Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 4357–4374 | Cite as

Study of xylan adsorption onto poly(ethylene terephthalate) using QCM-D

  • N. Dimitrušev
  • L. Fras Zemljič
  • B. Saake
  • S. Strnad
Original Paper

Abstract

Owing to superior mechanical properties, synthetic polymers like poly(ethylene terephthalate), polytetrafluorethylene, polypropylene, etc. keep an exceptional position in medical and technical fields. However, in many cases, their highly hydrophobic and inert surfaces represent an important drawback for many applications. Therefore, surface modifications are needed. The main aim of this investigation was to study the interaction of carboxymethylated xylans with poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) surfaces. Two different types of xylans, glucuronoxylan derived from wood, and arabinoxylan derived from oat spelt, were carboxymethylated in order to introduce hydrophilic entities. A quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation monitoring was used as a nanogram sensitive balance to detect the amount of deposited carboxymethylated xylans onto PET, as well as the behaviour of the bound xylan layers. The deposition/adsorption of xylans onto PET model films was studied in the dependence of the pH value and ionic strength, as well as of the presence of an anchoring polymer layer. Xylans deposit favourably at lower pH and higher ionic strengths, which are conditions leading to lower solubilities of xylans, manifesting that physical interactions between PET films and xylans are the driving force for the adsorption, which was reversible. When an intermediate layer of chosen functional polymer poly(ethyleneimine), a so-called anchoring agent was applied, the binding of xylans was improved significantly. The results showed that with the surface modifications and targeted introduction of derivatised xylans, it is possible to tailor surface hydrophilicities and reactivities of PET materials accurately.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Xylans Carboxymethylated xylans Poly(ethylene terephthalate) films Adsorption QCM-D Hydrophilicity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research work was conducted within the framework of the Research Programme P2-0118 Textile Chemistry (Slovenian Research Agency) and granted by the Slovenian Technology Agency –TIA (P-MR10/03). We thank Matej Bracic for his technical support and Dr. Alenka Vesel for the XPS measurements.

References

  1. Biolin Scientific (2016) Biolin Scientific. In: Precis. Tensiometers. https://www.biolinscientific.com/. Accessed 17 May 2018
  2. Bračič M, Fras-Zemljič L, Pérez L et al (2017a) Protein-repellent and antimicrobial nanoparticle coatings from hyaluronic acid and a lysine-derived biocompatible surfactant. J Mater Chem B 5:3888–3897.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TB00311K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bračič M, Mohan T, Griesser T et al (2017b) One-step noncovalent surface functionalization of PDMS with chitosan-based bioparticles and their protein-repellent properties. Adv Mater Interfaces.  https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.201700416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chibowski S, Wiśniewska M, Marczewski AW, Pikus S (2003) Application of the SAXS method and viscometry for determination of the thickness of adsorbed polymer layers at the ZrO2-polymer solution interface. J Colloid Interface Sci 267:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00698-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chibowski S, Grządka E, Patkowski J (2009) Influence of a type of electrolyte and its ionic strength on the adsorption and the structure of adsorbed polymer layer in the system: polyacrylic acid/SiO2. Croat Chem Acta 82:623–631Google Scholar
  6. Crittenden RG, Playne MJ (1996) Production, properties and applications of food-grade oligosaccharides. Trends Food Sci Technol 7:353–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(96)10038-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daus S, Heinze T (2010) Xylan-based nanoparticles: prodrugs for ibuprofen release. Macromol Biosci 10:211–220.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200900201 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutschle AL, Römhild K, Meister F et al (2014) Effects of cationic xylan from annual plants on the mechanical properties of paper. Carbohydr Polym 102:627–635.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2013.12.016 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Deutschmann R, Dekker RFH (2012) From plant biomass to bio-based chemicals: latest developments in xylan research. Biotechnol Adv 30:1627–1640.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.07.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietrichs HH, Zschirnt KI (1972) Untersuchungen über den enzymatischen Abbau von Holocellulosen in vitro. Holz als Roh- und Werkst 30:66–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02617244 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doctor VM, Lewis D, Coleman M et al (1991) Anticoagulant properties of semisynthetic polysaccharide sulfates. Thromb Res 64:413–425.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-3848(91)90342-T CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Doliška A (2011) Uporaba kremenove mikrotehtnice za spremljanje adsorpcije biopolimerov. Tekstilec 54:172–180Google Scholar
  13. Doliška A (2012) Improving the biocompatibility of PET surfaces by adsorbing mannans and mannan derivatives. Karl-Franzens University of GrazGoogle Scholar
  14. Doliška A, Strnad S, Ribitsch V et al (2009) Analysis of galactoglucomannans from spruce wood by capillary electrophoresis. Cellulose.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9328-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doliška A, Strnad S, Stana-Kleinschek K (2012) Heparin adsorption onto model poly(ethylene terephtalate) (pet) surfaces monitored by QCM-D. Mater Tehnol 46:81–85Google Scholar
  16. Donelli I, Taddei P, Smet PF et al (2009) Enzymatic surface modification and functionalization of PET: a water contact angle, FTIR, and fluorescence spectroscopy study. Biotechnol Bioeng 103:845–856.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22316 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Drobota M, Persin Z, Zemljic L et al (2013) Chemical modification and characterization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) surfaces for collagen immobilization. Open Chem 11:1786–1798.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-013-0319-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ebringerová A, Hromádková Z (1999) Xylans of industrial and biomedical importance. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 16:325–346.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.1999.10647982 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ebringerova A, Hromadkova Z, Hribalova V (1995) Structure and mitogenic activities of corn cob heteroxylans. Int J Biol Macromol 17:327–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-8130(96)81840-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ebringerová A, Hromádková Z, Heinze T (2005) Hemicellulose. In: Heinze T (ed) Polysaccharides I. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 1–67Google Scholar
  21. Elliot SJ, Striker LJ, Stetler-Stevenson WG et al (1999) Pentosan polysulfate decreases proliferation and net extracellular matrix production in mouse mesangial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:62–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fooks LJ, Fuller R, Gibson GR (1999) Prebiotics, probiotics and human gut microbiology. Int Dairy J 9:53–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(99)00044-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fras Zemljič L, Stenius P, Laine J, Stana-Kleinschek K (2008) Topochemical modification of cotton fibres with carboxymethyl cellulose. Cellulose 15:315–321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-007-9175-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fras L, Laine J, Stenius P et al (2004) Determination of dissociable groups in natural and regenerated cellulose fibers by different titration methods. J Appl Polym Sci 92:3186–3195.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.20294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansen NML, Plackett D (2008) Sustainable films and coatings from hemicelluloses: a review. Biomacromol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800053z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hartman J, Albertsson A-C, Lindblad MS, Sjöberg J (2006) Oxygen barrier materials from renewable sources: material properties of softwood hemicellulose-based films. J Appl Polym Sci 100:2985–2991.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.22958 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heinze T, Petzold K, Hornig S (2007) Novel nanoparticles based on xylan. Cellul Chem Technol 41:13–18Google Scholar
  28. Henriksson Å, Gatenholm P (2002) Surface properties of CTMP fibers modified with xylans. Cellulose 9:55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015826713109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hettrich K, Fischer S, Schröder N et al (2006) Derivatization and characterization of xylan from oat spelts. Macromol Symp 232:37–48.  https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.200551405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Holmberg K, Jönsson B, Kronberg B, Lindman B (2003) Surfactants and polymers in aqueous solution. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  31. Indest T, Strnad S, Kleinschek KS et al (2006) Electrokinetic properties of commercial vascular grafts. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Indest T, Laine J, Ribitsch V et al (2008) Adsorption of chitosan on PET films monitored by quartz crystal microbalance. Biomacromol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm800333p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kargl R, Mohan T, Bračič M et al (2012) Adsorption of carboxymethyl cellulose on polymer surfaces: evidence of a specific interaction with cellulose. Langmuir 28:11440–11447.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la302110a CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kastantin M, Langdon BB, Schwartz DK (2013) A bottom-up approach to understanding protein layer formation at solid-liquid interfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 31:240–252.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2012.2196707.Separate CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kolar M, Mozetič M, Stana-Kleinschek K et al (2015) Covalent binding of heparin to functionalized PET materials for improved haemocompatibility. Materials (Basel) 8:1526–1544.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma8041526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kopf A, Baschnagel J, Wittmer J, Binder K (1996) On the adsorption process in polymer brushes: a Monte Carlo study. Macromolecules 29:1433–1441.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma951083k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee SH, Lee HL, Youn HJ (2014) Adsorption and viscoelastic properties of cationic xylan on cellulose film using QCM-D. Cellulose 21:1251–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0186-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Linder A, Bergman R, Bodin A, Gatenholm P (2003) Mechanism of assembly of xylan onto cellulose surfaces. Langmuir 19:5072–5077.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la0341355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lloyd LL, Kennedy JF, Methacanon P et al (1998) Carbohydrate polymers as wound management aids. Carbohydr Polym 37:315–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(98)00077-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lorenz D, Erasmy N, Akil Y, Saake B (2016) A new method for the quantification of monosaccharides, uronic acids and oligosaccharides in partially hydrolyzed xylans by HPAEC-UV/VIS. Carbohydr Polym 140:181–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.12.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Marx KA (2003) Quartz crystal microbalance: a useful tool for studying thin polymer films and complex biomolecular systems at the solution–surface interface. Biomacromol.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm020116i CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miraftab M, Qiao Q, Kennedy JF et al (2003) Fibres for wound dressings based on mixed carbohydrate polymer fibres. Carbohydr Polym 53:225–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8617(03)00108-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Miyajima T, Mori M, Ishiguro SI (1997) Analysis of complexation equilibria of polyacrylic acid by a Donnan-based concept. J Colloid Interface Sci 187:259–266.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1996.4694 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Mohan T, Spirk S, Kargl R et al (2012) Watching cellulose grow—kinetic investigations on cellulose thin film formation at the gas–solid interface using a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D). Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 400:67–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2012.02.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mohan T, Kargl R, Tradt KE et al (2015) Antifouling coating of cellulose acetate thin films with polysaccharide multilayers. Carbohydr Polym 116:149–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2014.04.068 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Ojstršek A, Fakin T, Stana Kleinschek K, Fakin D (2017) Modification of polyamide knitted fabric using different zeolites. Tekstilec 60:116–125.  https://doi.org/10.14502/Tekstilec2017.60.116-125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oliveira EE, Silva AE, Junior TN et al (2010) Xylan from corn cobs, a promising polymer for drug delivery: production and characterization. Bioresour Technol 101:5402–5406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.137 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Petzold-Welcke K, Schwikal K, Daus S, Heinze T (2014) Xylan derivatives and their application potential—mini-review of own results. Carbohydr Polym 100:80–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.052 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Puls J, Saake B (2004) Industrially isolated hemicelluloses. In: Gatenholm P, Tenkanen M (eds) Hemicelluloses: science and technology, vol 864. ACS symposium series. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 24–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Qiu X, Amarasekara A, Doctor V (2006) Effect of oversulfation on the chemical and biological properties of fucoidan. Carbohydr Polym 63:224–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.08.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ristić T, Mohan T, Kargl R et al (2014) A study on the interaction of cationized chitosan with cellulose surfaces. Cellulose 21:2315–2325.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0267-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saake B, Kruse T, Puls J (2001) Investigation on molar mass, solubility and enzymatic fragmentation of xylans by multi-detected SEC chromatography. Bioresour Technol 80:195–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00089-X CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Saghira S, Iqbal MS, Hussaina MA et al (2008) Structure characterization and carboxymethylation of arabinoxylan isolated from Ispaghula (Plantago ovata) seed husk. Carbohydr Polym 74:309–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARBPOL.2008.02.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schwikal K, Heinze T, Saake B et al (2011) Properties of spruce sulfite pulp and birch kraft pulp after sorption of cationic birch xylan. Cellulose 18:727–737.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-011-9526-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Šimkovic I (2013) Unexplored possibilities of all-polysaccharide composites. Carbohydr Polym 95:697–715.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.040 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Šimkovic I, Tracz A, Kelnar I et al (2014) Quaternized and sulfated xylan derivative films. Carbohydr Polym 99:356–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.075 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Van Houte F (2016) The European man-made fibres industry: meeting the challenges of a changing world. In: 55th Dornbirn Man-made fibers congress. 5th Dornbirn man-made fibers congress, Austria, 20–22 Sept 2016Google Scholar
  58. van Oss CJ, Chaudhury MK, Good RJ (1988) Interfacial Lifshitz—van der Waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems. Chem Rev 88:927–941.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00088a006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Velkova N, Doliška A, Fras Zemljič L et al (2015) Influence of carboxymethylation on the surface physical-chemical properties of glucuronoxylan and arabinoxylan films. Polym Eng Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.24059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vesel A, Mozetic M, Strnad S (2011) Improvement of adhesion of fucoidan on polyethylene terephthalate surface using gas plasma treatments. Vacuum.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2010.12.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vinardell MP, Mitjans M (2017) Lignins and their derivatives with beneficial effects on human health. Int J Mol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061219 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhao Y, Qiu Y, Wang H et al (2016) Preparation of nanofibers with renewable polymers and their application in wound dressing. Int J Polym Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4672839 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Dimitrušev
    • 2
  • L. Fras Zemljič
    • 1
  • B. Saake
    • 3
  • S. Strnad
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Engineering Materials and Design, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MariborMariborSlovenia
  2. 2.Institute for Environmental Protection and Sensors Ltd.MariborSlovenia
  3. 3.Chemical Wood TechnologyUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations