Cellulose

, Volume 24, Issue 11, pp 4807–4819 | Cite as

Fabrication of homogeneous and enhanced soybean protein isolate-based composite films via incorporating TEMPO oxidized nanofibrillated cellulose stablized nano-ZnO hybrid

  • Yutao Yan
  • Kaili Wang
  • Zhong Wang
  • Wolfgang Gindl-Altmutter
  • Shifeng Zhang
  • Jianzhang Li
Original Paper
  • 196 Downloads

Abstract

Soybean protein isolate (SPI) is well-suited to the preparation of composite films due to its abundance, renewability, biodegradability, and favorable film-forming capacity. In this study, different SPI-based composite films were prepared by incorporating nano-ZnO and 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine 1-oxyl (TEMPO) oxidized nanofibrillated cellulose (TNFC) separately or together. Nano-ZnO was introduced to endow the films with multifunction capability, while TNFC was introduced to stabilize the nanoparticles. Both the macro optical characterization and micro scanning electron microscope with energy dispersive X-ray (SEM–EDX) analysis indicated that TNFC could significantly decrease nano-ZnO aggregation and improve its dispersibility in the SPI matrix due to the mechanical restriction and physical adsorption effect of TNFC to the nano-ZnO. In addition to the improved dispersibility, incorporating nano-ZnO and TNFC benefitted the mechanical properties and thermo stability of the SPI-based composite films. The tensile strength and Young’s modulus increased by 73 and 57%, respectively, and the maximum degradation temperature increased by 10 °C, compared to that of the unmodified SPI film. These results can be attributed to the hydrogen bonds formed among SPI components, TNFC, and nano-ZnO, which were further examined by attenuated total reflectance-fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis. After the incorporation of nano-ZnO, the SPI-based composite films also possessed excellent UV-shielding capacity and superior antimicrobial ability. To this effect, this work provides a valuable reference for nanoparticles dispersion and application in regards to polymer enhancement and multi-functionalization.

Keywords

Soy protein isolate Films TEMPO oxidized nanofibrillated cellulose Nano-ZnO Improved dispersibility Multi-functionalization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by “The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities” (No. 2016ZCQ01) and “the National Natural Science Foundation of China” (Project 51779005/E090301).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ai F, Zheng H, Wei M, Huang J (2007) Soy protein plastics reinforced and toughened by SiO2 nanoparticles. J Appl Polym Sci 105:1597–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almutawah A, Barker SA, Belton PS (2007) Hydration of gluten: a dielectric, calorimetric, and Fourier transform infrared study. Biomacromol 8:1601–1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Althues H, Henle J, Kaskel S (2007) Functional inorganic nanofillers for transparent polymers. Chem Soc Rev 36:1454–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aulin C, Salazar-Alvarez G, Lindström T (2012) High strength, flexible and transparent nanofibrillated cellulose–nanoclay biohybrid films with tunable oxygen and water vapor permeability. Nanoscale 4:6622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bagheri M, Rabieh S (2013) Preparation and characterization of cellulose-ZnO nanocomposite based on ionic liquid ([C4mim]Cl). Cellulose 20:699–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bajpai SK, Chand N, Chaurasia V (2011) Nano zinc oxide-loaded calcium alginate films with potential antibacterial properties. Food Bioprocess Technol 5:1871–1881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cai J, Kimura S, Wada M, Kuga S (2009) Nanoporous cellulose as metal nanoparticles support. Biomacromol 10:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen L, Remondetto G, Rouabhia M, Subirade M (2008) Kinetics of the breakdown of cross-linked soy protein films for drug delivery. Biomaterials 29:3750–3756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen J, Chen X, Zhu Q, Chen F, Zhao X, Ao Q (2013) Determination of the domain structure of the 7S and 11S globulins from soy proteins by XRD and FTIR. J Sci Food Agric 93:1687–1691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chung SJ, Leonard JP, Nettleship I, Lee J-K, Soong Y, Martello DV, Chyu MK (2009) Characterization of ZnO nanoparticle suspension in water: effectiveness of ultrasonic dispersion. Powder Technol 194:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciannamea EM, Stefani PM, Ruseckaite RA (2014) Physical and mechanical properties of compression molded and solution casting soybean protein concentrate based films. Food Hydrocoll 38:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corbierre MK, Cameron NS, Sutton M, Mochrie SGJ, Lurio LB, Rühm A, Lennox RB (2001) Polymer-stabilized gold nanoparticles and their incorporation into polymer matrices. J Am Chem Soc 123:10411–10412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dash S, Swain SK (2013) Effect of nanoboron nitride on the physical and chemical properties of soy protein. Compos Sci Technol 84:39–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Echeverría I, Eisenberg P, Mauri AN (2014) Nanocomposites films based on soy proteins and montmorillonite processed by casting. J Membr Sci 449:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fu F, Li L, Liu L, Cai J, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Zhang L (2015) Construction of cellulose based ZnO nanocomposite films with antibacterial properties through one-step coagulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:2597–2606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garrido T, Etxabide A, Peñalba M, de la Caba K, Guerrero P (2013) Preparation and characterization of soy protein thin films: processing–properties correlation. Mater Lett 105:110–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. González A, Alvarez Igarzabal CI (2015) Nanocrystal-reinforced soy protein films and their application as active packaging. Food Hydrocoll 43:777–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. González A, Strumia MC, Alvarez Igarzabal CI (2011) Cross-linked soy protein as material for biodegradable films: synthesis, characterization and biodegradation. J Food Eng 106:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grüneberger F, Künniger T, Huch A, Zimmermann T, Arnold M (2015) Nanofibrillated cellulose in wood coatings: dispersion and stabilization of ZnO as UV absorber. Prog Org Coat 87:112–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ifuku S, Tsuji M, Morimoto M, Saimoto H, Yano H (2009) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles templated by TEMPO-mediated oxidized bacterial cellulose nanofibers. Biomacromol 10:2714–2717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang H, K-s Moon, Li Y, Wong CP (2006) Surface functionalized silver nanoparticles for ultrahigh conductive polymer composites. Chem Mater 18:2969–2973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnsen BB, Kinloch AJ, Mohammed RD, Taylor AC, Sprenger S (2007) Toughening mechanisms of nanoparticle-modified epoxy polymers. Polymer 48:530–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jung C (2000) Insight into protein structure and protein–ligand recognition by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. J Mol Recognit 13:325–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kang HJ, Song XS, Wang Z, Zhang W, Zhang SF, Li JZ (2016) High-performance and fully renewable soy protein isolate-based film from microcrystalline cellulose via bio-inspired poly(dopamine) surface modification. ACS Sust Chem Eng 4:4354–4360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kanmani P, Rhim JW (2014) Properties and characterization of bionanocomposite films prepared with various biopolymers and ZnO nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 106:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krochta JM, Mulder-Johnston D (1997) Edible and biodegradable polymer films: challenges and opportunities. Food technology (USA)Google Scholar
  27. Kumar P, Sandeep KP, Alavi S, Truong VD, Gorga RE (2010) Preparation and characterization of bio-nanocomposite films based on soy protein isolate and montmorillonite using melt extrusion. J Food Eng 100:480–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laurent S, Forge D, Port M, Roch A, Robic C, Vander Elst L, Muller RN (2008) Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem Rev 108:2064–2110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Y et al (2013) Strong transparent magnetic nanopaper prepared by immobilization of Fe3O4 nanoparticles in a nanofibrillated cellulose network. J Mater Chem A 1:15278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li K, Chen H, Li Y, Li J, He J (2015) Endogenous Cu and Zn nanocluster-regulated soy protein isolate films: excellent hydrophobicity and flexibility. RSC Adv 5:66543–66548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li Y, Chen H, Dong Y, Li K, Li L, Li J (2016) Carbon nanoparticles/soy protein isolate bio-films with excellent mechanical and water barrier properties. Ind Crops Prod 82:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu Y, Li K (2007) Development and characterization of adhesives from soy protein for bonding wood. Int J Adhes Adhes 27:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lodha P, Netravali AN (2005) Thermal and mechanical properties of environment-friendly ‘green’ plastics from stearic acid modified-soy protein isolate. Ind Crops Prod 21:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lu Y, Weng L, Zhang L (2004) Morphology and properties of soy protein isolate thermoplastics reinforced with chitin whiskers. Biomacromol 5:1046–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martins NCT et al (2013) Antibacterial paper based on composite coatings of nanofibrillated cellulose and ZnO. Colloids Surf Physicochem Eng Aspects 417:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nafchi AM, Alias AK, Mahmud S, Robal M (2012) Antimicrobial, rheological, and physicochemical properties of sago starch films filled with nanorod-rich zinc oxide. J Food Eng 113:511–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Odegard GM, Clancy TC, Gates TS (2005) Modeling of the mechanical properties of nanoparticle/polymer composites. Polymer 46:553–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Park S, Bae D, Rhee K (2000) Soy protein biopolymers cross-linked with glutaraldehyde. J Am Oil Chem Soc 77:879–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramanathan T et al (2008) Functionalized graphene sheets for polymer nanocomposites. Nat Nanotechnol 3:327–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rhim JW, Gennadios A, Handa A, Weller CL, Hanna MA (2000) Solubility, tensile, and color properties of modified soy protein isolate films. J Agric Food Chem 48:4937–4941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rhim JW, Gennadios A, Weller CL, Hanna MA (2002) Sodium dodecyl sulfate treatment improves properties of cast films from soy protein isolate. Ind Crops Prod 15:199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromol 8:2485–2491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salarbashi D, Mortazavi SA, Noghabi MS, Fazly Bazzaz BS, Sedaghat N, Ramezani M, Shahabi-Ghahfarrokhi I (2016) Development of new active packaging film made from a soluble soybean polysaccharide incorporating ZnO nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 140:220–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Samaele N, Amornpitoksuk P, Suwanboon S (2010) Effect of pH on the morphology and optical properties of modified ZnO particles by SDS via a precipitation method. Powder Technol 203:243–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shankar S, Teng X, Li G, Rhim J-W (2015) Preparation, characterization, and antimicrobial activity of gelatin/ZnO nanocomposite films. Food Hydrocoll 45:264–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shin Y, Bae I-T, Arey BW, Exarhos GJ (2008) Facile stabilization of gold-silver alloy nanoparticles on cellulose nanocrystal. J Phys Chem C 112:4844–4848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Song F, Tang DL, Wang XL, Wang YZ (2011) Biodegradable soy protein isolate-based materials: a review. Biomacromol 12:3369–3380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sun L, Chen W, Liu Y, Li J, Yu H (2015) Soy protein isolate/cellulose nanofiber complex gels as fat substitutes: rheological and textural properties and extent of cream imitation. Cellulose 22:2619–2627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tian H, Wang Y, Zhang L, Quan C, Zhang X (2010) Improved flexibility and water resistance of soy protein thermoplastics containing waterborne polyurethane. Ind Crops Prod 32:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ullah A, Wu J (2013) Feather fiber-based thermoplastics: effects of different plasticizers on material properties. Macromol Mater Eng 298:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vaz CM, van Doeveren PFNM, Yilmaz G, de Graaf LA, Reis RL, Cunha AM (2005) Processing and characterization of biodegradable soy plastics: effects of crosslinking with glyoxal and thermal treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 97:604–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang S-Y, Zhu B-B, Li D-Z, Fu X-Z, Shi L (2012) Preparation and characterization of TIO2/SPI composite film. Mater Lett 83:42–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu Q, Zhang L (2001) Effects of the molecular weight on the properties of thermoplastics prepared from soy protein isolate. J Appl Polym Sci 82:3373–3380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Xiao S, Gao R, Gao L, Li J (2016) Poly(vinyl alcohol) films reinforced with nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) isolated from corn husk by high intensity ultrasonication. Carbohydr Polym 136:1027–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xiong R, Lu C, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Zhang X (2013) Nanofibrillated cellulose as the support and reductant for the facile synthesis of Fe3O4/Ag nanocomposites with catalytic and antibacterial activity. J Mater Chem A 1:14910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Xu F, Dong Y, Zhang W, Zhang S, Li L, Li J (2015) Preparation of cross-linked soy protein isolate-based environmentally-friendly films enhanced by PTGE and PAM. Ind Crops Prod 67:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yang C, Wu J, Hou Y (2011) Fe3O4 nanostructures: synthesis, growth mechanism, properties and applications. Chem Commun (Camb) 47:5130–5141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yu J, Yang J, Liu B, Ma X (2009) Preparation and characterization of glycerol plasticized-pea starch/ZnO–carboxymethylcellulose sodium nanocomposites. Bioresour Technol 100:2832–2841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang J, Gao G, Zhang M, Zhang D, Wang C, Zhao D, Liu F (2006) ZnO/PS core–shell hybrid microspheres prepared with miniemulsion polymerization. J Colloid Interface Sci 301:78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang S, Xia C, Dong Y, Yan Y, Li J, Shi SQ, Cai L (2016) Soy protein isolate-based films reinforced by surface modified cellulose nanocrystal. Ind Crops Prod 80:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zheng H, Ai F, Wei M, Huang J, Chang PR (2007) Thermoplastic soy protein nanocomposites reinforced by carbon nanotubes. Macromol Mater Eng 292:780–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yutao Yan
    • 1
  • Kaili Wang
    • 1
  • Zhong Wang
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Gindl-Altmutter
    • 2
  • Shifeng Zhang
    • 1
  • Jianzhang Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Wooden Material Science and Application, Beijing Key Laboratory of Wood Science and Engineering, MOE Engineering Research Centre of Forestry Biomass Materials and BioenergyBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and Process EngineeringBOKU-University of Natural Resources and Life Science ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations