Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–18 | Cite as

Thermochromic ink–paper interactions and their role in biodegradation of UV curable prints

  • Marina Vukoje
  • Snežana Miljanić
  • Jasna Hrenović
  • Mirela Rožić
Original Paper
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, biodegradability aspects of UV thermochromic leuco dye print on three different paper materials (synthetic, recycled, and bulky) were studied using the soil burial test under anaerobic conditions. Biodegradation of UV curable thermochromic prints were evaluated for changes by visual examination, microbial growth assay, weight loss measurements, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy and colorimetric measurements. Results showed a better absorption of ink into the bulky paper structure, followed by recycled paper. Synthetic paper is not absorbent. The ink binder altogether with classic pigment and microcapsules penetrates into the structure of bulky paper. Recycled paper absorbs ink binder mostly with classic pigment. Better adsorption of binder into the bulky paper structure results in thinner layer of ink binder on the paper surface. On non-absorbent synthetic paper, microcapsules are covered with thicker layer of ink binder. In the case of bulky paper, the highest rate of biodegradation was observed, resulting in a higher number of bacteria, higher weight loss, higher changes in colour (destruction of almost all microcapsules) and almost complete reduction in thermochromic effect of the prints. Results show that microcapsules, which penetrate into the structure of bulky paper, are promoting the rate of bulky paper biodegradation. The opposite behaviour was noticed for the penetration of classic pigment into the structure of recycled paper, which resulted in remarkable reduction of recycled paper biodegradation rate. The thicker layer of ink binder (containing classic pigment) on the surface of microcapsules on recycled paper resulted in slower rate of microcapsules degradation and smaller colour change of the print. The thickest layer of ink binder and classic pigment on synthetic paper surface causes the slowest rate of biodegradation of print.

Keywords

Thermochromic ink Paper ink interactions Biodegradation Bacteria SEM FTIR 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support of University of Zagreb, Grant No. TP122 and Croatian Science Foundation (Project No. IP-2014-09-5656).

References

  1. Aitken D, Burkinshaw SM, Griffiths J et al (1996) Textile applications of thermochromic systems. Rev Prog Color 26:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arutchelvi J, Sudhakar M, Arkatkar A et al (2008) Biodegradation of polyethylene and polypropylene. Indian J Biotechnol 7:9–22Google Scholar
  3. Bardi MAG, Munhoz MML, Auras RA, Machado LDB (2014) Assessment of UV exposure and aerobic biodegradation of poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate)/starch blend films coated with radiation-curable print inks containing degradation-promoting additives. Ind Crops Prod 60:323–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bénard F, Mailhot B, Mallégol J, Gardette JL (2008) Photoageing of an electron beam cured polyurethane acrylate resin. Polym Degrad Stab 93:1122–1130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carré B, Magnin L, Ayala C (2005) Digital prints: a survey of the various deinkability behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 7th research forum on recycling, PAPTAC, Quebec, Canada, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  6. Chalmers JM (2007) Spectra-structure correlations: polymer spectra. In: Griffiths PM, Chalmers JM (eds) Handbook of vibrational spectroscopy. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciolacu D, Ciolacu F, Popa VI (2011) Amorphous cellulose—structure and characterization. Cellul Chem Technol 45:13–21.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156856198X00740 Google Scholar
  8. Das G, Kalita RD, Deka H et al (2013) Biodegradation, cytocompatability and performance studies of vegetable oil based hyperbranched polyurethane modified biocompatible sulfonated epoxy resin/clay nanocomposites. Prog Org Coat 76:1103–1111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De la Cruz FB, Yelle DJ, Gracz HS, Barlaz MA (2014) Chemical changes during anaerobic decomposition of hardwood, softwood, and old newsprint under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. J Agric Food Chem 62:6362–6374.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf501653h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derkacheva O, Sukhov D (2008) Investigation of lignins by FTIR spectroscopy. Macromol Symp 265:61–68.  https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.200850507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. El-Sayed WS, El-Baz AF, Othman AM (2006) Biodegradation of melamine formaldehyde by Micrococcus sp. strain MF-1 isolated from aminoplastic wastewater effluent. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 57:75–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2005.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erhan SZ, Bagby MO (1995) Vegetable-oil-based printing ink formulation and degradation. Ind Crops Prod 3:237–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6690(94)00040-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erhan SZ, Bagby MO, Nelsen TC (1997) Statistical evaluation of biodegradation of news ink vehicles and ink formulations. J Am Oil Chem Soc 74:707–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fujinami F (1996) Ultraviolet-curable thermochromic ink composition. U.S. Patent 5,500,040, 19 March 1996Google Scholar
  15. Grilj S, Klanjšek Gunde M, Szentgyörgyvölgyi R, Gregor-Svetec D (2012) FT-IR and UV/VIS analysis of classic and recycled papers. Papíripar LVI/4:7–13Google Scholar
  16. Hajzeri M, Bašnec K, Bele M, Klanjšek Gunde M (2015) Influence of developer on structural, optical and thermal properties of a benzofluoran-based thermochromic composite. Dye Pigment 113:754–762.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2014.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hermann BG, Debeer L, De Wilde B et al (2011) To compost or not to compost: carbon and energy footprints of biodegradable materials’ waste treatment. Polym Degrad Stab 96:1159–1171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.12.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Homola TJ (2008) Color-changing inks. AccessScience. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoshino A, Kanao S, Fukushima K et al (2003) Influence of surface printing materials on the degradability of biodegradable plastic films in soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 49:903–907.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2003.10410354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huang J, Sun J, Zhang R et al (2016) Improvement of biodegradability of UV-curable adhesives modified by a novel polyurethane acrylate. Prog Org Coat 95:20–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim DS, Seo WH (2004) Ultraviolet-curing behavior and mechanical properties of a polyester acrylate resin. J Appl Polym Sci 92:3921–3928.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20422 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Komilis DP, Ham RK (2003) The effect of lignin and sugars to the aerobic decomposition of solid wastes. Waste Manag 23:419–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00062-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kulčar R, Friskovec M, Hauptman N et al (2010) Colorimetric properties of reversible thermochromic printing inks. Dye Pigment 86:271–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2010.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leach RH (2007) The printing ink manual, 5th edn. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  25. Leja K, Lewandowicz G (2010) Polymer biodegradation and biodegradable polymers—a review. Pol J Environ Stud 19:255–266Google Scholar
  26. López Alvarez JV, Larrucea MA, Bermúdez PA, Chicote BL (2009) Biodegradation of paper waste under controlled composting conditions. Waste Manag 29:1514–1519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.11.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Monte MC, Fuente E, Blanco A, Negro C (2009) Waste management from pulp and paper production in the European Union. Waste Manag 29:293–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oprea S, Doroftei F (2011) Biodegradation of polyurethane acrylate with acrylated epoxidized soybean oil blend elastomers by Chaetomium globosum. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 65:533–538.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oprea S, Potolinca VO, Gradinariu P et al (2016) Synthesis, properties, and fungal degradation of castor-oil-based polyurethane composites with different cellulose contents. Cellulose 23:2515–2526.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0972-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Panák O, Držková M, Kaplanová M et al (2017) The relation between colour and structural changes in thermochromic systems comprising crystal violet lactone, bisphenol A, and tetradecanol. Dye Pigment 136:382–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.08.050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pivnenko K, Eriksson E, Astrup TF (2015) Waste paper for recycling: overview and identification of potentially critical substances. Waste Manag 45:134–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2015.02.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Proniewicz LM, Paluszkiewicz C, Wesełucha-Birczyńska A et al (2002) FT-IR and FT-Raman study of hydrothermally degraded groundwood containing paper. J Mol Struct 614:345–353.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2860(02)00275-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raditoiu A, Raditoiu V, Nicolae CA et al (2016) Optical and structural dynamical behavior of crystal violet lactone-phenolphthalein binary thermochromic systems. Dye Pigment 134:69–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.06.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robert T (2015) “green ink in all colors”—printing ink from renewable resources. Prog Org Coat 78:287–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2014.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seeboth A, Lotzsch D (2008) Thermochromic phenomena in polymers. Smithers Rapra Technology Limited, ShropshireGoogle Scholar
  36. Seeboth A, Lotzsch D (2013) Thermochromic and thermotropic materials. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  37. Seeboth A, Klukowska A, Ruhmann R, Lötzsch D (2007) Thermochromic polymer materials. Chin J Polym Sci 25:123–135.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0256767907001923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shah AA, Hasan F, Hameed A, Ahmed S (2008) Biological degradation of plastics: a comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv 26:246–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shogren RL, Petrovic Z, Liu Z, Erhan SZ (2004) Biodegradation behavior of some vegetable oil-based polymers. J Polym Environ 12:173–178.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOOE.0000038549.73769.7d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stinson JA, Ham RK (1995) Effect of lignin on the anaerobic decomposition of cellulose as determined through the use of a biochemical methane potential method. Environ Sci Technol 29:2305–2310.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es00009a023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tang SLP, Stylios GK (2006) An overview of smart technologies for clothing design and engineering. Int J Cloth Sci Technol 18:108–128.  https://doi.org/10.1108/09556220610645766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thompson B (2004) Printing materials: science and technology, 2nd edn. Pira International Press, LeatherheadGoogle Scholar
  43. Tinti A, Tugnoli V, Bonora S, Francioso O (2015) Recent applications of vibrational mid-infrared (IR) spectroscopy for studying soil components: a review. J Cent Eur Agric 16:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/16.1.1535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Wyk JPH, Mohulatsi M (2003) Biodegradation of waste cellulose. J Polym Environ 11:23–28.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023883428359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Venelampi O, Weber A, Rönkkö T, Itävaara M (2003) The biodegradation and disintegration of paper products in the composting environment. Compost Sci Util 11:200–209.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2003.10702128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vukoje M, Rožić M, Miljanić S, Pasanec Preprotić S (2017) Biodegradation of thermochromic offset prints. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 32:289–298.  https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2017-32-02-p289-298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang X, De la Cruz FB, Ximenes F, Barlaz MA (2015) Decomposition and carbon storage of selected paper products in laboratory-scale landfills. Sci Total Environ 532:70–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang T, Wu W, Wang X, Mu Y (2010) Effect of average functionality on properties of UV-curable waterborne polyurethane-acrylate. Prog Org Coat 68:201–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2010.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Graphic ArtsUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Department of Chemistry, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations