Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 12, pp 7369–7379 | Cite as

A waterborne bio-based polymer pigment: colored regenerated cellulose suspension from waste cotton fabrics

  • Lei Ding
  • Yang Jiang
  • Bijia Wang
  • Yingzhan Li
  • Zhiping Mao
  • Hong Xu
  • Yi Zhong
  • Linping Zhang
  • Xiaofeng Sui
Original Paper
  • 153 Downloads

Abstract

Waterborne bio-based polymer pigments are promising environmentally friendly coloring materials. In this work, novel colored cellulose suspensions applicable for coloring, labelling and anti-counterfeiting were prepared from waste cotton fabrics. It was demonstrated that cellulose regenerated from a phosphoric acid solution of waste cotton fabrics could be conveniently colored by reacting with reactive dyes. The high specific surface area of the regenerated cellulose (RC) allowed for high color build-up of up to 210 mg/g dye fixation and K/S value of up to 31. The resulting colored regenerated cellulose (CRC) suspension had typical characteristics of regenerated cellulose and was used to color polyurethane (PU). The resulting colored PU films exhibited excellent color fastness/resistance to leaching when soaked in water. This study demonstrated a way of alleviating the environmental burden of waste cotton fabrics by converting them to high value-added colored waterborne cellulose suspension.

Graphical abstract

Preparation and application of CRC suspensions from waste cotton fabrics

Keywords

Waterborne bio-based pigments Regenerated cellulose suspension Waste cotton fabrics Reactive dyeing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. 2232018A3-04 and 2232018-02), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC0802802), and the Programmer of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (No. 105-07-005735).

References

  1. Abitbol T, Palermo A, Moran-Mirabal JM, Cranston ED (2013) Fluorescent labeling and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals with varying charge contents. Biomacromolecules 14:3278–3284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed NSE (2005) The use of sodium edate in the dyeing of cotton with reactive dyes. Dyes Pigm 65:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashori A, Babaee M, Jonoobi M, Hamzeh Y (2014) Solvent-free acetylation of cellulose nanofibers for improving compatibility and dispersion. Carbohydr Polym 102:369–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beija M, Charreyre M-T, Martinho JMG (2011) Dye-labelled polymer chains at specific sites: synthesis by living/controlled polymerization. Prog Polym Sci 36:568–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bekkour K, Sun-Waterhouse D, Wadhwa SS (2014) Rheological properties and cloud point of aqueous carboxymethyl cellulose dispersions as modified by high or low methoxyl pectin. Food Res Int 66:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farahbakhsh N, Venditti RA, Jur JS (2014) Mechanical and thermal investigation of thermoplastic nanocomposite films fabricated using micro- and nano-sized fillers from recycled cotton T-shirts. Cellulose 21:2743–2755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farahbakhsh N, Roodposhti PS, Ayoub A, Venditti RA, Jur JS (2015) Melt extrusion of polyethylene nanocomposites reinforced withnanofibrillated cellulose from cotton and wood sources. J Appl Polym Sci 132:41857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. García A, Gandini A, Labidi J, Belgacem N, Bras J (2016) Industrial and crop wastes: a new source for nanocellulose biorefinery. Ind Crops Prod 93:26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Han YY, Zhang XX, Wu XD, Lu CH (2015) Flame retardant, heat insulating cellulose aerogels from waste cotton fabrics by in situ formation of magnesium hydroxide nanoparticles in cellulose gel nanostructures. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:1853–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu Y, Shen BY, Li BT, Xu M, Jiang GQ, Kan CY (2016) Preparation and properties of a novel polymerizable amphiphilic anthraquinone derivative and its cationic colored copolymer latexes. RSC Adv 6:37765–37772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang J-L, Li C-J, Gray DG (2013) Cellulose nanocrystals incorporating fluorescent methylcoumarin groups. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1:1160–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jang B, Kim SY, Do JY (2012) Dye-incorporated water-soluble polymer via click triazole formation. Dyes Pigm 94:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jia X, Chen YW, Shi C, Ye YF, Wang P, Zeng XX, Wu T (2013) Preparation and characterization of cellulose regenerated from phosphoric acid. J Agric Food Chem 61:12405–12414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang Y, Liu LL, Wang BJ, Sui XF, Zhong Y, Zhang LP, Mao ZP, Xu H (2018) Cellulose-rich oleogels prepared with an emulsion-templated approach. Food Hydrocolloids 77:460–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jonoobi M, Oladi R, Davoudpour Y, Oksman K, Dufresne A, Hamzeh Y, Davoodi R (2015) Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review. Cellulose 22:935–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leng TY, Jakubek ZJ, Mazloumi M, Leung ACW, Johnston LJ (2017) Ensemble and single particle fluorescence characterization of dye-labeled cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 33:8002–8011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li JJ, Song ZQ, Li DG, Shang SB, Guo Y (2014) Cotton cellulose nanofiber-reinforced high density polyethylenecomposites prepared with two different pretreatment methods. Ind Crops Prod 59:318–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mao HY, Wang CX, Wang YJ (2015) Synthesis of polymeric dyes based on waterborne polyurethane for improved color stability. New J Chem 39:3543–3550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miranda R, Sosa_Blanco C, Bustos-Martínez D, Vasile C (2007) Pyrolysis of textile wastes. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 80:489–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nallathambi A, Venkateshwarapuram Rengaswami GD (2016) Salt-free reactive dyeing of cotton hosiery fabrics by exhaust application of cationic agent. Carbohydr Polym 152:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Navarro JRG, Bergström L (2014) Labelling of N-hydroxysuccinimide-modified rhodamine B on cellulose nanofibrils by the amidation reaction. RSC Adv 4:60757–60761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Navarro JRG, Conzatti G, Yu Y, Fall AB, Mathew R, Eden M, Bergstrom L (2015) Multicolor fluorescent labeling of cellulose nanofibrils by click chemistry. Biomacromolecules 16:1293–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nechyporchuk O, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2016) Production of cellulose nanofibrils: a review of recent advances. Ind Crops Prod 93:2–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nielsen LJ, Eyley S, Thielemans W, Aylott JW (2010) Dual fluorescent labelling of cellulose nanocrystals for pH sensing. Chem Commun 46:8929–8931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schyrr B, Pasche S, Voirin G, Weder C, Simon YC, Foster EJ (2014) Biosensors based on porous cellulose nanocrystal-poly(vinyl alcohol) scaffolds. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:12674–12683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sebe G, Ham-Pichavant F, Ibarboure E, Koffi ALC, Tingaut P (2012) Supramolecular structure characterization of cellulose II nanowhiskers produced by acid hydrolysis of cellulose I substrates. Biomacromolecules 13:570–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shen F, Xiao WX, Lin LL, Yang G, Zhang YZ, Deng SH (2013) Enzymatic saccharification coupling with polyester recovery from cotton-based waste textiles by phosphoric acid pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 130:248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun XW, Lu CH, Liu Y, Zhang W, Zhang XX (2014) Melt-processed poly(vinyl alcohol) composites filled with microcrystalline cellulose from waste cotton fabrics. Carbohydr Polym 101:642–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tang BT, Zhang SF, Yang JZ, Liu F (2006) Synthesis of a novel water-soluble crosslinking polymeric dye with good dyeing properties. Dyes Pigm 68:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tian WG, Zhang JM, Yu J, Wu J, Zhang J, He JS, Wang FS (2018) Phototunable full-color emission of cellulose-based dynamic fluorescent materials. Adv Funct Mater 28:1703548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang S, Lu A, Zhang LN (2016) Recent advances in regenerated cellulose materials. Prog Polym Sci 53:169–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang ZH, Yao ZJ, Zhou JT, Zhang Y (2017) Reuse of waste cotton cloth for the extraction of cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 157:945–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wu XD, Lu CH, Zhou ZH, Yuan GP, Xiong R, Zhang XX (2014) Green synthesis and formation mechanism of cellulose nanocrystal-supported gold nanoparticles with enhanced catalytic performance. Environ Sci Nano 1:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiong R, Zhang XX, Tian D, Zhou ZH, Lu CH (2012) Comparing microcrystalline with spherical nanocrystalline cellulose from waste cotton fabrics. Cellulose 19:1189–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yue YY, Zhou CJ, French AD, Xia G, Han GP, Wang QW, Wu QL (2012) Comparative properties of cellulose nano-crystals from native and mercerized cotton fibers. Cellulose 19:1173–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang FL, Pang ZQ, Dong CH, Liu Z (2015) Preparing cationic cotton linter cellulose with high substitution degree by ultrasonic treatment. Carbohydr Polym 132:214–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang YC, Jiang Y, Han L, Wang BJ, Xu H, Zhong Y, Zhang LP, Mao ZP, Sui XF (2018) Biodegradable regenerated cellulose-dispersed composites with improved properties via a pickering emulsion process. Carbohydr Polym 179:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Ding
    • 1
  • Yang Jiang
    • 1
  • Bijia Wang
    • 1
  • Yingzhan Li
    • 1
  • Zhiping Mao
    • 1
  • Hong Xu
    • 1
  • Yi Zhong
    • 1
  • Linping Zhang
    • 1
  • Xiaofeng Sui
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Lab of Science and Technology of Eco-Textile, Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and BiotechnologyDonghua UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations