Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–13 | Cite as

Carboxymethylcellulose-quaternary graphene oxide nanocomposite polymer hydrogel as a biodegradable draw agent for osmotic water treatment process

  • Alireza Shakeri
  • Hasan Salehi
  • Mahdi Taghvay Nakhjiri
  • Ehsan Shakeri
  • Neda Khankeshipour
  • Farnaz Ghorbani
Original Research
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

Forward osmosis (FO) as a membrane-based water treatment process, utilizes the natural osmotic pressure gradient as driving force, originates from two solutions with different concentrations separated by a semipermeable membrane. Eligible FO draw agents of low cost, high water flux, easy recovery, and low reverse draw solute flux play a key role in the FO process. Some recently developed polymer hydrogels showed attractive features as draw agents in the FO process. In this study, a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer hydrogel was synthesized via free radical polymerization of the carboxymethylcellulose and acrylic acid as biocompatible monomers and subsequently used as an FO draw agent. In addition, to enhance the FO performance of polymer hydrogel, quaternary graphene oxide (QGO) as nanomodifier was synthesized and incorporated within the hydrogel matrix. The successful incorporation of QGO and its effect on FO performance of the hydrogel was systematically investigated. The obtained results showed that the QGO modified hydrogels have higher swelling ratio than the pure polymer hydrogel due to their more polar functional groups and more porous structures. The QGO hydrogel also has significantly higher water flux than the pure polymer hydrogel.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Draw agent Forward osmosis Carboxymethylcellulose Biocompatible Quaternary graphene oxide 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the University of Tehran for received financial and instrumental support.

References

  1. Akar E, Altınışık A, Seki Y (2012) Preparation of pH- and ionic-strength responsive biodegradable fumaric acid crosslinked carboxymethyl cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 90:1634–1641.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.043 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Akther N, Sodiq A, Giwa A et al (2015) Recent advancements in forward osmosis desalination: a review. Chem Eng J 281:502–522.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.05.080 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali W, Gebert B, Hennecke T et al (2015) Design of thermally responsive polymeric hydrogels for brackish water desalination: effect of architecture on swelling, deswelling, and salt rejection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:15696–15706.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b03878 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai Y, Shen W, Loo SL et al (2013) Towards temperature driven forward osmosis desalination using Semi-IPN hydrogels as reversible draw agents. Water Res 47:3773–3781.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai Y, Wang R, Krantz WB et al (2015) Exploration of using thermally responsive polyionic liquid hydrogels as draw agents in forward osmosis. RSC Adv 5:97143–97150.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra19018e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M (2006) Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. J Membr Sci 281:70–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cui H, Zhang H, Yu M, Yang F (2018) Performance evaluation of electric-responsive hydrogels as draw agent in forward osmosis desalination. Desalination 426:118–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartanto Y, Zargar M, Wang H et al (2016) Thermoresponsive acidic microgels as functional draw agents for forward osmosis desalination. Environ Sci Technol 50:4221–4228.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04123 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hou S, Su S, Kasner ML et al (2010) Formation of highly stable dispersions of silane-functionalized reduced graphene oxide. Chem Phys Lett 501:68–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2010.10.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu X, Su E, Zhu B et al (2014) Preparation of silanized graphene/poly(methyl methacrylate) nanocomposites in situ copolymerization and its mechanical properties. Compos Sci Technol 97:6–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hu X, Wang Y, Zhang L et al (2018) Design of a pH-sensitive magnetic composite hydrogel based on salecan graft copolymer and Fe3O4 @SiO2 nanoparticles as drug carrier. Int J Biol Macromol 107:1811–1820.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.043 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang Y, Zeng M, Ren J et al (2012) Preparation and swelling properties of graphene oxide/poly(acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) super-absorbent hydrogel nanocomposites. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 401:97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.03.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Y, Zeng M, Feng Z et al (2016) Graphene oxide-based composite hydrogels with self-assembled macroporous structures. RSC Adv 6:3561–3570.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra25910j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khalid I, Ahmad M, Minhas MU, Barkat K (2018) Synthesis and evaluation of chondroitin sulfate based hydrogels of loxoprofen with adjustable properties as controlled release carriers. Carbohydr Polym 181:1169–1179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.092 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Koç A, Durkut S, Elçin AE et al (2007) Evaluation of modified CMC and CMC-PVA as miscible polymer blend membranes for hepatocytes. Macromol Biosci 7:681–689.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200600265 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kou L, Gao C (2011) Making silicananoparticle-covered graphene oxide nanohybrids as general building blocks for large-area superhydrophilic coatings. Nanoscale 3:519–528.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C0NR00609B CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Li D, Zhang X, Yao J et al (2011) Stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a new class of draw agent for forward osmosis desalination. Chem Commun 47:1710–1712.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cc04701e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li D, Zhang X, Simon GP, Wang H (2013) Forward osmosis desalination using polymer hydrogels as a draw agent: influence of draw agent, feed solution and membrane on process performance. Water Res 47:209–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.09.049 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Luo H, Wang Q, Tao T et al (2014) Performance of strong ionic hydrogels based on 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate as draw agents for forward osmosis. J Environ Eng 140:04014044.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000875 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahdavi H, Rahimi A (2018) Zwitterion functionalized graphene oxide/polyamide thin film nanocomposite membrane: towards improved anti-fouling performance for reverse osmosis. Desalination 433:94–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.01.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marcano DC, Kosynkin DV, Berlin JM et al (2010) Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4:4806–4814.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1006368 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakhjiri MT, Marandi GB, Kurdtabar M (2018) Poly(AA-co-VPA) hydrogel cross-linked with N-maleyl chitosan as dye adsorbent: isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamic investigation. Int J Biol Macromol 117:152–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.140 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakka R, Mungray AA (2016) Biodegradable and biocompatible temperature sensitive triblock copolymer hydrogels as draw agents for forward osmosis. Sep Purif Technol 168:83–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.05.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nath J, Dolui SK (2018) Applied Clay Science Synthesis of carboxymethyl cellulose-g-poly (acrylic acid)/LDH hydrogel for in vitro controlled release of vitamin B 12. Appl Clay Sci 155:65–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2018.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pendergast MM, Hoek EMV (2011) A review of water treatment membrane nanotechnologies. Energy Environ Sci 4:1946.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00541j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pourhashem S, Vaezi MR, Rashidi A, Bagherzadeh MR (2017) Distinctive roles of silane coupling agents on the corrosion inhibition performance of graphene oxide in epoxy coatings. Prog Org Coatings 111:47–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rasoulzadeh M, Namazi H (2017) Carboxymethyl cellulose/graphene oxide bio-nanocomposite hydrogel beads as anticancer drug carrier agent. Carbohydr Polym 168:320–326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.03.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rastgar M, Shakeri A, Salehi H (2017) Study of polyamide thin film characteristics impact on permeability/selectivity performance and fouling behavior of forward osmosis membrane. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0043-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rastgar M, Shakeri A, Bozorg A et al (2018) Highly-efficient forward osmosis membrane tailored by magnetically responsive graphene oxide/Fe3O4 nanohybrid. Appl Surf Sci 441:923–935.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Razmjou A, Simon GP, Wang H (2013) Effect of particle size on the performance of forward osmosis desalination by stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a draw agent. Chem Eng J 215–216:913–920.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salehi H, Rastgar M, Shakeri A (2017a) Anti-fouling and high water permeable forward osmosis membrane fabricated via layer by layer assembly of chitosan/graphene oxide. Appl Surf Sci 413:99–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Salehi H, Shakeri A, Rastgar M (2017b) Carboxylic polyethersulfone: a novel pH-responsive modifier in support layer of forward osmosis membrane. J Membr Sci 548:641–653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.10.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shakeri A, Salehi H, Rastgar M (2017) Chitosan-based thin active layer membrane for forward osmosis desalination. Carbohydr Polym 174:658–668.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Shakeri A, Nakhjiri MT, Salehi H et al (2018) Preparation of polymer-carbon nanotubes composite hydrogel and its application as forward osmosis draw agent. J Water Process Eng 24:42–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tu KL, Simon GP, Wang H (2017) Fast-responsive monolithic hydrogels as draw agent for forward osmosis membrane process. Sep Sci Technol 52:2583–2590.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2017.1310237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang X, Xing W, Zhang P et al (2012) Covalent functionalization of graphene with organosilane and its use as a reinforcement in epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 72:737–743.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wen P, Chen Y, Hu X et al (2017) Polyamide thin film composite nanofiltration membrane modified with acyl chlorided graphene oxide. J Membr Sci 535:208–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilson NR, Pandey PA, Beanland R et al (2009) Graphene oxide: structural analysis and application as a highly transparent support for electron Mmcroscopy. ACS Nano 3:2547–2556.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn900694t CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu GR, Wang SH, Zhao HL et al (2015) Layer-by-layer (LBL) assembly technology as promising strategy for tailoring pressure-driven desalination membranes. J Membr Sci 493:428–443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2015.06.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu XL, Lin FW, Du Y et al (2016) Graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes stabilized by cationic porphyrin for high salt rejection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:12588–12593.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b03693 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang H, Li F, Shan C et al (2009) Covalent functionalization of chemically converted graphene sheets via silane and its reinforcement. J Mater Chem 19:4632.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b901421g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zeng Y, Qiu L, Wang K et al (2013) Significantly enhanced water flux in forward osmosis desalination with polymer-graphene composite hydrogels as a draw agent. RSC Adv 3:887–894.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RA22173J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang H, Li J, Cui H et al (2015) Forward osmosis using electric-responsive polymer hydrogels as draw agents: influence of freezing–thawing cycles, voltage, feed solutions on process performance. Chem Eng J 259:814–819.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhao S, Zou L, Tang CY, Mulcahy D (2012) Recent developments in forward osmosis: opportunities and challenges. J Membr Sci 396:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemistry, College of ScienceUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryKaraj Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityKarajIran

Personalised recommendations