Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 9, pp 4887–4903 | Cite as

Utilisation of natural cellulose fibres in wastewater treatment

  • Nur Syazwani Abd Rahman
  • Mohd Firdaus Yhaya
  • Baharin Azahari
  • Wan Ruslan Ismail
Review Paper
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

Water safety and security are global problems. Indeed, researchers have taken this matter seriously and have begun to find alternative ways of treating wastewater. The conventional method for treating wastewater has been found to be uneconomical, and the polymeric materials used were not environmentally friendly. Biosorption techniques and mechanisms have been shown to be an effective alternative to replace conventional technologies. As agricultural waste is abundantly available, it has been chosen as the best starting material to produce biosorption material. Also, the hydroxyl functional groups in cellulose act as important parts to produce better absorbent materials. This review has explored the role of natural fibres as adsorbents for wastewater treatment while at the same time, for the removal of adsorbates such as oil, dyes, heavy metals, ionic compounds, and others as reported in the literature. Also investigated in this study, were the different modification types used to enhance the fibres and the mechanism of contaminant removal by the absorbents. Lastly, the physical forms of adsorbates and common types of effluents treated using natural fibres were examined and discussed.

Keywords

Adsorbents Natural fibres Cellulose Wastewater Effluent Water treatment Biosorption 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education and Universiti Sains Malaysia for their financial support in this research via 203.PHUMANITI.6711512 and the MyBrain15 scholarship.

References

  1. Abdelmouleh M, Boufi S, Ben Salah A, Belgacem MN, Gandini A (2002) Interaction of silane coupling agents with cellulose. Langmuir 18:3203–3208Google Scholar
  2. Abdul Khalil HPS, Siti Alwani M, Ridzuan R, Kamarudin H, Khairul A (2008) Chemical composition, morphological characteristics, and cell wall structure of malaysian oil palm fibers. Polym Plast Technol Eng 47:273–280Google Scholar
  3. Adekunle KF (2015) Surface treatments of natural fibres—a review: part 1. Open J Polym Chem 5:41Google Scholar
  4. Adekunle K, Åkesson D, Skrifvars M (2010) Biobased composites prepared by compression molding with a novel thermoset resin from soybean oil and a natural-fiber reinforcement. J Appl Polym Sci 116:1759–1765Google Scholar
  5. Ahmad AL, Ooi BS, Mohammad AW, Choudhury JP (2004) Development of a highly hydrophilic nanofiltration membrane for desalination and water treatment. Desalination 168:215–221Google Scholar
  6. Ahmad T, Rafatullah M, Ghazali A, Sulaiman O, Hashim R (2011) Oil palm biomass-based adsorbents for the removal of water pollutants—a review. J Environ Sci Health Part C 29:177–222Google Scholar
  7. Anirudhan TS, Unnithan MR (2007) Arsenic(V) removal from aqueous solutions using an anion exchanger derived from coconut coir pith and its recovery. Chemosphere 66:60–66Google Scholar
  8. Annadurai G, Juang RS, Lee DJ (2002) Use of cellulose-based wastes for adsorption of dyes from aqueous solutions. J Hazard Mater 92:263–274Google Scholar
  9. Asadpour R, Sapari N, Hasnain Isa M, Kakooei S, Orji KU, Daneshfozoun S (2016) Esterification of corn silk fiber to improve oil absorbency. In: Paper presented at the advanced materials researchGoogle Scholar
  10. Ashby MF, Ferreira PJSG, Schodek DL (2009) Nanomaterials, nanotechnologies and design: an introduction for engineers and architects. Butterworth-Heinemann, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Ashori A, Babaee M, Jonoobi M, Hamzeh Y (2014) Solvent-free acetylation of cellulose nanofibers for improving compatibility and dispersion. Carbohydr Polym 102:369–375Google Scholar
  12. Asim M, Abdan K, Jawaid M, Nasir M, Dashtizadeh Z, Ishak MR, Hoque ME (2015) A review on pineapple leaves fibre and its composites. Int J Polym Sci 2015:16Google Scholar
  13. Babel S, Kurniawan TA (2003) Low-cost adsorbents for heavy metals uptake from contaminated water: a review. J Hazard Mater 97:219–243Google Scholar
  14. Barakat MA (2011) New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Arab J Chem 4:361–377Google Scholar
  15. Bazargan A, Tan J, Hui CW, McKay G (2014) Utilization of rice husks for the production of oil sorbent materials. Cellulose 21:1679–1688Google Scholar
  16. Bharathi K, Ramesh S (2013) Removal of dyes using agricultural waste as low-cost adsorbents: a review. Appl Water Sci 3:773–790Google Scholar
  17. Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2010) Utilization of agro-industrial and municipal waste materials as potential adsorbents for water treatment—a review. Chem Eng J 157:277–296Google Scholar
  18. Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M, Witek-Krowiak A (2015) Agricultural waste peels as versatile biomass for water purification—a review. Chem Eng J 270:244–271Google Scholar
  19. Bledzki AK, Gassan J (1997) Handbook of engineering polymeric materials. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Bledzki AK, Reihmane S, Gassan J (1996) Properties and modification methods for vegetable fibers for natural fiber composites. J Appl Polym Sci 59:1329–1336Google Scholar
  21. Bourbonnais R, Marchessault RH (2010) Application of polyhydroxyalkanoate granules for sizing of paper. Biomacromolecules 11:989–993Google Scholar
  22. Brandão PC, Souza TC, Ferreira CA, Hori CE, Romanielo LL (2010) Removal of petroleum hydrocarbons from aqueous solution using sugarcane bagasse as adsorbent. J Hazard Mater 175:1106–1112Google Scholar
  23. Britt PF, Buchanan Iii A, Thomas KB, Lee SK (1995) Pyrolysis mechanisms of lignin: surface-immobilized model compound investigation of acid-catalyzed and free-radical reaction pathways. J Anal Appl Pyrol 33:1–19Google Scholar
  24. Çankaya N (2015) Cellulose grafting by atom transfer radical polymerization method. In: Cellulose-fundamental aspects and current trends. InTechGoogle Scholar
  25. Carpenter AW, De Lannoy CF, Wiesner MR (2015) Cellulose nanomaterials in water treatment technologies. Environ Sci Technol 49:5277–5287Google Scholar
  26. Cazetta AL, Vargas AMM, Nogami EM, Kunita MH, Guilherme MR, Martins AC, Silva TL, Moraes JCG, Almeida VC (2011) NaOH-activated carbon of high surface area produced from coconut shell: kinetics and equilibrium studies from the methylene blue adsorption. Chem Eng J 174:117–125Google Scholar
  27. Chandramohan D, Marimuthu K (2011) A review on natural fibers. Int J Recent Res Appl Stud 8:194–206Google Scholar
  28. Chen Y, Zhai SR, Liu N, Song Y, An QD, Song XW (2013) Dye removal of activated carbons prepared from NaOH-pretreated rice husks by low-temperature solution-processed carbonization and H3PO4 activation. Biores Technol 144:401–409Google Scholar
  29. Cho D, Yun SH, Kim J, Lim S, Park M, Lee SS, Lee GW (2004) Influence of silane coupling agents on the interlaminar and thermal properties of woven glass fabric/nylon 6 composites. Macromol Res 12:119–126Google Scholar
  30. Cho D, Kim HJ, Drzal LT (2013) Surface treatment and characterization of natural fibers: effects on the properties of biocomposites. Polym Compos 3:133–177Google Scholar
  31. Collinson SR, Thielemans W (2010) The catalytic oxidation of biomass to new materials focusing on starch, cellulose and lignin. Coord Chem Rev 254:1854–1870Google Scholar
  32. Das N (2010) Recovery of precious metals through biosorption—a review. Hydrometallurgy 103:180–189Google Scholar
  33. David NSH (1992) Chemical modification of lignocellulosic material. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. De Gisi S, Lofrano G, Grassi M, Notarnicola M (2016) Characteristics and adsorption capacities of low-cost sorbents for wastewater treatment: a review. Sustain Mater Technol 9:10–40Google Scholar
  35. Demirbas A (2008) Heavy metal adsorption onto agro-based waste materials: a review. J Hazard Mater 157:220–229Google Scholar
  36. Dharmarathne N, Sato N, Kawamoto K, Sato H, Tanaka N (2013) Evaluation of wastewater treatment efficiency using coconut fiber biofilm reactor system with synthetic leachate. In: 3rd international conference on engineering and applied science, Osaka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  37. Dorrestijn E, Laarhoven LJJ, Arends IWCE, Mulder P (2000) The occurrence and reactivity of phenoxyl linkages in lignin and low rank coal. J Anal Appl Pyrol 54:153–192Google Scholar
  38. El Hamdaoui L, El Moussaouiti M, Gmouh S (2016) Homogeneous esterification of cellulose in the mixture N-butylpyridinium chloride/dimethylsulfoxide. Int J Polym Sci 2016:7Google Scholar
  39. Etim U, Umoren S, Eduok U (2016) Coconut coir dust as a low cost adsorbent for the removal of cationic dye from aqueous solution. J Saudi Chem Soc 20:S67–S76Google Scholar
  40. Faravelli T, Frassoldati A, Migliavacca G, Ranzi E (2010) Detailed kinetic modeling of the thermal degradation of lignins. Biomass Bioenergy 34:290–301Google Scholar
  41. Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink HP, Sain M (2012) Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog Polym Sci 37:1552–1596Google Scholar
  42. French AD (2017) Glucose, not cellobiose, is the repeating unit of cellulose and why that is important. Cellulose 24:4605–4609Google Scholar
  43. Gaballah I, Goy D, Allain E, Kilbertus G, Thauront J (1997) Recovery of copper through decontamination of synthetic solutions using modified barks. Metall Mater Trans B 28:13–23Google Scholar
  44. Gebald C, Wurzbacher JA, Tingaut P, Zimmermann T, Steinfeld A (2011) Amine-based nanofibrillated cellulose as adsorbent for CO2 capture from air. Environ Sci Technol 45:9101–9108Google Scholar
  45. Gebru KA, Das C (2017a) Removal of bovine serum albumin from wastewater using fouling resistant ultrafiltration membranes based on the blends of cellulose acetate, and PVP-TiO2 nanoparticles. J Environ Manag 200:283–294Google Scholar
  46. Gebru KA, Das C (2017b) Removal of Pb(II) and Cu (II) ions from wastewater using composite electrospun cellulose acetate/titanium oxide (TiO2) adsorbent. J Water Process Eng 16:1–13Google Scholar
  47. Gebru KA, Das C (2018) Removal of chromium (VI) ions from aqueous solutions using amine-impregnated TiO2 nanoparticles modified cellulose acetate membranes. Chemosphere 191:673–684Google Scholar
  48. Gönen F, Serin DS (2012) Adsorption study on orange peel: removal of Ni (II) ions from aqueous solution. Afr J Biotech 11:1250–1258Google Scholar
  49. Hafren J, Córdova A (2005) Direct organocatalytic polymerization from cellulose fibers. Macromol Rapid Commun 26:82–86Google Scholar
  50. Hameed B, El-Khaiary M (2008) Batch removal of malachite green from aqueous solutions by adsorption on oil palm trunk fibre: equilibrium isotherms and kinetic studies. J Hazard Mater 154:237–244Google Scholar
  51. Hameed BH, Din ATM, Ahmad AL (2007) Adsorption of methylene blue onto bamboo-based activated carbon: kinetics and equilibrium studies. J Hazard Mater 141:819–825Google Scholar
  52. Han SH, Oh HJ, Kim SS (2014) Evaluation of fiber surface treatment on the interfacial behavior of carbon fiber-reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos B Eng 60:98–105Google Scholar
  53. Haussard M, Gaballah I, Kanari N, De Donato P, Barrès O, Villieras F (2003) Separation of hydrocarbons and lipid from water using treated bark. Water Res 37:362–374Google Scholar
  54. He L, Li X, Li W, Yuan J, Zhou H (2012) A method for determining reactive hydroxyl groups in natural fibers: application to ramie fiber and its modification. Carbohydr Res 348:95–98Google Scholar
  55. Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2016) A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res 91:156–173Google Scholar
  56. Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA (2015) Green modification of surface characteristics of cellulosic materials at the molecular or nano scale: a review, vol. 10Google Scholar
  57. Ibrahim S, Wang S, Ang HM (2010) Removal of emulsified oil from oily wastewater using agricultural waste barley straw. Biochem Eng J 49:78–83Google Scholar
  58. Igwe JC, Abia AA (2007) Adsorption isotherm studies of Cd (II), Pb(II) and Zn (II) ions bioremediation from aqueous solution using unmodified and EDTA-modified maize cob. Eclética Química 32:33–42Google Scholar
  59. Inyang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue Y, Zimmerman AR, Pullammanappallil P, Cao X (2012) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution by biochars derived from anaerobically digested biomass. Biores Technol 110:50–56Google Scholar
  60. Jayaprabha J, Brahmakumar M, Manilal V (2011) Banana pseudostem characterization and its fiber property evaluation on physical and bioextraction. J Nat Fibers 8:149–160Google Scholar
  61. Ji F, Li C, Tang B, Xu J, Lu G, Liu P (2012) Preparation of cellulose acetate/zeolite composite fiber and its adsorption behavior for heavy metal ions in aqueous solution. Chem Eng J 209:325–333Google Scholar
  62. Jin G, Pingdao G, Li Y, Fangchuan Z (2012) Degradation of dye wastewater by ns-pulse DBD plasma. Plasma Sci Technol 15:928–934Google Scholar
  63. Juang RS, Shiau RC (2000) Metal removal from aqueous solutions using chitosan-enhanced membrane filtration. J Membr Sci 165:159–167Google Scholar
  64. Kaiser A, Stark WJ, Grass RN (2017) Rapid production of a porous cellulose acetate membrane for water filtration using readily available chemicals. J Chem Educ 94:483–487Google Scholar
  65. Kalia S, Dufresne A, Cherian BM, Kaith BS, Avérous L, Njuguna J, Nassiopoulos E (2011) Cellulose-based bio- and nanocomposites: a review. Int J Polym Sci 2011:2011Google Scholar
  66. Kang PH, Jeun JP, Chung BY, Kim JS, Nho YC (2007) Preparation and characterization of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) grafted kapok fiber by using radiation induced-grafting technique. J Ind Eng Chem Seoul 13:956Google Scholar
  67. Karaj-Abad SG, Abbasian M, Jaymand M (2016) Grafting of poly [(methyl methacrylate)-block-styrene] onto cellulose via nitroxide-mediated polymerization, and its polymer/clay nanocomposite. Carbohydr Polym 152:297–305Google Scholar
  68. Kareem TA, Kaliani AA (2012) Glow discharge plasma electrolysis for nanoparticles synthesis. Ionics 18:315–327Google Scholar
  69. Karen (2014) Trends in industrial wastewater treatment. Retrieved 14 February 2018, from http://www.uswaterservices.com/news/2014/08/trends-in-industrial-wastewater-treatment/ 
  70. Kellenberger CR, Luechinger NA, Lamprou A, Rossier M, Grass RN, Stark WJ (2012) Soluble nanoparticles as removable pore templates for the preparation of polymer ultrafiltration membranes. J Membr Sci 387–388:76–82Google Scholar
  71. Kercher A, Nagle D (2003) Microstructural evolution during charcoal carbonization by X-ray diffraction analysis. Carbon 41:15–27Google Scholar
  72. Kim UJ, Kuga S, Wada M, Okano T, Kondo T (2000) Periodate oxidation of crystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 1:488–492Google Scholar
  73. Kim H, Watthanaphanit A, Saito N (2017) Simple solution plasma synthesis of hierarchical nanoporous MnO for organic dye removal. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:5842–5851Google Scholar
  74. Kong W, Ren J, Wang S, Chen Q (2014) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using acrylic-modified sugarcane bagasse-based adsorbents: equilibrium and kinetic studies 9:3184–3196Google Scholar
  75. Kozáková Z, Nejezchleb M, Krčma F, Halamová I, Čáslavský J, Dolinová J (2010) Removal of organic dye direct red 79 from water solutions by DC diaphragm discharge: analysis of decomposition products. Desalination 258:93–99Google Scholar
  76. Kucharyov MS (1993) Properties and modification methods for vegetable fibers for natural fiber composites. Tekst Prom 23:8–9Google Scholar
  77. Kulkarni SJ, Kaware JP (2015) Analysis of packed bed adsorption column with low cost adsorbent for cadmium removal. Int J Therm Environ Eng 9:17–24Google Scholar
  78. Lackinger E, Sartori J, Potthast A, Rosenau T (2012) Novel and green ASA-type paper sizing agents based on renewable resources: from model experiments over lab trials to paper machine and large-scale production. In: Jin Y, Wang Z, Wu W (eds) Proceeding of the 4th international conference on pulping, papermaking and biotechnology (ICPPB’12), pp 435–439Google Scholar
  79. Li H, Liu H, Fu S, Zhan H (2011) Surface hydrophobicity modification of cellulose fibers by layer-by-layer self-asssembly of lignosulfonates. BioResources 6:1681–1695Google Scholar
  80. Li Y, Jiang L, Xiong C, Peng W (2015) Effect of different surface treatment for bamboo fiber on the crystallization behavior and mechanical property of bamboo fiber/nanohydroxyapatite/poly(lactic-co-glycolic) composite. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:12017–12024Google Scholar
  81. Liimatainen H, Visanko M, Sirviö JA, Hormi OEO, Niinimaki J (2012) Enhancement of the nanofibrillation of wood cellulose through sequential periodate-chlorite oxidation. Biomacromolecules 13:1592–1597Google Scholar
  82. Liu R, Ma W, Jia CY, Wang L, Li HY (2007) Effect of pH on biosorption of boron onto cotton cellulose. Desalination 207:257–267Google Scholar
  83. Liu S, Zeng J, Tao D, Zhang L (2010) Microfiltration performance of regenerated cellulose membrane prepared at low temperature for wastewater treatment. Cellulose 17:1159–1169Google Scholar
  84. Liu S, Zhao Y, Ma F, Ma L, O’Shea K, Zhao C, Hu X, Wu M (2015) Control of Microcystis aeruginosa growth and associated microcystin cyanotoxin remediation by electron beam irradiation (EBI). RSC Adv 5:31292–31297Google Scholar
  85. Loganathan P, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J (2013a) Enhanced removal of nitrate from water using surface modification of adsorbents—a review. J Environ Manag 131:363–374Google Scholar
  86. Loganathan P, Vigneswaran S, Kandasamy J, Naidu R (2013b) Defluoridation of drinking water using adsorption processes. J Hazard Mater 248–249:1–19Google Scholar
  87. Ma W, Yan S, Meng M, Zhang S (2014) Preparation of betaine-modified cationic cellulose and its application in the treatment of reactive dye wastewater. J Appl Polym Sci 131:40522Google Scholar
  88. Maimaiti H, Arken K, Wumaier M, Wushuer L (2014) Oil absorbency of cellulose/butylmethacrylate graft polymer fibers. Iran Polym J 23:671–678Google Scholar
  89. Malik PK (2003) Use of activated carbons prepared from sawdust and rice-husk for adsorption of acid dyes: a case study of acid yellow 36. Dyes Pigm 56:239–249Google Scholar
  90. Mallakpour S, Rafiee Z (2011) Ionic liquids as environmentally friendly solvents in macromolecules chemistry and technology, part I. J Polym Environ 19:447–484Google Scholar
  91. Marshall WE, Wartelle LH, Boler DE, Johns MM, Toles CA (1999) Enhanced metal adsorption by soybean hulls modified with citric acid. Biores Technol 69:263–268Google Scholar
  92. Memon GZ, Bhanger M, Akhtar M, Talpur FN, Memon JR (2008) Adsorption of methyl parathion pesticide from water using watermelon peels as a low cost adsorbent. Chem Eng J 138:616–621Google Scholar
  93. Michailof C, Stavropoulos GG, Panayiotou C (2008) Enhanced adsorption of phenolic compounds, commonly encountered in olive mill wastewaters, on olive husk derived activated carbons. Biores Technol 99:6400–6408Google Scholar
  94. Missoum K, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2013) Nanofibrillated cellulose surface modification: a review. Materials 6:1745–1766Google Scholar
  95. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (2001) Surface modifications of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: an overview. Compos Interfaces 8:313–343Google Scholar
  96. Mondal MIH, Islam MK (2014) Effect of pH on the dye absorption of jute fibre dyed with direct dyes. Orient J Chem 30:1571–1575Google Scholar
  97. Mukhopadhyay S, Fangueiro R (2009) Physical modification of natural fibers and thermoplastic films for composites—a review. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 22:135–162Google Scholar
  98. Nag A (1995) Utilization of charred sawdust as an adsorbent of dyes, toxic salts and oil from water. Process Saf Environ Prot Trans Inst Chem Eng Part B 73:299–306Google Scholar
  99. Nakajima A, Sakaguchi T (1990) Recovery and removal of uranium by using plant wastes. Biomass 21:55–63Google Scholar
  100. Namasivayam C, Sureshkumar M (2008) Removal of chromium (VI) from water and wastewater using surfactant modified coconut coir pith as a biosorbent. Biores Technol 99:2218–2225Google Scholar
  101. Nguyen TAH, Ngo HH, Guo WS, Zhang J, Liang S, Yue QY, Li Q, Nguyen TV (2013) Applicability of agricultural waste and by-products for adsorptive removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Biores Technol 148:574–585Google Scholar
  102. O’Connell DW, Birkinshaw C, O’Dwyer TF (2008) Heavy metal adsorbents prepared from the modification of cellulose: a review. Biores Technol 99:6709–6724Google Scholar
  103. Okita Y, Saito T, Isogai A (2010) Entire surface oxidation of various cellulose microfibrils by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Biomacromolecules 11:1696–1700Google Scholar
  104. Oshida K, Kogiso K, Matsubayashi K, Takeuchi K, Kobayashi S, Endo M, Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G (1995) Analysis of pore structure of activated carbon fibers using high resolution transmission electron microscopy and image processing. J Mater Res 10:2507–2517Google Scholar
  105. Owen G, Bandi M, Howell JA, Churchouse SJ (1995) Economic assessment of membrane processes for water and waste water treatment. J Membr Sci 102:77–91Google Scholar
  106. Pan Y, Xiao H, Song Z (2013) Hydrophobic modification of cellulose fibres by cationic-modified polyacrylate latex with core-shell structure. Cellulose 20:485–494Google Scholar
  107. Parab H, Sudersanan M, Shenoy N, Pathare T, Vaze B (2009) Use of agro-industrial wastes for removal of basic dyes from aqueous solutions. Clean Soil Air Water 37:963–969Google Scholar
  108. Phan NH, Rio S, Faur C, Le Coq L, Le Cloirec P, Nguyen TH (2006) Production of fibrous activated carbons from natural cellulose (jute, coconut) fibers for water treatment applications. Carbon 44:2569–2577Google Scholar
  109. Qin JJ, Oo MH, Kekre KA (2007) Nanofiltration for recovering wastewater from a specific dyeing facility. Sep Purif Technol 56:199–203Google Scholar
  110. Qiu Y, Hwang YJ, Zhang C, Bures BL, McCord M (2002) Atmospheric pressure helium + oxygen plasma treatment of ultrahigh modulus polyethylene fibers. J Adhes Sci Technol 16:449–457Google Scholar
  111. Radetić MM, Jocić DM, Jovančić PM, Petrović ZL, Thomas HF (2003) Recycled wool-based nonwoven material as an oil sorbent. Environ Sci Technol 37:1008–1012Google Scholar
  112. Ran J, Wu L, Zhang Z, Xu T (2014) Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP): a versatile and forceful tool for functional membranes. Prog Polym Sci 39:124–144Google Scholar
  113. Rawajfih Z, Nsour N (2006) Characteristics of phenol and chlorinated phenols sorption onto surfactant-modified bentonite. J Colloid Interface Sci 298:39–49Google Scholar
  114. Rezaee A, Godini H, Dehestani S, Khavanin A (2008) Application of impregnated almond shell activated carbon by zinc and zinc sulfate for nitrate removal from water. J Environ Health Sci Eng 5:125–130Google Scholar
  115. Rodríguez Correa C, Stollovsky M, Hehr T, Rauscher Y, Rolli B, Kruse A (2017) Influence of the carbonization process on activated carbon properties from lignin and lignin-rich biomasses. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:8222–8233Google Scholar
  116. Rombaldo CFS, Lisboa ACL, Mendez MOA, Coutinho AR (2014) Brazilian natural fiber (jute) as raw material for activated carbon production. An Acad Bras Ciênc 86:2137–2144Google Scholar
  117. Rowell RM, Schultz TP, Narayan R (1992) Emerging technologies for materials and chemicals from biomass. In: ACS symposium series (USA), vol 476Google Scholar
  118. Roy D, Guthrie JT, Perrier S (2005) Graft polymerization: grafting poly (styrene) from cellulose via reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. Macromolecules 38:10363–10372Google Scholar
  119. Roy D, Semsarilar M, Guthrie JT, Perrier S (2009) Cellulose modification by polymer grafting: a review. Chem Soc Rev 38(7):2046–2064Google Scholar
  120. Ru ZX, Chai LX, Liu YB (2011) Treatment of metallurgical comprehensive electroplating waste-water with oxidation-reduction method. China Nonferrous Metall 6:60–62Google Scholar
  121. Shen Y, Ma D, Ge X (2017) CO2-looping in biomass pyrolysis or gasification. Sustain Energy Fuels 1:1700–1729Google Scholar
  122. Sidik S, Jalil A, Triwahyono S, Adam S, Satar M, Hameed B (2012) Modified oil palm leaves adsorbent with enhanced hydrophobicity for crude oil removal. Chem Eng J 203:9–18Google Scholar
  123. Sivakumar P, Palanisamy N (2010) Mechanistic study of dye adsorption on to a novel non-conventional low-cost adsorbent. Adv Appl Sci Res 1:58–65Google Scholar
  124. Song Y, Lei S, Zhou J, Tian Y (2016) Removal of heavy metals and cyanide from gold mine waste-water by adsorption and electric adsorption. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 91:2539–2544Google Scholar
  125. Soylak M, Cay RS (2007) Separation/preconcentration of silver(I) and lead(II) in environmental samples on cellulose nitrate membrane filter prior to their flame atomic absorption spectrometric determinations. J Hazard Mater 146:142–147Google Scholar
  126. Srivastava A, Chaurasia A, Sharma S, Mishra G (2006) Kinetics and mechanism of polymerization of vinyl acetate using triphenyl stibonium 1, 2, 3, 4-tetraphenyl-cyclopentadiene ylide. J Sci Ind Res 65:514–517Google Scholar
  127. Strathmann H (2001) Membrane separation processes: current relevance and future opportunities. AIChE J 47:1077–1087Google Scholar
  128. Sud D, Mahajan G, Kaur MP (2008) Agricultural waste material as potential adsorbent for sequestering heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions—a review. Biores Technol 99:6017–6027Google Scholar
  129. Suhas Gupta VK, Carrott PJM, Singh R, Chaudhary M, Kushwaha S (2016) Cellulose: a review as natural, modified and activated carbon adsorbent. Biores Technol 216:1066–1076Google Scholar
  130. Sun X, Peng B, Ji Y, Chen J, Li D (2009) Chitosan (chitin)/cellulose composite biosorbents prepared using ionic liquid for heavy metal ions adsorption. AIChE J 55:2062–2069Google Scholar
  131. Takada A, Kadokawa JI (2015) Fabrication and characterization of polysaccharide ion gels with ionic liquids and their further conversion into value-added sustainable materials. Biomolecules 5:244Google Scholar
  132. Takaichi S, Isogai A (2013) Oxidation of wood cellulose using 2-azaadamantane N-oxyl (AZADO) or 1-methyl-AZADO catalyst in NaBr/NaClO system. Cellulose 20:1979–1988Google Scholar
  133. Tan I, Ahmad AL, Hameed B (2008) Adsorption of basic dye on high-surface-area activated carbon prepared from coconut husk: equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J Hazard Mater 154:337–346Google Scholar
  134. Teli MD, Valia SP (2013) Acetylation of banana fibre to improve oil absorbency. Carbohydr Polym 92:328–333Google Scholar
  135. Telkapalliwar N, Shivankar V (2016) Adsorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solution onto microwave assisted activated carbon prepared from orange peel. Int J Appl Innov Eng Manag 5:76–82Google Scholar
  136. Tian Y, Wu G, Tian X, Tao X, Chen W (2013) Novel erythrocyte-like graphene microspheres with high quality and mass production capability via electrospray assisted self-assembly. Sci Rep 3:3327Google Scholar
  137. Ticoalu A, Aravinthan T, Cardona F (2010) A review of current development in natural fiber composites for structural and infrastructure applications. In: Paper presented at the southern region engineering conference 2010, SREC 2010—incorporating the 17th annual international conference on mechatronics and machine vision in practice, M2VIP 2010Google Scholar
  138. Tripathi A, Ranjan MR (2015) Heavy metal removal from wastewater using low cost adsorbents. J Bioremed Biodeg 6:315Google Scholar
  139. Ugbolue SCO (1990) Structure/property relationships in textile fibres. Text Prog 20:1–43Google Scholar
  140. Van der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C (2002) Distillation vs. membrane filtration: overview of process evolutions in seawater desalination. Desalination 143:207–218Google Scholar
  141. Van Oss CJ (1990) A review of: “Active Carbon.” (1988) Bansal RC, Donnet JB, Stoeckli F (eds). Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 482, $135.00. J Dispers Sci Technol 11:323Google Scholar
  142. Villalobos-Rodríguez R, Montero-Cabrera ME, Esparza-Ponce HE, Herrera-Peraza EF, Ballinas-Casarrubias ML (2012) Uranium removal from water using cellulose triacetate membranes added with activated carbon. Appl Radiat Isot 70:872–881Google Scholar
  143. Walha K, Amar RB, Firdaous L, Quéméneur F, Jaouen P (2007) Brackish groundwater treatment by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and electrodialysis in Tunisia: performance and cost comparison. Desalination 207:95–106Google Scholar
  144. Wang J, Xu L, Meng Y, Cheng C, Li A (2011) Adsorption of Cu2 + on new hyper-crosslinked polystyrene adsorbent: batch and column studies. Chem Eng J 178:108–114Google Scholar
  145. Wang J, Zheng Y, Wang A (2012a) Effect of kapok fiber treated with various solvents on oil absorbency. Ind Crops Prod 40:178–184Google Scholar
  146. Wang X, Zhou M, Jin X (2012b) Application of glow discharge plasma for wastewater treatment. Electrochim Acta 83:501–512Google Scholar
  147. Wang J, Zheng Y, Wang A (2013a) Coated kapok fiber for removal of spilled oil. Mar Pollut Bull 69(1):91–96Google Scholar
  148. Wang J, Zheng Y, Wang A (2013b) Preparation and properties of kapok fiber enhanced oil sorption resins by suspended emulsion polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 127:2184–2191Google Scholar
  149. Wang Y, Yadav S, Heinlein T, Konjik V, Breitzke H, Buntkowsky G, Schneider Jorg J, Zhang K (2014) Ultra-light nanocomposite aerogels of bacterial cellulose and reduced graphene oxide for specific absorption and separation of organic liquids. RSC Adv 4:21553–21558Google Scholar
  150. Wang Z, Guo H, Shen F, Yang G, Zhang Y, Zeng Y, Wang L, Xiao H, Deng S (2015) Biochar produced from oak sawdust by lanthanum (La)-involved pyrolysis for adsorption of ammonium (NH4 +), nitrate (NO3 ), and phosphate (PO4 3−). Chemosphere 119:646–653Google Scholar
  151. Wang J, Geng G, Liu X, Han F, Xu J (2016) Magnetically superhydrophobic kapok fiber for selective sorption and continuous separation of oil from water. Chem Eng Res Des 115:122–130Google Scholar
  152. Welgemoed TJ (2005) Capacitive deionization technology TM development and evaluation of an industrial prototype system. Desalination 183:327–340Google Scholar
  153. Wen T, Zhao Z, Shen C, Li J, Tan X, Zeb A, Wang X, Xu AW (2016) Multifunctional flexible free-standing titanate nanobelt membranes as efficient sorbents for the removal of radioactive 90Sr2+ and 137Cs+ ions and oils. Sci Rep 6:20920Google Scholar
  154. Wendler F, Kosan B, Krieg M, Meister F (2009) Possibilities for the physical modification of cellulose shapes using ionic liquids. Macromol Symp 280:112–122Google Scholar
  155. Williams PT, Besler S (1996) The influence of temperature and heating rate on the slow pyrolysis of biomass. Renew Energy 7:233–250Google Scholar
  156. Won SW, Kotte P, Wei W, Lim A, Yun YS (2014) Biosorbents for recovery of precious metals. Biores Technol 160:203–212Google Scholar
  157. Wong KK, Lee CK, Low KS, Haron MJ (2003) Removal of Cu and Pb by tartaric acid modified rice husk from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 50:23–28Google Scholar
  158. Xu X, Gao BY, Yue QY, Zhong QQ (2010) Preparation of agricultural by-product based anion exchanger and its utilization for nitrate and phosphate removal. Biores Technol 101:8558–8564Google Scholar
  159. Yan Z, Liu Y, Ren W, Yuan Z (2012) Investigation of liquid plasma catalysis on Ti electrodes for the decolorization of a brilliant red B solution. J Electrostat 70:48–53Google Scholar
  160. Yang YW, Wu JY, Liu CT, Liao GC, Cheng KY, Chiang MH, Wu JS (2015) An optimized two-step nitrogen-based plasma treatment procedure under atmospheric-pressure condition and its surface amination mechanism. Plasma Process Polym 12:678–690Google Scholar
  161. Zhang X, Duan C, Jia X, Dai B (2016) Carboxylation kapok fiber as a low-cost, environmentally friendly adsorbent with remarkably enhanced adsorption capacity for cationic dyes. Res Chem Intermed 42:5069–5085Google Scholar
  162. Zhu H, Zhang Y, Yang X, Liu H, Zhang X, Yao J (2015) An eco-friendly one-step synthesis of dicarboxyl cellulose for potential application in flocculation. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:2825–2829Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nur Syazwani Abd Rahman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mohd Firdaus Yhaya
    • 1
  • Baharin Azahari
    • 1
  • Wan Ruslan Ismail
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Bioresource, Paper and Coatings Technology, School of Industrial TechnologyUniversiti Sains MalaysiaGeorge TownMalaysia
  2. 2.Section of Geography, School of HumanitiesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaGeorge TownMalaysia

Personalised recommendations