Advertisement

Cellulose

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Simultaneous 3D cell distribution and bioactivity enhancement of bacterial cellulose (BC) scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering

  • Jing Wu
  • Na Yin
  • Shiyan Chen
  • Douglas B. Weibel
  • Huaping Wang
Original Research

Abstract

Due to its dense nanofibril network and inadequate biocompatibility, virgin bacterial cellulose (BC) has limitations in fulfilling the complex biological requirements of cartilage tissue engineering. To address these limits, we herein demonstrate the synthetic protocol of a BC-based scaffold endowed with several added features. A combinatorial approach was adopted to sequentially conduct surface modification by lotus root starch (LRS), three-dimensional (3D) architecture construction by agarose porogen templating, and hydroxyapitate (HA) deposition on the same BC substrate. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the target scaffold pBC/LRS-M/HA has a nanoporous hierarchical structure with a pore size of 300–500 μm. In vitro LIVE/DEAD assay further indicated that effective cell growth and successful chondrocytes distribution in 3D were achieved on such scaffold with significantly higher cell viability and total cell numbers after 14 days cultivation. Moreover, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity assay showed significantly higher ALP activity by approximately 50% and 100% increments, respectively, on pBC/LRS-M/HA than the two control scaffolds. These results comprehensively prove that the overall performance of the BC-based scaffold was enhanced in a synergistic manner. The devised protocol is facile, non-toxic and the pore-size is tunable.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Biomaterials Tissue engineering Bacterial cellulose Porous architecture Hydroxyapitate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by “the National Natural Science Foundation of China” (Nos. 51573024 and 81370795), “DHU Distinguished Young Professor Program” and “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (No. 2232018D3-35).

References

  1. Ahn SJ, Shin YM, Kim SE, Jeong SI, Jeong JO, Park J-S, Gwon HJ, Seo DE, Nho YC, Kang SS, Kim CY, Huh JB, Lim YM (2015) Characterization of hydroxyapatite-coated bacterial cellulose scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 20:948–955.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-015-0176-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahrem H, Pretzel D, Endres M, Conrad D, Courseau J, Müller H, Jaeger R, Kaps C, Klemm DO, Kinne RW (2014) Laser-structured bacterial nanocellulose hydrogels support ingrowth and differentiation of chondrocytes and show potential as cartilage implants. Acta Biomater 10(3):1341–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson J, Stenhamre H, Bäckdahl H, Gatenholm P (2010) Behavior of human chondrocytes in engineered porous bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 94A:1124–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32784 Google Scholar
  4. Bodin A, Concaro S, Brittberg M, Gatenholm P (2007) Bacterial cellulose as a potential meniscus implant. J Tissue Eng Regener Med 1:406–408.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai ZJ, Hou CW (2012) Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose/gelatin composite porous scaffold. Polym Mater Sci Eng 28:140–143Google Scholar
  6. Cannon RE, Anderson SM (1991) Biogenesis of bacterial cellulose. Crit Rev Microbiol 17:435–447.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10408419109115207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao LY, Zhang CB, Huang JF (2005) Influence of temperature, [Ca2+], Ca/P ratio and ultrasonic power on the crystallinity and morphology of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles prepared with a novel ultrasonic precipitation method. Mater Lett 59:1902–1906.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Oliveira RL, da Silva Barud H, de Assunção RMN, da Silva Meireles C, Carvalho GO, Filho GR, Messaddeq Y, Ribeiro SJL (2011) Synthesis and characterization of microcrystalline cellulose produced from bacterial cellulose. J Therm Anal Calorim 106:703–709.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-011-1449-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demir S, Sahin F, Kose G (2014) Usage of bacterial cellulose/collagen scaffolds incorporated with Igf-I and TGF beta-1 genes for cartilage regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regener Med 8:279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Derfus B, Kranendonk S, Camacho N, Mandel N, Kushnaryov V, Lynch K, Ryan L (1998) Human osteoarthritic cartilage matrix vesicles generate both calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate and apatite in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int 63:258–262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002239900523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenbarth E (2007) Biomaterials for tissue engineering. Adv Eng Mater 9:1051–1060.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.200700287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126:677–689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fink H, Ahrenstedt L, Bodin A, Brumer H, Gatenholm P, Krettek A, Risberg B (2011) Bacterial cellulose modified with xyloglucan bearing the adhesion peptide RGD promotes endothelial cell adhesion and metabolism—a promising modification for vascular grafts. J Tissue Eng Regener Med 5:454–463.  https://doi.org/10.1002/term.334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuerst M, Bertrand J, Lammers L, Dreier R, Echtermeyer F, Nitschke Y, Rutsch F, Schafer FKW, Niggemeyer O, Steinhagen J, Lohmann CH, Pap T, Ruther W (2009) Calcification of articular cartilage in human osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 60:2694–2703.  https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24774 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao C, Wan YZ, Yang CX, Dai KR, Tang TT, Luo HL, Wang JH (2011) Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose sponge with hierarchical pore structure as tissue engineering scaffold. J Porous Mat 18:139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-010-9364-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardner KH, Blackwell J (1974) The structure of native cellulose. Biopolymers 13:1975–2001.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.1974.360131005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gea S, Reynolds CT, Roohpour N, Wirjosentono B, Soykeabkaew N, Bilotti E, Peijs T (2011) Investigation into the structural, morphological, mechanical and thermal behaviour of bacterial cellulose after a two-step purification process. Bioresour Technol 102:9105–9110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grande CJ, Torres FG, Gomez CM, Carmen Bañó M (2009a) Nanocomposites of bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater 5:1605–1615.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.01.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grande CJ, Torres FG, Gomez CM, Troncoso OP, Canet-Ferrer J, Martínez-Pastor J (2009b) Development of self-assembled bacterial cellulose–starch nanocomposites. Mater Sci Eng C 29:1098–1104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2008.09.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hong L, Wang YL, Jia SR, Huang Y, Gao C, Wan YZ (2006) Hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose composites synthesized via a biomimetic route. Mater Lett 60:1710–1713.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchens SA, Benson RS, Evans BR, O’Neill HM, Rawn CJ (2006) Biomimetic synthesis of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite in a natural hydrogel. Biomaterials 27:4661–4670.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21:2529–2543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hwang NS, Varghese S, Elisseeff J (2007) Cartilage Tissue engineering. In: Vemuri MC (ed) Stem cell assays. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 351–373.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-536-7_24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A (2000) Bacterial cellulose—a masterpiece of nature’s arts. J Mater Sci 35:261–270.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004775229149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D (2005) Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 26:5474–5491.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim J, Cai ZJ, Chen Y (2009) Biocompatible bacterial cellulose composites for biomedical application. J Nanotechnol Eng Med 1:011006–011006–011006–011007.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4000062 Google Scholar
  27. Martínez Ávila H, Feldmann E-M, Pleumeekers MM, Nimeskern L, Kuo W, de Jong WC, Schwarz S, Müller R, Hendriks J, Rotter N, van Osch GJVM, Stok KS, Gatenholm P (2015) Novel bilayer bacterial nanocellulose scaffold supports neocartilage formation in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 44:122–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.12.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Müller FA, Müller L, Hofmann I, Greil P (2005) Accelerated biomimetic deposition of bonelike apatite on fibrous cellulose templates. Key Eng Mater 284–286:183–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Naseri N, Poirier J-M, Girandon L, Frohlich M, Oksman K, Mathew AP (2016) 3-Dimensional porous nanocomposite scaffolds based on cellulose nanofibers for cartilage tissue engineering: tailoring of porosity and mechanical performance. RSC Adv 6:5999–6007.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA27246G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nge TT, Sugiyama J (2007) Surface functional group dependent apatite formation on bacterial cellulose microfibrils network in a simulated body fluid. J Biomed Mater Res A 81A:124–134.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nge TT, Nogi M, Yano H, Sugiyama J (2010) Microstructure and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose/chitosan porous scaffold. Cellulose 17:349–363.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9394-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Petersen N, Gatenholm P (2011) Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:1277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3432-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM (2009) Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 8:457–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rajwade JM, Paknikar KM, Kumbhar JV (2015) Applications of bacterial cellulose and its composites in biomedicine. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:2491–2511.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6426-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramani D, Sastry TP (2014) Bacterial cellulose-reinforced hydroxyapatite functionalized graphene oxide: a potential osteoinductive composite. Cellulose 21:3585–3595.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0313-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rusu VM, Ng C-H, Wilke M, Tiersch B, Fratzl P, Peter MG (2005) Size-controlled hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as self-organized organic–inorganic composite materials. Biomaterials 26:5414–5426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.01.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, Reis RL (2004) Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci 4:743–765.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.200400026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saska S, Barud HS, Gaspar AMM, Marchetto R, Ribeiro SJL, Messaddeq Y (2011) Bacterial cellulose-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites for bone regeneration. Int J Biomater 2011:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/175362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shi SK, Chen SY, Zhang X, Shen W, Li X, Hu WL, Wang HP (2009) Biomimetic mineralization synthesis of calcium-deficient carbonate-containing hydroxyapatite in a three-dimensional network of bacterial cellulose. J Chem Technol Biot 84:285–290.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suetsugu Y, Shimoya I, Tanaka J (1998) Configuration of carbonate ions in apatite structure determined by polarized infrared spectroscopy. J Am Ceram Soc 81:746–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL, Brittberg M, Gatenholm P (2005) Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 26:419–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Temenoff JS, Mikos AG (2000) Review: tissue engineering for regeneration of articular cartilage. Biomaterials 21:431–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00213-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ul-Islam M, Khan S, Ullah MW, Park JK (2015) Bacterial cellulose composites: synthetic strategies and multiple applications in bio-medical and electro-conductive fields. Biotechnol J 10:1847–1861.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201500106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Uraki Y, Nemoto J, Otsuka H, Tamai Y, Sugiyama J, Kishimoto T, Ubukata M, Yabu H, Tanaka M, Shimomura M (2007) Honeycomb-like architecture produced by living bacteria, Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym 69:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.08.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wan YZ, Hong L, Jia SR, Huang Y, Zhu Y, Wang YL, Jiang HJ (2006) Synthesis and characterization of hydroxyapatite–bacterial cellulose nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 66:1825–1832.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wan YZ, Huang Y, Yuan CD, Raman S, Zhu Y, Jiang HJ, He F, Gao C (2007) Biomimetic synthesis of hydroxyapatite/bacterial cellulose nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C 27:855–864.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.10.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang J, Yang C, Wan Y, Luo H, He F, Dai K, Huang Y (2013) Laser patterning of bacterial cellulose hydrogel and its modification with gelatin and hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Soft Mater 11:173–180.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1539445x.2011.611204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams WS, Cannon RE (1989) Alternative environmental roles for cellulose produced by Acetobacter xylinum. Appl Environ Microbiol 55:2448–2452Google Scholar
  49. Yamane S, Iwasaki N, Kasahara Y, Harada K, Majima T, Monde K, Nishimura S-i, Minami A (2007) Effect of pore size on in vitro cartilage formation using chitosan-based hyaluronic acid hybrid polymer fibers. J Biomed Mater Res A 81A:586–593.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31095 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang JX, Lv XG, Chen SY, Li Z, Feng C, Wang HP, Xu YM (2014) In situ fabrication of a microporous bacterial cellulose/potato starch composite scaffold with enhanced cell compatibility. Cellulose 21:1823–1835.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0220-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yin N, Chen SY, Ouyang Y, Tang L, Yang JX, Wang HP (2011) Biomimetic mineralization synthesis of hydroxyapatite bacterial cellulose nanocomposites. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 21:472–477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0071(12)60085-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yin N, Chen SY, Li Z, Ouyang Y, Hu WL, Tang L, Zhang W, Zhou B, Yang JX, Xu QS, Wang HP (2012a) Porous bacterial cellulose prepared by a facile surfactant-assisted foaming method in azodicarbonamide-NaOH aqueous solution. Mater Lett 81:131–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2012.04.133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yin N, Chen SY, Ouyang Y, Tang L, Li Z, Yang JX, Xu QS, Wang HP (2012b) Fabrication and characterization of hydroxyapatite nanocomposites based on bacterial cellulose with surface modification. Adv Mater Res 476–478:457–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yin N, Stilwell MD, Santos TMA, Wang H, Weibel DB (2015) Agarose particle-templated porous bacterial cellulose and its application in cartilage growth in vitro. Acta Biomater 12:129–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yin N, Chen SY, Cao YM, Wang HP, Wu QK (2017) Improvement in mechanical properties and biocompatibility of biosynthetic bacterial cellulose/lotus root starch composites. Chin J Polym Sci 35:354–364.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10118-017-1903-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, Popp J, Goldstein A, Gatenholm P (2010) Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 6:2540–2547.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zimmermann KA, LeBlanc JM, Sheets KT, Fox RW, Gatenholm P (2011) Biomimetic design of a bacterial cellulose/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for bone healing applications. Mat Sci Eng C-Mater 31:43–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2009.10.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Co-Innovation Center for Textile IndustryDonghua UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Materials Science and EngineeringDonghua UniversityShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations