, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 721–733

Cellulose I crystallinity determination using FT–Raman spectroscopy: univariate and multivariate methods

  • Umesh P. Agarwal
  • Richard S. Reiner
  • Sally A. Ralph


Two new methods based on FT–Raman spectroscopy, one simple, based on band intensity ratio, and the other using a partial least squares (PLS) regression model, are proposed to determine cellulose I crystallinity. In the simple method, crystallinity in cellulose I samples was determined based on univariate regression that was first developed using the Raman band intensity ratio of the 380 and 1,096 cm−1 bands. For calibration purposes, 80.5% crystalline and 120-min milled (0% crystalline) Whatman CC31 and six cellulose mixtures produced with crystallinities in the range 10.9–64% were used. When intensity ratios were plotted against crystallinities of the calibration set samples, the plot showed a linear correlation (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.992). Average standard error calculated from replicate Raman acquisitions indicated that the cellulose Raman crystallinity model was reliable. Crystallinities of the cellulose mixtures samples were also calculated from X-ray diffractograms using the amorphous contribution subtraction (Segal) method and it was found that the Raman model was better. Additionally, using both Raman and X-ray techniques, sample crystallinities were determined from partially crystalline cellulose samples that were generated by grinding Whatman CC31 in a vibratory mill. The two techniques showed significant differences. In the second approach, successful Raman PLS regression models for crystallinity, covering the 0–80.5% range, were generated from the ten calibration set Raman spectra. Both univariate-Raman and WAXS determined crystallinities were used as references. The calibration models had strong relationships between determined and predicted crystallinity values (R2 = 0.998 and 0.984, for univariate-Raman and WAXS referenced models, respectively). Compared to WAXS, univariate-Raman referenced model was found to be better (root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC) and root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) values of 6.1 and 7.9% vs. 1.8 and 3.3%, respectively). It was concluded that either of the two Raman methods could be used for cellulose I crystallinity determination in cellulose samples.


Cellulose Crystallinity Raman spectroscopy FT–Raman Univariate Multivariate PLS X-ray 


  1. Agarwal UP (2008) Raman spectroscopic characterization of wood and pulp fibers. In: Hu TQ (ed) Characterization of lignocellulose materials. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 17–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal UP, Kawai N (2005) Self-absorption phenomenon in near-infrared Fourier transform Raman spectroscopy of cellulosic and lignocellulosic materials. Appl Spectrosc 24:385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal UP, Ralph SA (1997) FT–Raman spectroscopy of wood: identifying contributions of lignin and carbohydrate polymers in the spectrum of black spruce (Picea mariana). Appl Spectrosc 51:1648–1655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agarwal UP, McSweeny JD, Ralph SA (1999) An FT–Raman study of softwood, hardwood and chemically modified black spruce MWLs. 10th international symposium on wood and pulping chemistry, TAPPI Press, II: 136–140Google Scholar
  5. Andersson S, Serimaa R, Paakkari T, Saranpää P, Pesonen E (2003) Crystallinity of wood and the size of cellulose crystallites in Norway spruce (Picea abies). J Wood Sci 49:531–537Google Scholar
  6. Atalla RH, Isogai A (1998) Recent developments in spectroscopic and chemical characterization of cellulose. In: Dumitriu S (ed) Polysaccharides—Structural diversity and functional versatility, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 123–157Google Scholar
  7. Bertran MS, Dale BE (1985) Enzymatic hydrolysis and recrystallization behavior of initially amorphous cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng XXVII:177–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faix O, Böttcher JH (1992) The influence of particle size and concentration in transmission and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy of wood. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff 50:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forziati FH, Stone WK, Rowen JW, Appel WD (1950) Cotton powder for infrared transmission measurements. J Res Natl Bur Stand 45:109–113Google Scholar
  10. Garvey CJ, Parker IH, Simon GP (2005) On the interpretation of X-ray diffraction powder patterns in terms of the nanostructure of cellulose I fibres. Macromol Chem Phys 206:1568–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Horii F, Hirai A, Kitamaru R (1987) CP/MAS 13C NMR spectra of the crystalline components of native celluloses. Macromolecules 20:2117–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hulleman SHD, Van Hazendonk JM, Van Dam JEG (1994) Determination of crystallinity in native cellulose from higher plants with diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 261:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Isogai T, Yanagisawa M, Isogai A (2009) Degrees of polymerization (DP) and DP distribution of cellouronic acids prepared from alkali-treated celluloses and ball-milled native celluloses by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Cellulose 16:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jahan MS, Mun SP (2005) Effect of tree age on the cellulose structure of Nalita wood (Trema orientalis). Wood Sci Technol 39:367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jayme G, Knolle H (1964) The empirical X-ray determination of the degree of crystallinity of cellulosic material. Papier 18:249–255Google Scholar
  16. Larsson PT, Wickholm K, Iversen T (1997) A CP/MAS C-13 NMR investigation of molecular ordering in celluloses. Carbohydr Res 302:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leppänen K, Andersson S, Torkkeli M, Knaapila M, Kotelnikova N, Serimaa R (2009) Structure of cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose from various wood species, cotton and flax studied by X-ray scattering. Cellulose 16:999–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maddams WF (1980) The scope and limitations of curve fitting. Appl Spectrosc 34:245–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meier RJ (2005) On art and science in curve-fitting vibrational spectra. Vib Spectrosc 39:266–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Newman RH (1999) Estimation of the lateral dimensions of cellulose crystallites using 13C NMR signal strengths. Solid State NMR 15:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Newman RH, Hemmingson JA (1990) Determination of the degree of cellulose crystallinity in wood by carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Holzforschung 44:351–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paradkar RP, Sakhalkar SS, He X, Ellison MS (2003) Estimating crystallinity in high density polyethylene fibers using online Raman spectroscopy. J App Poly Sci 88:545–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Park S, Johnson DK, Ishizawa CI, Parilla PA, Davis MF (2009) Measuring the crystallinity index of cellulose by solid state, 13C nuclear magnetic resonance. Cellulose 16:641–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rayirath P, Avramidis S, Mansfield SD (2008) The effect of wood drying on crystallinity and microfibril angle in black spruce (Picea mariana). J Wood Chem Technol 28:167–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Richter U, Krause T, Schempp W (1991) Untersuchungen zur Alkalibehandlung von Cellulosefasern. Teil 1. Infrarotspektroskopische und Röntgenographische Beurteilung der Änderung des Ordnungszustandes. Angew Makromol Chem 185(186):155–167Google Scholar
  26. Schenzel K, Fischer S, Brendler E (2005) New method for determining the degree of cellulose I crystallinity by means of FT Raman spectroscopy. Cellulose 12:223–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schroeder LR, Gentile VM, Atalla RH (1986) Nondegradative preparation of amorphous cellulose. J Wood Chem Technol 6:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwanninger M, Rodrigues JC, Pereira H, Hinterstoisser B (2004) Effects of short-time vibratory ball milling on the shape of FT-IR spectra of wood and cellulose. Vib Spectrosc 36:23–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Segal L, Creely JJ, Martin AE, Conrad CM (1959) An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Res J 29:786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stuart BH (1995) Polymer crystallinity studied using Raman spectroscopy. Vib Spectrosc 10:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stubičar N, Šmit I, Stubičar M, Tonejc A, Jánosi A, Schurz J, Zipper P (1998) An X-ray diffraction study of the crystalline to amorphous phase change in cellulose during high-energy dry ball milling. Holzforschung 52:455–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. TAPPI Press (1991a) T 203 om-88, Alpha-, beta-, and gamma-cellulose in pulp. In: Fibrous materials and pulp testing. TAPPI test methods, Vol. 1. AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  33. TAPPI Press (1991b) T 230 om-88, Viscosity of pulp. In: Fibrous materials and pulp testing. TAPPI test methods, Vol. 1. AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  34. Teeaar R, Serimaa R, Paakkari T (1987) Crystallinity of cellulose, as determined by CP/MAS NMR and XRD methods. Polymer Bulletin 17:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiley JH, Atalla RH (1987a) Band assignment in the Raman spectra of celluloses. Carbohydr Res 160:113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wiley JH, Atalla RH (1987b) Raman spectra of cellulose. In: Atalla RH (ed) The structures of cellulose. ACS Symp Ser 340:151–168Google Scholar
  37. Wulin Q, Farao Z, Takashi E, Takahiro H (2004) Milling-induced esterification between cellulose and maleated polypropylene. J Appl Poly Sci 91:1703–1709CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Umesh P. Agarwal
    • 1
  • Richard S. Reiner
    • 1
  • Sally A. Ralph
    • 1
  1. 1.USDA Forest Service, Forest Products LaboratoryMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations