, Volume 25, Issue 12, pp 7409–7422 | Cite as

Magnetic hybrids synthesized from agroindustrial byproducts for highly efficient removal of total chromium from tannery effluent and catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol

  • Graziele da C. CunhaEmail author
  • Iris Amanda Alves Silva
  • Jôse Raymara Alves
  • Rhayza Victoria Matos Oliveira
  • Thalles Henrique Santos Menezes
  • Luciane P. C. Romão


The use of industrial waste to synthesize materials of technological interest is a rational way to minimize or solve environmental pollution problems. This work reports the removal of chromium ions from tannery effluent using magnetic hybrid adsorbents synthesized from waste biomass: coconut mesocarp (HCN), sugar cane bagasse (HBS), sawdust (HS), and termite nest (HT). The presence of organic matter and the cobalt ferrite phase in the structures of the materials were confirmed by XRD and FTIR analyses. Removal assays performed at different pH values showed the effectiveness of the adsorbents for removal at the natural pH of the effluent (pH 4.75), with adsorption capacity exceeding 6.6 mg g−1 for all the hybrids studied. The adsorption processes showed fast kinetics, with the HS hybrid removing 5.1 mg g−1 of the chromium species present in the effluent in the first 5 min. The HS hybrid presented the highest removal capacity, 6.7 mg g−1, while HBS showed the lowest, 6.6 mg g−1. The removal at equilibrium showed the following increasing order of efficiency of the hybrids: HBS < HCN < HT ≈ HS. The HCN and HT adsorbent matrices saturated with chromium ions (HCNCr and HTCr) showed excellent catalytic performance in the reduction of 4-nitrophenol, with 99.9% conversion within 180–240 s. The other hybrids did not present catalytic activity. The materials showed high capacities for reuse in two successive reduction cycles. The findings highlight the effectiveness of an industrial symbiosis approach to the development of new technologically important materials.


Magnetic hybrid Adsorption Tannery effluent Total chromium Catalysis 



The authors wish to thank the Brazilian funding agencies FAPITEC/SE, CLQM, CNPq, INCT and CAPES (postdoctoral grant).


  1. Araújo BR, Reis JOM, Rezende EIP, Mangrich AS, Wisniewski A Jr, Dick DP, Romão LPC (2013) Application of termite nest for adsorption of Cr(VI). J Environ Manag 129:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ABRAF, Asssociação brasileira de produtores de floresta plantadas. 2013. Anuário ABRAF 2013, ano base 2012.148. Accessed 12 June 2017
  3. Bedemo A, Chandravanshi BS, Zewge F (2016) Removal of trivalent chromium from aqueous solution using aluminum oxide hydroxide. Springerplus 5:1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beyki MH, Alijani H, Fazli Y (2017) Polyo-phenylenediamine–MgAl@CaFe2O4 nanohybrid for effective removing of lead(II), chromium(III) and anionic azo dye. Process Safety Environmental Protection 102:687–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen B, Chen Z (2009) Sorption of naphthalene and 1-naphthol by biochars of orange peels with different pyrolytic temperatures. Chemosphere 76:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y-G, He Y, Ye W-M, Jia L-Y (2015) Competitive adsorption characteristics of Na(I)/Cr(III) and Cu(II)/Cr(III) on GMZ bentonite in their binary solution. J Ind Eng Chem 26:335–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chon R, Chon AL (1997). Subprodutos del procesado de las frutas. In: Arthey D, Ashurst PR (eds) Procesado de Frutas. Zaragoza, 273, ISBN 8420008397Google Scholar
  8. Chowdhury S, Mazumder MAJ, Al-Attas O, Husain T (2016) Heavy metals in drinking water: occurrences, implications, and future needs in developing countries. Sci Total Environ 570:476–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruz DRS, Santos BTJ, Cunha GC, Romão LPC (2017) Green synthesis of a magnetic hybrid adsorbent (CoFe2O4/NOM): Removal of chromium from industrial effluent and evaluation of the catalytic potential of recovered chromium ions. J Hazard Mater 334:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Culita DC, Simonescu CM, Dragne M, Stanica N, Munteanu C, Preda S, Oprea O (2015) Effect of surfactant concentration on textural, morphological and magnetic properties of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles and evaluation of their adsorptive capacity for Pb(II) íons. Ceram Int 41:13553–13560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunha G da C, Santos MC, Araújo BR, Jesus JHF, Santos LO, Santos JM, Romão LPC (2015) Performance of agroindustrial wastes for removal of disinfection by-products from water. Water Air Soil Pollut 226: 426–436Google Scholar
  12. Cunha G da C, Peixoto JA, Requião DS, Romão LPC, Macedo ZS (2016) Recycling of chromium wastes from the tanning industry to produce ceramic nanopigments. Green Chem 18:3673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deravanesiyan M, Beheshti M, Malekpour A (2015) Alumina nanoparticles immobilization onto the NaX zeolite and the removal of Cr(III) and Co (II) ions from aqueous solutions. J Ind Eng Chem 21:580–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Devi P, Saroha AK (2017) Utilization of sludge based adsorbents for the removal of various pollutants: a review. Sci Total Environ 578:16–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Estrada SO, Aguilar HAC, Pandjyan T, Corea M, Domínguez IAR, Tavizon G (2017) Tuning of the magnetic response in cobalt ferrite CoxFe3−xO4 by varying the Fe2+ to Co2+ molar ratios: rietveld refinement and DFT structural analysis. J Alloys Compd 695:2706–2716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Filho AT, Lange LC, Melo GCB, Praes GE (2016) Pyrolysis of chromium rich tanning industrial wastes and utilization of carbonized wastes in metallurgical process. Waste Manage 48:448–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Annual Statistics 20. Accessed 01 June 2017
  18. Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage 92:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gao S, Tang Y, Wang L, Liu L, Jia D, Zhao Z (2017) NiFe nanoalloys in situ immobilized on coal based activated carbons through one-step pyrolysis as magnetically recoverable catalysts for reduction of 4-nitrophenol. J Alloys Compd 702:531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goyal A, Bansal S, Singhal S (2014) Facile reduction of nitrophenols: comparative catalytic efficiency of MFe2O4 (M = Ni, Cu, Zn) nanoferrites. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:4895–4908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guiza S (2017) Biosorption of heavy metal from aqueous solution using cellulosic waste orange peel. Ecol Eng 99:134–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta VK, Agarwal S, Saleh TA (2011) Chromium removal by combining the magnetic properties of iron oxide with adsorption properties of carbon nanotubes. Water Res 45:2207–2212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gupta VK, Atar N, Yola MY, Üstündağ Z, Uzun L (2014) A novel magnetic Fe@Au coreeshell nanoparticles anchored graphene oxide recyclable nanocatalyst for the reduction of nitrophenol compounds. Water Res 48:210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Houari B, Louhibi S, Tizaoui K, Boukli-hacene L, Benguella B, Roisnel T, Dorcet V (2016) New synthetic material removing heavy metals from aqueous solutions and wastewater. Arabian J Chem in prelo Google Scholar
  25. Hu J, Chen G, Lo IMC (2005) Removal and recovery of Cr(VI) from wastewater by maghemite nanoparticles. Water Res 39:4528–4536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jesus JHF, Cunha G da C, Cardoso EMC, Mangrich AS, Romão LPC (2017) Evaluation of waste biomasses and their biochars for removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Environ Manage 200:186–195Google Scholar
  27. Khare P, Dilshad U, Rout PK, Yadav V, Jain S (2017) Plant refuses driven biochar: application as metal adsorbent from acidic solutions. Arabian J Chem 10:S3054–S3063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumari M, Pittman CU Jr, Mohan D (2015) Heavy metals [chromium (VI) and lead (II)] removal from water using mesoporous magnetite (Fe3O4) nanospheres. J Colloid Interf Sci 442:120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kumari V, Yadav A, Haq I, Kumar S, Bharagava RN, Singh SK, Raj A (2016) Genotoxicity evaluation of tannery effluent treated with newly isolated hexavalent chromium reducing Bacillus cereus. J Environ Manag 183:204–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li K, Li P, Cai J, Xiao S, Yang H, Li A (2016) Efficient adsorption of both methyl orange and chromium from their aqueous mixtures using a quaternary ammonium salt modified chitosan magnetic composite adsorbent. Chemosphere 154:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lingamdinne LP, Koduru JR, Choi Y, Chang Y, Yang J (2016) Studies on removal of Pb(II) and Cr(III) using graphene oxide based inverse spinel nickel ferrite nano-composite as sorbent. Hydrometallurgy 165:64–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lingamdinne LP, Chang Y, Yang J, Singh J, Choi E, Shiratani M, Koduru JR, Attri P (2017) Biogenic reductive preparation of magnetic inverse spinel iron oxide nanoparticles for the adsorption removal of heavy metals. Chem Eng J 307:74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lu S, Yu J, Cheng Y, Wang Q, Barras A, Xu W, Szunerits S, Cornu D, Boukherroub R (2017) Preparation of silver nanoparticles/polydopamine functionalized polyacrylonitrile fiber paper and its catalytic activity for the reduction 4-nitrophenol. Appl Surf Sci 411:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lugo-Lugo V, Barrera-Díaz C, Ureña-Núñez F, Bilyeu B, Linares-Hernández I (2012) Biosorption of Cr(III) and Fe(III) in single and binary systems onto pretreated orange peel. J Environ Manage 112:120–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma Y, Wua X, Zhang G (2017a) Core-shell Ag@Pt nanoparticles supported on sepiolite nanofibers for the catalytic reduction of nitrophenols in water: enhanced catalytic performance and DFT study. Appl Catal B 205:262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ma J-F, Xing J, Wang K, Yangc H, Fei B, Liu X (2017b) Inspired by efficient cellulose-dissolving system: facile one-pot synthesis of biomass-based hydrothermal magnetic carbonaceous materials. Carbohydr Polym 164:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moghaddam MM, Pieber B, Glasnov T, Kappe CO (2014) Immobilized iron oxide nanoparticles as stable and reusable catalysts for hydrazine-mediated nitro reductions in continuous flow. Chemsuschem 7:3122–3131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mohan D, Singh KP, Singh VK (2006) Trivalent chromium removal from wastewater using low cost activated carbon derived from agricultural waste material and activated carbon fabric cloth. J Hazard Mater 135:280–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nguyen TAH, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Zhang J, Liang S, Yue QY, Li Q, Nguyen TV (2013) Applicability of agricultural waste and by-products for adsorptive removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Bioresour Technol 148:574–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Onyancha D, Mavura W, Ngila JC, Ongoma P, Chacha J (2008) Studies of chromium removal from tannery wastewaters by algae biosorbents, Spirogyra condensata and Rhizoclonium hieroglyphicum. J Hazard Mater 158:605–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parsons JG, Hernandez J, Gonzalez CM, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2014) Sorption of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) to high and low pressure synthetic nano-magnetite (Fe3O4) particles. Chem Eng J 254:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peng S, Liu Y, Xue Z, Yin W, Liang X, Li M, Chang J (2017) Modified nanoporous magnetic cellulose–chitosan microspheres for efficient removal of Pb(II) and methylene blue from aqueous solution. Cellulose 24:4793–4806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reddy HK, Lee SM (2014) Magnetic biochar composite: facile synthesis, characterization, and application for heavy metal removal. Colloids Surf A 454:96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reddy NA, Lakshmipathy R, Sarada NC (2014) Application of Citrullus lanatus rind as biosorbent for removal of trivalent chromium from aqueous solution. Alexandria Engineering Journal 53:969–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Brasil. Conselho Nacional do meio Ambiente-CONAMA. Resolução Nº 357 de 17 de março de 2005. Dispõe sobre a classificação dos corpos de água e diretrizes ambientais para o seu enquadramento, bom como estabelece as condições e padrões de lançamento de efluentes, e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 17 de março de 2005Google Scholar
  46. CONAMA. Resolução Nº 430, de 13 de maio de 2011. Accessed 29 June 2017
  47. Rezaei H (2016) Biosorption of chromium by using Spirulina sp. Arab J Chem 9:846–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sadeek SA, Negm NA, Hefni HHH, Wahab MMA (2015) Metal adsorption by agricultural biosorbents: adsorption isotherm, kinetic and biosorbents chemical structures. Int J Biol Macromol 81:400–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sahraei R, Pour ZS, Ghaemy M (2017) Novel magnetic bio-sorbent hydrogel beads based on modified gum tragacanth/graphene oxide: removal of heavy metals and dyes from water. J Clean Prod 142:2973–2984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saleh S, Kamarudin KB, Ghani WAWAK, Kheang LS (2016) Removal of organic contaminant from aqueous solution using magnetic biochar. Procedia Eng 148:228–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saraswat S, Rai JPN (2010) Heavy metal adsorption from aqueous solution using Eichhornia crassipes dead biomass. Int J Miner Process 94:203–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29(10):786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shen W, Qu Y, Pei X, Li S, Zhou J (2017) Catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol using gold nanoparticles biosynthesized by cell-free extracts of Aspergillus sp WL-Au. J Hazard Mater 321:299–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simeonidis E, Kaprara T, Samaras M, Angelakeris N, Pliatsikas G, Vourlias M, Mitrakas AN (2015) Optimizing magnetic nanoparticles for drinking water technology: the case of Cr(VI). Sci Total Environ 535:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Song W, Gao B, Zhang T, Xu X, Huang X, Yu H, Yue Q (2015) High-capacity adsorption of dissolved hexavalent chromium using amine-functionalized magnetic corn stalk composites. Bioresour Technol 190:550–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Srisombat L, Nonkumwonga J, Suwannarat K, Kuntalue B, Ananta S (2017) Simple preparation Au/Pd core/shell nanoparticles for 4-nitrophenol reduction. Colloids Surf A 512:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Su C (2017) Environmental implications and applications of engineered nanoscale magnetite and its hybrid nanocomposites: a review of recent literature. J Hazard Mater 322:48–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Ground Water and Drinking Water, Table of Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants Accessed 14 June 2017
  59. Vaiopoulou E, Gikas P (2012) Effects of chromium on activated sludge and on the performance of wastewater treatment plants: a review. Water Res 46:549–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Veni DK, Kannan P, Edison TNJI, Senthilkumar A (2017) Biochar from green waste for phosphate removal with subsequent disposal. Waste Manage 68:752–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang T, Jin X, Chen Z, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2014) Simultaneous removal of Pb(II) and Cr(III) by magnetite nanoparticles using various synthesis conditions. J Ind Eng Chem 20:3543–3549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wang D, Hea S, Shana C, Yea Y, Mac H, Zhanga X, Zhang W, Pan B (2016) Chromium speciation in tannery effluent after alkaline precipitation: isolation and characterization. J Hazard Mater 316:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang X, Tan F, Wan W, Qiao X, Qiu X, Chen J (2017) Anchoring of silver nanoparticles on graphitic carbon nitride sheets for the synergistic catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Chemosphere 172:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yap MW, Mubarak NM, Sahuc JN, Abdullah EC (2017) Microwave induced synthesis of magnetic biochar from agricultural biomass for removal of lead and cadmium from wastewater. J Ind Eng Chem 45:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang H, Luan Q, Tang H, Huang F, Zheng M, Deng Q, Xiang X, Yang C, Shi J, Zheng C, Zhou Q (2017) Removal of methyl orange from aqueous solutions by adsorption on cellulose hydrogel assisted with Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Cellulose 24:903–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhao J, Liu J, Li N, Wang W, Nan J, Zhao Z, Cui F (2016) Highly efficient removal of bivalent heavy metals from aqueous systems by magnetic porous Fe3O4-MnO2: adsorption behavior and process study. Chem Eng J 304:737–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graziele da C. Cunha
    • 1
    Email author
  • Iris Amanda Alves Silva
    • 1
  • Jôse Raymara Alves
    • 1
  • Rhayza Victoria Matos Oliveira
    • 1
  • Thalles Henrique Santos Menezes
    • 1
  • Luciane P. C. Romão
    • 1
  1. 1.Chemistry DepartmentFederal University of Sergipe (UFS)AracajuBrazil

Personalised recommendations