Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Production of dissolving pulp from Eulaliopsis binata with the concept of integrated biorefinery

  • Guodong Wu
  • Yuedong Zhang
  • Bing YuanEmail author
  • Chao Liu
  • Guang Yu
  • Congxia Xie
  • Bin LiEmail author
  • Hui Peng
Original Research
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, the grass material of Eulaliopsis binata (EB) was used for the production of dissolving pulp with the concept of integrated biorefinery. Sequential treatments were conducted via dilute acid-assisted pre-hydrolysis with the hemicellulose removal rate of 89.5%, ammonium sulfite (AS) treatment and KOH treatment with the delignification rate of 91.7%, as well as bleaching for the further purification of pulp. Results showed that, after the sequential treatments, the resultant pulp had 92.1% of α-cellulose, a degree of polymerization of 544, and 53.8% reactivity, which met the quality requirement of dissolving pulp for viscose production. In addition, the obtained pre-hydrolysis liquor with a high concentration of xylose and low concentration of inhibitors could be subjected to bioethanol fermentation, and the spent liquor derived from AS and KOH treatments could be used to produce fertilizer. Therefore, the entire process for the manufacture of EB dissolving pulp could be economic and sustainable.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Eulaliopsis binata Dissolving pulp Pre-hydrolysis Ammonium sulfite Potassium hydroxide Integrated biorefinery 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31470609, 25106240 and 31700509), and the Primary Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province (Grant No. 2016CYJS07A02).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahsan L, Jahan MS, Ni Y (2014) Recovering/concentrating of hemicellulosic sugars and acetic acid by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis from prehydrolysis liquor of kraft based hardwood dissolving pulp process. Bioresour Technol 155:111–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.096 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso DM et al (2017) Increasing the revenue from lignocellulosic biomass: maximizing feedstock utilization. Sci Adv 3:e1603301.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603301 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen C, Liu Y, Duan C, Li J, Ma X, Zheng L, Ni Y (2015) Comparison of production technology and characteristics of the dissolving pulps based on AS and PHK process. China Pulp Paper 34(12):66–70.  https://doi.org/10.11980/j.issn.0254-508X.2015.12.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiriac AI, Pastor FIJ, Popa VI, Aflori M, Ciolacu D (2014) Changes of supramolecular cellulose structure and accessibility induced by the processive endoglucanase Cel9B from Paenibacillus barcinonensis. Cellulose 21:203–219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0118-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du J, Li B, Li C, Zhang Y, Yu G, Wang H, Mu X (2016) Tough and multi-responsive hydrogel based on the hemicellulose from the spent liquor of viscose process. Int J Biol Macromol 88:451–456.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Du H, Liu C, Zhang M, Kong Q, Li B, Xian M (2018) Preparation and industrialization status of nanocellulose. Prog Chem 30:448–462.  https://doi.org/10.7536/pc170830 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duan C, Li J, Ma X, Chen C, Liu Y, Stavik J, Ni Y (2015) Comparison of acid sulfite (AS)- and prehydrolysis kraft (PHK)-based dissolving pulps. Cellulose 22:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0781-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. French AD (2014) Idealized powder diffraction patterns for cellulose polymorphs. Cellulose 21:885–896.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0030-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gong W, Liu C, Mu X, Du H, Lv D, Li B, Han S (2015) Hydrogen peroxide-assisted sodium carbonate pretreatment for the enhancement of enzymatic saccharification of corn stover. ACS sustain. Chem Eng 3:3477–3485.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01278 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gürbüz EI, Gallo JMR, Alonso DM, Wettstein SG, Lim WY, Dumesic JA (2013) Conversion of hemicellulose into furfural using solid acid catalysts in γ-valerolactone. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:1270–1274.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201207334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ibarra D, Kopcke V, Larsson PT, Jaaskelainen AS, Ek M (2010) Combination of alkaline and enzymatic treatments as a process for upgrading sisal paper-grade pulp to dissolving-grade pulp. Bioresour Technol 101:7416–7423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.050 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jahan MS, Akter T, Nayeem J, Samaddar PR, Moniruzzaman M (2016a) Potassium hydroxide pulping of saccharum spontaneum (kash). J-FOR 6(1):46–53Google Scholar
  13. Jahan MS, Haris F, Rahman MM, Samaddar PR, Sutradhar S (2016b) Potassium hydroxide pulping of rice straw in biorefinery initiatives. Bioresour Technol 219:445–450.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.08.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaur I, Ni Y (2015) A process to produce furfural and acetic acid from pre-hydrolysis liquor of kraft based dissolving pulp process. Sep Purif Technol 146:121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2015.03.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar H, Christopher LP (2017) Recent trends and developments in dissolving pulp production and application. Cellulose 24:2347–2365.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1285-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li B, Li H, Zha Q, Bandekar R, Alsaggaf A, Ni Y (2011) Review: effects of wood quality and refining process on TMP pulp and paper quality. BioResources 6:3569–3584.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.6.3.3569-3584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li B, Liu H, Xu H, Pang B, Mou H, Wang H, Mu X (2014) Characterization of the detailed relationships of the key variables in the process of the alkaline sulfite pretreatment of corn stover by multivariate analysis. Bioresources 9:2757–2771.  https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.9.2.2757-2771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li H, Legere S, He Z, Zhang H, Li J, Yang B, Zhang S, Zhang L, Zheng L, Ni Y (2018) Methods to increase the reactivity of dissolving pulp in the viscose rayon production process: a review. Cellulose.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-1840-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu C, van der Heide E, Wang H, Li B, Yu G, Mu X (2013) Alkaline twin-screw extrusion pretreatment for fermentable sugar production. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:97.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-97 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu H, Hu H, Jahan MS, Ni Y (2014) Improvement of furfural production from concentrated prehydrolysis liquor (PHL) of a kraft-based hardwood dissolving pulp production process. J Wood Chem Technol 66:320–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shen J, Kaur I, Baktash MM, He Z, Ni Y (2013) A combined process of activated carbon adsorption, ion exchange resin treatment and membrane concentration for recovery of dissolved organics in pre-hydrolysis liquor of the kraft-based dissolving pulp production process. Bioresour Technol 127:59–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Shen J, Singh R, Konduri M, Fatehi P (2015) Cationic hemicellulose as a product of dissolving pulp based biorefinery. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:1426–1432.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ie504363j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Singleton VL, Rossi JA (1965) Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents amjenolvitic. Am J Enol Vitic 16:144–158.  https://doi.org/10.12691/ijebb-2-1-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sixta H (2006) Handbook of pulp. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D, Crocker D (2008) Determination of structure carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP). NREL/TP-510-42618. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, COGoogle Scholar
  27. Smit A, Huijgen W (2017) Effective fractionation of lignocellulose in herbaceous biomass and hardwood using a mild acetone organosolv process. Green Chem 19:5505–5514.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7gc02379k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sun S, Sun S, Cao X, Sun R (2016) The role of pretreatment in improving the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials. Bioresour Technol 199:49–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.061 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tang J, Chen K, Xu J, Li J, Zhao C (2011) Effects of dilute acid hydrolysis on composition and structure of cellulose in Eulaliopsis binata. BioResources 6(2):1069–1078Google Scholar
  30. Tang J, Chen K, Huang F, Xu J, Li J (2013) Characterization of the pretreatment liquor of biomass from the perennial grass, Eulaliopsis binata, for the production of dissolving pulp. Bioresour Technol 129:548–552.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.096 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Heiningen ARP (2006) Converting a kraft pulp mill into an integrated forest biorefinery. Pulp Paper Canda 107(6):38–43Google Scholar
  32. Wang H, Pang B, Wu K, Kong F, Li B, Mu X (2014) Two stages of treatments for upgrading bleached softwood paper grade pulp to dissolving pulp for viscose production. Biochem Eng J 82:183–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2013.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xie X et al (2018) A sustainable and effective potassium hydroxide pretreatment of wheat straw for the production of fermentable sugars. Bioresour Technol Rep 3:169–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2018.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xu H, Li B, Mu X, Yu G, Liu C, Zhang Y, Wang H (2014) Quantitative characterization of the impact of pulp refining on enzymatic saccharification of the alkaline pretreated corn stover. Bioresour Technol 169:19–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.068 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu H et al (2015) Effect and characterization of sodium lignosulfonate on alkali pretreatment for enhancing enzymatic saccharification of corn stover. Ind Crops Prod 76:638–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xu H, Li B, Mu X (2016) A review of alkali-based pretreatment to enhance enzymatic saccharification for lignocellulosic biomass conversion. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:8691–8705.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yang S (2005) Lignocellulosic chemistry. China Light Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang L, Cao J, Mao J, Jin Y (2013) Sodium carbonate–sodium sulfite pretreatment for improving the enzymatic hydrolysis of rice straw. Ind Crops Prod 43:711–717.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yao J-L, Zhou Y, Hu C-G (2007) Apomixis in Eulaliopsis binata: characterization of reproductive mode and endosperm development. Sex Plant Reprod 20:151–158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-007-0051-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang H, Li Z, Ni Y, van Heiningen ARP (2012) Fundamentals of pulp production. Chinese Chemical Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao L, Yuan Z, Kapu NS, Chang XF, Beatson R, Trajano HL, Martinez DM (2017) Increasing efficiency of enzymatic hemicellulose removal from bamboo for production of high-grade dissolving pulp. Bioresour Technol 223:40–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Chemistry and Molecular EngineeringQingdao University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  2. 2.CAS Key Laboratory of Biofuels, CAS Key Laboratory of Bio-Based Material, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations