Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 11, pp 6319–6331 | Cite as

Influence of drying process on reactivity of cellulose and xylan in acetylation of willow (Salix schwerinii E. L. Wolf) kraft pulp monitored by HSQC-NMR spectroscopy

  • Yasuko Saito
  • Takashi Endo
  • Daisuke Ando
  • Fumiaki Nakatsubo
  • Hiroyuki Yano
Original Paper

Abstract

The acetylation behavior of xylan and cellulose in kraft pulp (KP) was investigated. Heteronuclear single quantum coherence-nuclear magnetic resonance (HSQC-NMR) spectroscopy was used to identify the positions at which the hydroxyl groups of polysaccharides were acetylated. X-ray diffraction analysis was used to determine the acetylation of cellulose in the crystal region. It was found that only xylan was obviously acetylated in the initial stages of the reaction. In the next stage of the acetylation, however, both the xylan and surface of the cellulose crystals reacted. Then, acetylation of the inner crystal region of the cellulose started before the completion of the xylan modification. To improve the reactivity of xylan in KP, the effect of drying or the dehydration of never-dried KP prior to acetylation was also investigated. The use of supercritical CO2 (scCO2) drying produced a KP with a higher specific surface area. This caused the xylan to exhibit a higher reactivity than that resulting from freeze drying and vacuum drying after solvent exchange. Furthermore, never-dry dehydration pretreatment produced xylan with the highest reactivity. This suggests that the cellulose–cellulose and/or cellulose–hemicellulose adhesion in the cell wall that arises as a result of drying reduces the reactivity of the xylan.

Keywords

Kraft pulp Acetylation HSQC-NMR spectroscopy Drying process Reactivity of xylan 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan (Grant P13006). The authors express their gratitude to Shiranuka-cho, Hokkaido, Japan for kindly providing the willow wood chips.

References

  1. Almasi H, Ghanbarzadeh B, Dehghannia J, Pirsa S, Zandi M (2015) Heterogeneous modification of softwoods cellulose nanofibers with oleic acid: effect of reaction time and oleic acid concentration. Fiber Polym 16(8):1715–1722.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-015-4294-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ando D, Nakatsubo F, Yano H (2017) Acetylation of ground pulp: monitoring acetylation via HSQC-NMR spectroscopy. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(2):1755–1762.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Lucka-Gabor M, Gutowski VS (2008) The effects of acetylation on properties of flax fibre and its polypropylene composites. eXPRESS Polym Lett 2(6):413–422.  https://doi.org/10.3144/expresspolymlett.2008.50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boustani ME, Brouillette F, Lebrun G, Belfkira A (2015) Solvent-free acetylation of lignocellulosic fibers at room temperature: effect on fiber structure and surface properties. J Appl Polym Sci 132:42247.  https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.42247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colom X, Carrillo F, Nogués F, Garriga P (2003) Structural analysis of photodegraded wood by means of FTIR spectroscopy. Polym Degrad Stab 80:543–549.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-3910(03)00051-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Efanov MV (2001) Transformations of aspen wood and its principal components by O-acylation. Chem Nat Compd 37(5):482–485.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014487830358 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fundador NGV, Enomoto-Rogers Y, Takemura A, Iwata T (2012) Synthesis and characterization of xylan esters. Polymer 53:3885–3893.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.06.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iwamoto S, Yamamoto S, Lee S-H, Endo T (2014) Solid-state shear pulverization as effective treatment for dispersing lignocellulose nanofibers in polypropylene composites. Cellulose 21:1573–1580.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0195-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalia S, Kaith BS, Kaur I (2012) Pretreatments of natural fibers and their application as reinforcing material in polymer composites-a review. Polym Eng Sci 49(7):1253–1272.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.21328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kamitakahara H, Enomono Y, Hasegawa C, Nakatsubo F (2005) Synthesis of diblock copolymers with cellulose derivatives. 2. Characterization and thermal properties of cellulose triacetate-block-oligoamide-15. Cellulose 12:527–541.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-005-7135-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Khen GMA, Shams MSA, Kabir MdR, Gafur MA, Terano M, Alam MS (2013) Influence of chemical treatment on the properties of banana stem fiber and banana stem fiber/coir hybrid fiber reinforced maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene/low-density polyethylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 128:1020–1029.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.38197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim H, Ralph J (2010) Solution-state 2D NMR of ball-milled plant cell wall gels in DMSO-d6/pyridine-d5. Org Biomol Chem 8:576–591.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b916070a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim H, Ralph J (2014) A gel-state 2D-NMR method for plant cell wall profiling and analysis: a model study with the amorphous cellulose and xylan from ball-milled cotton linters. RSC Adv 4:7549–7560.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra46338a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Luo X, Zhu JY (2011) Effects of drying-induced fiber hornification on enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. Enzyme Microb Technol 48:92–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.09.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Olaru N, Olaru L, Vasile C, Ander P (2011) Surface modified cellulose obtained by acetylation without solvents of bleached and unbleached kraft pulps. Polymery 56:834–840Google Scholar
  16. Peng Y, Gardner DJ, Han Y, Kiziltas A, Cai Z, Tshabalala MA (2013) Influence of drying method on the material properties of nanocellulose I: thermostability and crystallinity. Cellulose 20:2379–2392.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-0019-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peredo K, Reyes H, Escobar D, Vege-Lara J, Berg A, Pereira M (2015) Acetylation of bleached Kraft pulp: effect of xylan content on properties of acetylated compounds. Carbohydr Polym 117:1014–1020.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Pickering KL, Efendy MGA, Le TM (2016) A review of recent developments in natural fibre composites and their mechanical performance. Compos Part A 83:98–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Popescu C-M, Larsson PT, Olaru N, Vasile C (2012) Spectroscopic study of acetylated kraft pulp fibers. Carbohydr Polym 88:530–536.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qu C, Kishimoto T, Kishino M, Hamada M, Nakajima N (2011) Heteronuclear single-quantum coherence nuclear magnetic resonance (HSQC NMR) characterization of acetylated fir (Abies sachallnensis MAST) wood regenerated from ionic liquid. J Agric Food Chem 59:5382–5389.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf200498n CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramsden MJ, Blake FSR (1997) A kinetic study of the acetylation of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin components in wood. Wood Sci Technol 31:45–50.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002260050013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rowell RM, Simonson R, Hess S, Plackett DV, Cronshaw D, Dunningham E (1994) Acetyl distribution in acetylated whole wood and reactivity of isolated wood cell-wall components to acetic anhydride. Wood Fiber Sci 26(1):11–18Google Scholar
  23. Saheb DN, Jog JP (1999) Natural fiber polymer composites: a review. Adv Polym Technol 18(4):351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sato A, Kabusaki D, Okumura H, Nakatani T, Nakatsubo F, Yano H (2016) Surface modification of cellulose nanofibers with alkenyl succinic anhydride for high-density polyethylene reinforcement. Compos A 83:72–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Text Res J 29:786–794.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004051755902901003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suzuki K, Homma Y, Igarashi Y, Okumura H, Yano H (2017) Effect of preparation process of microfibrillated cellulose-reinforced polypropylene upon dispersion and mechanical properties. Cellulose 24:3789–3801.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1355-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thimm JC, Burritt DJ, Ducker WA, Melton LD (2000) Celery (Apium graveolens L.) parenchyma cell walls examined by atomic force microscopy: effect of dehydration on cellulose microfibrils. Planta 212:25–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250000359 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoshida N (2010) Surface chemical modification of cellulose nanofiber (octanoylation). The master thesis in Research Institute for Sustainable Humanosphere, Kyoto University. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/182500. Accessed 12 Apr 2016

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for Sustainable ChemistryNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)HiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Research Institute for Sustainable HumanosphereKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations