pp 1–11 | Cite as

Influence of residual lignin and thermal drying on the ultrastructure of chemical hardwood pulp and its enzymatic hydrolysis properties

  • Yaping Li
  • Bo LiEmail author
  • Wenxuan Mo
  • Wenjing Yang
  • Shubin Wu
Original Research


Recycled pulp can be used as a potential and sustainable resource for production of fermentable monosaccharides. In this work, the effects of residual lignin and thermal drying on ultrastructure, physical properties and further enzymatic digestibility of chemical pulps were investigated. The results showed that drying process (at 105 °C for 24 h) did not significantly change the functional groups but it resulted in increased cellulose crystallinity and fibril aggregation, pore shrinkage and decreased swelling ability of fibers. On the other hand, residual lignin (~ 3%) in unbleached pulp restrained partially the deterioration of those properties during drying, compared to bleached pulp (lignin content 0.3%). Compared with once-dried bleached pulp, the unbleached pulp after drying had a slightly higher proportion of amorphous region, higher average pore size and specific surface area, and lower hornification degree, which are favorable for enzymatic hydrolysis. Moreover, the fibrils may have wrapped the lignin when they aggregated, reducing the unfavorable adsorption of lignin to cellulase. Enzymolysis also showed that the once-dried unbleached pulp was much easier to digest, and yielded 66% glucose after 12-h hydrolysis, which was much higher than the yield (54%) of the once-dried bleached pulp and should have good prospects.

Graphical abstract


Hornification Residual lignin Ultrastructure Cellulose crystallinity Enzymatic hydrolysis 



The authors would like to thank Professor Xinsheng Chai, South China University of Technology (SCUT), Guangzhou, China, for his help in thorough review of the manuscript and insightful discussions of the subject. Moreover, the authors are also grateful for the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470607), the open-funds (Grant Number 201320) of State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering of SCUT, and Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project (Grant Number 201607020025).

Supplementary material

10570_2018_2184_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 38 kb)


  1. Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 101(13):4851–4861. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreasson B, Forsström J, Wågberg L (2003) The porous structure of pulp fibres with different yields and its influence on paper strength. Cellulose 10(2):111–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bansal P, Vowell BJ, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS (2012) Elucidation of cellulose accessibility, hydrolysability and reactivity as the major limitations in the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 107:243–250. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao Y, Tan H (2004) Structural characterization of cellulose with enzymatic treatment. J Mol Struct 705(1–3):189–193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Wang Y, Wan J, Ma Y (2010) Crystal and pore structure of wheat straw cellulose fiber during recycling. Cellulose 17(2):329–338. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Wan J, Huang M, Ma Y, Wang Y, Lv H, Yang J (2011) Influence of drying temperature and duration on fiber properties of unbleached wheat straw pulp. Carbohydr Polym 85(4):759–764. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fahlén J, Salmén L (2005) Pore and matrix distribution in the fiber wall revealed by atomic force microscopy and image analysis. Biomacromolecules 6:433–438. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21(2):885–896. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo WJ, Wang Y, Huang MZ, Wan JQ, Ma YW (2011) An investigation of the variation of pore structure in Eucalyptus fibre during recycling. BioResources 6(2):1029–1042Google Scholar
  10. Hattula T (1986) Crystallization and disordering of wood cellulose during hydrothermal treatment. Paperi Ja Puu-Paper and Timber 68(11):847–850Google Scholar
  11. Hubbe MA, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ (2007) What happens to cellulosic fibers during papermaking and recycling? A review. BioResources 2(4):739–788Google Scholar
  12. Idström A, Brelid H, Nydén M, Nordstierna L (2013) CP/MAS 13C NMR study of pulp hornification using nanocrystalline cellulose as a model system. Carbohydr Polym 92(1):881–884. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jayme G (1944) Mikro-Quellungsmessungen an Zellstoffen. Papier-Fabrikant/Wochenblatt für Papierfabrikation 6:187–194Google Scholar
  14. Jonoobi M, Harun J, Shakeri A, Misra M, Oksman K (2009) Chemical composition, crystallinity, and thermal degradation of bleached and unbleached kenaf bast (Hibiscus cannabinus) pulp and nanofibers. BioResources 4(2):626–639Google Scholar
  15. Kapoor M, Raj T, Vijayaraj M, Chopra A, Gupta RP, Tuli DK, Kumar R (2015) Structural features of dilute acid, steam exploded, and alkali pretreated mustard stalk and their impact on enzymatic hydrolysis. Carbohydr Polym 124:265–273. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kontturi E, Vuorinen T (2009) Indirect evidence of supramolecular changes within cellulose microfibrils of chemical pulp fibers upon drying. Cellulose 16(1):65–74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kumar L, Arantes V, Chandra R, Saddler J (2012) The lignin present in steam pretreated softwood binds enzymes and limits cellulose accessibility. Bioresour Technol 103(1):201–208. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Letková E, Letko M, Vrška M (2011) Influence of recycling and temperature on the swelling ability of paper. Chem Pap 65(6):822–828. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li J, Liu Y, Duan C, Zhang H, Ni Y (2015) Mechanical pretreatment improving hemicelluloses removal from cellulosic fibers during cold caustic extraction. Bioresour Technol 192:501–506. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Li J, Zhang S, Li H, Ouyang X, Huang L, Ni Y, Chen L (2018) Cellulase pretreatment for enhancing cold caustic extraction-based separation of hemicelluloses and cellulose from cellulosic fibers. Bioresour Technol 251:1–6. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Luo X, Zhu JY (2011) Effects of drying-induced fiber hornification on enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Enzyme Microb Technol 48(1):92–99. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakagame S, Chandra RP, Kadla JF, Saddler JN (2011) The isolation, characterization and effect of lignin isolated from steam pretreated Douglas-fir on the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Bioresour Technol 102(6):4507–4517. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Öhgren K, Bura R, Saddler J, Zacchi G (2007) Effect of hemicellulose and lignin removal on enzymatic hydrolysis of steam pretreated corn stover. Bioresour Technol 98(13):2503–2510. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Palonen H, Tjerneld F, Zacchi G, Tenkanen M (2004) Adsorption of Trichoderma reesei CBH I and EG II and their catalytic domains on steam pretreated softwood and isolated lignin. J Biotechnol 107(1):65–72. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Park S, Johnson DK, Ishizawa CI, Parilla PA, Davis MF (2009) Measuring the crystallinity index of cellulose by solid state 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Cellulose 16(4):641–647. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK (2010) Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3(1):10. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Qin L, Li X, Zhu J, Li W, Xu H, Guan Q, Zhang M, Li B, Yuan Y (2017) Optimization of ethylenediamine pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis to produce fermentable sugars from corn stover. Ind Crops Prod 102:51–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott CD, Davison BH, Scott TC, Woodward J, Dees C, Rothrock DS (1994) An advanced bioprocessing concept for the conversion of waste paper to ethanol. Appl Biochem Biotech 45(1):641–653. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE Jr, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Somwang K, Enomae T, Isogai A, Onabe F (2002) Changes in crystallinity and re-swelling capability of pulp fibers by recycling treatment. Japan TAPPI J 56(6):863–869. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wan JQ, Wang Y, Xiao Q (2010) Effects of hemicellulose removal on cellulose fiber structure and recycling characteristics of eucalyptus pulp. Bioresour Technol 101(12):4577–4583. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wan J, Lian J, Wang Y, Ma Y (2015) Investigation of cellulose supramolecular structure changes during conversion of waste paper in near-critical water on producing 5-hydroxymethyl furfural. Renew Energy 80:132–139. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang Y, Lian J, Wan J, Ma Y, Zhang Y (2015) A supramolecular structure insight for conversion property of cellulose in hot compressed water: polymorphs and hydrogen bonds changes. Carbohydr Polym 133:94–103. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wei W, Wu S, Liu L (2012) Enzymatic saccharification of dilute acid pretreated eucalyptus chips for fermentable sugar production. Bioresour Technol 110:302–307. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wistara N, Young RA (1999) Properties and treatments of pulps from recycled paper. Part I. Physical and chemical properties of pulps. Cellulose 6(4):291–324. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wood BE, Aldrich HC, Ingram LO (1997) Ultrasound stimulates ethanol production during the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of mixed waste office paper. Biotechnol Progr 13(3):232–237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yeh A, Huang Y, Chen SH (2010) Effect of particle size on the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 79(1):192–199. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang H, Wu S (2014) Dilute ammonia pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse followed by enzymatic hydrolysis to sugars. Cellulose 21(3):1341–1349. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang H, Wu S (2015) Generation of lignin and enzymatically digestible cellulose from ethanol-based organosolv pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse. Cellulose 22(4):2409–2418. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhou Z, Xue W, Lei F, Cheng Y, Jiang J, Sun D (2016) Kraft GL-ethanol pretreatment on sugarcane bagasse for effective enzymatic hydrolysis. Ind Crops Prod 90:100–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper EngineeringSouth China University of TechnologyGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Superlight Material and Surface Technology, Ministry of EducationHarbin Engineering UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations