Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 6093–6105 | Cite as

Bacterial cellulose for increasing barrier properties of paper products

  • Amanda Fillat
  • Josefina Martínez
  • Cristina Valls
  • Oriol Cusola
  • M. Blanca Roncero
  • Teresa Vidal
  • Susana V. Valenzuela
  • Pilar Diaz
  • F. I. Javier Pastor
Original Paper

Abstract

Bacterial cellulose was combined with wood cellulose papers in order to obtain biomaterials with increased barrier properties. For this purpose, different parameters were assessed: two producing bacterial strains (Komagataeibacter xylinus and Gluconacetobacter sucrofermentans), two paper supports to hold bacterial cellulose (filter paper and eucalyptus paper), two kinds of combined biomaterials (composite and bilayer) and two drying temperatures (90 °C and room temperature). Papers with increased barrier properties (100° of water contact angle, 1220 s of water drop test and air permeability < 1 µm (Pa s)−1) were obtained by the addition of bacterial cellulose to each paper support. However, due to the lower initial barrier properties of filter paper, higher improvements were produced with this paper. In addition, bacterial cellulose provided smoother surfaces with higher gloss without a detrimental effect on physical properties. Higher resistance to water absorption was obtained with K. xylinus possibly explained by its longer size fibers than G. sucrofermentans, as analysed by SEM. Smoothness and gloss were specially increased in the bilayer biomaterial although resistance to air and water were further improved in the composite. In this biomaterial drying at high temperature had a detrimental effect. SEM analysis of the products obtained showed the intimate contact among fibers of bacterial cellulose and wood paper. Results obtained show the contribution of bacterial cellulose to improve the properties of paper and its potential for the design of new added value paper products from biomass.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Bacterial cellulose Barrier properties Hydrophobicity Air permeability Water resistance Cellulose paper 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the ‘‘Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad’’ of Spain for their support in this work under the projects FILMBIOCEL CTQ2016-77936-R (funding also from the ‘‘Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional FEDER’’), BIOPAPµFLUID (CTQ2013-48995-C2-1-R and CTQ2013-48995-C2-2-R) and MICROBIOCEL (CTQ2017-84966-C2-1-R and CTQ2017-84966-C2-2-R). The authors are grateful to the consolidated research UPC - UB group AGAUR 2017 SGR 30 and to the Serra Húnter Fellow to Cristina Valls. The experiments described in this article have been performed complying with the Spanish current laws.

References

  1. Aulin C, Gällstedt M, Lindström T (2010) Oxygen and oil barrier properties of microfibrillated cellulose films and coatings. Cellulose 17:559–574.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9393-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beltramino F, Roncero MB, Vidal T et al (2015) Increasing yield of nanocrystalline cellulose preparation process by a cellulase pretreatment. Bioresour Technol 192:574–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beltramino F, Roncero MB, Torres AL et al (2016) Optimization of sulfuric acid hydrolysis conditions for preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose from enzymatically pretreated fibers. Cellulose 23:1777–1789.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-0897-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boufi S, González I, Delgado-Aguilar M et al (2017) Nanofibrillated cellulose as an additive in papermaking process. Cellul Nanofibre Compos Prod Prop Appl 154:153–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100957-4.00007-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brodin FW, Gregersen ØW, Syverud K (2014) Cellulose nanofibrils: challenges and possibilities as a paper additive or coating material—a review. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:156–166.  https://doi.org/10.3183/NPPRJ-2014-29-01-p156-166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chawla PR, Bajaj IB, Survase SA, Singhal RS (2009) Microbial cellulose: fermentative production and applications (review). Food Technol Biotechnol 47:107–124Google Scholar
  7. Chen Y, Geng B, Ru J et al (2018) Comparative characteristics of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers and resulting nanopapers from bamboo, softwood, and hardwood pulps. Cellulose 25:895.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1553-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cusola O, Valls C, Vidal T, Roncero MB (2014) Rapid functionalisation of cellulose-based materials using a mixture containing laccase activated lauryl gallate and sulfonated lignin. Holzforschung 68:631–639.  https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2013-0128 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gao W, Chen K, Yang R, Yang F, Han W (2011) Properties of bacterial cellulose and its influence on the physical properties of paper. BioResources 6(1):144–153Google Scholar
  10. Gicquel E, Martin C, Garrido Yanez J, Bras J (2017) Cellulose nanocrystals as new bio-based coating layer for improving fiber-based mechanical and barrier properties. J Mater Sci 52:3048–3061.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0589-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilbert HJ (2010) The biochemistry and structural biology of plant cell wall deconstruction. Plant Physiol 153:444–455.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.156646 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Gindl W, Keckes J (2004) Tensile properties of cellulose acetate butyrate composites reinforced with bacterial cellulose. Compos Sci Tech 64 (15):2407–2413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagiwara Y, Putra A, Kakugo A et al (2010) Ligament-like tough double-network hydrogel based on bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 17:93–101.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9357-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrera MA, Mathew AP, Oksam K (2017) Barrier and mechanical properties of plasticized and cross-linked nanocellulose coatings for paper packaging applications. Cellulose 24:3969–3980.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1405-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hestrin S, Schramm M (1954) Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. II. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J 58(2):345–352CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chemie Int Ed 44:3358–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200460587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S et al (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chemie Int Ed 50:5438–5466.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201001273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lavoine N, Bras J, Desloges I (2014a) Mechanical and barrier properties of cardboard and 3D packaging coated with microfibrillated cellulose. J Appl Polym Sci 40106:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.40106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Khelifi B, Bras J (2014b) Impact of different coating processes of microfibrillated cellulose on the mechanical and barrier properties of paper. J Mater Sci 49:2879–2893.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7995-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lim GH, Lee J, Kwon N et al (2016) Fabrication of flexible magnetic papers based on bacterial cellulose and barium hexaferrite with improved mechanical properties. Electron Mater Lett 12:574–579.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-016-6179-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin SP, Loira Calvar I, Catchmark JM et al (2013) Biosynthesis, production and applications of bacterial cellulose. Cellulose 20:2191–2219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-013-9994-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakagaito AN, Iwamoto S , Yano H (2005) Bacterial cellulose: the ultimate nano-scalar cellulose morphology for the production of high-strength composites. Appl Phys A 80(1):93–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Osong SH, Norgren S, Engstrand P (2016) Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review. Cellulose 23:93–123.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0798-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pommet M, Juntaro J, Heng JYY et al (2008) Surface modification of natural fibers using bacteria: depositing bacterial cellulose onto natural fibers to create hierarchical fiber reinforced nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 9:1643–1651.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800169g CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Quintana E, Valls C, Vidal T, Roncero MB (2013) An enzyme-catalysed bleaching treatment to meet dissolving pulp characteristics for cellulose derivatives applications. Bioresour Technol 148:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Quintana E, Valls C, Vidal T, Roncero MB (2015) Comparative evaluation of the action of two different endoglucanases. Part I: on a fully bleached, commercial acid sulfite dissolving pulp. Cellulose 22:2067–2079.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-015-0623-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Quintana E et al (2015) Characterization of purified bacterial cellulose focused on its use on paper restoration. Carbohydr Polym 116:173–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.03.064 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Gómez N et al (2016a) Use of bacterial cellulose in degraded paper restoration. Part I: application on model papers. J Mater Sci 51:1541–1552.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9477-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Gómez N et al (2016b) Use of bacterial cellulose in degraded paper restoration. Part II: application on real samples. J Mater Sci 51:1553–1561.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9477-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Gómez N et al (2017) Paper reinforcing by in situ growth of bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci 52:5882–5893.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0824-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shah N, Ul-Islam M, Khattak WA, Park JK (2013) Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: a multipurpose advanced material. Carbohydr Polym 98:1585–1598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Surma-Slusarska B, Danielewicz D, Presler S (2008) Properties of composites of unbeaten birch and pine sulphate pulps with bacterial cellulose. Fibres Text East Eur 16:127–129Google Scholar
  33. Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16:75–85.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-008-9244-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tabarsa T, Sheykhnazari S, Ashori A, Mashkour M (2017) Preparation and characterization of reinforced papers using nano bacterial cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 101:334–340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.108 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Tang L, Huang B, Lu Q et al (2013) Ultrasonication-assisted manufacture of cellulose nanocrystals esterified with acetic acid. Bioresour Technol 127:100–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.133 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tuck CO, Pérez E, Horváth IT et al (2012) Valorization of biomass: deriving more value from waste. Science 80-(337):695–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xiang Z, Jin X, Liu Q, Chen Y, Li J, Lu F (2017a) The reinforcement mechanism of bacterial cellulose on paper made from woody and non-woody fiber sources. Cellulose 24 (11):5147–5156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xiang Z, Liu Q, Chen Y, Lu F (2017b) Effects of physical and chemical structures of bacterial cellulose on its enhancement to paper physical properties. Cellulose 24:3513–3523.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1361-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yamanaka S, Watanabe K, Kitamura N et al (1989) The structure and mechanical-properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci 24:3141–3145.  https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf01139032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics, Faculty of BiologyUniversity of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.CELBIOTECH_Paper Engineering Research GroupUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya, BarcelonaTechTerrassaSpain

Personalised recommendations