Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 4303–4330 | Cite as

Sugarcane bagasse fiber and its cellulose nanocrystals for polymer reinforcement and heavy metal adsorbent: a review

  • R. Z. Khoo
  • W. S. Chow
  • H. Ismail
Review Paper

Abstract

The development of cellulose and nanocellulose based materials have been a subject of intense research in recent decades due to their renewability, high strength and stiffness, as well as environmental friendliness. Advancements in industrial biotechnology provide ample opportunities for economic utilization of cellulosic agro-residues such as sugarcane bagasse. Sugarcane bagasse (SCB) is an abundant fibrous waste of the sugarcane industry and it is normally used for animal feed, enzymes, paper and biofuel conversion application. Due to its high cellulose content (40–50%), SCB is a good source of cellulose fiber for the synthesis of cellulose nanocrystals. This review reports recent developments, current results and trends in the field of sugarcane bagasse fiber (SCBF) and sugarcane bagasse fiber cellulose nanocrystals (SBFCNC) as a green material in the manufacturing of composite materials and heavy metal adsorbent. Herein, the preparation methods and properties of the SCBF and SBFCNC composites are discussed. The reinforcing abilities of the SCBF and SBFCNC in various polymers are summarized. Also, the potential applications of SBFCNC as heavy metal adsorbent are documented. These demonstrated that we can widen the application of cellulose nanocrystals (synthesized from agriculture waste) while contribute to the sustainable development of the related products.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Sugarcane bagasse Cellulose nanocrystals Composite materials Heavy metal adsorbent 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Universiti Sains Malaysia Research University Grant (Grant No. 1001/PBAHAN/8014024).

References

  1. Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat AH, Ireana Yusra AF (2012) Green composites from sustainable cellulose nanofibrils: a review. Carbohydr Polym 87:963–979Google Scholar
  2. Abdul Khalil HPS, Davoudpour Y, Islam MN, Mustapha A, Sudesh K, Dungani R, Jawaid M (2014) Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: a review. Carbohydr Polym 99:649–665Google Scholar
  3. Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothan LA, Jacob M, Thomas S, Cvelbar U, Anandjiwala R (2011) Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: a novel approach. Carbohydr Polym 86:1468–1475Google Scholar
  4. Aitomäki Y, Oksman K (2014) Reinforcing efficiency of nanocellulose in polymers. React Funct Polym 85:151–156Google Scholar
  5. Ali RM, Hamad HA, Hussein MM, Malash GF (2016) Potential of using green adsorbent of heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions: adsorption kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamic, mechanism and economic analysis. Ecol Eng 91:317–332Google Scholar
  6. Alomá I, Martín-Lara MA, Rodríguez IL, Blázquez G, Calero M (2012) Removal of nickel(II) ions from aqueous solutions by biosorption on sugarcane bagasse. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 43:275–281Google Scholar
  7. Ansari F, Galland S, Johansson M, Plummer CJG, Berglund LA (2014) Cellulose nanofiber network for moisture stable, strong and ductile biocomposites and increased epoxy curing rate. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 63:35–44Google Scholar
  8. Argun ME, Dursun S, Ozdemir C, Karatas M (2007) Heavy metal adsorption by modified oak sawdust: thermodynamics and kinetics. J Hazard Mater 141:77–85Google Scholar
  9. Azeredo HM, Mattoso LH, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Filho GC, Munford ML, Wood D, McHugh TH (2010) Nanocellulose reinforced chitosan composite films as affected by nanofiller loading and plasticizer content. J Food Sci 75:1–7Google Scholar
  10. Bediako JK, Wei W, Kim S, Yun YS (2015) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous phases using chemically modified waste Lyocell fiber. J Hazard Mater 299:550–561Google Scholar
  11. Behera S, Arora R, Nandhagopal N, Kumar S (2014) Importance of chemical pretreatment for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 36:91–106Google Scholar
  12. Bezerra TL, Ragauskas AJ (2016) A review of sugarcane bagasse for second-generation bioethanol and biopower production. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 10:634–647Google Scholar
  13. Bhattacharya D, Germinario LT, Winter WT (2008) Isolation, preparation and characterization of cellulose microfibers obtained from bagasse. Carbohydr Polym 73:371–377Google Scholar
  14. Bondeson D, Mathew A, Oksman K (2006) Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 13:171–180Google Scholar
  15. Boontima B, Noomhorm A, Puttanlek C, Uttapap D, Rungsardthong V (2014) Mechanical properties of sugarcane bagasse fiber-reinforced soy based biocomposites. J Polym Environ 23:97–106Google Scholar
  16. Bras J, Hassan ML, Bruzesse C, Hassan EA, El-Wakil NA, Dufresne A (2010) Mechanical, barrier, and biodegradability properties of bagasse cellulose whiskers reinforced natural rubber nanocomposites. Ind Crops Prod 32:627–633Google Scholar
  17. Cao Y, Shibata S, Fukumoto I (2006) Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites reinforced with bagasse fibre before and after alkali treatments. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 37:423–429Google Scholar
  18. Cao X, Dong H, Li CM (2007) New nanocomposite materials reinforced with flax cellulose nanocrystals in waterborne polyurethane. Biomacromolecules 8:899–904Google Scholar
  19. Carpenter AW, de Lannoy CF, Wiesner MR (2015) Cellulose nanomaterials in water treatment technologies. Environ Sci Technol 49:5277–5287Google Scholar
  20. Cerqueira EF, Baptista CARP, Mulinari DR (2011) Mechanical behaviour of polypropylene reinforced sugarcane bagasse fibers composites. Procedia Eng 10:2046–2051Google Scholar
  21. Chi K, Catchmark JM (2017) Enhanced dispersion and interface compatibilization of crystalline nanocellulose in polylactide by surfactant adsorption. Cellulose 24:4845–4860Google Scholar
  22. Chimenez TA, Gehlen MH, Marabezi K, Curvelo AAS (2013) Characterization of sugarcane bagasse by autofluorescence microscopy. Cellulose 21:653–664Google Scholar
  23. Cho M-J, Park B-D (2011) Tensile and thermal properties of nanocellulose-reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites. J Ind Eng Chem 17:36–40Google Scholar
  24. de Campos A et al (2013) Obtaining nanofibers from curauá and sugarcane bagasse fibers using enzymatic hydrolysis followed by sonication. Cellulose 20:1491–1500Google Scholar
  25. de Morais Teixeira E, Corrêa AC, Manzoli A, de Lima Leite F, de Oliveira CR, Mattoso LHC (2010) Cellulose nanofibers from white and naturally colored cotton fibers. Cellulose 17:595–606Google Scholar
  26. de Souza Lima MM, Borsali R (2004) Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: structure, properties, and applications. Macromol Rapid Commun 25:771–787Google Scholar
  27. Demirbas A (2008) Heavy metal adsorption onto agro-based waste materials: a review. J Hazard Mater 157:220–229Google Scholar
  28. Desmet G, Takács E, Wojnárovits L, Borsa J (2011) Cellulose functionalization via high-energy irradiation-initiated grafting of glycidyl methacrylate and cyclodextrin immobilization. Radiat Phys Chem 80:1358–1362Google Scholar
  29. Dicker MPM, Duckworth PF, Baker AB, Francois G, Hazzard MK, Weaver PM (2014) Green composites: a review of material attributes and complementary applications. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 56:280–289Google Scholar
  30. Dittenber DB, GangaRao HVS (2012) Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 43:1419–1429Google Scholar
  31. Dos Santos VC, Tarley CR, Caetano J, Dragunski DC (2010) Assessment of chemically modified sugarcane bagasse for lead adsorption from aqueous medium. Water Sci Technol 62:457–465Google Scholar
  32. Eichhorn SJ (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers: promising materials for advanced applications. Soft Matter 7:303–315Google Scholar
  33. Eyley S, Thielemans W (2014) Surface modification of cellulose nanocrystals. Nanoscale 6:7764–7779Google Scholar
  34. Fox SC, Li B, Xu D, Edgar KJ (2011) Regioselective esterification and etherification of cellulose: a review. Biomacromolecules 12:1956–1972Google Scholar
  35. Garg UK, Kaur MP, Garg VK, Sud D (2007) Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by agricultural waste biomass. J Hazard Mater 140:60–68Google Scholar
  36. Garg UK, Kaur MP, Garg VK, Sud D (2008a) Removal of nickel(II) from aqueous solution by adsorption on agricultural waste biomass using a response surface methodological approach. Bioresour Technol 99:1325–1331Google Scholar
  37. Garg U, Kaur MP, Jawa GK, Sud D, Garg VK (2008b) Removal of cadmium(II) from aqueous solutions by adsorption on agricultural waste biomass. J Hazard Mater 154:1149–1157Google Scholar
  38. Gatenholm P, Klemm D (2010) Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical applications. MRS Bull 35:208–213Google Scholar
  39. Gilfillan WN, Moghaddam L, Doherty WOS (2014) Preparation and characterization of composites from starch with sugarcane bagasse nanofibers. Cellulose 21:2695–2712Google Scholar
  40. Gonçalves AR, Benar P, Costa SM, Ruzene DS, Moriya RY, Luz SM, Ferretti LP (2005) Integrated processes for use of pulps and lignins obtained from sugarcane bagasse and straw. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 123:821–826Google Scholar
  41. Guimarães JL, Wypych F, Saul CK, Ramos LP, Satyanarayana KG (2010) Studies of the processing and characterization of corn starch and its composites with banana and sugarcane fibers from Brazil. Carbohydr Polym 80:130–138Google Scholar
  42. Gurgel LVA, Gil LF (2009) Adsorption of Cu(II), Cd(II) and Pb(II) from aqueous single metal solutions by succinylated twice-mercerized sugarcane bagasse functionalized with triethylenetetramine. Water Res 43:4479–4488Google Scholar
  43. Gurgel LVA, Freitas RPd, Gil LF (2008) Adsorption of Cu(II), Cd(II), and Pb(II) from aqueous single metal solutions by sugarcane bagasse and mercerized sugarcane bagasse chemically modified with succinic anhydride. Carbohydr Polym 74:922–929Google Scholar
  44. Hamad W (2006) On the development and applications of cellulosic nanofibrillar and nanocrystalline materials. Can J Chem Eng 84:513–519Google Scholar
  45. Hassan ML, Mathew AP, Hassan EA, El-Wakil NA, Oksman K (2012) Nanofibers from bagasse and rice straw: process optimization and properties. Wood Sci Technol 46:193–205Google Scholar
  46. Henrique MA, Flauzino Neto WP, Silvério HA, Martins DF, Gurgel LVA, da Silva Barud H, de Morais LC, Pasquini D (2015) Kinetic study of the thermal decomposition of cellulose nanocrystals with different polymorphs, cellulose I and II, extracted from different sources and using different types of acids. Ind Crops Prod 76:128–140Google Scholar
  47. Hokkanen S, Repo E, Sillanpää M (2013) Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions by succinic anhydride modified mercerized nanocellulose. Chem Eng J 223:40–47Google Scholar
  48. Hokkanen S, Repo E, Suopajärvi T, Liimatainen H, Niinimaa J, Sillanpää M (2014) Adsorption of Ni(II), Cu(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solutions by amino modified nanostructured microfibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 21:1471–1487Google Scholar
  49. Hokkanen S, Bhatnagar A, Sillanpää M (2016) A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res 91:156–173Google Scholar
  50. Jiang Y, Pang H, Liao B (2009) Removal of copper(II) ions from aqueous solution by modified bagasse. J Hazard Mater 164:1–9Google Scholar
  51. Jonoobi M, Oladi R, Davoudpour Y, Oksman K, Dufresne A, Hamzeh Y, Davoodi R (2015) Different preparation methods and properties of nanostructured cellulose from various natural resources and residues: a review. Cellulose 22:935–969Google Scholar
  52. Júnior OK, Gurgel LVA, de Freitas RP, Gil LF (2009) Adsorption of Cu(II), Cd(II), and Pb(II) from aqueous single metal solutions by mercerized cellulose and mercerized sugarcane bagasse chemically modified with EDTA dianhydride (EDTAD). Carbohydr Polym 77:643–650Google Scholar
  53. Kalia S, Boufi S, Celli A, Kango S (2013) Nanofibrillated cellulose: surface modification and potential applications. Colloid Polym Sci 292:5–31Google Scholar
  54. Kardam A, Raj KR, Srivastava S, Srivastava MM (2013) Nanocellulose fibers for biosorption of cadmium, nickel, and lead ions from aqueous solution. Clean Technol Environ 16:385–393Google Scholar
  55. Kargarzadeh H, Mariano M, Huang J, Lin N, Ahmad I, Dufresne A, Thomas S (2017) Recent developments on nanocellulose reinforced polymer nanocomposites: a review. Polymer 132:368–393Google Scholar
  56. Kargarzadeh H, Mariano M, Gopakumar D, Ahmad I, Thomas S, Dufresne A, Huang J, Lin N (2018) Advances in cellulose nanomaterials. Cellulose 25:2151–2189Google Scholar
  57. Karnitz OJ, Gurgel LV, de Melo JC (2007) Adsorption of heavy metal ion from aqueous single metal solution by chemically modified sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 98:1291–1297Google Scholar
  58. Khiari R (2017) Valorization of agricultural residues for cellulose nanofibrils production and their use in nanocomposite manufacturing. Int J Polym Sci 2017:1–10Google Scholar
  59. Khoo RZ, Chow WS (2015) Mechanical and thermal properties of poly(lactic acid)/sugarcane bagasse fiber green composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 30:1091–1102Google Scholar
  60. Khoramzadeh E, Nasernejad B, Halladj R (2013) Mercury biosorption from aqueous solutions by sugarcane bagasse. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 44:266–269Google Scholar
  61. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Linstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:5438–5466Google Scholar
  62. Kumar A, Negi YS, Choudhary V, Bhardwaj NK (2014) Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals produced by acid-hydrolysis from sugarcane bagasse as agro-waste. J Mater Phys Chem 2:1–8Google Scholar
  63. Lal Homagai P, Ghimire KN, Inoue K (2010) Adsorption behavior of heavy metals onto chemically modified sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 101:2067–2069Google Scholar
  64. Lam NT, Chollakup R, Smitthipong W, Nimchua T, Sukyai P (2017) Characterization of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from sugarcane bagasse for potential biomedical materials. Sugar Tech 19:539–552Google Scholar
  65. Le Bras D, Stromme M, Mihranyan A (2015) Characterization of dielectric properties of nanocellulose from wood and algae for electrical insulator applications. J Phys Chem B 119:5911–5917Google Scholar
  66. Lee SC, Mariatti M (2008) The effect of bagasse fibers obtained (from rind and pith component) on the properties of unsaturated polyester composites. Mater Lett 62:2253–2256Google Scholar
  67. Li Q, Zhai J, Zhang W, Wang M, Zhou J (2007) Kinetic studies of adsorption of Pb(II), Cr(III) and Cu(II) from aqueous solution by sawdust and modified peanut husk. J Hazard Mater 141:163–167Google Scholar
  68. Li J, Wei X, Wang Q, Chen J, Chang G, Kong L, Su J, Liu Y (2012) Homogeneous isolation of nanocellulose from sugarcane bagasse by high pressure homogenization. Carbohydr Polym 90:1609–1613Google Scholar
  69. Li J, Wang Y, Wei X, Wang F, Han D, Wang Q, Kong L (2014) Homogeneous isolation of nanocelluloses by controlling the shearing force and pressure in microenvironment. Carbohydr Polym 113:388–393Google Scholar
  70. Liu P, Sehaqui H, Tingaut P, Wichser A, Oksman K, Mathew AP (2013) Cellulose and chitin nanomaterials for capturing silver ions (Ag+) from water via surface adsorption. Cellulose 21:449–461Google Scholar
  71. Liu P, Borrell PF, Bozic M, Kokol V, Oksman K, Mathew AP (2015) Nanocelluloses and their phosphorylated derivatives for selective adsorption of Ag(+), Cu(2+) and Fe(3+) from industrial effluents. J Hazard Mater 294:177–185Google Scholar
  72. Liu P, Oksman K, Mathew AP (2016) Surface adsorption and self-assembly of Cu(II) ions on TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers in aqueous media. J Colloid Interface Sci 464:175–182Google Scholar
  73. Loh YR, Sujan D, Rahman ME, Das CA (2013) Sugarcane bagasse-The future composite material: a literature review. Resour Conserv Recycl 75:14–22Google Scholar
  74. Luz SM, Del Tio J, Rocha GJM, Gonçalves AR, Del’Arco AP (2008a) Cellulose and cellulignin from sugarcane bagasse reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of acetylation on mechanical and thermal properties. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 39:1362–1369Google Scholar
  75. Luz SM, Gonçalves AR, Del’arco AP, Ferrão PMC (2008b) Composites from Brazilian natural fibers with polypropylene: mechanical and thermal properties. Compos Interface 15:841–850Google Scholar
  76. Mahfoudhi N, Boufi S (2017) Nanocellulose as a novel nanostructured adsorbent for environmental remediation: a review. Cellulose 24:1171–1197Google Scholar
  77. Malaysian DOE (2017) Malaysia marine water quality criteria and standard. https://www.doe.gov.my/portalv1/en/info-umum/piawaian-dan-kriteria-kualiti-air-marin-malaysia/301. Accessed 10 Jan 2018
  78. Mandal A, Chakrabarty D (2011) Isolation of nanocellulose from waste sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and its characterization. Carbohydr Polym 86:1291–1299Google Scholar
  79. Mandal A, Chakrabarty D (2014) Studies on the mechanical, thermal, morphological and barrier properties of nanocomposites based on poly(vinyl alcohol) and nanocellulose from sugarcane bagasse. J Ind Eng Chem 20:462–473Google Scholar
  80. Mandal A, Chakrabarty D (2015a) Characterization of nanocellulose reinforced semi-interpenetrating polymer network of poly(vinyl alcohol) and polyacrylamide composite films. Carbohydr Polym 134:240–250Google Scholar
  81. Mandal A, Chakrabarty D (2015b) Synthesis and characterization of nanocellulose reinforced full-interpenetrating polymer network based on poly(vinyl alcohol) and polyacrylamide (both crosslinked) composite films. Polym Compos 35:1720–1731Google Scholar
  82. Martín-Lara MÁ, Rico ILR, IdlCA Vicente, García GB, de Hoces MC (2010) Modification of the sorptive characteristics of sugarcane bagasse for removing lead from aqueous solutions. Desalination 256:58–63Google Scholar
  83. Moretti MMdS, Bocchini-Martins DA, Nunes CdCC, Villena MA, Perrone OM, da Silva R, Boscolo M, Gomes E (2014) Pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse with microwaves irradiation and its effects on the structure and on enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Energy 122:189–195Google Scholar
  84. Moubarik A, Grimi N, Boussetta N (2013a) Structural and thermal characterization of Moroccan sugar cane bagasse cellulose fibers and their applications as a reinforcing agent in low density polyethylene. Compos B Eng 52:233–238Google Scholar
  85. Moubarik A, Grimi N, Boussetta N, Pizzi A (2013b) Isolation and characterization of lignin from Moroccan sugar cane bagasse: production of lignin–phenol-formaldehyde wood adhesive. Ind Crops Prod 45:296–302Google Scholar
  86. Mulinari DR, Voorwald HJC, Cioffi MOH, da Silva MLCP, Luz SM (2009a) Preparation and properties of HDPE/sugarcane bagasse cellulose composites obtained for thermokinetic mixer. Carbohydr Polym 75:317–321Google Scholar
  87. Mulinari D, Voorwald H, Cioffi M, Dasilva M, Dacruz T, Saron C (2009b) Sugarcane bagasse cellulose/HDPE composites obtained by extrusion. Compos Sci Technol 69:214–219Google Scholar
  88. nee’Nigam PS, Gupta N, Anthwal A (2009) Pre-treatment of agro-industrial residues. In: nee’Nigam PS, Pandey A (eds) Biotechnology for agro-industrial residues utilisation: utilisation of agro-residues. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 13–33Google Scholar
  89. Niu X, Zheng L, Zhou J, Dang Z, Li Z (2014) Synthesis of an adsorbent from sugarcane bagasse by graft copolymerization and its utilization to remove Cd(II) ions from aqueous solution. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45:2557–2564Google Scholar
  90. O’Connell DW, Birkinshaw C, O’Dwyer TF (2008) Heavy metal adsorbents prepared from the modification of cellulose: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:6709–6724Google Scholar
  91. Oksman K, Mathew AP, Bondeson D, Kvien I (2006) Manufacturing process of cellulose whiskers/polylactic acid nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 66:2776–2784Google Scholar
  92. Oliveira FBd, Bras J, Pimenta MTB, Curvelo AAdS, Belgacem MN (2016) Production of cellulose nanocrystals from sugarcane bagasse fibers and pith. Ind Crops Prod 93:48–57Google Scholar
  93. Orlando US, Baes AU, Nishijima W, Okada M (2002) Preparation of chelating agents from sugarcane bagasse by microwave radiation as an alternative ecologically benign procedure. Green Chem 4:555–557Google Scholar
  94. Oun AA, Rhim JW (2016) Characterization of nanocelluloses isolated from Ushar (Calotropis procera) seed fiber: effect of isolation method. Mater Lett 168:146–150Google Scholar
  95. Palamae S, Palachum W, Chisti Y, Choorit W (2014) Retention of hemicellulose during delignification of oil palm empty fruit bunch (EFB) fiber with peracetic acid and alkaline peroxide. Biomass Bioenergy 66:240–248Google Scholar
  96. Pehlivan E, Tran HT, Ouedraogo WK, Schmidt C, Zachmann D, Bahadir M (2013) Sugarcane bagasse treated with hydrous ferric oxide as a potential adsorbent for the removal of As(V) from aqueous solutions. Food Chem 138:133–138Google Scholar
  97. Peng BL, Dhar N, Liu HL, Tam KC (2011) Chemistry and applications of nanocrystalline cellulose and its derivatives: a nanotechnology perspective. Can J Chem Eng 89:1191–1206Google Scholar
  98. Pereira FV, Gurgel LV, Gil LF (2010) Removal of Zn2+ from aqueous single metal solutions and electroplating wastewater with wood sawdust and sugarcane bagasse modified with EDTA dianhydride (EDTAD). J Hazard Mater 176:856–863Google Scholar
  99. Pereira PHF, Voorwald HCJ, Cioffi MOH, Mulinari DR, Luz SMD, Silva MLCP (2011) Sugarcane bagasse pulping and bleaching: thermal and chemical characterization. BioResources 6:2471–2482Google Scholar
  100. Peternele WS, Winkler-Hechenleitner AA, Pineda EAG (1999) Adsorption of Cd(II) and Pb(II) onto functionalized formic lignin from sugar cane bagasse. Bioresour Technol 68:95–100Google Scholar
  101. Pranata Putra W, Kamari A, Najiah Mohd Yusoff S, Fauziah Ishak C, Mohamed A, Hashim N, Illyas Md Isa (2014) Biosorption of Cu(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) ions from aqueous solutions using selected waste materials: adsorption and characterisation studies. J Encapsul Adsorpt Sci 4:25–35Google Scholar
  102. Putro JN, Kurniawan A, Ismadji S, Ju Y-H (2017) Nanocellulose based biosorbents for wastewater treatment: study of isotherm, kinetic, thermodynamic and reusability. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manage 8:134–149Google Scholar
  103. Ramaraj B (2007) Mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene/sugarcane Bagasse composites. J Appl Polym Sci 103:3827–3832Google Scholar
  104. Rambabu N, Panthapulakkal S, Sain M, Dalai AK (2016) Production of nanocellulose fibers from pinecone biomass: evaluation and optimization of chemical and mechanical treatment conditions on mechanical properties of nanocellulose films. Ind Crops Prod 83:746–754Google Scholar
  105. Ramos SNdC, Xavier ALP, Teodoro FS, Elias MMC, Gonçalves FJ, Gil LF, de Freitas RP, Gurgel LVA (2015) Modeling mono- and multi-component adsorption of cobalt(II), copper(II), and nickel(II) metal ions from aqueous solution onto a new carboxylated sugarcane bagasse Part I: batch adsorption study. Ind Crops Prod 74:357–371Google Scholar
  106. Ramos SNdC, Xavier ALP, Teodoro FS, Gil LF, Gurgel LVA (2016) Removal of cobalt(II), copper(II), and nickel(II) ions from aqueous solutions using phthalate-functionalized sugarcane bagasse: mono-and multicomponent adsorption in batch mode. Ind Crops Prod 79:116–130Google Scholar
  107. Rao M, Parwate A, Bhole A (2002) Removal of Cr6+ and Ni2+ from aqueous solution using bagasse and fly ash. Waste Manag 22:821–830Google Scholar
  108. Rocha GJM, Gonçalves AR, Oliveira BR, Olivares EG, Rossell CEV (2012) Steam explosion pretreatment reproduction and alkaline delignification reactions performed on a pilot scale with sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production. Ind Crops Prod 35:274–279Google Scholar
  109. Sarker TC, Azam SMGG, El-Gawad AMA, Gaglione SA, Bonanomi G (2017) Sugarcane bagasse: a potential low-cost biosorbent for the removal of hazardous materials. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19:2343–2362Google Scholar
  110. Scaffaro R, Botta L, Lopresti F, Maio A, Sutera F (2017) Polysaccharide nanocrystals as fillers for PLA based nanocomposites. Cellulose 24:447–478Google Scholar
  111. Sen M, Dastidar MG (2010) Adsorption-desorption studies on Cr(VI) using non-living fungal biomass. Asian J Chem 22:2331–2338Google Scholar
  112. Singh R, Shukla A, Tiwari S, Srivastava M (2014) A review on delignification of lignocellulosic biomass for enhancement of ethanol production potential. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 32:713–728Google Scholar
  113. Slavutsky AM, Bertuzzi MA (2014) Water barrier properties of starch films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals obtained from sugarcane bagasse. Carbohydr Polym 110:53–61Google Scholar
  114. Sofla MRK, Brown RJ, Tsuzuki T, Rainey TJ (2016) A comparison of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibres extracted from bagasse using acid and ball milling methods. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 7:1–9Google Scholar
  115. Soliman EM, Ahmed SA, Fadl AA (2011) Removal of calcium ions from aqueous solutions by sugar cane bagasse modified with carboxylic acids using microwave-assisted solvent-free synthesis. Desalination 278:18–25Google Scholar
  116. Sousa FW, Sousa MJ, Oliveira IR, Oliveira AG, Cavalcante RM, Fechine PBA, Neto VOS, Keukeleire Dd, Nascimento RF (2009) Evaluation of a low-cost adsorbent for removal of toxic metal ions from wastewater of an electroplating factory. J Environ Manag 90:3340–3344Google Scholar
  117. Sud D, Mahajan G, Kaur MP (2008) Agricultural waste material as potential adsorbent for sequestering heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions—a review. Bioresour Technol 99:6017–6027Google Scholar
  118. Suopajärvi T, Liimatainen H, Karjalainen M, Upola H, Niinimäki J (2015) Lead adsorption with sulfonated wheat pulp nanocelluloses. J Water Process Eng 5:136–142Google Scholar
  119. Tchounwou PB, Yedjou CG, Patlolla AK, Sutton DJ (2012) Heavy metal toxicity and the environment. EXS 101:133–164Google Scholar
  120. Teixeira EdM, Bondancia TJ, Teodoro KBR, Corrêa AC, Marconcini JM, Mattoso LHC (2011) Sugarcane bagasse whiskers: extraction and characterizations. Ind Crops Prod 33:63–66Google Scholar
  121. Thomas MG, Abraham E, Jyotishkumar P, Maria HJ, Pothen LA, Thomas S (2015) Nanocelluloses from jute fibers and their nanocomposites with natural rubber: preparation and characterization. Int J Biol Macromol 81:768–777Google Scholar
  122. Ullah I, Nadeem R, Iqbal M, Manzoor Q (2013) Biosorption of chromium onto native and immobilized sugarcane bagasse waste biomass. Ecol Eng 60:99–107Google Scholar
  123. Vilay V, Mariatti M, Mat Taib R, Todo M (2008) Effect of fiber surface treatment and fiber loading on the properties of bagasse fiber–reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Compos Sci Technol 68:631–638Google Scholar
  124. Wang L, Tong Z, Ingram LO, Cheng Q, Matthews S (2013) Green composites of poly(lactic acid) and sugarcane bagasse residues from bio-refinery processes. J Polym Environ 21:780–788Google Scholar
  125. WHO (2004) Copper in drinking water: Background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking water quality. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/copper.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2017
  126. Xie K, Jing L, Zhao W, Zhang Y (2011) Adsorption removal of Cu2+ and Ni2+ from waste water using nano-cellulose hybrids containing reactive polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes. J Appl Polym Sci 122:2864–2868Google Scholar
  127. Yu JX, Wang LY, Chi RA, Zhang YF, Xu ZG, Guo J (2013a) Adsorption of Pb2+ , Cd2+ , Cu2+ , and Zn2+ from aqueous solution by modified sugarcane bagasse. Res Chem Intermediat 41:1525–1541Google Scholar
  128. Yu JX, Wang LY, Chi RA, Zhang YF, Xu ZG, Guo J (2013b) Competitive adsorption of Pb2+ and Cd2+ on magnetic modified sugarcane bagasse prepared by two simple steps. Appl Surf Sci 268:163–170Google Scholar
  129. Zheng Y, Zhang R, Pan Z (2016) Investigation of adsorption kinetics and isotherm of cellulase and β-glucosidase on lignocellulosic substrates. Biomass Bioenergy 91:1–9Google Scholar
  130. Zhu HX, Cao XJ, He YC, Kong QP, He H, Wang J (2015) Removal of Cu2+ from aqueous solutions by the novel modified bagasse pulp cellulose: kinetics, isotherm and mechanism. Carbohydr Polym 129:115–126Google Scholar
  131. Zimmermann T, Bordeanu N, Strub E (2010) Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydr Polym 79:1086–1093Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Engineering CampusUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations