Advertisement

Cellulose

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 2675–2693 | Cite as

The surface properties of cellulose and lignocellulosic materials assessed by inverse gas chromatography: a review

  • José A. F. Gamelas
Review Paper

Abstract

The physicochemical surface properties of cellulose and lignocellulosic materials are of major importance in the context of the production of composites, in papermaking, and textile area. These properties can be evaluated by using inverse gas chromatography (IGC), a particularly suitable technique for the characterization of the surface properties of fibrous materials and powders. At infinite dilution conditions of appropriate gas probes, IGC may provide important parameters including the dispersive component of the surface energy of the material under analysis, thermodynamic data on the adsorption of specific probes, and Lewis acid–base interaction parameters between the matrix and the filler of composite materials. This paper critically reviews the most relevant results available in the literature concerning the characterization of cellulose and lignocellulosic materials using IGC. Emphasis will be put into the cellulose and nanocellulose surface properties, changes in the surface properties of cellulose and lignocellulosic materials after chemical and physical modifications, and in the compatibility of cellulose-based materials with polymeric matrices. The surface properties of non-woody fibers will also be considered. Before discussing the results available in the literature, the theoretical background and the main approaches used for the calculation of parameters accessed by IGC will be given. It is expected that this review can contribute to a better knowledge of the physicochemical surface properties of cellulosics.

Keywords

Inverse gas chromatography Surface energy Acid–base properties Cellulose Polymers Composites 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Gabriela Martins for her helpful suggestions to this paper.

References

  1. Abdel-Halim ES (2012) Physiochemical properties of differently pretreated cellulosic fibers. Carbohydr Polym 88:1201–1207Google Scholar
  2. Bach S, Belgacem MN, Gandini A (2005) Hydrophobisation and densification of wood by different chemical treatments. Holzforschung 59:389–396Google Scholar
  3. Belgacem MN (2000) Characterization of polysaccharides, lignin and other woody components by inverse gas chromatography: a review. Cellul Chem Technol 34:357–383Google Scholar
  4. Belgacem MN, Gandini A (1999) IGC as a tool to characterize dispersive and acid-base properties of the surface of fibers and powders. In: Pfefferkorn E (ed) Interfacial phenomena in chromatography. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 41–124Google Scholar
  5. Belgacem MN, Czeremuszkin G, Sapieha S, Gandini A (1995) Surface characterization of cellulose fibres by XPS and inverse gas chromatography. Cellulose 2:145–157Google Scholar
  6. Belgacem MN, Blayo A, Gandini A (1996) Surface characterization of polysaccharides, lignins, printing ink pigments, and ink fillers by inverse gas chromatography. J Colloid Interface Sci 182:431–436Google Scholar
  7. Boras L, Sjostrom J, Gatenholm P (1997) Characterization of surfaces of CTMP fibers using inverse gas chromatography combined with multivariate data analysis. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 12(4):220–224Google Scholar
  8. Borges JP, Godinho MH, Belgacem MN, Martins AF (2001) New bio-composites based on short fibre reinforced hydroxypropylcellulose films. Compos Interface 8:233–241Google Scholar
  9. Botaro VR, Gandini A (1998) Chemical modification of the surface of cellulosic fibres. 2. Introduction of alkenyl moieties via condensation reactions involving isocyanate functions. Cellulose 5:65–78Google Scholar
  10. Brendlé E, Papirer E (1997a) A new topological index for molecular probes used in inverse gas chromatography for the surface nanorugosity evaluation 1. Method of evaluation. J Colloid Interface Sci 194:207–216Google Scholar
  11. Brendlé E, Papirer E (1997b) A new topological index for molecular probes used in inverse gas chromatography 2. Application for the evaluation of the solid surface specific interaction potential. J Colloid Interface Sci 194:217–224Google Scholar
  12. Carvalho MG, Santos JMRCA, Martins AA, Figueiredo MM (2005a) The effects of beating, web forming and sizing on the surface energy of Eucalyptus globulus kraft fibres evaluated by inverse gas chromatography. Cellulose 12:371–383Google Scholar
  13. Carvalho MG, Ferreira PJ, Santos JMRCA, Amaral JL, Figueiredo MM (2005b) Effect of extended cooking and oxygen prebleaching on the surface energy of Eucalyptus globulus kraft pulps. J Pulp Paper Sci 31(2):90–94Google Scholar
  14. Chehimi MM, Abel M, Perruchot C, Delamar M, Lascelles SF, Armes SP (1999) The determination of the surface energy of conducting polymers by inverse gas chromatography at infinite dilution. Synth Met 104:51–59Google Scholar
  15. Chen J, Yan N (2012) Hydrophobization of bleached softwood kraft fibers via adsorption of organo-nanoclay. Bioresources 7:4132–4149Google Scholar
  16. Chtourou H, Riedl B, Kokta BV (1995) Surface characterizations of modified polyethylene pulp and wood pulps fibres using XPS and inverse gas chromatography. J Adhes Sci Technol 9:551–574Google Scholar
  17. Chtourou H, Riedl B, Kokta BV (1997) Strength properties of wood-PE composites: influence of pulp ratio and pretreatment of PE fibers. Tappi J 80:141–151Google Scholar
  18. Conder JR, Young CL (1979) Physicochemical measurement by gas chromatography. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Cordeiro N, Gouveia C, Jacob John M (2011a) Investigation of surface properties of physico-chemically modified natural fibres using inverse gas chromatography. Ind Crop Prod 33:108–115Google Scholar
  20. Cordeiro N, Gouveia C, Moraes AGO, Amico SC (2011b) Natural fibers characterization by inverse gas chromatography. Carbohydr Polym 84:110–117Google Scholar
  21. Cordeiro N, Ornelas M, Ashori A, Sheshmani S, Norouzi H (2012) Investigation on the surface properties of chemically modified natural fibres using inverse gas chromatography. Carbohydr Polym 87:2367–2375Google Scholar
  22. Coupas AC, Gauthier H, Gauthier R (1998) Inverse gas chromatography as a tool to characterize ligno-cellulosic fibers modified for composite applications. Polym Compos 19:280–286Google Scholar
  23. Dominkovics Z, Dányádi L, Pukánszky B (2007) Surface modification of wood flour and its effect on the properties of PP/wood composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci 38:1893–1901Google Scholar
  24. Donnet JB, Park SJ, Balard H (1991) Evaluation of specific interactions of solid surfaces by inverse gas chromatography—a new approach based on polarizability of the probes. Chromatographia 31:434–440Google Scholar
  25. Donnet JB, Qin RY, Wang MJ (1992) A new approach for estimating the molecular areas of linear hydrocarbons and their derivatives. J Colloid Interface Sci 153:572–577Google Scholar
  26. Dorris GM, Gray DG (1980) Adsorption of n-alkanes at zero surface coverage on cellulose paper and wood fibres. J Colloid Interface Sci 77:353–362Google Scholar
  27. Duarte GV, Gamelas JAF, Ramarao BV, Amidon TE, Ferreira PJ (2012) Properties of extracted Eucalyptus globulus kraft pulps. Tappi J 11(4):47–55Google Scholar
  28. Felix JM, Gatenholm P (1993a) Characterization of cellulose fibers using inverse gas chromatography. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 8(1):200–203Google Scholar
  29. Felix JM, Gatenholm P (1993b) Formation of entanglements at brushlike interfaces in cellulose-polymer composites. J Appl Polym Sci 50:699–708Google Scholar
  30. Felix JM, Gatenholm P, Schreiber HP (1993) Controlled interactions in cellulose-polymer composites. 1. Effect on mechanical properties. Polym Compos 14:449–457Google Scholar
  31. Felix J, Gatenholm P, Schreiber HP (1994) Plasma modification of cellulose fibers: effects on some polymer composite properties. J Appl Polym Sci 51:285–295Google Scholar
  32. Fowkes FM (1964) Attractive forces at interfaces. Ind Eng Chem 56:40Google Scholar
  33. Gadhe JB, Gupta RB, Elder T (2006) Surface modification of lignocellulosic fibers using high-frequency ultrasound. Cellulose 13:9–22Google Scholar
  34. Gamelas JAF, Santos JMRCA, Ferreira PJ (2011) Surface energetics of softwood kraft pulps by inverse gas chromatography. In: Ander P, Bauer W, Heinemann S, Kallio P, Passas R, Treimanis A (eds) Fine structure of papermaking fibres. COST Office, Brussels, pp 39–49Google Scholar
  35. Gamelas JAF, Evtyugina MG, Portugal I, Evtuguin DV (2012) New polyoxometalate-functionalized cellulosic fibre/silica hybrids for environmental applications. RSC Adv 2:831–839Google Scholar
  36. Gamelas JAF, Duarte GV, Ferreira PJ (2013) Inverse gas chromatography and XPS of extracted kraft pulps. Holzforschung 67:273–276Google Scholar
  37. Gardner DJ, Oporto GS, Mills R, Samir MASA (2008) Adhesion and surface issues in cellulose and nanocellulose. J Adhesion Sci Technol 22:545–567Google Scholar
  38. Garnier G, Glasser WG (1994) Measurement of the surface free energy of amorphous cellulose by alkane adsorption: a critical evaluation of inverse gas chromatography (IGC). J Adhesion 46:165–180Google Scholar
  39. Garnier G, Glasser WG (1996) Measuring the surface energies of spherical cellulose beads by inverse gas chromatography. Polym Eng Sci 36:885–894Google Scholar
  40. Gassan J, Gutowski VS, Bledzki AK (2000) About the surface characteristics of natural fibres. Macromol Mater Eng 283:132–139Google Scholar
  41. Gauthier R, Joly C, Coupas AC, Gauthier H, Escoubes M (1998a) Interfaces in polyolefin/cellulosic fiber composites: chemical coupling, morphology, correlation with adhesion and aging in moisture. Polym Compos 19:287–300Google Scholar
  42. Gauthier H, Coupas A, Villemagne P, Gauthier R (1998b) Physicochemical modifications of partially esterified cellulose evidenced by inverse gas chromatography. J Appl Polym Sci 69:2195–2203Google Scholar
  43. Goss KU (1997) Considerations about the adsorption of organic molecules from the gas phase to surfaces: implications for inverse gas chromatography and the prediction of adsorption coefficients. J Colloid Interface Sci 190:241–249Google Scholar
  44. Gregorova A, Wimmer R, Hrabalova M, Koller M, Ters T, Mundigler N (2009) Effect of surface modification of beech wood flour on mechanical and thermal properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/wood flour composites. Holzforschung 63:565–570Google Scholar
  45. Gulati D, Sain M (2006a) Surface characteristics of untreated and modified hemp fibers. Polym Eng Sci 46:269–273Google Scholar
  46. Gulati D, Sain M (2006b) Fungal-modification of natural fibers: a novel method of treating natural fibers for composite reinforcement. J Polym Environ 14:347–352Google Scholar
  47. Gurnagul N, Gray DG (1987) Surface-adsorption at low coverage of normal-alkanes on bleached kraft papers using gas-chromatography. Can J Chem 65:1935–1939Google Scholar
  48. Gutmann V (1978) The donor-acceptor approach to molecular interactions. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Heng JYY, Pearse DF, Thielmann F, Lampke T, Bismarck A (2007) Methods to determine surface energies of natural fibres: a review. Compos Interface 14:581–604Google Scholar
  50. Jacob PN, Berg JC (1994) Acid-base surface energy characterization of microcrystalline cellulose and two wood pulp fiber types using inverse gas chromatography. Langmuir 10:3086–3093Google Scholar
  51. Jandura P, Riedl B, Kokta BV (2002) Inverse gas chromatography study on partially esterified paper fiber. J Chromatogr 969:301–311Google Scholar
  52. Kamdem DP, Riedl B (1991) Characterization of wood fibers modified by phenol-formaldehyde. Colloid Polym Sci 269:595–603Google Scholar
  53. Kamdem DP, Riedl B (1992) Inverse gas chromatography of lignocellulosic fibers coated with a thermosetting polymer: use of peak maximum and conder and young methods. J Colloid Interface Sci 150:507–516Google Scholar
  54. Kamdem DP, Bose SK, Luner P (1993) Inverse gas chromatography characterization of birch wood meal. Langmuir 9:3039–3044Google Scholar
  55. Kazayawoko M, Balatinecz J, Romansky M (1997) Thermodynamics of adsorption of n-alkanes on maleated wood fibers by inverse gas chromatography. J Colloid Interface Sci 190:408–415Google Scholar
  56. Kazayawoko M, Balatinecz JJ, Matuana LM (1999) Surface modification and adhesion mechanisms in wood fiber-polypropylene composites. J Mater Sci 34:6189–6199Google Scholar
  57. Kiselev AV (1967) Adsorbents in gas chromatography. In: Giddings JC, Keller RA (eds) Advances in chromatography. Marcel Dekker Co., New York, vol. 4, pp 113–196 Google Scholar
  58. Lee HL, Luner P (1989) Characterization of AKD sized papers by inverse gas chromatography. Nord Pulp Paper Res J 4(2):164–172Google Scholar
  59. Lee HL, Luner P (1993) Analysis of the adsorption of alkanes on high surface area cellulose by inverse gas chromatography. J Wood Chem Technol 13:127–144Google Scholar
  60. Liu FP, Rials TG, Simonsen J (1998) Relantionship of wood surface energy to surface composition. Langmuir 14:536–541Google Scholar
  61. Lundqvist A, Odberg L, Berg JC (1995) Surface characterization of non-chlorine-bleached pulp fibers and calcium-carbonate coatings using inverse gas-chromatography. Tappi J 78:139–142Google Scholar
  62. Matuana LM, Woodhams RT, Balatinecz JJ, Park CB (1998) Influence of interfacial interactions on the properties of PVC/cellulosic fiber composites. Polym Compos 19:446–455Google Scholar
  63. Matuana LM, Balatinecz JJ, Park CB, Woodhams RT (1999) Surface characteristics of chemically modified newsprint fibers determined by inverse gas chromatography. Wood Fiber Sci 31:116–127Google Scholar
  64. Megiatto JD, Oliveira FB, Rosa DS, Gardrat C, Castellan A, Frollini E (2007) Renewable resources as reinforcement of polymeric matrices: composites based on phenolic thermosets and chemically modified sisal fibers. Macromol Biosci 7:1121–1131Google Scholar
  65. Megiatto JD, Silva CG, Rosa DS, Frollini E (2008) Sisal chemically modified with lignins: correlation between fibers and phenolic composites properties. Polym Degrad Stab 93:1109–1121Google Scholar
  66. Mills RH, Gardner DJ, Wimmer R (2008) Inverse gas chromatography for determining the dispersive surface free energy and acid-base interactions of sheet molding compound-Part II 14 lignocellulosic fiber types for possible composite reinforcement. J Appl Polym Sci 110:3880–3888Google Scholar
  67. Mills RH, Jara R, Gardner DJ, van Heiningen A (2009) Inverse gas chromatography for determining the surface free energy and acid-base chemical characteristics of a water extracted hardwood (Acer rubrum). J Wood Chem Technol 29(1):11–23Google Scholar
  68. Mukhopadhyay P, Schreiber HP (1995) Aspects of acid-base interactions and use of inverse gas chromatography. Colloid Surf A 100:47–71Google Scholar
  69. Oporto GS, Gardner DJ, Kiziltas A, Neivandt DJ (2011) Understanding the affinity between components of wood-plastic composites from a surface energy perspective. J Adhes Sci Technol 25:1785–1801Google Scholar
  70. Papirer E, Brendle E, Balard H, Vergelati C (2000) Inverse gas chromatography investigation of the surface properties of cellulose. J Adhes Sci Technol 14:321–337Google Scholar
  71. Paredes JJ, Mills R, Howel C, Shaler SM, Gardner DJ, van Heiningen A (2009) Surface characterization of red maple strands after hot water extraction. Wood Fiber Sci 41(1):38–50Google Scholar
  72. Peng S, Zou Q (2007) An investigation on the surface properties of lyocell-based carbon fiber with inverse gas chromatography. J Mater Sci 42:6907–6912Google Scholar
  73. Peterlin S, Planinsek O, Moutinho I, Ferreira P, Dolenc D (2010) Inverse gas chromatography analysis of spruce fibers with different lignin content. Cellulose 17:1095–1102Google Scholar
  74. Pommet M, Juntaro J, Heng JYY, Mantalaris A, Lee AF, Wilson K, Kalinka G, Shaffer MSP, Bismarck A (2008) Surface modification of natural fibers using bacteria: depositing bacterial cellulose onto natural fibers to create hierarchical fiber reinforced nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 9:1643–1651Google Scholar
  75. Ramires EC, Frollini E (2012) Tannin–phenolic resins: synthesis, characterization, and application as matrix in biobased composites reinforced with sisal fibers. Compos Part B Eng 43:2851–2860Google Scholar
  76. Rani PR, Ramanaiah S, Reddy KS (2011) Lewis acid-base properties of cellulose acetate butyrate by inverse gas chromatography. Surf Interface Anal 43:683–688Google Scholar
  77. Reutenauer S, Thielmann F (2003) The characterization of cotton fibers and the interaction with perfume molecules by inverse gas chromatography (IGC). J Mater Sci 38:2205–2208Google Scholar
  78. Rials TG, Simonsen J (2000) Investigating interphase development in wood polymer composites by inverse gas chromatography. Compos Interface 7:81–92Google Scholar
  79. Riddle FL, Fowkes FM (1990) Spectral shifts in acid-base chemistry. 1. Van der Waals contributions to acceptor numbers. J Am Chem Soc 112:3259–3264Google Scholar
  80. Riedl B, Kamdem DP (1992) Estimation of the dispersive component of surface energy of polymer grafted lignocellulosic fibers with inverse gas chromatography. J Adhes Sci Technol 6:1053–1067Google Scholar
  81. Rjiba N, Nardin M, Dréan J, Frydrych R (2007) A study of the surface properties of cotton fibers by inverse gas chromatography. J Colloid Interface Sci 314:373–380Google Scholar
  82. Rocha N, Gamelas JAF, Gonçalves PM, Gil MH, Guthrie JT (2009) Influence of physical-chemical interactions on the thermal stability and surface properties of poly(vinyl chloride)-b-poly(hydroxypropyl acrylate)-b-poly(vinyl chloride) block copolymers. Eur Polym J 45:3389–3398Google Scholar
  83. Saint Flour C, Papirer E (1982) Gas solid chromatography: a method of measuring surface free energy characteristics of short glass fibers. 2. Through retention volumes measured near zero surface coverage. Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 21:666–669Google Scholar
  84. Saint Flour C, Papirer E (1983) Gas-solid chromatography: a quick method of estimating surface free energy variations induced by the treatment of short glass fibers. J Colloid Interface Sci 91:69–75Google Scholar
  85. Santos JMRCA, Guthrie JT (2005) Analysis of interactions in multicomponent polymeric systems: the key-role of inverse gas chromatography. Mat Sci Eng R 50:79–107Google Scholar
  86. Sasa B, Odon P, Stane S, Julijana K (2006) Analysis of surface properties of cellulose ethers and drug release from their matrix tablets. Eur J Pharm Sci 27:375–383Google Scholar
  87. Schultz J, Lavielle L (1989) Interfacial properties of carbon-fiber epoxy matrix composites. In: Lloyd DR, Ward TC, Schreiber HP (eds) Inverse gas chromatography characterization of polymers and other materials, ACS symposium series, 391. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 185–202Google Scholar
  88. Schultz J, Lavielle L, Martin C (1987) The role of the interface in carbon fibre-epoxy composites. J Adhesion 23:45–60Google Scholar
  89. Shen Q (2009) Surface properties of cellulose and cellulose derivatives: a review. In: Roman M (ed) Model cellulosic surfaces, ACS symposium series, 1019. American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 259–289Google Scholar
  90. Shen W, Parker IH (1999) Surface composition and surface energetics of various eucalypt pulps. Cellulose 6:41–55Google Scholar
  91. Shen W, Yao W, Li M, Parker I (1998a) Characterization of eucalypt fibre surface using inverse gas chromatography and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Appita J 51(2):147–151Google Scholar
  92. Shen W, Parker IH, Sheng YJ (1998b) The effects of surface extractives and lignin on the surface energy of eucalypt kraft pulp fibers. J Adhes Sci Technol 12:161–174Google Scholar
  93. Shen W, Sheng YJ, Parker IH (1999) Comparison of the surface energetics data of eucalypt fibers and some polymers obtained by contact angle and inverse gas chromatography methods. J Adhes Sci Technol 13:887–901Google Scholar
  94. Shen W, Filonanko Y, Truong Y, Parker IH, Brack N, Pigram P, Liesegang J (2000) Contact angle measurement and surface energetics of sized and unsized paper. Colloid Surf A 173:117–126Google Scholar
  95. Siddiqui N, Mills RH, Gardner DJ, Bousfield D (2011) Production and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from wood pulp. J Adhes Sci Technol 25:709–721Google Scholar
  96. Simonsen J, Hong Z, Rials TG (1997) The properties of the wood-polystyrene interphase determined by inverse gas chromatography. Wood Fiber Sci 29:75–84Google Scholar
  97. Smidsrod O, Guillet JE (1969) Study of polymer-solute interactions by gas chromatography. Macromolecules 2:272–277Google Scholar
  98. Steele DF, Moreton RC, Staniforth JN, Young PM, Tobyn MJ, Edge S (2008) Surface energy of microcrystalline cellulose determined by capillary intrusion and inverse gas chromatography. AAPS J 10:494–503Google Scholar
  99. Tonoli GHD, Almeida AEFD, Pereira-da-Silva MA, Bassa A, Oyakawa D, Savastano H (2010) Surface properties of eucalyptus pulp fibres as reinforcement of cement-based composites. Holzforschung 64:595–601Google Scholar
  100. Trejo-O′Reilly JA, Cavaille JY, Belgacem MN, Gandini A (1998) Surface energy and wettability of modified cellulosic fibres for use in composite materials. J Adhesion 67:359–374Google Scholar
  101. Tshabalala MA (1997) Determination of the acid-base characteristics of lignocellulosic surfaces by inverse gas chromatography. J Appl Polym Sci 65:1013–1020Google Scholar
  102. Tze WT, Gardner DJ (2001) Contact angle and IGC measurements for probing surface-chemical changes in the recycling of wood pulp fibers. J Adhes Sci Technol 15:223–241Google Scholar
  103. Tze WTY, Gardner DJ, Tripp CP, O’Neill SC (2006a) Cellulose fiber/polymer adhesion: effects of fiber/matrix interfacial chemistry on the micromechanics of the interphase. J Adhes Sci Technol 20:1649–1668Google Scholar
  104. Tze WTY, Walinder MEP, Gardner DJ (2006b) Inverse gas chromatography for studying interaction of materials used for cellulose fiber/polymer composites. J Adhes Sci Technol 20:743–759Google Scholar
  105. Walinder MEP, Gardner DJ (2000) Surface energy of extracted and non-extracted Norway spruce wood particles studied by inverse gas chromatography (IGC). Wood Fiber Sci 32:478–488Google Scholar
  106. Walinder MEP, Gardner DJ (2002) Acid-base characterization of wood and selected thermoplastics. J Adhes Sci Technol 16:1625–1649Google Scholar
  107. Wang B, Sain M (2007) The effect of chemically coated nanofiber reinforcement on biopolymer based nanocomposites. Bioresources 2:371–388Google Scholar
  108. Zafeiropoulos NE, Williams DR, Baillie CA, Matthews FL (2002) Engineering and characterisation of the interface in flax fibre/polypropylene composite materials. Part I. Development and investigation of surface treatments. Compos Part A Appl Sci 33:1083–1093Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Engineering Department, CIEPQPFUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations