Cellulose

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 659–669 | Cite as

Amphiphilic cholesteryl-bearing carboxymethylcellulose derivatives: self-assembly and rheological behaviour in aqueous solution

  • Liqun Yang
  • Jianliang Kuang
  • Zhiquan Li
  • Bifang Zhang
  • Xiang Cai
  • Li-Ming Zhang
Article

Abstract

The self-assembly of amphiphilic cholesteryl-bearing carboxymethylcellulose derivatives (CCMCs) from individual molecules to self-aggregates, in addition to their rheological behaviour in aqueous solution were investigated. The conformations of the individual CCMC individual molecules and self-aggregates, and the microstructures of CCMC self-aggregates were characterized using the static and dynamic light scattering analyses, and the steady fluorescence technology. The results showed that the individual CCMC chains became compact, and aqueous NaCl solution changed from an approximate θ solvent to a bad one when the number of hydrophobic cholesteryl groups increased. The CCMC self-aggregates exhibited as compact spheres. The microstructural characterization indicated that one CCMC self-aggregate consisted of multiple individual CCMC molecules and hydrophobic microdomains, and multiple cholesteryl groups self-associated into one hydrophobic microdomain. The atomic force microscopy images of CCMC self-aggregates in phase mode showed that the multiple interior hydrophobic phase separation regions were surrounded by hydrophilic polysaccharide chains, providing an evidence for multiple hydrophobic microdomains in one self-aggregate. The rheological analysis proved that the CCMC self-aggregates were a microgel, in which the associations of cholesteryl groups provided multiple cross-linking points in the polymer network. The microgel solutions displayed a unique thixotropy and a shear thinning behaviour.

Keywords

Carboxymethylcellulose Self-assembly Conformation Microstructure Rheological behaviour 

Abbreviations

A2

The second virial coefficient

AFM

Atomic force microscopy

CAC

Critical aggregation concentration

CMC

Carboxymethylcellulose

CCMC

Cholesteryl-bearing carboxymethylcellulose derivatives

DCC

N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide

DLS

Dynamic light scattering

DMAP

4-(N,N′-dimethylamino)pyridine

DMSO

Dimethyl sulfoxide

DSchol

Degree of substitution by cholesteryl groups

G′

The storage modulus

G′′

The loss modulus

HEC

Hydroxyethyl cellulose

HPC

Hydroxypropyl cellulose

MC

Methylcellulose

Mw

The weight averaged molecular weight

NCCMC

The aggregation number of CCMC molecules per one self-aggregate

Nchol

The aggregation number of cholesteryl groups per one microdomain

Ndomain

The number of the hydrophobic microdomains per one CCMC self-aggregate

Rg

The radius of gyration

SLS

Static light scattering

pTSA

p-Toluenesulfonic acid

ω

The frequency

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.20574089 and No.30470476), the Foundation of the Key Laboratory of Cellulose and Lignocellulosics Chemistry from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Co-operation Project of Science and Technology between Governments of China and Japan from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China.

References

  1. Akiyoshi K, Sunamoto J (1996) Supramolecular assembly of hydrophobized polysaccharides. Supramol Sci 3:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akiyoshi K, Deguchi S, Moriguchi N, Yamaguchi S, Sunamoto J (1993) Self-aggregates of hydrophobic polysaccharide in water. Formation and characterization of nanoparticle. Macromolecules 26:3062–3068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akiyoshi K, Deguchi S, Tajima H, Nishikawa T, Sunamoto J (1997) Microscopic structure and thermoresponsiveness of a hydrogel nanoparticle by self-assembly of a hydrophobized polysaccharide. Macromolecules 30:857–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binana-Limbele W, Zana R (1990) Fluorescence probing of microdomains in aqueous soltions of polysoaps. 2. Study of the size of the microdomains. Macromolecules 23:2731–2739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao Y, Li H, Zuo J, Niu A (2000) Studies on micellar confmation of polymeric surfants based on carboxymethylcellulose in aqueous solutions. Acta Polym Sin 3:345–349Google Scholar
  6. Charpentier D, Mocanu G, Carpov A, Chapelle S, Merle L, Muller G (1997) New hydrophobically modified carboxymethylcelllulose derivatives. Carbohydr Polym 33:177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danilevicius A, Dobiliene J, Wutz C, Liesiene J (2007) Phenoxyhydroxypropyhydeoxyethylcelulose-new amphiphilic cellulose derivative. Cellulose 14:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Derand H, Wesslen B, Wittgren B, Wahlund KG (1996) Poly(ethylene glycol) graft copolymers containing carboxylic acid groups: aggregation and viscometric properties in aqueous solution. Macromolecules 29:8770–8775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Durand A, Dellacherie E (2006) Aqueous solution of native and hydrophobically modified polysaccharides: temperature effect. Biomacromolecules 7:958–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gref R, Rodrigues J, Couvreur P (2002) Polysaccharides grafted with polyesters: novel amphiphilic copolymers for biomedical applications. Macromolecules 35:9861–9867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Holmberg K, Jonsson B, Kronberg B, Lindman B (2003) Surfactants and polymers in aqueous solution, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang H, Liu W, He B, Shen D, Ma L, Huang Y (2006) Synthesis of amphiphilic ethyl cellulose grafting poly(acrylic acid) copolymers and their self-assembly morphologies in water. Polymer 47:7927–7934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kulicket WM, Kull AH, Kull W, Thielking H, Engelhardt J, Pannek JB (1996) Characterization of aqueous carboxymethylcellulose solutions in terms of their molecular structure and its influence on rheological behaviour. Polymer 37:2723–2731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuroda K, Fujimoto K, Sunamoto J, Akiyoshi K (2002) Hierachical self-assembly of hydrophobically modified pullulan in water: gelation by networks of nanoparticles. Langmuir 18:3780–3786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Landoll LM (1982) Nonionic polymer surfactants. J Polym Sci Polym Chem Ed 20, 443–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee KY, Jo WH, Kwon IC, Kim YH, Jeong SY (1998) Structural determination and interior polarity of self-aggregates prepared from deoxycholic acid-modified chitosan in water. Macromolecules 31:378–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu XM, Pramoda KP, Yang YY, Chow SY, He C (2004) Cholesteryl-grafted functional amphiphilic poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-N-hydroxylmethylacrylamide): synthesis, temperature sensitivity, self-assembly and encapsulation of a hydrophobic agent. Biomaterials 25:2619–2628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ma Y, Cao T, Webber SE (1998) polymer micelles from poly(acrylic acid)-graft-polystyrene. Macromolecules 31:1773–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merle L, Charpentier D, Mocanu G, Chapelle S (1999) Comparison of the distribution pattern of associative carboxymethylcellulose derivatives. Eur Polym J 35:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nichifor M, Lopes A, Carpov A, Melo E (1999) Aggregation in water of dextran hydrophobically modified with bile acids. Macromolecules 32:7078–7085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nishimura H, Donkai N, Miyamoto T (1997) Preparation and properties of a new type of comb-shaped, amphiphhilic cellulose derivative. Cellulose 4:89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ostmark E, Harrisson S, Wooley KL, Malmstrom EE (2007) Comb polymers prepared by ATRP from hydroxypropyl cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8:1138–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pelletier S, Hubert P, Payan E, Marchal P, Choplin L, Dellacherie E (2001) Amphiphilic derivatives of sodium alginate and hyaluronate for cartilage repair: rheological properties. J Biomed Mater Res 54:102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ross-Murphy SB, Dickinson E (1995) New physico-chemical techniques for the characterization of complex food systems. Blackie, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi R, Burt HM (2003) Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic hydroxyprocellulose-graft-poly(ɛ-caprolactone). J Appl Polym Sci 89:718–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simon S, Dugast JY, Cerf DL, Picton L, Muller G (2003) Amphiphilic polysaccharides. Evidence for a competition between intra and intermolecular associations in dilute system. Polymer 44:7917–7924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Srokova I, Tomanova V, Ebringerova A, Malovikova A, Heinze T (2004) Water-soluble amphiphilic O-(carboxymethyl)-cellulose derivatives-synthesis and properties. Macromol Mater Eng 289:63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Turro NJ, Yekta A (1978) Luminescenet probes for detergent solutions: a simple procedure for determination of the mean aggregation number of micelles. J Am Chem Soc 100:5951–5952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wei Y, Cheng F (2007) Synthesis and aggregates of cellulose-based hydrophobically associating polymer. Carbohydr Polym 68:734–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wilhelm M, Zhao CL, Wang Y, Xu R, Winnik MA (1991) Poly(styrene-ethylene oxide) block copolymer micelle formation in water: a fluorescence probe study. Macromolecules 24:1033–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wu C (1998) A comparison between the ‘coil-to-globule’ transition of linear chains and the ‘volumer phase transition’ of spherical microgels. Polymer 39:4609–4619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang L, Zhang B, Wen L, Liang Q, Zhang LM (2007) Amphiphilic cholesteryl grafted sodium alginate derivative: Synthesis and self-assembly in aqueous solution. Carbohydr Polym 68:218–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang L, Kuang J, Wang J, Li Z, Zhang LM (2008) Loading and in vitro controlled release of indomethacin using amphiphilic cholesteryl-bearing carboxymethylcellulose derivatives. Macromol Biosci 8:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yaron A, Cohen E, Arab S (1992) Stabilization of aloe vera gel by interaction with sulfated polysaccharides from red microalgae and with xanthan gum. J Agric Food Chem 40:1316–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ye L, Li Q, Huang R (2006) Study on the rheological behavior of the hydrophobically modified hydroxyethyl cellulose with 1,2-epoxyhexadeecane. J Appl Polym Sci 101:2953–2959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yuan W, Yuan J, Zhang F, Xie X (2007) Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro degradation of ethylcellulose-graft-poly(ɛ-caprolactone)-block-poly(L-lactide) copolymers by sequential ring-opening polymerization. Biomacromolecules 8:1101–1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zeng H, Li Z (1996) New method on the determination of DS of CMC. J Cellul Sci Technol 4:38–43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liqun Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jianliang Kuang
    • 1
  • Zhiquan Li
    • 1
  • Bifang Zhang
    • 1
  • Xiang Cai
    • 1
  • Li-Ming Zhang
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Polymer Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringSun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouP.R. China
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Cellulose and Lignocellulosics Chemistry, Guangzhou Institute of ChemistryChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations