Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 4269–4274 | Cite as

Preparation of cellulose nanofibrils for imaging purposes: comparison of liquid cryogens for rapid vitrification

  • Jonathan Ø. Torstensen
  • Per-Olav Johnsen
  • Henrik Riis
  • Richard J. Spontak
  • Liyuan Deng
  • Øyvind W. Gregersen
  • Kristin Syverud
Communication
  • 291 Downloads

Abstract

Artifact-free imaging of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) from aqueous nanocellulose suspensions is nontrivial due to frequent irreversible agglomeration and structure damage during the course of sample preparation, especially as water is solidified prior to freeze-drying. In this study, we have examined the morphologies of CNF suspensions prepared by rapid vitrification in two different liquid cryogens—nitrogen and ethane—followed by freeze-drying. Results obtained by scanning electron microscopy confirm that vitrification in liquid ethane not only greatly improves the survivability of fine-scale CNF structural elements but also significantly reduces the propensity for CNF to agglomerate.

Keywords

Nanocellulose Cellulose nanofibril Freeze-drying Cryopreparation Scanning electron microscopy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Counsel of Norway through the NANO 2021 program (Grant Number 239172) and NANO-MBE projects. We are grateful to I. Leirset and A. Reitan for technical assistance and to Sødra for supplying the pulp.

References

  1. Bailey SM, Zasadzinski JAN (1991) Validation of convection-limited cooling of samples for freeze-fracture electron microscopy. J Microsc 163:307–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Deepa B, Abraham E, Cordeiro N, Mozetic M, Mathew AP, Oksman K, Faria M, Thomas S, Pothan LA (2015) Utilization of various lignocellulosic biomass for the production of nanocellulose: a comparative study. Cellulose 22:1075–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dubochet J, Lepault J, Freeman R, Berriman J, Homo J (1982) Electron microscopy of frozen water and aqueous solutions. J Microsc 128:219–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Echlin P (1992) Low-temperature microscopy and analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frey MW, Cuculo JA, Spontak RJ (1996) Morphological characteristics of the lyotropic and gel phases in the cellulose/NH3/NH4SCN system. J Polym Sci, Part B: Polym Phys 34:2049–2058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujisawa S, Okita Y, Fukuzumi H, Saito T, Isogai A (2011) Preparation and characterization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril films with free carboxyl groups. Carbohydr Polym 84:579–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heggset EB, Chinga-Carrasco G, Syverud K (2017) Temperature stability of nanocellulose dispersions. Carbohydr Polym 157:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang F, Hsieh Y-L (2013) Chemically and mechanically isolated nanocellulose and their self-assembled structures. Carbohydr Polym 95:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jiang F, Hsieh Y-L (2014) Super water absorbing and shape memory nanocellulose aerogels from TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils via cyclic freezing–thawing. J Mater Chem A 2:350–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu Y, Stoeckel D, Gordeyeva K, Agthe M, Schütz C, Fall AB, Bergström L (2018) Nanoscale assembly of cellulose nanocrystals during drying and redispersion. ACS Macro Lett 7:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moberg T, Sahlin K, Yao K, Geng S, Westman G, Zhou Q, Oksman K, Righdal M (2017) Rheological properties of nanocellulose suspensions: effects of fibril/particle dimensions and surface characteristics. Cellulose 24:2499–2510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peng Y, Gardner DJ, Han Y (2012) Drying cellulose nanofibrils: in search of a suitable method. Cellulose 19:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rodionova G, Saito T, Lenes M, Eriksen Ø, Gregersen ØW, Kuramae R, Isogai A (2013) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of norway spruce and eucalyptus pulps: preparation and characterization of nanofibers and nanofiber dispersions. J Polym Environ 21:207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ryan KP (1992) Cryofixation of tissues for electron microscopy: a review of plunge cooling methods. Scanning Microsc 6:715–743Google Scholar
  15. Ryan KP, Bald WB, Neumann K, Simonsberger P, Purse DH, Nicholson DN (1990) Cooling rate and ice-crystal measurement in biological specimens plunged into liquid ethane, propane, and Freon 22. J Microsc 158:365–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saito T, Isogai A (2004) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. The effect of oxidation conditions on chemical and crystal structures of the water-insoluble fractions. Biomacromolecules 5:1983–1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8:2485–2491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Torstensen JØ, Liu M, Jin S-A, Deng L, Hawari AI, Syverud K, Spontak RJ, Gregersen ØW (2018) Swelling and free-volume characteristics of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibril films. Biomacromolecules 19:1016–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  2. 2.RISE- PFITrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  4. 4.Departments of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and Materials Science and EngineeringNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations