka N, Jabli M, Saleh TA, Salman GA (2018) Amines modified fibers obtained from natural Populus tremula and their rapid biosorption of Acid Blue 25. J Mol Liq 250:423–432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.12.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang X, Xu S, Tan Y, Du J, Wang J (2016) Synthesis and characterization of a porous and hydrophobic cellulose-based composite for efficient and fast oil–water separation. Carbohydr Polym 140:188–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang F, Pan Y, Cai P, Guo T, Xiao H (2017) Single and binary adsorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions using sugarcane cellulose-based adsorbent. Bioresour Technol 241:482–490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.162 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Yu HY, Zhang H, Song ML, Zhou Y, Yao J, Ni QQ (2017) From cellulose nanospheres, nanorods to nanofibers: various aspect ratio induced nucleation/reinforcing effects on polylactic acid for robust-barrier food packaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:43920–43938.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b09102 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang J, Li Y, Zhang C, Jing Y (2008) Adsorption of malachite green from aqueous solution onto carbon prepared from Arundo donax root. J Hazard Mater 150:774–782.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang P, Dong SJ, Ma HH, Zhang BX, Wang YF, Hu XM (2015) Fractionation of corn stover into cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin using a series of ionic liquids. Ind Crops Prod 76:688–696.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Komal
    • 1
  • Kanu Gupta
    • 1
  • Simranjeet Kaur
    • 1
  • Jasleen Kaur
    • 1
  • Anupama Kaushik
    • 2
  • Sonal Singhal
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryPanjab UniversityChandigarhIndia
  2. 2.Dr. SSB UICET, Panjab UniversityChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations