Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 661–671 | Cite as

3D-oriented fiber networks made by foam forming

  • Majid AlimadadiEmail author
  • Tetsu Uesaka
Original Paper

Abstract

In industrial applications, such as paper and nonwovens, cellulose fibers are used in the form of a network where the fibers are oriented more or less in the sheet-plane direction. However, in many biological systems, fibers are instead oriented in a three-dimensional (3D) space, creating a wide variety of functionalities. In this study we created a 3D-oriented fiber network on the laboratory scale and have identified some unique features of its structure and mechanical properties. The 3D fiber network sheets were prepared by using foam-forming as well as modifying consolidation and drying procedures. The fiber orientation and tensile/compression behavior were determined. The resulting sheets were extremely bulky (above 190 cm3/g) and had extremely low stiffness (or high softness) compared to the reference handsheets. Despite this high bulk, the sheets retained good structural integrity. We found that a 3D-oriented fiber network requires much less fiber-fiber contact to create a connected (“percolated”) network than a two-dimensionally oriented network. The compression behavior in the thickness direction was also unique, characterized by extreme compressibility because of its extreme bulk and a long initial increase in the compression load as well as high strain recovery after compression because of its fiber reorientation during compression.

Keywords

3D fiber network Foam forming Percolation Compression 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund EU-Mål 2, and the authors acknowledge the financial support. The authors also acknowledge various support and help provided by Staffan K. Nyström, Håkan Norberg, and Jan Lövgren from Mittuniversitetet and by Rickard Boman from SCA R&D Centre, Sundsvall. Prof. Bo Westerlind of Mittuniversitetet and Kent Malmgren of SCA R&D are also acknowledged for stimulating discussions and suggestions during the course of this study.

References

  1. Al-Qararah AM, Hjelt T, Kinnunen K, Beletski N, Ketoja JA (2012) Exceptional pore size distribution in foam-formed fibre networks. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27:226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Qararah AM, Hjelt T, Koponen A, Harlin A, Ketoja JA (2013) Bubble size and air content of wet fibre foams in axial mixing with macro-instabilities. Colloids Surf A 436:1130–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.08.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balberg I, Anderson CH, Alexander S, Wagner N (1984) Excluded volume and its relation to the onset of percolation. Phys Rev B 30:3933–3943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carnaby GA, Pan N (1989) Theory of the compression hysteresis of fibrous assemblies. Text Res J 59:275–284. doi: 10.1177/004051758905900505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cervin NT, Andersson L, Ng JBS, Olin P, Bergström L, Wågberg L (2013) Lightweight and strong cellulose materials made from aqueous foams stabilized by nanofibrillated cellulose. Biomacromolecules 14:503–511. doi: 10.1021/bm301755u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke A, Archenhold G, Davidson N (1995) A novel technique for determining the 3D spatial distribution of glass fibres in polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 55:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eberhardt C, Clarke A (2001) Fibre-orientation measurements in short-glass-fibre composites. Part I: automated, high-angular-resolution measurement by confocal microscopy. Compos Sci Technol 61:1389–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Exerowa D, Kruglyakov PM (1998) Foam and foam films: theory, experiment, application studies in interface science, vol 5. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Fellers C (2009) Paper products physics and technology. In: Ek M, Gellerstedt G, Henriksson G (eds) Pulp and paper chemistry and technology, vol 4. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. Gatward APJ, Radvan B (1973) Method and apparatus for forming a non-woven fibrous web from a foamed fiber furnish. United States PatentGoogle Scholar
  11. Jahangiri P et al (2014) On filtration and heat insulation properties of foam formed cellulose based materials. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinnunen K, Lehmonen J, Beletski N, Jetsu P, Hjelt T (2013) Benefits of foam forming technology and its applicability in high MFC addition structures. In: Proceedings of the 15th fundamental research symposium. Advances in pulp and paper research. Cambridge, The Pulp & Paper Fundamental Research Society, pp 837–850. September 2013Google Scholar
  13. Komori T, Itoh M (1991) Theory of the general deformation of fiber assemblies. Text Res J 61:588–594. doi: 10.1177/004051759106101005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Komori T, Makishima K (1977) Numbers of fiber-to-fiber contacts in general fiber assemblies. Text Res J 47:13–17. doi: 10.1177/004051757704700104 Google Scholar
  15. Komori T, Itoh M, Takaku A (1992) A model analysis of the compressibility of fiber assemblies. Text Res J 62:567–574. doi: 10.1177/004051759206201002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lappalainen T, Lehmonen J (2012) Determinations of bubble size distribution of foam-fibre mixture using circular hough transform. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27:930–939. doi: 10.3183/NPPRJ-2012-27-05-p930-939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lappalainen T, Salminen K, Kinnunen K, Järvinen M, Mira I, Andersson L (2014) Foam forming revisited. Part II: effect of surfactant on the properties of foam-formed paper products. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 29:689–699. doi: 10.3183/NPPRJ-2014-29-04-p689-699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lehmonen J, Jetsu P, Kinnunen K, Hjelt T (2013) Potential of foam-laid forming technology in paper applications. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 28:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Madani A, Zeinoddini S, Varahmi S, Turnbull H, Phillion AB, Olson JA, Martinez DM (2014) Ultra-lightweight paper foams: processing and properties. Cellulose 21:2023–2031. doi: 10.1007/s10570-014-0197-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mira I et al (2014) Foam forming revisited Part I: foaming behaviour of fibre-surfactant systems. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29:679–689. doi: 10.3183/NPPRJ-2014-29-04-p679-689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pike GE, Seager CH (1974) Percolation and conductivity: a computer study—I. Phys Rev B 10:1421–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Poranen J, Kiiskinen H, Salmela J, Asikainen J, Keränen J, Pääkkönen E (2013) Breakthrough in papermaking resource efficiency with foam forming. Paper presented at the TAPPI PaperCon 2013, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
  23. Punton VW (1975) Fibre distribution in foam and foam-laid paper. Paper presented at the International Paper Physics Conference, New York. 21–25 SeptGoogle Scholar
  24. Radvan B, Gatward APJ (1972) The formation of wet-laid webs by a foaming process. Tappi J 55:748–751Google Scholar
  25. Rättö P (2005) The influence of surface roughness on the compressive behaviour of paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 20:304–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sander EA, Barocas VH (2009) Comparison of 2D fiber network orientation measurement methods. J Biomed Mater Res A 88:322–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith MK, Punton VW, Rixson AG (1974) The structure and properties of paper formed by a foaming process. Tappi J 57:107–111Google Scholar
  28. Stankovic SB (2008) Compression hysteresis of fibrous systems. Polym Eng Sci 48:676–682. doi: 10.1002/pen.20994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ting T, Johnston R, Chiu WK (2000) Compression of paper in the Z-direction: the effects of fibre morphology, wet pressing and refining. Appita J 53:378–384Google Scholar
  30. Tsarouchas D, Markaki A (2011) Extraction of fibre network architecture by X-ray tomography and prediction of elastic properties using an affine analytical model. Acta Mater 59:6989–7002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Wyk CM (1946) 20—Note on the compressibility of wool. J Text Inst Trans 37:T285–T292. doi: 10.1080/19447024608659279 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhu Y, Blumenthal W, Lowe T (1997) Determination of non-symmetric 3-D fiber-orientation distribution and average fiber length in short-fiber composites. J Compos Mater 31:1287–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and FSCNMid Sweden UniversitySundsvallSweden

Personalised recommendations