, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 2877–2885 | Cite as

Effects of interfacial stereocomplexation in cellulose nanocrystal-filled polylactide nanocomposites

  • Youssef HabibiEmail author
  • Sabrina Aouadi
  • Jean-Marie Raquez
  • Philippe Dubois
Original Paper


Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC), extracted from cellulose fibers by the mean of acid hydrolysis, were subjected to ring opening polymerization of d-Lactide initiated from the hydroxyl groups available at their surface. The resulting CNC-g-PDLA nanohybrids were incorporated in poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) matrix through melt-blending and the obtained nanocomposites were characterized in terms of their thermo-mechanical properties. Surface-induced polylactide (PLA) stereocomplexation resulting from the co-crystallization of grafted PDLA chains and unbounded PLLA ones from the matrix was evidenced. Acquired results and a thorough comparison with their counterparts grafted with PLLA chains reveal the effects of the stereocomplexed PLA structure surrounding CNC. Important alterations of both crystalline structure and its behavior of the final materials were observed originated from an efficient nucleation effect induced by the addition of these nanohybrids. Significant enhancement of the mechanical performances was also obtained most probably brought by the stereocomplexation that stiffens and stabilize further the percolation network.

Graphical Abstract


Cellulose nanocrystals Nanocomposites Nanohybrids Polylactide Stereocomplexation 



The authors thank the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2010–2013) for financial support under the Grant Agreement 1017233.


  1. Avella M, Buzarovska A, Errico M, Gentile G, Grozdanov A (2009) Eco-challenges of bio-based polymer composites. Materials 2:911–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun B, Dorgan JR, Hollingsworth LO (2012) Supra-molecular ecobionanocomposites based on polylactide and cellulosic nanowhiskers: synthesis and properties. Biomacromolecules 13:2013–2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Darder M, Aranda P, Ruiz-Hitzky E (2007) Bionanocomposites: a new concept of ecological, bioinspired, and functional hybrid materials. Adv Mater 19:1309–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dorgan JR, Braun B (2011) Polymer composites incoporating stereocomplexation, US 2011/0319509 A1Google Scholar
  5. Dufresne A (2003) Interfacial phenomena in nanocomposites based on polysaccharide nanocrystals. Compos Interfaces 10:369–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fortunati E, Armentano I, Zhou Q, Iannoni A, Saino E, Visai L, Berglund LA, Kenny JM (2012) Multifunctional bionanocomposite films of poly(lactic acid), cellulose nanocrystals and silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 87:1596–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frone AN, Berlioz S, Chailan JF, Panaitescu DM, Donescu D (2011) Cellulose fiber-reinforced polylactic acid. Polym Compos 32:976–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goffin A-L, Raquez J-M, Duquesne E, Siqueira G, Habibi Y, Dufresne A, Dubois P (2011) From interfacial ring-opening polymerization to melt processing of cellulose nanowhisker-filled polylactide-based nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 12:2456–2465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Habibi Y, Dufresne A (2008) Highly filled bionanocomposites from functionalized polysaccharide nanocrystals. Biomacromolecules 9:1974–1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Habibi Y, Dufresne A (2010) Nanocrystals from natural polysaccharides. In: Sattler KD (ed) Handbook of nanophysics. CRC Press, pp 1–17Google Scholar
  11. Habibi Y, Goffin A-L, Schiltz N, Duquesne E, Dubois P, Dufresne A (2008) Bionanocomposites based on poly(ε-caprolactone)-grafted cellulose nanocrystals by ring-opening polymerization. J Mater Chem 18:5002–5010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110:3479–3500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inkinen S, Hakkarainen M, Albertsson A-C, Södergård A (2011) From lactic acid to poly(lactic acid) (PLA): characterization and analysis of PLA and its precursors. Biomacromolecules 12:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink H-P, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:3358–3393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee K-Y, Blaker JJ, Bismarck A (2009) Surface functionalisation of bacterial cellulose as the route to produce green polylactide nanocomposites with improved properties. Compos Sci Technol 69:2724–2733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin N, Huang J, Chang PR, Feng J, Yu J (2011) Surface acetylation of cellulose nanocrystal and its reinforcing function in poly(lactic acid). Carbohydr Polym 83:1834–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J (2011) Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev 40:3941–3994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ouali N, Cavaillé J-Y, Perez J (1991) Elastic, viscoelastic and plastic behavior of multiphase polymer blends. Plast Rubber Compos Process Appl 16:55Google Scholar
  19. Pan P, Inoue Y (2009) Polymorphism and isomorphism in biodegradable polyesters. Prog Polym Sci 34:605–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pei A, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2010) Functionalized cellulose nanocrystals as biobased nucleation agents in poly(l-lactide) (PLLA)—crystallization and mechanical property effects. Compos Sci Technol 70:815–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Petersson L, Kvien I, Oksman K (2007) Structure and thermal properties of poly(lactic acid)/cellulose whiskers nanocomposite materials. Compos Sci Technol 67:2535–2544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raquez JM, Murena Y, Goffin AL, Habibi Y, Ruelle B, DeBuyl F, Dubois P (2012) Surface-modification of cellulose nanowhiskers and their use as nanoreinforcers into polylactide: a sustainably-integrated approach. Compos Sci Technol 72:544–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sarasua J-R, Prud’homme RE, Wisniewski M, Le Borgne A, Spassky N (1998) Crystallization and melting behavior of polylactides. Macromolecules 31:3895–3905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Slager J, Domb AJ (2003) Biopolymer stereocomplexes. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 55:549–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Takayanagi M, Uemura S, Minami S (1964) Application of equivalent model method to dynamic rheo-optical properties of a crystalline polymer. J Polym Sci 5:113–122Google Scholar
  26. Tang L, Weder C (2010) Cellulose whisker/epoxy resin nanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:1073–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tingaut P, Zimmermann T, Lopez-Suevos F (2009) Synthesis and characterization of bionanocomposites with tunable properties from poly(lactic acid) and acetylated microfibrillated cellulose. Biomacromolecules 11:454–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Youssef Habibi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sabrina Aouadi
    • 1
  • Jean-Marie Raquez
    • 1
  • Philippe Dubois
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Polymeric and Composite Materials, Center of Innovation and Research in Materials and Polymers (CIRMAP)University of Mons (UMONS)MonsBelgium

Personalised recommendations