Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 2943–2953 | Cite as

Structural changes during swelling of highly charged cellulose fibres

  • Anna SjöstedtEmail author
  • Jakob Wohlert
  • P. Tomas Larsson
  • Lars Wågberg
Original Paper

Abstract

Structural changes of fibrils and fibril aggregates in the fibre wall were studied after oxidation of the cellulose by 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy to high charge densities (highest charge density: 1300 μeq/g). The increase in pore volume was measured by mini-WRV at two different pH levels, and the supramolecular structure in the fibre wall in terms of aggregate size, specific surface area and average pore size was measured by solid state NMR, DVS desorption and BET N2 gas adsorption. A structural change in the arrangement of the fibrils inside the fibril aggregates was observed although the oxidation did not lead to a complete liberation of individual fibrils, i.e. they still exist as an aggregated structure after oxidation. Theoretical estimates suggest that the electrostatic repulsion energy connected with the increase in surface charge of the fibrils can be sufficient to gradually separate the fibrils enough to expose all fibril surfaces to oxidation chemicals.

Keywords

Cellulose fibres Nano structure TEMPO oxidation Fibril Fibril aggregates CNF Cellulose nano fibrils Specific surface area 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Domsjö Fabriker AB is acknowledged for kindly supplying the pulp used in this work. The authors would like to acknowledge Anne-Mari Olsson at Innventia for the help with desorption measurements. Wallenberg Wood Science Center is acknowledged for financial support. Dr Anthony Bristow is thanked for linguistic revision of the manuscript.

References

  1. Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA (2001) Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(18):10037–10041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergenstrahle M, Mazeau K, Berglund LA (2008) Molecular modeling of interfaces between cellulose crystals and surrounding molecules: effects of caprolactone surface grafting. Eur Polymer J 44(11):3662–3669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chunilall V, Bush T, Larsson PT, Iversen T, Kindness A (2010) A CP/MAS C-13-NMR study of cellulose fibril aggregation in eucalyptus dissolving pulps during drying and the correlation between aggregate dimensions and chemical reactivity. Holzforschung 64(6):693–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fall A (2013) Colloidal interactions and orientation of nanocellulose particles. Ph.D. Thesis, KTHRoyal Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  7. Gellerstedt F, Wagberg L, Gatenholm P (2000) Swelling behaviour of succinylated fibers. Cellulose 7(1):67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grignon J, Scallan AM (1980) Effect of pH and neutral salts upon the swelling of cellulose gels. J Appl Polym Sci 25(12):2829–2843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Isogai A, Saito T, Fukuzumi H (2011) TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 3(1):71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jakob HF, Fengel D, Tschegg SE, Fratzl P (1995) The elementary cellulose fibril in Picea abies: comparison of transmission electron microscopy, small-angle X-ray scattering, and wide-angle X-ray scattering results. Macromolecules 28(26):8782–8787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Katz S, Beatson RP, Scallan AM (1984) The determination of strong and weak acidic groups in sulfite pulps. Svensk Papperstidning 87:R48–R53Google Scholar
  12. Larsson PT, Wickholm K, Iversen T (1997) A CP/MAS C-13 NMR investigation of molecular ordering in celluloses. Carbohydr Res 302(1–2):19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Larsson PT, Svensson A, Wagberg L (2013) A new, robust method for measuring average fibre wall pore sizes in cellulose I rich plant fibre walls. Cellulose 20(2):623–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li T-Q, Henriksson U, Eriksson JC, Ödberg L (1989) Deuterium NMR and water adsorption studies of the effect of beating on the water-cellulose interaction. Funda Papermak 1:39–65Google Scholar
  15. Lindström T, Carlsson G (1982) The effect of carboxyl groups and their ionic form during drying on the hornification of cellulose fibers. Svensk Papperstidning-Nordisk Cellulosa 85(15):R146–R151Google Scholar
  16. Newman RH (1992) Solid-state C-13 NMR-spectroscopy of multiphase biomaterials. ACS Symp Ser 489:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8(8):2485–2491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saito T, Hirota M, Tamura N, Kimura S, Fukuzumi H, Heux L, Isogai A (2009) Individualization of nano-sized plant cellulose fibrils by direct surface carboxylation using TEMPO catalyst under neutral conditions. Biomacromolecules 10(7):1992–1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saito T, Kuramae R, Wohlert J, Berglund LA, Isogai A (2013) An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. Biomacromolecules 14(1):248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Ikkala O, Berglund LA (2011) Strong and tough cellulose nanopaper with high specific surface area and porosity. Biomacromolecules 12(10):3638–3644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stone JE, Scallan AM (1967) The effect of component removal upon the porous structure of the cell wall of wood. II. Swelling in water and the fibre saturation point. Tappi 50(10):496–501Google Scholar
  22. Svensson A, Larsson PT, Salazar-Alvarez G, WÃ¥gberg L (2013) Preparation of dry ultra-porous cellulosic fibres: characterization and possible initial uses. Carbohydr Polym 92(1):775–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wågberg L, Björklund M (1993) Adsorption of cationic potato starch on cellulosic fibres. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 8(4):339–404Google Scholar
  24. Wickholm K, Larsson PT, Iversen T (1998) Assignment of non-crystalline forms in cellulose I by CP/MAS C-13 NMR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 312(3):123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wohlert J, Berglund LA (2011) A coarse-grained model for molecular dynamics simulations of native cellulose. J Chem Theory Comput 7(3):753–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Sjöstedt
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jakob Wohlert
    • 1
  • P. Tomas Larsson
    • 1
    • 3
  • Lars Wågberg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Wallenberg Wood Science CenterKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of Fiber and Polymer Technology, School of Chemical Science and EngineeringKTH Royal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Innventia ABStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations