Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 24, Issue 8, pp 3573–3587 | Cite as

Synthesis and application of magnesium peroxide on cotton fabric for antibacterial properties

  • Rahul Navik
  • Logesh Thirugnanasampanthan
  • Harun Venkatesan
  • Md. Kamruzzaman
  • Faizan Shafiq
  • Yingjie Cai
Original Paper

Abstract

An antibacterial agent (MgO2) was synthesised using 0.2 and 0.4 M concentrations of MgCl2·6H2O and H2O2, which was subsequently applied to cotton fabric using a conventional pad-dry-cure method in order to achieve antibacterial properties against S. aureus and E. Coli microorganisms. The antibacterial effect against these microorganisms was investigated using a zone of inhibition test and the percent reduction method. The outcomes of these measurements showed that when the cotton fabric was treated with the reaction product of MgCl2·6H2O and H2O2, it retained 90–93% antibacterial activity against S. aureus and 89–91% against E. coli bacteria. This antibacterial effect against these microorganisms was attributed to the presence of reactive oxygen species and Mg ions on the treated cotton fabric. Long term antibacterial effects against S. aureus and E. coli microorganisms were recorded for up to 70 laundering cycles, and the amounts of retained bound peroxide and Mg ions on the finished specimens were measured using iodimetric titration and MP-AES measurements. Additionally, the properties of synthesised MgO2 crystalline powder and treated cotton fabric were studied using UV–Vis, EDX, FTIR spectroscopy, and SEM measurements. The influence of the MgO2 application on mechanical properties such as tensile strength, tear strength, whiteness index, and crease recovery angle of the treated cotton fabric was also analysed. The results obtained clearly confirmed that the treated cotton fabric possessed antibacterial effects for up to 70 laundering cycles. This is likely due to the presence of the required amount of oxidative species and Mg ions on the treated cotton fabrics. The FTIR and EDX results showed that the presence of these key elements (oxygen containing groups) was responsible for the antibacterial property of the finished fabrics. The whiteness index and tensile strength were improved after treatment with MgO2, although tear strength and flexibility of treated specimens were decreased after treatment.

Keywords

Cotton Magnesium peroxide Antibacterial activity Wash durability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the China National Textile & Apparel Council (2013 “Textile Vision” Applied Basic Research, 2013-153); Hubei Province Science and Technology Support Program (Grant No. 2013BAA043) and the Collaborative Innovation Plan of Hubei Province for Key Technology of Eco-Ramie Industry (2014-8).

References

  1. Bang ES, Lee ES, Kim SI, Yu YH, Bae SE (2007) Durable antimicrobial finish of cotton fabrics. J Appl Polym Sci 106:938–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bashar MM, Khan MA (2013) An overview on surface modification of cotton fiber for apparel use. J Polym Environ 21:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhuiyan MR, Shaid A, Khan M (2014) Cationization of cotton fiber by chitosan and its dyeing with reactive dye without salt. Chem Mater Eng 2:96–100Google Scholar
  4. Bhuiyan MR, Hossain M, Zakaria M, Islam M, Uddin MZ (2016) Chitosan coated cotton fiber: physical and antimicrobial properties for apparel use. J Polym Environ 1–9 doi: 10.1007/s10924-016-0815-2
  5. Bindhu M, Umadevi M, Micheal MK, Arasu MV, Al-Dhabi NA (2016) Structural, morphological and optical properties of MgO nanoparticles for antibacterial applications. Mater Lett 166:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butola B, Mohammad F (2016) Silver nanomaterials as future colorants and potential antimicrobial agents for natural and synthetic textile materials. RSC Adv 6:44232–44247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ditaranto N, Picca RA, Sportelli MC, Sabbatini L, Cioffi N (2016) Surface characterization of textiles modified by copper and zinc oxide nano-antimicrobials. Surf Interface Anal 48:505–508. doi: 10.1002/sia.5951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. El-Rafie MH, Ahmed HB, Zahran MK (2014) Characterization of nanosilver coated cotton fabrics and evaluation of its antibacterial efficacy. Carbohydr Polym 107:174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gargoubi S, Tolouei R, Chevallier P, Levesque L, Ladhari N, Boudokhane C, Mantovani D (2016) Enhancing the functionality of cotton fabric by physical and chemical pre-treatments: a comparative study. Carbohydr Polym 147:28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guzman M, Dille J, Godet S (2012) Synthesis and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 8:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. He L, Gao C, Li S, Chung CT, Xin JH (2017) Non-leaching and durable antibacterial textiles finished with reactive zwitterionic sulfobetaine. J Ind Eng Chem 46:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ibrahim HMM, Hassan MS (2016) Characterization and antimicrobial properties of cotton fabric loaded with green synthesized silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 151:841–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ibrahim NA, El-Zairy EMR, Eid BM (2016) Eco-friendly modification and antibacterial functionalization of viscose fabric. J Text Inst 108:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Imlay JA, Linn S (1988) DNA damage and oxygen radical toxicity. Science 240:1302–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jaiakumar T, Umadevi M, Mayandi J, Sathe G (2016) Synergistic effect of MgO/Ag co-doping on TiO2 for efficient antibacterial agents. Mater Lett 184:82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang CK, Kim SS, Kim S, Lee J, Lee J-H, Roh C, Lee J (2016) Antibacterial cotton fibers treated with silver nanoparticles and quaternary ammonium salts. Carbohydr Polym 151:1012–1018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karmakar SR (1999) Chemical technology in the pre-treatment processes of textiles, vol 12, 1st edn. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Khafaga MR, Ali HE, El-Naggar AWM (2016) Antimicrobial finishing of cotton fabrics based on gamma irradiated carboxymethyl cellulose/poly (vinyl alcohol)/TiO2 nanocomposites. J Text Inst 107:766–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klapiszewski L et al (2015) Kraft lignin/silica–AgNPs as a functional material with antibacterial activity. Colloids Surf B 134:220–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lam YL, Kan CW, Yuen CWM (2010) Wrinkle-resistant finishing of cotton fabric with BTCA–the effect of co-catalyst. Text Res J 80:482–493Google Scholar
  21. Li J, He J, Huang Y (2017) Role of alginate in antibacterial finishing of textiles. Int J Biol Macromol 94:466–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mirhosseini M, Afzali M (2016) Investigation into the antibacterial behavior of suspensions of magnesium oxide nanoparticles in combination with nisin and heat against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus in milk. Food Control 68:208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nallathambi G, Ramachandran T, Rajendran V, Palanivelu R (2011) Effect of silica nanoparticles and BTCA on physical properties of cotton fabrics. Mater Res 14:552–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Petkova P, Francesko A, Perelshtein I, Gedanken A, Tzanov T (2016) Simultaneous sonochemical-enzymatic coating of medical textiles with antibacterial ZnO nanoparticles. Ultrason Sonochem 29:244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rajendra R, Balakumar C, Ahammed H, Jayakumar S, Vaideki K, Rajesh E (2010) Use of zinc oxide nano particles for production of antimicrobial textiles. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2:202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rajendran R, Radhai R, Kotresh T, Csiszar E (2013) Development of antimicrobial cotton fabrics using herb loaded nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 91:613–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramanujam K, Sundrarajan M (2014) Biocidal activities of monochlorotriazine-β-cyclodextrine with MgO modified cellulosic fabrics. J Text Inst 106:1–7Google Scholar
  28. Sarkar RK, De P, Chauhan PD (2003) Bacteria-resist finish on cotton fabrics using natural herbal extracts. Indian J Fibre Text Res 28:322–331Google Scholar
  29. Sawai J (2003) Quantitative evaluation of antibacterial activities of metallic oxide powders (ZnO, MgO and CaO) by conductimetric assay. J Microbiol Methods 54:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sawai J et al (2000) Antibacterial characteristics of magnesium oxide powder. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 16:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sawai J, Doi R, Maekawa Y, Yoshikawa T, Kojima H (2002) Indirect conductimetric assay of antibacterial activities. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 29:296–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sellik A, Pollet T, Ouvry L, Briançon S, Fessi H, Hartmann D, Renaud F (2017) Degradation of paraoxon (VX chemical agent simulant) and bacteria by magnesium oxide depends on the crystalline structure of magnesium oxide. Chem Biol Interact 267:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shankar S, Rhim J-W (2017) Facile approach for large-scale production of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles and preparation of antibacterial cotton pads. Carbohydr Polym 163:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simončič B, Klemenčič D (2016) Preparation and performance of silver as an antimicrobial agent for textiles: a review. Text Res J 86:210–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stoimenov P, Klinger R, Marchin G, Klabunde K (2002) Metal oxide nanoparticles as bactericidal agents Langmuir 18:6679–6686Google Scholar
  36. Sungur Ş, Gülmez F (2015) Determination of metal contents of various fibers used in textile industry by MP-AES. J Spectrosc 3:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2015/640271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomson S (2008) Magnesium, magnesium oxide & magnesium peroxide. GAIA Research Institute. http://www.gaiaresearch.co.za/magnesium.html. Accessed 16, May 2017
  38. Vigo TL, Danna GF (1996) Magnesium hydroperoxyacetate (MHPA) and magnesium dihydroperoxide (MDHP): new antibacterial agents for fibrous substrates. Polym Adv Technol 7:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vigo TL, Danna GF (1997) Reaction products of magnesium acetate and hydrogen peroxide for imparting antibacterial activity to fibrous substrates. United States of America Patent 5,656,037, Aug 12Google Scholar
  40. Vigo TL, Danna GF, Goynes WR (1999) Affinity and durability of magnesium peroxide-based antibacterial agents to cellulosic substrates. Text Chem Color 31:29–33Google Scholar
  41. Wang C (2010) Preparation of calcium perborate and magnesium peroxide. Dalian University of Technology, DalianGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang Y, Sha L, Zhao J, Li Q, Zhu Y, Wang N (2017) Antibacterial property of fabrics coated by magnesium-based brucites. Appl Surf Sci 400:413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yetisen AK et al (2016) Nanotechnology in textiles. ACS Nano 10:3042–3068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou Q, Lv J, Ren Y, Chen J, Gao D, Lu Z, Wang C (2016) A green in situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles on cotton fabrics using Aloe vera leaf extraction for durable ultraviolet protection and antibacterial activity. Text Res J. doi: 10.1177/0040517516671124 Google Scholar
  45. Zhu X et al (2016) Highly effective antibacterial activity and synergistic effect of Ag–MgO nanocomposite against Escherichia coli. J Alloys Compd 684:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rahul Navik
    • 1
  • Logesh Thirugnanasampanthan
    • 2
  • Harun Venkatesan
    • 2
  • Md. Kamruzzaman
    • 2
  • Faizan Shafiq
    • 2
  • Yingjie Cai
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Hubei Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Clean Production and High Value Utilization of Bio-based Textile MaterialsWuhan Textile UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringWuhan Textile UniversityWuhanChina
  3. 3.Engineering Research Centre for Clean Production of Textile Dyeing and Printing, Ministry of EducationWuhan Textile UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations