Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 407–420 | Cite as

Isolation of cellulose nanocrystals from onion skin and their utilization for the preparation of agar-based bio-nanocomposites films

  • Jong-Whan RhimEmail author
  • Jeevan Prasad Reddy
  • Xiaogang Luo
Original Paper

Abstract

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) were isolated from onion skin using different concentrations of acid (45, 55, and 65 % H2SO4) and agar/CNC composite films were prepared to test their performance properties. The major component of onion skin was α-Cellulose (41.1 %). The yield, crystallinity index (CI), crystallite size, and thermal stability of the CNC varied depending on the acid concentration. The CNC isolated with 45 % of H2SO4 (CNC45) had the highest yield (48.6 %), CI (0.26), crystallite size (2.49 nm), and thermal stability among the tested CNCs. Performance test results of agar/CNCs composite films also indicated that the CNC45 reinforced composite film had the highest tensile strength (TS: 50 MPa) and Young’s modulus (YM: 1.98 GPa) with the lowest water vapor permeability (WVP: 1.78 × 10−9 g m/m2 s Pa). The properties of agar/CNC45 composite films were also greatly influenced by the content of nanofiller. The composite film exhibited the maximum strength and water vapor barrier properties with 3 wt% inclusion of CNC45. The present study revealed that the onion skin is an interesting new source of cellulose material for the preparation of bio-nanocomposite materials.

Keywords

Onion skin Microcrystalline fiber Cellulose nanofiber Agar Bio-nanocomposite 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by iPET (Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries), Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Adel AM, El–Wahab ZHA, Ibrahim AA, Mona TAS (2010) Characterization of microcrystalline cellulose prepared from lignocellulosic materials. Part I. Acid catalyzed hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol 101:4446–4455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agustin MB, Ahmmad B, Richel EPDL, Jerico LB, Joel RS, Fumihiko H (2013) Starch-based biocomposite films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals from garlic stalks. Polym Compos 34:1325–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akaranta O, Efanga DE (1997) Dyeability of textile fibers with azo compounds prepared by coupling red onion skin extract with diazonium salts. J Nat Sci SriLanka 25:121–126Google Scholar
  4. Alemdar A, Sain M (2008) Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresour Technol 99:1664–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azizi-Samir MAS, Alloin F, Dufresne A (2005) Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 6:612–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6:1048–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benítez V, Mollá E, Martín-Cabrejas MA, Aguilera Y, López-Andréu FJ, Cools K, Terry LA, Esteban RM (2011) Characterization of industrial onion wastes (Allium cepa L.): dietary fiber and bioactive compounds. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 66:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bledzki AK, Mamun AA, Gabor ML, Gutowski VS (2008) The effects of acetylation on properties of flax fiber and its polypropylene composites. Express Polym Lett 2:413–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bondeson D, Mathew A, Oksman K (2006) Optimization of the isolation of nanocrystals from microcrystalline cellulose by acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 13:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bras J, Hassan ML, Bruzesse C, Hassan EA, El-Wakil NA, Dufresne A (2010) Mechanical, barrier, and biodegradability properties of bagasse cellulose whiskers reinforced natural rubber nanocomposites. Ind Crop Prod 32:627–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Y, Liu C, Chang PR, Cao X, Anderson DP (2009) Bionanocomposites based on pea starch and cellulose nanowhiskers hydrolyzed from pea hull fibre: effect of hydrolysis time. Carbohydr Polym 76:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Das K, Ray D, Bandyopadhyay NR, Ghosh T, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2009) A study of the mechanical, thermal and morphological properties of microcrystalline cellulose particles prepared from cotton slivers using different acid concentrations. Cellulose 16:783–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. El-Sakhawy M, Hassan ML (2007) Physical and mechanical properties of microcrystalline cellulose prepared from agricultural residues. Carbohydr Polym 67:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gumuskaya E, Usta M, Kirci H (2003) The effects of various pulping conditions on crystalline structure of cellulose in cotton linters. Polym Degrad Stab 81:559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han G, Huan S, Han J, Zhang Z, Wu Q (2014) Effect of acid hydrolysis conditions on the properties of cellulose nanoparticle-reinforced polymethylmethacrylate composites. Materials 7:16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lidström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43:3434–3441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herrick FW, Casebier RL, Hamilton JK, Sandberg KR (1983) Microfibrillated cellulose: morphology and accessibility. J Appl Polym Sci Appl Polym Symp 37:797–813Google Scholar
  18. Hubbe MA, Rojas OJ, Lucia LA, Sain M (2008) Cellulose nanocomoposites: a review. Bioresources 3:929–980Google Scholar
  19. Huda MS, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2008) Effect of fiber surface-treatments on the properties of laminated biocomposites from poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and kenaf fibers. Comp Sci Technol 68:424–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huq T, Salmieri S, Khan A, Khan RA, Tien CL, Riedl B, Fraschin C, Bouchard J, Uribe-Calderon J, Kamal MR, Lacroix M (2012) Nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) reinforced alginate based biodegradable nanocomposite film. Carbohydr Polym 90:1757–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ioelovich M (2012a) Study of cellulose interaction with concentrated solutions of sulfuric acid. ISRN Chem Eng 428974:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ioelovich M (2012b) Optimal conditions for isolation of nanocrystalline cellulose particles. Nanosci Nanotechnol 2:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Janewit W, Nakorn W, Suneerat P (2008) Product yields and characteristics of rice husk, rice straw and corncob during fast pyrolysis in a drop-tube/fixed-bed reactor. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol 30:393–404Google Scholar
  24. Jiang F, Hsieh YL (2013) Chemically and mechanically isolated nanocellulose and their self-assembled structures. Carbohydr Polym 95:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan A, Khan RA, Salmieri S, Tien CL, Riedl B, Bouvhard J, Chauve G, Tan V, Kamal MR, Lacroix M (2012) Mechanical and barrier properties of nanocrystalline cellulose reinforced chitosan based nanocomposite films. Carbohydr Polym 90:1601–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Khan A, Huq T, Khan RA, Riedl B, Lacroix M (2014) Nanocellulose-based composites and bioactive agents for food packaging. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 54:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Komolwanich T, Tatijarern P, Prasertwasu S, Khumsupan D, Chaisuwan T, Luengnaruemitchai A, Wongkasemjit S (2014) Comparative potentiality of kans grass (Saccharum spontaneum) and giant reed (Arundo donax) as lignocellulosic feedstocks for the release of monomeric sugars by microwave/chemical pretreatment. Cellulose. doi: 10.1007/s10570-013-0161-7 Google Scholar
  28. Li X, Tabil LG, Panigrahi S (2007) Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composites: a review. J Polym Environ 15:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li Y, Zhang J, He J, Reddy JP, Rajulu AV (2010) Tensile properties of hildegardia fibers reinforced polypropylene biocomposites. J Compos Mater 44:1681–1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Limayema A, Ricke SC (2012) Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: current perspectives, potential issues and future prospects. Prog Energy Combust Sci 38:449–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lu P, Hsieh YL (2010) Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals: rods, spheres, and network. Carbohydr Polym 82:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ludueina L, Fasce D, Alvarez VA, Stefani PM (2011) Nanocellulose from rice husk following alkaline treatment to remove silica. BioResources 6:1440–1453Google Scholar
  33. Maheswari CU, Reddy KO, Muzenda M, Guduri BR, Rajulu AV (2012) Extraction and characterization of cellulose microfibrils from agricultural residue-Cocos nucifera L. Biomass Bioenerg 46:555–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mandal A, Chakrabarty D (2014) Studies on the mechanical, thermal, morphological and barrier properties of nanocomposites based on poly(vinyl alcohol) and nanocellulose from sugarcane bagasse. J Ind Eng Chem 20:462–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mesquita JP, Donnici CL, Teixeira IF, Pereira FV (2012) Bio-based nanocomposites obtained through covalent linkage between chitosan and cellulose nanocrystals. Carbohydr Polym 90:210–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Missoum K, Martoïa F, Belgacem MN, Bras J (2013) Effect of chemically modified nanofibrillated cellulose addition on the properties of fiber-based materials. Ind Crop Prod 48:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nazir MS, Wahjoedi BA, Yussof AW, Abdullah MA (2013) Eco-friendly extraction and characterization of cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunches. Bioresources 8:2161–2172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nyambo C, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2010) Polylactide-based renewable green composites from agricultural residues and their hybrids. Biomacromolecules 11:1654–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oksman K, Etang JA, Mathew AP, Jonoobi M (2011) Cellulose nanowhiskers separated from a bio-residue from wood bioethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 35:146–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Padma SV, Rakhi S (2009) Dyeing of cotton, wool and silk with extract of Allium cepa. Pigment Resin Technol 38:242–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pan M, Zhou X, Chen M (2013) Cellulose nanowhiskers isolation and properties from acid hydrolysis combined with high pressure homozinization. Bioresources 8:933–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rajulu AV, Rao GB, Rao BRP, Reddy AMS, He J, Zhang J (2002) Properties of ligno-cellulose fiber Hildegardia. J Appl Polym Sci 84:2216–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reddy JP, Rhim JW (2014) Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from garlic skin. Mater Lett 129:20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reddy KO, Maheswari CU, Reddy DJP, Rajulu AV (2009) Thermal properties of Napier grass fibers. Mater Lett 63:2390–2392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reddy K, Maheswari UC, Mukul S, Song JI, Rajulu AV (2013) Tensile and structural characterization of alkali treated borassus fruit fine fibers. Compos B 44:433–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rhim JW, Lee SB, Hong SI (2011) Preparation and characterization of agar/clay nanocomposite films: the effect of clay type. J Food Sci 76:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Roman M, Winter WT (2004) Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5:1671–1677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Santos RMD, Neto WPF, Silvério HA, Martins DF, Dantas NO, Pasquini D (2013) Cellulose nanocrystals from pineapple leaf, a new approach for the reuse of this agro-waste. Ind Crop Prod 50:707–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh S, Mohanty AK, Sugio T, Takai Y, Hamada H (2008) Renewable resource based biocomposites from natural fiber and polyhydroxybutyrate-co-valerate (PHBV) bioplastic. Compos A 39:875–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Siro I, Plackett D (2010) Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review. Cellulose 17:459–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Suryanegara L, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2009) The effect of crystallization of PLA on the thermal and mechanical properties of microfibrillated cellulose-reinforced PLA composites. Comps Sci Technol 69:1187–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wada M, Heux L, Sugiyama J (2004) Polymorphism of cellulose I family: reinvestigation of cellulose IV. Biomacromolecules 5:1385–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waleed KEZ, Maha MI (2003) Synthesis and characterization of cellulose resins. Polym Adv Technol 14:623–631Google Scholar
  54. Wang N, Ding E, Cheng R (2007) Thermal degradation behaviors of spherical cellulose nanocrystals with sulfate groups. Polymer 48:3486–3493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yu L, Dean L, Li L (2006) Polymer blends and composites from renewable resources. Prog Polym Sci 31:576–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jong-Whan Rhim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jeevan Prasad Reddy
    • 1
  • Xiaogang Luo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Food Engineering and Bionanocomposite Research InstituteMokpo National UniversityMuangunRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.School of Chemical Engineering and PharmacyWuhan Institute of TechnologyWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations