Surface chemical modification of microfibrillated cellulose: improvement of barrier properties for packaging applications
- 2.4k Downloads
Heterogeneous acetylation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) was carried out to modify its physical properties and at the same time to preserve the morphology of cellulose fibrils. The overall reaction success was assessed by FTIR together with the degree of substitution (DS) defined by titration and the degree of surface substitution (DSS) evaluated by means of XPS. Dynamic contact angle measurements confirmed the hydrophobicity improvement relative to non-modified samples. The increase of contact angle upon reaching a certain reaction time and some decrease following the further acetylation was confirmed. Mechanical properties of MFC films made from chemically modified material were evaluated using tensile strength tests which showed no significant reduction of tensile strength. According to SEM images, dimension analysis and tensile strength data, the acetylation seemed not to affect the morphology of cellulose fibrils.
KeywordsHeterogeneous acetylation Acetic anhydride (AA) Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) Hydrophobicity
The authors would like to thank Leena-Sisko Johansson for assistance with XPS measurement, Dr. Gary Chinga Carrasco for help with analysis of SEM images, Bård Helge Hoff for valuable discussions and Prof. Torbjørn Helle for linguistic help and project partners in SustainBarrier project at PFI for the financial support.
- Fellers C, Norman B (1996) Pappersteknik. Avdelingen för Pappersteknik, Kungl Tekniska Högskolan, Stockholm, TABS-Tryckeri AB i Smäland, p 292Google Scholar
- Hayashi J (1989) Acylation of cellulose with carboxylic acids. Cellul Chem Technol 23:661–670Google Scholar
- Heinze Th, Liebert T, Koschella A (2006) Esterification of polisaccharides. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
- Panaitescu DM, Vuluga DM, Paven H, Iorga MD, Ghiurea M, Matasaru I, Nechita P (2008) Properties of polymer composites with cellulose microfibrils. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 47:1228–1234Google Scholar
- Parry RT (1993) Principles and applications of modified atmosphere packaging of foods. Chapman & Hall, SuffolkGoogle Scholar
- Rasband WS (1997) ImageJ, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/
- Syverud K, Xhanari K, Chinga-Carrasco G, Yu Y, Stenius P (2009) Films made of cellulose nanofibrils—surface modification by adsorption of a cationic surfactant and characterisation by computer-assisted electron microscopy. Submitted to J Nanoparticle ResearchGoogle Scholar
- Tuil RV et al. (2000) In: Weber CJ (ed) Biobased packaging materials for the food industry—status and perspectives. KVL, Cohephagen, pp 27–32Google Scholar
- Wang S, Cheng Q, Rials TG and Lee S-H (2006) Cellulose microfibril/nanofibril and its nanocompsites. Proceedings of the 8th Pacific rim bio-based composites symposiumGoogle Scholar